The Flock Above Us: The Unconstitutionality Of Automated License Plate Readers,
2026
Candidate for Juris Doctor, Roger Williams University School of Law
The Flock Above Us: The Unconstitutionality Of Automated License Plate Readers, Evan Degaitas
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Borderline Constitution,
2026
University of Colorado Law School
The Borderline Constitution, Pratheepan Gulasekaram
Publications
This Feature identifies and theorizes a distinct constitutional regime that federal courts have constructed at, adjacent to, and because of the nation’s border. Drawing together strands of First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment law, along with habeas doctrine, constitutional torts, tribal sovereignty, and separation-of-powers concerns, this Feature demonstrates how constitutional guarantees systematically recede in the border’s shadow. These deviations from canonical and mainstream constitutional norms authorize intrusive state invasions of privacy and other fundamental rights, abdicate judicial oversight in favor of outsized executive discretion, and entrench racial and religious subordination.
The Feature further demonstrates that the effects of border exceptionalism …
The Public Franchise Tradition As A Limit On Patent Takings,
2026
University of Colorado Law School
The Public Franchise Tradition As A Limit On Patent Takings, Laura E. Dolbow
Publications
A longstanding debate exists over whether patents are forms of “private property” that the Takings Clause protects. Recently, in a different context, the Supreme Court stated that a patent is a specific form of property: a public franchise. Several scholars have argued that the public franchise characterization means patents are not protected by the Takings Clause at all. This Article identifies another potential implication of the public franchise framing. It argues that even if patents are viewed as protected by the Takings Clause, the public franchise framing suggests that the scope of that protection should be quite narrow.
To explore …
Two Dogmas Of Free Speech Doctrine,
2026
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Two Dogmas Of Free Speech Doctrine, David R. Dow
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preempted Or Permitted? State Immigration Enforcement, Federal Preemption, And The Future Of Immigration Policy,
2026
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Preempted Or Permitted? State Immigration Enforcement, Federal Preemption, And The Future Of Immigration Policy, Aryn Kerr
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Oklahoma’S Bible Policy: The Evolving Establishment Clause From Lemon To Kennedy,
2026
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Oklahoma’S Bible Policy: The Evolving Establishment Clause From Lemon To Kennedy, Carson Douglas Shaw
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Structures In Private Law And The Example Of Waste Law,
2026
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Constitutional Structures In Private Law And The Example Of Waste Law, Jill M. Fraley
Scholarly Articles
This Article proposes three criteria for when a private law mechanism performs a structural constitutional function: when it constrains present authority in the name of future stability, when it disperses enforcement to avoid centralized authority, and when it has structural entrenchment to avoid ordinary displacement. While many private law doctrines contain constitutional resonances or echo rights, the core of constitutional law is the power structure—a precondition for the protection of those rights. Constitutional structures have three key components: self-binding through time, separation and diffusion of power, and entrenchment beyond ordinary politics. For a private law doctrine to do more than …
The Law And Ai As An “Apex Collaborator”: Legal Frameworks For Optimized Cooperation,
2026
University of California, Irvine
The Law And Ai As An “Apex Collaborator”: Legal Frameworks For Optimized Cooperation, David S. Filippi, Bill Tomlinson, Andrew W. Torrance
FIU Law Review
Law fundamentally exists to enable human cooperation, providing frameworks for everything from basic contracts to complex international agreements. As artificial intelligence systems grow more sophisticated, they may enable new ways that collaborative activity can occur. We posit the possibility of a new kind of AI entity: the “Apex Collaborator,” a computational system with capabilities for cooperation and partnership that are superior, in at least some ways, to those of humans. Just as apex predators shape the ecosystems in which they live through predation, Apex Collaborators would shape human-AI networks through their ability to enhance peaceful coexistence, collective problem-solving, and shared …
Let’S Talk About The Biological Reality Of Sex, Baby,
2026
Louisiana State University Law Center
Let’S Talk About The Biological Reality Of Sex, Baby, John Parsi
FIU Law Review
Sex is at the very core of individual identity. It affects the conception of the self and the way others view the individual. Every day, one’s sex may open and close doors, access to communities, and opportunities. Laws that define sex may affirm scientific knowledge and protect people, or threaten to unravel the facts and the reality of sex. A deep unmooring of sex is underway, and this Article aims to halt it. On day one of the current presidential term, January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order on “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological …
Cruel And Unusual Punishments And The Constitutional Status Of The Idea Of Progress,
2026
Indiana University McKinney School of Law
Cruel And Unusual Punishments And The Constitutional Status Of The Idea Of Progress, R. George Wright
FIU Law Review
To this point, we have developed some idea of what progress might have meant to the constitutional Framers, ratifiers, and later judges. We need not attempt the fruitless task of doing any precise head count of the variations of the concrete meaning, perceived likelihood, or value of progress among those parties. Doubtless some persons were more optimistic than others.178 But we need only assume that enough constitutional Framers, ratifiers, and judicial interpreters sufficiently shared any mainstream understanding of progress. Any such constitutional legitimacy of the idea, or the multiple ideas, of progress licenses the language of progress embraced in Trop.
Comparing Access To Land: Drawing Parallels In Diverse Jurisdictions,
2026
L'École de Droit de Sciences Po
Comparing Access To Land: Drawing Parallels In Diverse Jurisdictions, Helena Alviar Garcia, Anamaría Muñoz Rincón
FIU Law Review
By exploring the intersection between transitional justice initiatives and transformative constitutionalism, this article proposes that fruitful comparative study covering similarities and differences between diverse definitions of property—challenges and possibilities of accessing it and the main characteristics of the disputes over it—in four jurisdictions can be advanced. A close examination of the classic liberal paradigm framing the transitional process reveals the ways in which a progressive and justice-driven understanding of property falls short in all the countries considered. To examine this, we look at how property clauses, substantively and procedurally, are construed in transformative constitutions sitting at the heart of the …
Virtual Harm, Real Consequences: Constitutional Justifications For Criminalizing Ai-Generated Child Pornography,
2026
Florida International University College of Law
Virtual Harm, Real Consequences: Constitutional Justifications For Criminalizing Ai-Generated Child Pornography, Adam Abdin
FIU Law Review
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the creation of hyper-realistic child sexual abuse images without any real child involved. These AI-generated depictions pose a unique challenge: they replicate the most pernicious form of pornography—child pornography—while potentially being claimed as “speech” immune from regulation. This paper argues that it is both constitutionally permissible and morally imperative to criminalize AI-generated child pornography. This article presents two doctrinal pathways to justify a ban. First, such content can be treated as unprotected speech under existing First Amendment exceptions. Courts have long held that child pornography and obscenity lie outside First Amendment protection, and …
History And Tradition In First Amendment Intellectual Property Cases: A Critique,
2026
Harvard Law School
History And Tradition In First Amendment Intellectual Property Cases: A Critique, Rebecca Tushnet
Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review
This Article examines the increasing reliance on "history and tradition" as a method of constitutional analysis in First Amendment cases involving intellectual property. The author argues that, although the Supreme Court has recently embraced this methodology in other constitutional contexts, particularly Second Amendment jurisprudence, it has long relied on similar reasoning to uphold intellectual property rights against First Amendment challenges. Through an analysis of cases involving the right of publicity, copyright, and trademark law, the Article contends that the Court has used historical analogies to justify expanding intellectual property protections while giving insufficient consideration to their impact on free expression. …
Private Rights Of Action For Election Litigation In The Federal Courts,
2026
Notre Dame Law School
Private Rights Of Action For Election Litigation In The Federal Courts, Derek T. Muller
Journal Articles
Election litigation is surging. But just as litigants pursue more election claims in federal courts than ever before, federal courts are growing more skeptical about their authority to hear them. This Essay, a contribution to the 2025 Arnold Lecture at the University of Arkansas Little Rock, William H. Bowen School of Law, examines the narrowing landscape of private rights of action in election law with a particular focus on claims brought ahead of the 2024 election. It traces the Supreme Court's shift toward formalism, the heavy emphasis on remedies found in federal statutes, and the diminishing avenues for private enforcement …
The American Dream And The Politics Of Promise: Presidential Rhetoric Against Reality On Inequality, Education, And Assistance Since 2000,
2026
Touro Law School
The American Dream And The Politics Of Promise: Presidential Rhetoric Against Reality On Inequality, Education, And Assistance Since 2000, Abigail Demonte
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
S.F. 2200 (2025) - Permission To Change: Minnesota's Illusory Privilege Reform In A Post-Notorious Rbg Era,
2026
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
S.F. 2200 (2025) - Permission To Change: Minnesota's Illusory Privilege Reform In A Post-Notorious Rbg Era, A.G. Summers
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Reclaiming The Constitution: "For There Is Always Light, If Only We're Brave Enough To See It",
2026
Marquette University Law School
Reclaiming The Constitution: "For There Is Always Light, If Only We're Brave Enough To See It", Palma Joy Strand, Gregory J. O'Meara S.J.
Marquette Law Review
As citizens—and as lawyers—we are schooled to view the U.S. Constitution as what—indeed—“constitutes” us as a nation and as a people. As lawyers— and as citizens—we are also schooled to understand that the Constitution is law and that its meaning is to be ascertained through the process of law and by lawyers and judges. This Article builds on a popular constitutionalism frame to describe the profound limitations of restricting constitutional meaning-making to a legal enterprise performed primarily by judges—especially in regard to positive rights written into the Constitution but under-protected in constitutional law. In addition, litigation’s either–or mindset has come …
The First Amendment Right To Privacy,
2026
Marquette University Law School
The First Amendment Right To Privacy, Alex Chemerinsky
Marquette Law Review
The First Amendment is often considered to be in tension with privacy. This
Article is about the contexts in which it is not.
Although freedom of speech can pose challenges for privacy governance,
privacy is a core First Amendment value. Many important First Amendment decisions were motivated more by intuitions about privacy than any other interest. For each primary First Amendment liberty—the rights to speak, listen, associate, and practice religion—the Supreme Court has recognized not only a
substantive liberty but also the right to exercise it privately.
But although expressive privacy is an important First Amendment value, it
remains underrecognized, …
Re-Evaluating Deshany In An Era Of Gun Violence And Government Inaction,
2026
Marquette University Law School
Re-Evaluating Deshany In An Era Of Gun Violence And Government Inaction, Bonnie Carlson
Marquette Law Review
In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court held that the State has no constitutional duty to protect individuals from violence committed by private third parties. An exception to this rule exists when the State has a special relationship to the plaintiff immediately preceding the harm. The DeShaney Court sharply proscribed the scope of the special relationship exception, holding that it only applies when the State has a plaintiff in custody. This effectively closes the door on relief for the vast majority of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 plaintiffs.
This Article proposes a new special relationship test …
Back To The Fourth Amendment,
2026
Marquette University Law School
Back To The Fourth Amendment, Shea Daley Burdette
Marquette Law Review
Does the Fourth Amendment protect against governmental seizures of an individual’s digital property? The answer depends on whether government action constitutes a meaningful interference with digital property. Back to the Fourth Amendment considers the Founders’ intentional choice to use two separate words, search and seizure, to protect against governmental overreach. The Article advances an approach to the seizure analysis that protects against governmental seizures of digital property—by encouraging the Court to look at whether the government access meaningfully interfered with an owner’s right
to exclude, historically recognized as a possessory interest.
The Fourth Amendment was adopted in response to “reviled …
