Lee V. United States: The Unusual Circumstances Test For Strickland Relief,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Lee V. United States: The Unusual Circumstances Test For Strickland Relief, Zachary Segal
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Did The African-American Electorate Unintentionally Help Elect Donald Trump President?,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Did The African-American Electorate Unintentionally Help Elect Donald Trump President?, C. Daniel Chill
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chained Against Her Will: What A Get Means For Women Under Jewish Law,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Chained Against Her Will: What A Get Means For Women Under Jewish Law, Michelle Kariyeva
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why New York Should Legalize Surrogacy: A Comparison Of Surrogacy Legislation In Other States With Current Proposed Surrogacy Legislation In New York,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Why New York Should Legalize Surrogacy: A Comparison Of Surrogacy Legislation In Other States With Current Proposed Surrogacy Legislation In New York, Briana R. Iannacci
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America, Monica Chawla
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Obama's Conversion On Same-Sex Marriage: The Social Foundations Of Individual Rights,
2018
Boston University School of Law
Obama's Conversion On Same-Sex Marriage: The Social Foundations Of Individual Rights, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
This essay explores how presidents who wish to seize a leadership role over the development of rights must tend to the social foundations of those rights. Broad cultural changes alone do not guarantee success, nor do they dictate the substance of constitutional ideas. Rather, presidential aides must actively re-characterize the social conditions in which rights are made, disseminated, and enforced. An administration must articulate a strategically plausible theory of a particular right, ensure there is cultural and institutional support for that right, and work to minimize blowback. Executive branch officials must seek to transform and popularize legal concepts while working …
Citizens Of The State,
2018
Columbia Law School
Citizens Of The State, Maeve Glass
Faculty Scholarship
According to conventional wisdom, state citizenship emerged out of the localism of early America and gave way to national citizenship with the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. This Article offers a different account of state citizenship and, with it, new resources for analyzing the Constitution. It argues that far from a primordial category that receded into irrelevance, state citizenship provided a crucial strategic tool in America’s antislavery movement, as abolitionist lawyers used the label of state citizenship to build a coalition with white elites by reframing the issue of slavery from the rights of a black person to the sovereignty …
Devil Take The Hindmost: Reform Considerations For States With A Constitutional Right To Bail,
2018
Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
Devil Take The Hindmost: Reform Considerations For States With A Constitutional Right To Bail, Jordan Gross
Faculty Law Review Articles
This Article submits that any meaningful discussion of bail reform at the state level must be jurisdiction-specific, and it must account for the practical, historical, and philosophical aspects of the state constitutional right to bailability. Part II of this Article is an overview of the origins and history of English and American bail law. Part III describes the role and regulation of commercial bail bonding in the United States. Part IV traces the history and current state of bail reform in the United States. Part V considers legal and practical barriers to reform unique to right-to-bail states, particularly jurisdictions without …
Precedent And The Semblance Of Law,
2018
Duke Law School
Precedent And The Semblance Of Law, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
Like its author, Randy Kozel's *Settled Versus Right* is insightful, thoughtful, and kind, deeply committed to improving the world that it sees. But despite its upbeat tone, the book paints a dark picture of current law and the current Court. It depicts a society whose judges are, in a positive sense, *lawless* -- not because they disregard the law, but because they are without law, because they have no shared law to guide them. What they do share is an institution, a Court, whose commands are generally accepted. So *Settled Versus Right* makes the best of what we've got, reorienting …
Martin, Ghana, And Global Legal Studies,
2018
Duke Law School
Martin, Ghana, And Global Legal Studies, H. Timothy Lovelace Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
This brief essay uses global legal studies to reconsider Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s activism after Gayle v. Browder. During this undertheorized portion of King's career, the civil rights leader traveled the world and gained a greater appreciation for comparative legal and political analysis. This essay explores King's first trip abroad and demonstrates how King's close study of Kwame Nkrumah's approaches to law reform helped to lay the foundation for watershed moments in King's own life.
In To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr., renowned civil rights scholar and author, Adam …
Federalism As A Check On Executive Authority: State Public Litigation, Executive Authority, And Political Polarization,
2018
Duke Law School
Federalism As A Check On Executive Authority: State Public Litigation, Executive Authority, And Political Polarization, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Erie As A Way Of Life,
2018
Duke Law School
The Behavior Of Jewish Judges: A Theoretical Study Of Religious Decision-Making,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
The Behavior Of Jewish Judges: A Theoretical Study Of Religious Decision-Making, Mark Goldfeder, Michael J. Broyde
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Stop Defending Discrimination: Anti-Boycott, Divestment, And Sanctions* Statutes Are Fully Constitutional,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Stop Defending Discrimination: Anti-Boycott, Divestment, And Sanctions* Statutes Are Fully Constitutional, Mark Goldfeder
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
A Dream Still Deferred: The Unlawful Use Of Student Fees For Instructional Technology In An Alabama Public School Causing A Disparate Impact For Minority Children,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
A Dream Still Deferred: The Unlawful Use Of Student Fees For Instructional Technology In An Alabama Public School Causing A Disparate Impact For Minority Children, Taurus Myhand
Scholarly Works
In framing the United States Constitution, the public education mandate was reserved for the states to strengthen, not weaken, the efforts of the governments to provide an education for the people. However, there are far too many instances where equal access to educational opportunities is still a dream deferred for many racial and ethnic minority children that are enrolled in public school systems throughout the United States. That is particularly the case for racial and ethnic minority students at one public school system in Alabama. This Note explores the constitutional issues raised by Pike Road School System’s use of mandatory …
You Be The Judge: The Wholesale Implementation Of Bail Schedules By The Judiciary As An Abdication Of Adjudicatory Responsibility Creating A Disparate Impact For African-Americans And Hispanics Accused Of A Criminal Offense,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
You Be The Judge: The Wholesale Implementation Of Bail Schedules By The Judiciary As An Abdication Of Adjudicatory Responsibility Creating A Disparate Impact For African-Americans And Hispanics Accused Of A Criminal Offense, Taurus Myhand
Scholarly Works
The presumption of innocence is not well illustrated in the age-old and widespread use of monetary bail systems by most jurisdictions throughout the United States. In fact, whether a person is detained in jails prior to the final disposition of the case, is not likely to be dependent on the strength of the government’s case toward proving the accusee’s guilt. Rather, pre-trial detention is much more dependent on whether the accusee has the means to pay an amount of money determined by a court.
As the calls for bail reform resurges, many legal professionals are looking for alternatives to monetary …
R. V. K.R.J.: Shifting The Balance Of The Oakes Test From Minimal Impairment To Proportionality Of Effects,
2018
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
R. V. K.R.J.: Shifting The Balance Of The Oakes Test From Minimal Impairment To Proportionality Of Effects, Marcus Moore
All Faculty Publications
The judgment of the Supreme Court in R. v. K.R.J. reflects an important potential change in the way proportionality analysis is conducted in the review of constitutional rights limitations under Canada’s Oakes test. Previously, most cases came down to the “Minimal Impairment” stage of Oakes. Its dominant role is challenged by KRJ, which places new weight on the subsequent and final “Proportionality of Effects” step. A permanent shift in the focus of the test to the Proportionality of Effects inquiry would be a landmark change in the thirty-year history of proportionality in Canada. The shift does not appear crafted to …
French Constitutionalism,
2018
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
French Constitutionalism, Elisabeth Zoller
Articles by Maurer Faculty
From the Foreword:
We are particularly pleased that this first special issue gives the opportunity to celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of the Fifth Republic’s Constitution. Readers will find an enlightened vision of French constitutionalism, so patiently depicted by our colleague Elisabeth Zoller through a life of teachings and research, both in France and in the United States. Defined as “a political doctrine that aims to guarantee political freedom, i.e. the freedom we enjoy in respect of political power, as opposed to civil liberty, which we enjoy in respect of our peers”, constitutionalism has, in France, a profoundly unique character according …
Constitutional Preservation And The Judicial Review Of Partisan Gerrymanders,
2018
Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Constitutional Preservation And The Judicial Review Of Partisan Gerrymanders, Edward B. Foley
Georgia Law Review
This Essay makes three contributions to the debate
over whether the Constitution contains a judicially
enforceable constrain on gerrymanders. First,it directly
tackles the Chief Justice'sfear of thejudiciaryappearing
partisan,observing that the same fear would exist if the
Constitution explicitly banned gerrymanders and
explaining why an implicit ban should be no less
judicially enforceable than an explicit ban under
Marbury v. Madison. Second, invoking the idea of
"institutional forbearance" in the important new book
How Democracies Die, the Essay shows how the
Elections Clause can be construed to protect
congressional districting from abuses of legislative
discretion committed by state legislatures. Together,
these …
The Doctrine Of Severability In Constitutional Review: A Perspective From Singapore,
2018
Singapore Management University
The Doctrine Of Severability In Constitutional Review: A Perspective From Singapore, Benjamin Joshua Ong
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor represents a substantial development in Singapore’s law on the doctrine of severability in constitutional review. An examination of Prabagaran reveals rich theoretical underpinnings relating to the nature of legislative intent. The case rightly locates the crux of the severability inquiry in secondary legislative intention, i.e. the legislature’s intention, at the time a statute was enacted, as to what should happen in the event that part of the statute is later held to be unconstitutional. This approach is preferable to the approach of asking whether excision of unconstitutional …
