A Non-Originalist Separation Of Powers,
2018
Georgia State University College of Law
A Non-Originalist Separation Of Powers, Eric J. Segall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The President, Prosecutorial Discretion, Obstruction Of Justice, And Congress,
2018
University of Richmond School of Law
The President, Prosecutorial Discretion, Obstruction Of Justice, And Congress, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
States Suing The Federal Government: Protecting Liberty Or Playing Politics?,
2018
University of Richmond
States Suing The Federal Government: Protecting Liberty Or Playing Politics?, Elbert Lin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law (?) Of The Lincoln Assassination,
2018
Georgetown University Law Center
The Law (?) Of The Lincoln Assassination, Martin S. Lederman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Shortly after John Wilkes Booth killed Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865, President Andrew Johnson directed that Booth’s alleged coconspirators be tried in a makeshift military tribunal, rather than in the Article III court that was open for business just a few blocks from Ford’s Theater. Johnson’s decision implicated a fundamental constitutional question that was a subject of heated debate throughout the Civil War: When, if ever, may the federal government circumvent Article III’s requirements of a criminal trial by jury, with an independent, tenure-protected presiding judge, by trying individuals other than members of the armed forces in a military …
Interpreting An Unamendable Text,
2018
Vanderbilt University Law School
Interpreting An Unamendable Text, Thomas W. Merrill
Vanderbilt Law Review
Many of the most important legal texts in the United States are highly unamendable. This applies not only to the Constitution, which has not been amended in over forty years, but also to many framework statutes, like the Administrative Procedure Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act. The problem is becoming increasingly severe, as political polarization makes amendment of these texts even more unlikely. This Article considers how interpreters should respond to highly unamendable texts. Unamendable texts have a number of pathologies, such as excluding the people and their representatives from any direct participation in legal change. They also pose an …
Critical Dialogue,
2018
Boston University School of Law
Critical Dialogue, James E. Fleming, Bruce P. Frohnen
Faculty Scholarship
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, I observe that in recent years, many have assumed that originalists have a monopoly on concern for fidelity in constitutional interpretation. I reject all forms of originalism and defend a moral reading of the United States Constitution. Such a conception views the Constitution as embodying abstract moral and political principles, not codifying concrete historical rules or practices. It sees interpretation of those principles as requiring normative judgments about how they are best understood, not merely historical research to …
Response To Bruce Frohnen’S Review Of Fidelity To Our Imperfect Constitution: For Moral Readings And Against Originalisms,
2018
Boston University School of Law
Response To Bruce Frohnen’S Review Of Fidelity To Our Imperfect Constitution: For Moral Readings And Against Originalisms, James E. Fleming, Bruce P. Frohnen
Faculty Scholarship
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, I observe that in recent years, many have assumed that originalists have a monopoly on concern for fidelity in constitutional interpretation. I reject all forms of originalism and defend a moral reading of the United States Constitution. Such a conception views the Constitution as embodying abstract moral and political principles, not codifying concrete historical rules or practices. It sees interpretation of those principles as requiring normative judgments about how they are best understood, not merely historical research to …
Getting To The Root Of The Problem: Written Representations To The Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods,
2018
Singapore Management University
Getting To The Root Of The Problem: Written Representations To The Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods, Yi Siong Sui, Aaron Yoong, Hao Ren Lyndon Choo, Lixin Chen
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The phenomenon of the spread of deliberate falsehoods has been exacerbated in the current day and age with the usage of technology. An examination of this issue shows that that the motivations and reasons for spreading such falsehoods have not changed. Instead, the primary mischief lies in the near instantaneous dissemination and ease of access via internet intermediaries.Despite this, there is a gap in the regulatory tools available to deal with this mischief. The solution hence should lie in imposing some sort of liability on internet intermediaries to remove deliberate falsehoods. Nevertheless, it is crucial that such intermediary liability must …
Zombie Religious Institutions,
2018
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Zombie Religious Institutions, Elizabeth Sepper
Northwestern University Law Review
This Article uncovers and names a phenomenon of pressing importance for healthcare policy and religious liberty law: the rise of zombie religious institutions—organizations that have contractual commitments to religious identity but lack actual attachments to churches or associations of religious people. Contracts create religion—sometimes in perpetuity—for institutions that are not, or never have been, religious and for providers who do not share the institution’s religious precepts. This Article details religion’s spread across healthcare through affiliations, mergers, and—most surprisingly—sales of hospitals that continue religious practice after their connection to a church ends. These contracts require hospitals—secular and religious, public and private, …
Accountability Claims In Constitutional Law,
2018
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Accountability Claims In Constitutional Law, Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos
Northwestern University Law Review
Several of the Supreme Court’s most controversial constitutional doctrines hinge on claims about electoral accountability. Restrictions on the President’s power to remove agency heads are disfavored because they reduce the President’s accountability for agency actions. Congress cannot delegate certain decisions to agencies because then Congress is less accountable for those choices. State governments cannot be federally commandeered because such conscription lessens their accountability. And campaign spending must be unregulated so that more information reaches voters and helps them to reward or punish incumbents for their performances.
There is just one problem with these claims. They are wrong—at least for the …
The Fortification Of Inequality: Constitutional Doctrine And The Political Economy,
2018
University of Michigan Law School
The Fortification Of Inequality: Constitutional Doctrine And The Political Economy, Kate Andrias
Articles
As Parts I and II of this Essay elaborate, the examination yields three observations of relevance to constitutional law more generally: First, judge-made constitutional doctrine, though by no means the primary cause of rising inequality, has played an important role in reinforcing and exacerbating it. Judges have acquiesced to legislatively structured economic inequality, while also restricting the ability of legislatures to remedy it. Second, while economic inequality has become a cause célèbre only in the last few years, much of the constitutional doctrine that has contributed to its flourishing is longstanding. Moreover, for several decades, even the Court’s more liberal …
Las Vegas Review-Journal V. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 7 (Feb. 27, 2018),
2018
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Las Vegas Review-Journal V. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 7 (Feb. 27, 2018), Matthew J. Mckissick
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined that the First Amendment does not allow a court to prevent the press from reporting on a redacted autopsy report already released to the public.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Dean Yelnosky's Blog: Ruling Could Destroy Labor Unions As We Know Them 2-26-2018,
2018
Roger Williams University School of Law
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Dean Yelnosky's Blog: Ruling Could Destroy Labor Unions As We Know Them 2-26-2018, Michael J. Yelnosky
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
State Constitutions And The Protection Of Rights,
2018
University of New Hampshire School of Law
State Constitutions And The Protection Of Rights, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
This article, using a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on partisan gerrymandering, explores how state constitutions can be significantly more protective of rights than the federal constitution.
February 24, 2018: When I Left The Darwin Day Committee,
2018
Duquesne University
February 24, 2018: When I Left The Darwin Day Committee, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “When I Left the Darwin Day Committee“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Serving Pets In Poverty: A New Frontier For The Animal Welfare Movement,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
Serving Pets In Poverty: A New Frontier For The Animal Welfare Movement, Amanda Arrington, Michael Markarian
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
How Fast Is Too Fast? Osha’S Regulation Of The Meat Industry’S Line Speed And The Price Paid By Humans And Animals,
2018
American University, Washington College of Law
How Fast Is Too Fast? Osha’S Regulation Of The Meat Industry’S Line Speed And The Price Paid By Humans And Animals, Israel Cook
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
The Farts Heard ‘Round The World: Where Cow-Tapping Falls On The International Agenda Of Sustainable Development,
2018
American University, Washington College of Law
The Farts Heard ‘Round The World: Where Cow-Tapping Falls On The International Agenda Of Sustainable Development, Alexandra C. Nolan
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
This Is Not The Bee’S Knees: A Critical View Of The Government’S Lack Of Policy To Conserve The Pollinators,
2018
American University, Washington College of Law
This Is Not The Bee’S Knees: A Critical View Of The Government’S Lack Of Policy To Conserve The Pollinators, Savannah Pugh
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Legislative Efforts To Increase State Management For Imperiled Species Should Be Rejected,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
Legislative Efforts To Increase State Management For Imperiled Species Should Be Rejected, Stephanie Kurose
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
