Legalization Of Abortion Against Victims Of Rape Crimes Viewed From Victimology Perspective,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Andalas
Legalization Of Abortion Against Victims Of Rape Crimes Viewed From Victimology Perspective, Siska Elvandari
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
One of human rights guaranteed and protected in the 1945 Constitution is the right to live and maintain life, stated in Article 28 A of the 1945 Constitution. The right to live and maintain life is the highest right that is inherent in human beings as the subject of law since humans were born to death in the world. The right to live and maintain life is not only inherent in human beings who have been born, but also in humans or children who are still in the womb, stated in Article II of the Civil Code that "Children are …
Politik Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Narapidana Melarikan Diri Dari Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Gajah Mada
Politik Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Narapidana Melarikan Diri Dari Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia, Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Prison escape has been committed by many prisoners in several correctional institutions in Indonesia. Since it is not a crime under Indonesian Law, the punishment of the action is merely an discipline sanction. Then, the existing punishment is not sufficient to prevent and eradicate prison escape. Hence, the rehabilitation by the correctional system will never work. This paper aims to analyse how the existing legislation regulates on the prison escape and how the viable regulation in prison escape. It is proven than in the Act on Correctional Institution and in the other relevan regulations, prison escape can never be investigated …
Merekonstruksi Paradigma Gugatan Citizen Lawsuit Di Indonesia Sebagai Sengketa Administrasi,
2020
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar
Merekonstruksi Paradigma Gugatan Citizen Lawsuit Di Indonesia Sebagai Sengketa Administrasi, Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between …
Rule Of Law, Neoliberalisme Dan Proyek Reformasi Hukum World Bank: Perspektif Critical Legal Studies,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Brawijaya
Rule Of Law, Neoliberalisme Dan Proyek Reformasi Hukum World Bank: Perspektif Critical Legal Studies, Syahriza Alkohir Anggoro
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
The emergence of World Bank legal reform projects in promoting the rule of law has been successful to encourage third world countries to reform their legal aspects to help formulate market friendly policy. This article tries to question the concept of rule of law that is materialized in many World Bank legal reform projects by using critical legal perspective to analysis legal scholarship on the role of law in the context of development. It trying to present an alternative explanation of World Bank’s rule of law which we are hypothetizing as a neoliberal concept. World Bank’s rule of law are …
Analisis Hukum Skema Kontrak Gross Split Terhadap Peningkatan Investasi Hulu Minyak Dan Gas Bumi,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Airlangga
Analisis Hukum Skema Kontrak Gross Split Terhadap Peningkatan Investasi Hulu Minyak Dan Gas Bumi, Muhammad Fajri
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
As a solution to the problems of the Cost Recovery production sharing contract system, the Government of Indonesia through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources issued Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation Number 08 of 2017 concerning Gross Split Production Sharing Contracts. This new regulation is motivated by the low number and length of time of the discovery of oil and gas reserves, along with the Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) which continues to decline in the upstream oil and gas sector. The Gross Split profit sharing scheme also offers bureaucratic cuts in investment …
Partisipasi Perempuan Dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Di Dewan Adat Terkait Dengan Penyelesaian Kasus-Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan: Kisah Dari Atambua, Sumba Timur, Rote Dan Labuan Bajo,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Indonesia
Partisipasi Perempuan Dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Di Dewan Adat Terkait Dengan Penyelesaian Kasus-Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan: Kisah Dari Atambua, Sumba Timur, Rote Dan Labuan Bajo, Lidwina Inge Nurtjahyo
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Based on Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, especially in Articles 2c, 5a, 7b and c, 15 (1) and (2) women and men are equal. If there are any discriminations, the states which have ratified the Convention shall eliminate the discriminations from rules or tradition or practices. Women in some indigenous communities have some limitation in decision making process, even in the process to get solution in violence aghaainst women cases. For examples in Rote, Labuan Bajo, East Sumba and Atambua (East Nusa Tenggara) women have limited access to the decision-making process in indigenous forums even in cases of …
Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen Uu Ite,
2020
University of Surabaya
Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen Uu Ite, Anton Hendrik Samudra
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
The amendment of the ITE Law is conducted to provide better legal certainty. This is an effort to respond to society development and aims to provide better legal protection and justice. The implementation of freedom of expression in the media of Information Communication Technology (ICT) affecting the number of defamation. With the amendment of ITE law, it is necessary to examine the nature of defamation offense and libel through ICT media.
Hubungan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional,
2020
Faculty of Law University of Indonesia
Hubungan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, Amelia Martira, Harsanto Nursadi
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Indonesia’s National Health Security (NHS) has begun since 2014 which give a lot of benefits to people in Indonesia. Access to health care become more easier without giving financial hardship. However, there are some obstacles that Indonesia NHS facing, which one is deficit in pool funding that is not enough to pay the benefits. One of newer solution to overcome this problem is by activating the resources from local government, especially from the funding. Basically, decentralization is the framework of the central and local government relation in Indonesia, by transferring power, authority and financial of health functional assignment to local …
Peran Dan Fungsi Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak Bagi Hasil Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Di Indonesia,
2020
University of Syiah Kuala
Peran Dan Fungsi Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak Bagi Hasil Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Di Indonesia, Zakia Vonna, Sri Walny Rahayu, M. Nur
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
This article describes contract as one of the essential elements in commercial law, one of which is the oil and gas sector. Therefore, in drafting the contract in the sector, requirements set in prevailing laws and regulation need to be met. In practice, notaries are often involved as public officials in the process of contract drafting in accordance with Article 15 of Law No 2 of 2014 regarding the amendment for Law No 30 of 2004 regarding the Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession, because they are state officials who are authorized to draft and ratify contracts. This research was …
Fugitive Slaves And Undocumented Immigrants: Testing The Boundaries Of Our Federalism,
2020
Thomas Jefferson School of Law.
Fugitive Slaves And Undocumented Immigrants: Testing The Boundaries Of Our Federalism, Sandra L. Rierson
University of Miami Law Review
Federalism—the dual system of sovereignty that invests both the nation as a whole and each individual state with the authority to govern the people of the United States of America—is a foundational pillar of American democracy. Throughout the nation’s history, political crises have tested the resilience of this dual system of government established by the United States Constitution. The fundamental contradiction of slavery in a nation founded on the principle that “all men are created equal” triggered the nation’s most prominent existential crisis, resulting in the Civil War. In the years leading up to that war, the federal government’s protection …
The Wrong Choice To Address School Choice: Espinoza V. Montana Department Of Revenue,
2020
Duke Law
The Wrong Choice To Address School Choice: Espinoza V. Montana Department Of Revenue, Brooke Reczka
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
For many school-choice advocates, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is the chance to extend the Supreme Court’s decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer in 2017. In Trinity Lutheran, the Supreme Court held that a state’s exclusion of a church from a public benefit program to resurface playgrounds discriminated against religion in violation of the Free Exercise Clause. Many school-choice proponents hope to extend the Trinity Lutheran holding from playgrounds materials to school funding and thus strike down religion-based exclusions in school voucher programs. However, Espinoza is the wrong vehicle to do so. In …
Bucklew V. Precythe'S Return To The Original Meaning Of "Unusual": Prohibiting Extensive Delays On Death Row,
2020
Cleveland State University
Bucklew V. Precythe'S Return To The Original Meaning Of "Unusual": Prohibiting Extensive Delays On Death Row, Jacob Leon
Cleveland State Law Review
The Supreme Court, in Bucklew v. Precythe, provided an originalist interpretation of the term “unusual” in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This originalist interpretation asserted that the word “unusual” proscribes punishments that have “long fallen out of use.” To support its interpretation, the Supreme Court cited John Stinneford’s well-known law review article The Original Meaning of “Unusual”: The Eighth Amendment as a Bar to Cruel Innovation. This Article, as Bucklew did, accepts Stinneford’s interpretation of the word “unusual” as correct. Under Stinneford’s interpretation, the term “unusual” is a legal term of art derived from eighteenth-century …
An Open Letter To The Ohio Supreme Court: Setting A Uniform Standard On Anders Briefs,
2020
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
An Open Letter To The Ohio Supreme Court: Setting A Uniform Standard On Anders Briefs, Matthew D. Fazekas
Cleveland State Law Review
Attorneys are faced with an ethical dilemma when they represent indigent defendants who wish to appeal a criminal sentence, but that appeal would be frivolous. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court, in Anders v. California, introduced a procedure protecting the rights of indigent defendants that balanced the ethical concerns of an attorney forced to file a frivolous appeal. In 2000, the Court in Smith v. Robbins held that the states can set their own procedure for the aforementioned ethical dilemma, so long as it protects the rights of indigent defendants in compliance with the Fourteenth Amendment. This has …
Extraterritorial Rights In Border Enforcement,
2020
Texas A&M University School of Law
Extraterritorial Rights In Border Enforcement, Fatma E. Marouf
Washington and Lee Law Review
Recent shifts in border enforcement policies raise pressing new questions about the extraterritorial reach of constitutional rights. Policies that keep asylum seekers in Mexico, expand the use of expedited removal, and encourage the cross-border use of force require courts to determine whether noncitizens who are physically outside the United States, or who are treated for legal purposes as being outside even if they have entered the country, can claim constitutional protections. This Article examines a small, but growing body of cases addressing these extraterritoriality issues in the border enforcement context, focusing on disparities in judicial analyses that have resulted in …
Inadequate Protection: Examining The Due Process Rights Of Individuals In Child Abuse And Neglect Registries,
2020
Legal Services of the Hudson Valley
Inadequate Protection: Examining The Due Process Rights Of Individuals In Child Abuse And Neglect Registries, Amanda S. Sen, Stephanie K. Glaberson, Aubrey Rose
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Article seeks to advance due process protections for people included in state child abuse and neglect registries. Between states, there are differences in the types of cases included in the state registry and the process required to be placed on or removed from the registry. To obtain judicial due process review, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a protected liberty or property interest is at stake. When federal courts have evaluated the individual liberty interest(s) implicated by placement on state child abuse and neglect registries, they have so far only found such an interest when the plaintiff’s employment opportunities were …
Limited Privacy In “Pings:” Why Law Enforcement’S Use Of Cell-Site Simulators Does Not Categorically Violate The Fourth Amendment,
2020
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Limited Privacy In “Pings:” Why Law Enforcement’S Use Of Cell-Site Simulators Does Not Categorically Violate The Fourth Amendment, Lara M. Mcmahon
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Note proposes four factors courts should consider when asked to determine whether law enforcement’s use of a cell-site simulator constituted a Fourth Amendment search. The first asks courts to consider whether the cell-site simulator surveillance infringed on a constitutionally protected area, such as the home. The second asks courts to consider the duration of the cell-site simulator surveillance. The third asks courts to consider whether the cell-site simulator surveillance was conducted actively or passively. The fourth asks courts to focus on the nature and depth of the information obtained as a result of the cell-site simulator surveillance. If, after …
Land Of The Free, If You Can Afford It: Reforming Mayor's Courts In Ohio,
2020
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Land Of The Free, If You Can Afford It: Reforming Mayor's Courts In Ohio, Lucia Lopez-Hisijos
Cleveland State Law Review
Unlike most states in America, Ohio has a unique system of punishing minor misdemeanors and ordinance violations through municipal institutions called mayor’s courts. In 2017, Ohio had 295 of these courts, and they heard nearly 300,000 cases. But these are not normal courts. Ohio’s mayor’s courts do not conduct ability to pay hearings and can jail defendants who fail to pay court fines. With the author’s original research into Ohio’s mayor’s courts, this Note argues that these institutions can function like modern-day debtor’s prisons and violate indigent defendants’ constitutional right to Due Process. Ultimately, this Note proposes a model bill …
The Nfl Player, The Schoolchild, And The Entertainer: When The Term "Free Speech" Is Too Freely Spoken, Exactly "Who's On First?",
2020
Morton College
The Nfl Player, The Schoolchild, And The Entertainer: When The Term "Free Speech" Is Too Freely Spoken, Exactly "Who's On First?", Christian Ketter
Cleveland State Law Review
As America’s media and politicians continue to debate the free speech rights of NFL players, schoolchildren, and entertainers, the dialogue has confused many Americans as to what exactly the First Amendment protects. Chief Justice John G. Roberts ultimately assumes the role of an umpire in many of these issues, guiding the United States Supreme Court to incrementally “call balls and strikes.” In recent years, the Court has umpired employment rights and state action cases, and Roberts’s calls will likely further distance the Court that decided Morse v. Frederick from the one that decided Tinker v. Des Moines. Amid a …
Ben Meir V. Prime Minister,
2020
Supreme Court of Israel
Ben Meir V. Prime Minister, Esther Hayut, Hanan Melcer, Noam Sohlberg
Translated Opinions
The petitions in this case challenged the Government’s decision of March 31, 2020 to authorize the Israel Security Agency (hereinafter: ISA), by virtue of sec. 7(b)(6) of the Israel Security Agency Law, 5762-2002 (hereinafter the ISA Law), to collect, process and use “technological information” regarding persons who had tested positive for the novel coronavirus (hereinafter: the virus), as well as persons who came into close contact with them (hereinafter: the Enabling Decision). The Journalists Union further asked that the journalists in the State of Israel be exempted from the application of the Enabling Decision, due to the fear of infringement …
April 25, 2020: The Disenchantment Of The Virus,
2020
Duquesne University
April 25, 2020: The Disenchantment Of The Virus, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Disenchantment of the Virus“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
