Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

34,792 Full-Text Articles 20,863 Authors 34,841,374 Downloads 250 Institutions

All Articles in Constitutional Law

Faceted Search

34,792 full-text articles. Page 289 of 891.

(Re)Framing Race In Civil Rights Lawyering, Anthony V. Alfieri, Angela Onwuachi-Willig 2021 University of Miami School of Law

(Re)Framing Race In Civil Rights Lawyering, Anthony V. Alfieri, Angela Onwuachi-Willig

Articles

This Review examines the significance of Henry Louis Gates, Jr.'s new book, Stony the Road: Reconstruction, White Supremacy, and the Rise of Jim Crow, for the study of racism in our nation's legal system and for the regulation of race in the legal profession, especially in the everyday labor of civil-rights and poverty lawyers, prosecutors, and public defenders. Surprisingly, few have explored the relevance of the racial narratives distilled by Gates in Stony the Roa - the images, stereotypes, and tropes that Whites constructed of Blacks to deepen and ensure the life and legacy of white supremacy-to the practice …


Marriage Or License To Rape? A Socio-Legal Analysis Of Marital Rape In India, Vidhik Kumar 2021 National University of Study and Research in Law, Ranchi (India)

Marriage Or License To Rape? A Socio-Legal Analysis Of Marital Rape In India, Vidhik Kumar

Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence

Rape exposes the failure of society’s institutions which were established to provide better security to an individual in a society. These institutions sometimes not only failed to protect an individual from such grave assaults on their autonomy and privacy, but also sanctioned them by either providing them legitimacy by law or not illegitimating them. States often have either provided legal sanctity to rapes within marriage or have refrained from declaring it a crime, on account of it being a private sphere not open to interference. Rape within marriage or marital rape is a global problem, and it is argued that …


'Who' Or 'What' Is The Rule Of Law?, Steven L. Winter 2021 Wayne State University Law School

'Who' Or 'What' Is The Rule Of Law?, Steven L. Winter

Law Faculty Research Publications

The standard account of the relation between democracy and the rule of law focuses on law’s liberty-enhancing role in constraining official action. This is a faint echo of the complex, constitutive relation between the two. The Greeks used one word – isonomia – to describe both. If democracy is the system in which people have an equal say in determining the rules that govern social life, then the rule of law is simultaneously before, after, concurrent and synonymous with democracy: It contributes to the formation of citizens with the capacity for self-governance, serves as the instrument through which democratic decisions …


The Era Brief June 2021, Center for Gender and Sexuality Law 2021 Columbia Law School

The Era Brief June 2021, Center For Gender And Sexuality Law

Center for Gender & Sexuality Law

At the ERA Project we get asked all the time: “Why do we need the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)?” “Doesn’t the Constitution already prohibit sex discrimination?” “What difference would it make to add explicit sex discrimination protections in the Constitution as the 28th Amendment?”


Religion's Ascension To A Top-Tier Right During Covid: New Report Unpacks The Supreme Court’S Recent Religious Liberty Cases, Law, Rights, and Religion Project 2021 Columbia Law School

Religion's Ascension To A Top-Tier Right During Covid: New Report Unpacks The Supreme Court’S Recent Religious Liberty Cases, Law, Rights, And Religion Project

Center for Gender & Sexuality Law

A new report released by The Law, Rights, and Religion Project (LRRP) at Columbia Law School — We The People (of Faith): The Supremacy of Religious Rights in the Shadow of a Pandemic — shows how the Supreme Court’s COVID-era opinions have created a hierarchy of constitutional rights, with religious rights at the top. This legal regime will have a resounding impact on U.S. law, affecting policymakers’ ability to protect public health, prevent discrimination, and secure labor rights long after the current COVID-19 crisis has abated.


In Fulton Decision, Scotus Solidifies Expansion Of Religious Exercise Rights, Law, Rights, and Religion Project 2021 Columbia Law School

In Fulton Decision, Scotus Solidifies Expansion Of Religious Exercise Rights, Law, Rights, And Religion Project

Center for Gender & Sexuality Law

On June 17, 2021, the Supreme Court solidified a dramatic shift in its reading of the constitutional protections for religious liberty. The Court ruled that religious organizations that contract with local governments to provide foster care services should be exempted from compliance with city non-discrimination requirements if the city permits any discretionary exemptions from those laws.


“More Than Tangential”: When Does The Public Have A Right To Access Judicial Records?, Jordan Elias 2021 Brooklyn Law School

“More Than Tangential”: When Does The Public Have A Right To Access Judicial Records?, Jordan Elias

Journal of Law and Policy

 Public accountability requires open proceedings and access to documents filed with the courts. The strong policy favoring access to judicial records creates a presumption against sealing documents without a compelling reason.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that this presumption of access arises when a proceeding relates “more than tangentially” to the merits. This is a low standard under which many types of motions qualify for the compelling reasons test.  With too much litigation occurring in secret, courts can use the “more than tangential” standard proactively to keep electronic case dockets available to citizens.


Medicate And Segregate: How Due Process Fails To Protect Mentally Ill Inmates From Medically Inappropriate Confinement And Restraint, Peter J. Teravskis 2021 University of Minnesota Law School

Medicate And Segregate: How Due Process Fails To Protect Mentally Ill Inmates From Medically Inappropriate Confinement And Restraint, Peter J. Teravskis

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

No abstract provided.


Freedom From Thirst: A Right To Basic Household Water, Martha F. Davis 2021 Northeastern University

Freedom From Thirst: A Right To Basic Household Water, Martha F. Davis

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Case For Environmental Human Rights: Recognition, Implementation, And Outcomes, James R. May 2021 Widener University Delaware Law School

The Case For Environmental Human Rights: Recognition, Implementation, And Outcomes, James R. May

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rétrospectives Et Perspectives Sur La Place Du Droit Comparé Dans La Jurisprudence Du Conseil Constitutionnel, Elisabeth Zoller 2021 Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Rétrospectives Et Perspectives Sur La Place Du Droit Comparé Dans La Jurisprudence Du Conseil Constitutionnel, Elisabeth Zoller

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


May 31, 2021: The Hallowed Secular Talmud, Bruce Ledewitz 2021 Duquesne University

May 31, 2021: The Hallowed Secular Talmud, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Hallowed Secular Talmud“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


Victim Impact: The Manson Murders And The Rise Of The Victims’ Rights Movement, Merrill W. Steeg 2021 University of New Orleans

Victim Impact: The Manson Murders And The Rise Of The Victims’ Rights Movement, Merrill W. Steeg

LSU New Orleans Theses and Dissertations

No abstract provided.


The Federalist Society And Constitutional Interpretation: Who Gets To Say What The Constitution Says, Deborah L. Toscano 2021 University of New Orleans

The Federalist Society And Constitutional Interpretation: Who Gets To Say What The Constitution Says, Deborah L. Toscano

LSU New Orleans Theses and Dissertations

The Federalist Society was organized in 1982 by conservative law students to counteract what they perceived to be a liberal bias in law schools, the courts, and government administration. Forty years later there is an acknowledgement of a rightward turn in the Supreme Court which scholars have attributed in part to the efforts of the Federalist Society. However, there is still little understanding of just how that change came about. This dissertation takes a step toward understanding that question. Viewing the Federalist Society as the center of a network of lawyers, think tanks, and legal institutions, I examine the influence …


Equal Injustice For All: High Quality Self-Representation Does Not Ensure A Matter Is “Fairly Heard”, Jona Goldschmidt 2021 Seattle University School of Law

Equal Injustice For All: High Quality Self-Representation Does Not Ensure A Matter Is “Fairly Heard”, Jona Goldschmidt

Seattle University Law Review Online

Self-represented litigants (SRLs) are generally less successful in court than parties with legal representation. Some access-to-justice programs view self-representation as a skill that can be taught and will lead to more success in case outcomes, but Jona Goldschmidt pushes back against this assumption. Goldschmidt argues that even high functioning, educated, and computer savvy SRLs are at a disadvantage in the courtroom when courts strictly enforce rules and do not offer reasonable accommodations.

In this Article, Goldschmidt evaluates three cases that illustrate expert SRLs’ challenges in the courtroom, and he argues that ridged rule enforcement and failure to accommodate lead to …


Preclearance And Politics: The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Paige E. Richardson 2021 University of Cincinnati College of Law

Preclearance And Politics: The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Paige E. Richardson

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tainted From Their Roots: The Fundamental Unfairness Of Depriving Foreign Nationals Of Counsel In Immigration Court, Jehanzeb Khan 2021 University of Cincinnati College of Law

Tainted From Their Roots: The Fundamental Unfairness Of Depriving Foreign Nationals Of Counsel In Immigration Court, Jehanzeb Khan

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Right To Remain Silent: First Amendment Rights Of Physicians In States With Narrated Ultrasound Laws, Sabrina Jemail 2021 University of Cincinnati College of Law

The Right To Remain Silent: First Amendment Rights Of Physicians In States With Narrated Ultrasound Laws, Sabrina Jemail

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.


Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: The Taxing Risk When Invoking The Fifth Amendment On A Tax Return, Jacob Hoback 2021 University of Cincinnati College of Law

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: The Taxing Risk When Invoking The Fifth Amendment On A Tax Return, Jacob Hoback

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Doctor Will Judge You Now, Blair E. Thompson 2021 Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University

The Doctor Will Judge You Now, Blair E. Thompson

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.


Digital Commons powered by bepress