Promoting Corporate Diversity: The Uncertain Role Of Institutional Investors,
2023
Seattle University School of Law
Promoting Corporate Diversity: The Uncertain Role Of Institutional Investors, Jill Fisch
Seattle University Law Review
Two developments are having an impact on corporate decisions. One is the increased engagement by institutional intermediaries and a shift in the focus of that engagement from corporate governance to environmental and social issues. The other is a heightened societal awareness of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) issues, particularly the importance of diversity in corporate leadership. This Article considers the intersection between the two. It describes how institutional investors have focused their attention on increasing diversity in corporate leadership, the potential motivations for that focus, and the impact of that focus, to date. It highlights the tensions that result from …
America’S Hidden Citizens: The Untold Stories Of The Unconscionable Deportations Of Its International Adoptees,
2023
Seattle University School of Law
America’S Hidden Citizens: The Untold Stories Of The Unconscionable Deportations Of Its International Adoptees, Halley Cody
Seattle University Law Review
This Note addresses how the U.S. should rectify the harms it has perpetrated on non-citizen adoptees by amending the current deportation statutes to prevent their deportation. Part I addresses the history of adoption in the U.S. and related effects on immigration law. Part II highlights the stories of Adam Crapser and Philip Clay, who were adopted by American families who failed to naturalize them as minors, and who were subsequently deported after they sustained criminal records. Part III examines the policy goals behind deportation as a consequence of criminal convictions, as well as remedies instituted to prevent unwarranted deportation and …
Inadequate Privacy: The Necessity Of Hipaa Reform In A Post-Dobbs World,
2023
Seattle University School of Law
Inadequate Privacy: The Necessity Of Hipaa Reform In A Post-Dobbs World, Katherine Robertson
Seattle University Law Review
Part I of this Comment will provide an overview of HIPAA and the legal impacts of Dobbs. Part II will discuss the anticipatory response to the impacts of Dobbs on PHI by addressing the response from (1) the states, (2) the Biden Administration, and (3) the medical field. Part III will discuss the loopholes that exist in HIPAA and further address the potential impacts on individuals and the medical field if reform does not occur. Finally, Part IV will argue that the reform of HIPAA is the best avenue for protecting PHI related to reproductive healthcare.
Raising The Threshold For Trademark Infringement To Protect Free Expression,
2023
American University Washington College of Law
Raising The Threshold For Trademark Infringement To Protect Free Expression, Christine Haight Farley, Lisa P. Ramsey
American University Law Review
The First Amendment right to free speech limits the scope of rights in trademark law. Congress and the courts have devised various defenses and common law doctrines to ensure that protected speech is exempted from trademark infringement liability. These defensive trademark doctrines, however, are narrow and often vary by jurisdiction. One current example is the speechprotective test first articulated by the Second Circuit in Rogers v. Grimaldi, expanded by the Ninth Circuit, and recently restricted by the Supreme Court in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products to uses of another’s mark within an expressive work that do not designate the …
The Road To Brackeen: Defending Icwa 2013-2023,
2023
American University Washington College of Law
The Road To Brackeen: Defending Icwa 2013-2023, Kathryn Fort
American University Law Review
From 2013 to 2023, the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was challenged in the courts more than the Affordable Care Act. This Article lays out the history of the fight over ICWA from Baby Girl to Haaland, from my perspective as a clinical professor who has been involved with every major ICWA case since 2013, as well as my observations about why ICWA was so vulnerable to an organized litigation attack despite continued bipartisan and widespread support of the law.
Buck As (Anti) Canon: The Misuse Of Eugenics Rhetoric In Selective-Abortion Jurisprudence And The Dangers For Tort Law,
2023
American University Washington College of Law
Buck As (Anti) Canon: The Misuse Of Eugenics Rhetoric In Selective-Abortion Jurisprudence And The Dangers For Tort Law, Samantha C. Smith
American University Law Review
America’s notorious eugenics case Buck v. Bell is being resurrected as anticanon in abortion jurisprudence. Buck became one of the Court’s worst decisions by upholding eugenic practices, but these recent anticanonical citations also prove harmful by misidentifying eugenics. This Article joins critics of this misuse of “eugenics” labeling and warns that the rhetorical use of Buck in abortion cases has dangerous implications for reproductive medicine. It draws on Buck as the leading precedent for eugenics under the law and demonstrates that selective-abortion cases are distinguishable because of two failures of the Buck Court: the failure to recognize state interference with …
Why Are We Not Worth Saving? Latin American Immigrant Women's Experiences With Post-9/11 Crimmigration Policies And Asylum-Seeking In The United States,
2023
Hollins University
Why Are We Not Worth Saving? Latin American Immigrant Women's Experiences With Post-9/11 Crimmigration Policies And Asylum-Seeking In The United States, Kaye Romans
Undergraduate Honors Theses
This thesis discusses Crimmigration—the convergence of criminal policies and immigration law—in a post-9/11 world as it relates to Latin American Immigrant women seeking asylum in the United States. Utilizing case law, legislation, and legal scholarship, I situate these policies in the broader context of immigration law both nationally and internationally, focusing on key post-9/11 legislation and policies such as Operation Streamline, Operation Liberty Shield, and Title 42, as well as key post-9/11 case law dealing with Latin American women seeking asylum in the United States. With these foundational understandings, I provide possible solutions that would lessen the harms presented to …
¿Por Qué No Vale La Pena Salvarnos? Experiencias De Mujeres Inmigrantes Latinoamericanas Con Políticas De Inmigración Post-9/11 Y Solicitantes De Asilo En Los Estados Unidos,
2023
Hollins University
¿Por Qué No Vale La Pena Salvarnos? Experiencias De Mujeres Inmigrantes Latinoamericanas Con Políticas De Inmigración Post-9/11 Y Solicitantes De Asilo En Los Estados Unidos, Kaye Romans
Undergraduate Honors Theses
Esta tesis aborda la Crimmigration—la convergencia de las políticas criminales y la ley de inmigración—en un mundo post-9/11 en lo que se refiere a las mujeres inmigrantes latinoamericanas que buscan asilo en los Estados Unidos. Utilizando la jurisprudencia, la legislación y la erudición legal, sitúo estas políticas en el contexto más amplio de la ley de inmigración tanto a nivel nacional como internacional, centrándome en la legislación y políticas claves posteriores al 9/11 tales como la Operation Streamline, la Operation Liberty Shield y el Title 42, así como la jurisprudencia clave posterior al 9/11 que trata con las mujeres latinoamericanas …
Situating Structural Challenges To Agency Authority Within The Framework Of The Finality Principle,
2023
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Situating Structural Challenges To Agency Authority Within The Framework Of The Finality Principle, Harold J. Krent
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Behind The Screen: Examining The Human Consequences And Constitutional Ramifications Of The Virtual Criminal Defendant,
2023
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Behind The Screen: Examining The Human Consequences And Constitutional Ramifications Of The Virtual Criminal Defendant, Mallory Kostroff
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
Defendants are waiting behind a screen to learn their fate in their criminal proceedings. This Note sounds the alarm that having incarcerated defendants appear virtually for their criminal proceedings will lead the criminal justice system further down a path of mass incarceration and destruction. This Note demonstrates and argues that there are no benefits for having an incarcerated defendant appear virtually because there are no real benefits to the defendant themselves. Courts further try to argue that video appearances are efficient as they save time and money but as this Note shows those arguments are misleading and miss the point …
No Balancing For Anticonstitutional Government Conduct,
2023
Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University
No Balancing For Anticonstitutional Government Conduct, Bruce Ledewitz
Law Faculty Publications
Noted Supreme Court critic Eric Segall has been criticizing the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen for its failure to engage in any kind of means-end balancing in striking down a New York gun control measure--balancing that he argues the Court has engaged in since the Reconstruction era. Segall is hardly the only American law professor to level this charge. But the lack of balancing in Bruen is neither unprecedented nor methodologically innovative. It certainly does not reflect a victory of originalism. Instead, the Bruen decision stands firmly in the tradition that courts do …
State Constitutional Rights, State Courts, And The Future Of Substantive Due Process Protections,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
State Constitutional Rights, State Courts, And The Future Of Substantive Due Process Protections, Jonathan L. Marshfield
UF Law Faculty Publications
By most accounts, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization signaled a broader stagnation (and perhaps retrenchment) of federal substantive due process protections. As a result, there is now great interest in the role that state constitutions and courts might play in protecting and expanding reproductive and privacy rights. This Article aims to place this moment in state constitutional development in broader context. It makes two core claims in this regard. First, although state courts are free to interpret state constitutions as providing broader individual rights protections than those contained in the Federal Constitution, state constitutions …
Cheap Speech And The Gordian Knot Of Defamation Reform,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Cheap Speech And The Gordian Knot Of Defamation Reform, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
UF Law Faculty Publications
This article addresses the complex past and uncertain future of defamation law in order to evaluate complaints lodged against it by critics, including—most notably—U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. The article describes how statutory and constitutional reforms have altered the legal landscape of defamation law over the past half-century and explains why the common law has played a less prominent role. The article then assesses the criticisms of Justices Thomas and Gorsuch, finding them to rest on flawed understandings of how today’s defamation law operates. After identifying barriers to reform, the article offers a prescription to modernize …
Is Silence Golden?,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Is Silence Golden?, Tracey Maclin
UF Law Faculty Publications
Absolute constitutional rights are rare—even the venerable rights of free speech and freedom of religion are not absolute. In criminal prosecutions, the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel has been described as the most important of all rights because it affects a defendant’s ability to assert his or her other rights. But the right to counsel is not unlimited.
Yet one right is absolute. A criminal defendant has an absolute right not to testify in his own criminal trial. The text of the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment—“no person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to …
White-Collar Courts,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
White-Collar Courts, Merritt E. Mcalister
UF Law Faculty Publications
Article III courts are white-collar courts. They are, scholars have said, “special.” They sit atop the judicial hierarchy, and they are the courts of the one percent. We inculcate that sense of specialness in a variety of ways: federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction; they are the subject of a (perhaps overrated) class in law school; we privilege clerkships with federal judges more than with state-court judges; and we focus more scholarly attention on federal courts than state courts. They are, in short, the courts of the elite—jurisdictionally, doctrinally, and socially. Perhaps the singular importance of federal courts was …
Bottom-Rung Appeals,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Bottom-Rung Appeals, Merritt E. Mcalister
UF Law Faculty Publications
There are haves and have-nots in the federal appellate courts, and the haves get more attention. For decades the courts have used a triage regime where they distribute judicial attention selectively: some appeals receive a lot of judicial attention, some appeals receive barely any. What this work unearths is that this triage system produces demonstrably unequal results depending on the circuit handling the appeal and whether the appellant has counsel or not. Together, these two factors produce dramatic disparities: in one circuit, for example, an unrepresented appellant receives, on average, a decision less than a tenth the length of a …
On Fires, Floods, And Federalism,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
On Fires, Floods, And Federalism, Andrew Hammond
UF Law Faculty Publications
In the United States, law condemns poor people to their fates in states. Where Americans live continues to dictate whether they can access cash, food, and medical assistance. What’s more, immigrants, territorial residents, and tribal members encounter deteriorated corners of the American welfare state. Nonetheless, despite repeated retrenchment efforts, this patchwork of programs has proven remarkably resilient. Yet, the ability of the United States to meet its people’s most basic needs now faces an unprecedented challenge: climate change. As extreme weather events like wildfires and hurricanes become more frequent and more intense, these climate-fueled disasters will displace and impoverish more …
Macro-Judging And Article Iii Exceptionalism,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Macro-Judging And Article Iii Exceptionalism, Merritt E. Mcalister
UF Law Faculty Publications
Over the last half-century, the federal courts have faced down two competing crises: an increase in small, low-value litigation thought unworthy of Article III attention and an increase in the numbers and complexity of “big” cases thought worthy of those resources. The choice was what to prioritize and how, and the answer the courts gave was consistent across all levels of the federal judiciary. Using what this Article calls “macro-judging,” Article III judges entrenched their own power and autonomy to focus on the work they deemed most “worthy” of their attention, while outsourcing less “important” work to an array of …
The End Of Balancing? Text, History & Tradition In First Amendment Speech Cases After Bruen,
2023
University of Florida Levin College of Law
The End Of Balancing? Text, History & Tradition In First Amendment Speech Cases After Bruen, Clay Calvert, Mary-Rose Papandrea
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article examines the potential impact on First Amendment free-speech jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court’s increasing reliance on text, history, and tradition in 2022 decisions such as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Court embraced a new test for examining Second Amendment cases. It concentrates on whether there is a historical tradition of regulating the conduct in question, and it eliminates any use of constitutionally common means-end standards of review such as strict and intermediate scrutiny. Those two scrutiny standards often guide the Court’s free-speech decisions. The Bruen majority, however, asserted that its …
Constitutional Law—Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Organization Will Likely Have A Negative, Disproportionate Impact On Women Of Color And Reassert Inferiority,
2023
University of Arkansas Little Rock
Constitutional Law—Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Organization Will Likely Have A Negative, Disproportionate Impact On Women Of Color And Reassert Inferiority, Makiya Turntine
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
