Constitutional Law Commons^™

Unpacking Constitutional Literacy, De Maartje Visser, Brian Christopher Jones

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

The contemporary crisis in relation to constitutional literacy relates not to the lack of knowledge that citizens possess about fundamental constitutional texts, but to the considerable lack of development in relation to what constitutional literacy itself entails. This article accordingly unpacks the notion of constitutional literacy: its importance, its characteristics, its variable nature, and its potential downsides. Using a comparative lens, the article invites reflection on the role that we expect citizens to play in our democracies, and especially the associated knowledge and skills required for successful state performance. We suggest that constitutional literacy is exceptionally multifaceted and fluid in …

Flourishing, Virtue, And The Common Good Constitutionalism, Lawrence B. Solum

Faculty Scholarship

In Common Good Constitutionalism, Professor Adrian Vermeule articulates a conception of the common good. Vermeule has much to say about the common good, but very little to say about the substantive component of his conception, which he describes as “happiness or flourishing.” This Article articulates a conception of the common good that is grounded in a virtue-centered conception of human flourishing. Humans are rational and social creatures, and therefore, flourishing for humans consists in rational and social activities that express the human excellence or virtues. The common good requires communities that facilitate human flourishing in three ways: (1) by creating …

Policing Protest: Speech, Space, Crime, And The Jury, Jenny E. Carroll

Faculty Scholarship

Speech is more than just an individual right—it can serve as a catalyst for democratically driven revolution and reform, particularly for minority or marginalized positions. In the past decade, the nation has experienced a rise in mass protests. However, dissent and disobedience in the form of such protests is not without consequences. While the First Amendment promises broad rights of speech and assembly, these rights are not absolute. Criminal law regularly curtails such rights—either by directly regulating speech as speech or by imposing incidental burdens on speech as it seeks to promote other state interests. This Feature examines how criminal …

Originalism After Dobbs, Bruen, And Kennedy: The Role Of History And Tradition, Randy E. Barnett, Lawrence B. Solum

Faculty Scholarship

In three recent cases, the constitutional concepts of history and tradition have played important roles in the reasoning of the Supreme Court. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization relied on history and tradition to overrule Roe v. Wade. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen articulated a history and tradition test for the validity of laws regulating the right to bear arms recognized by the Second Amendment. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District looked to history and tradition in formulating the test for the consistency of state action with the Establishment Clause.

These cases raise important questions about …

Penalaran Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 64/Puu-X/2012 Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pelindungan Data Pribadi Nasabah Perbankan Di Indonesia, Yosea Iskandar

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Title: The Significance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 64/PUU-X/2012 on Banking Customer Data Protection in Indonesia: An Analysis of Legal Interpretation and Implications

This article delves into the pivotal role played by Constitutional Court Decision No. 64/PUU-X/2012 in shaping the concept and regulations governing the protection of personal banking data in Indonesia. The decision redefined the obligations of banks to maintain confidentiality, particularly concerning information about depositors and their deposits. Widely acclaimed as a legal breakthrough, the decision prompted the government to amend banking laws in 2022 to reflect the Court's new interpretation. In contrast to existing scholarly works …

Justice Collaborator Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Memutus Perkara, Amalina Fikriyah, Ali Masyhar, Cahya Wulandari

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Justice Collaborator, which refers to the cooperation between a non-primary perpetrator and law enforcement in uncovering organized crimes, is often used to expose cases of extraordinary crimes. The concept of a Justice Collaborator has become a topic of public discussion following the case involving the murder ordered by Ferdy Sambo, where Ferdy Sambo instructed Richard Eliezer to kill Jhosua Hutabarat. Richard Eliezer was found guilty by the court and was designated as a Justice Collaborator.

Upaya Mediasi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (Laps Sjk): (Studi Kasus Sengketa Rehabilitasi Daftar Hitam Nasional (Dhn) Pt X Dan Bri), Benedetto Setyo Utomo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Salah satu upaya penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan yang dapat dilakukan oleh LAPS SJK adalah mediasi. Mediasi selain untuk menyelesaikan sengketa, dapat pula bertujuan untuk melindungi hubungan baik yang telah ada di antara para pihak, sehingga walaupun terjadi sengketa, hubungan antara para pihak, di mana dalam hal ini adalah bank dan nasabah, dapat dijaga secara berkesinambungan. Mediasi pada LAPS SJK bersifat rahasia dan mengutamakan win-win solution, sehingga memberikan kenyamanan bagi para pihak yang bersengketa dan mampu menjaga kepercayaan nasabah terhadap sektor jasa keuangan seperti bank. Selain itu, upaya mediasi melalui LAPS SJK menawarkan proses penyelesaian yang lebih cepat, lebih murah, …

Peninjauan Kembali Demi Keadilan, Alfret Alfret

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

As the world of law develops, there are more and more new provisions related to the implementation of Judicial Review (PK). Some concrete examples related to the development of PK provisions themselves are that a PK can only be carried out once. Apart from that, there is also a provision that the public prosecutor cannot carry out request for reconsideration. This raises the question of whether these restrictions do not conflict with the principles of justice. This research was studied using normative juridical methods based on existing legal provisions and decisions. So the results of this research show that …

Deeper Into The Knight: Exploring Deans Knight And Its Effects On The Canadian Gaar, Jinyan Li, Marshall Rothstein, Steve Suarez, Jeffrey Trossman

Articles & Book Chapters

This article discusses the most recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Deans Knight Income Corporation v. Canada (2023) and explores its implications for the Canadian GAAR.

Four Pathbreaking Women Judges To Participate In Iu Conference And Public Discussion Monday, Sept. 25, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

Four distinguished women judges from the Middle East and North Africa—including the first female judge in Jordanian history—will visit the Indiana University Bloomington campus Sept. 25-26 for a conference titled “Women Judges in Dialogue,” where they will discuss their own experience as women in the judiciary as well as issues surrounding constitutional adjudication in the region. They will be joined by faculty from the Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies and the Maurer School of Law.

Sponsored by the Center for the Study of the Middle East (CSME) at HLS and the Center for Constitutional Democracy (CCD) …

Brief Of Scholars Of Administrative Law And The Administrative Procedure Act As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Jeffrey Lubbers

Amicus Briefs & Court Filings

The principle of judicial deference to agency interpretations of law has been a pillar of this Court's administrative law doctrine for more than a century. This Court's decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), formalized one version of that principle, creating the two-step framework that is now subject to a multifaceted attack. Among other things, Chevron's opponents argue that the doctrine is at odds with the original public meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. This is wrong, and the text and history of that landmark statute provide no basis for …

Brief Of Amici Curiae Administrative And Federal Regulatory Law Professors In Support Of Respondents, Andrew F. Popper

Amicus Briefs & Court Filings

Amici write to address the first question presented: whether Chevron should be overruled. Properly understood, it should not. Chevron has been much discussed but not always understood. On the one hand, courts have sometimes misapplied the doctrine or failed to understand its legal foundations. On the other, courts and commentators alike have criticized Chevron, often as a result of such aggressive applications. This case provides an opportunity for the Court to clarify what Chevron does and does not entail, while reaffirming the essential role that judicial recognition of constitutionally delegated policymaking authority plays in federal statutory programs. Many of …

A Fireside Chat With A Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Roger Williams University School Of Law

School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events

No abstract provided.

Texas's "Operation Lone Star": The Supremacy Clause And Dual Federalism In Light Of Arizona V. United States, Reynaldo Ramirez, Jr

Texas A&M Law Review

The Supremacy Clause of Article Six of the United States Constitution was enacted to remedy the failures of the Articles of Confederation. Initially, the states enjoyed near-boundless state sovereignty in nearly all aspects of the first federalist government. However, in practice, the necessity of federal supremacy for conducting the business of governing obligated the states to prioritize national interests above the states’ sovereignty. To do so required revision of the Articles of Confederation. This drafting culminated in the contentious ratification of the Constitution in 1788, including the Supremacy Clause and the Tenth Amendment. That said, ratifying the Supremacy Clause and …

The Role Of U.S. Government Regulatioms, Bert Chapman

Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations

Provides detailed coverage of information resources on U.S. Government information resources for federal regulations. Features historical background on these regulations, details on the Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations, includes information on individuals can participate in the federal regulatory process by commenting on proposed agency regulations via https://regulations.gov/, describes the role of presidential executive orders, refers to recent and upcoming U.S. Supreme Court cases involving federal regulations, and describes current congressional legislation seeking to give Congress greater involvement in the federal regulatory process.

The Annual Scotus Term Preview, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023 Event Invitations

Join Professors Rebecca Ingber, Michael Herz, Kate Shaw and Luís C. Calderón Gómez as they talk about what to expect from the Supreme Court in the upcoming term.

The panelists will flag and discuss the most important cases to be heard this Term, including litigation over mifepristone, guns, taxation of unrealized income and the future of the administrative state.

The Scotus Term Preview, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Care Work, Gender Equality, And Abortion: Lessons From Comparative Feminist Constitutionalism, Linda C. Mcclain

Faculty Scholarship

Julie Suk, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It (2023).

Julie Suk’s ambitious book, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It, contributes to a feminist literature on equality and care spanning centuries and national boundaries, yet offers timely diagnoses and prescriptions for the United States at a very particular moment. That “moment” includes being four years into the COVID-19 pandemic and over one year into the post-Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey world wrought by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. That moment …

Opening Remarks, Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

Thank you. I am honored to be here. And there is no more fitting way to honor Michael than around the 40th anniversary of Plyler v. Doe.

This case centered on Texas statute § 21.031, which on its face, permitted the local school districts to exclude noncitizen children who entered the United States without immigration status or to charge admission for the same. The questions before the Court were: (1) whether a noncitizen under the statute who is present in the state without legal status is a “person” and therefore in the jurisdiction of the state within the meaning …

Entrevista Com Prof. James Green, James Green

Spect-actor: A Journal of Pedagogy & Theatre of the Oppressed

No abstract provided.