Foreword: Constitutional Constraints State Health Care & Privacy Regulation After Sorrell V. Ims Health,
2012
University of New Hampshire School of Law
Foreword: Constitutional Constraints State Health Care & Privacy Regulation After Sorrell V. Ims Health, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
This brief Foreword explains that First Amendment law is fertile ground for analysis under choice of law principles. It then opines that the majority and dissenting opinions in Sorrell v. IMS Health are rooted in different choices of law that would benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment and explanation.
The Penalties For Piracy: An Empirical Study Of National Prosecution Of International Crime,
2012
Northwestern University School of Law
The Penalties For Piracy: An Empirical Study Of National Prosecution Of International Crime, Eugene Kontorovich
Faculty Working Papers
This Article examines the sentences imposed by courts around the world in prosecutions of Somali pirates captured on the high seas. Somali piracy has become perhaps the highest-volume area of international criminal law by national courts. As with other international crimes, international law is silent on the subject of penalties. The large number of parallel prosecutions of offenders from a single international "situation" offers an empirical window into the interactions between international and national law in municipal courts; into factors affecting punishment for international crimes and the hierarchy of international offenses; and of course into potential concerns with the current …
The Multiple Roles Of International Courts And Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional And Administrative Review,
2012
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Multiple Roles Of International Courts And Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional And Administrative Review, Karen J. Alter
Faculty Working Papers
This chapter is part of an upcoming interdisciplinary volume on international law and politics. The chapter defines four judicial roles states have delegated to international courts (ICs) and documents the delegation of dispute settlement, administrative review, enforcement and constitutional review jurisdiction to ICs based on a coding of legal instruments defining the jurisdiction of 25 ICs. I show how the design of ICs varies by judicial role and argue that the delegation of multiple roles to ICs helps explain the shift in IC design to include compulsory jurisdiction and access for nonstate actors to initiate litigation. I am interested in …
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?,
2012
Roger Williams University School of Law
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?, Tanya Monestier
Law Faculty Scholarship
There has been significant academic buzz about Silver v. Imax, an Ontario case certifying a global class of shareholders alleging statutory and common law misrepresentation in connection with a secondary market distribution of shares. Although global class actions on a more limited scale have been certified in Canada prior to Imax, it can now be said that global classes have "officially" arrived in Canada. Many predict that the Imax decision means that Ontario will become the new center for the resolution of global securities disputes. This is particularly so after the United States largely relinquished this role in Morrison v. …
How Collective Settlements Camouflage The Costs Of Shareholder Lawsuits,
2012
Fordham University School of Law
How Collective Settlements Camouflage The Costs Of Shareholder Lawsuits, Richard Squire
Faculty Scholarship
Corporations insure against liability in shareholder lawsuits by buying tiered coverage from multiple insurers who each cover a distinct segment of the potential damages range. Rather than negotiating to settle individually with the plaintiff, the insurers seek to reach a single, collectively binding settlement agreement. This combination of segmented coverage and collective settlements produces a conflict of interests: the corporation’s managers and some insurers are better off if the case settles pre-trial for the expected damages, while other insurers are better off going to trial. To force reluctant insurers to settle, courts have created a duty that can require an …
Half Baked: The Federal And State Conflicts Of Legalizing Medical Marijuana,
2012
Claremont McKenna College
Half Baked: The Federal And State Conflicts Of Legalizing Medical Marijuana, Andrew K. Fevery
CMC Senior Theses
The legalization of medical marijuana has been a complicated and confusing process. The drug is used for medical purposes yet is only semi-legal and not approved by the federal government. This piece will observe the legal medical history of this drug in the United States. It will analyze the growth of the medical marijuana movement up to the present with a special emphasis to the importance of federal, state and local supremacy. It will observe important court cases that have been decisive in defining the reach of federal power under the Commerce Clause and the 1970 Controlled Substance Act. This …
Oklahoma's Save Our State Amendment And The Conflict Of Laws,
2012
Lewis & Clark Law School
Oklahoma's Save Our State Amendment And The Conflict Of Laws, John T. Parry
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Oklahoma's Save Our State Amendment: Two Issues For The Appeal,
2012
Lewis & Clark Law School
Oklahoma's Save Our State Amendment: Two Issues For The Appeal, John T. Parry
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Border Skirmishes: The Intersection Between Litigation And International Commercial Arbitration,
2012
Emory University School of Law
Border Skirmishes: The Intersection Between Litigation And International Commercial Arbitration, S. I. Strong
Faculty Articles
National courts are becoming increasingly involved with international commercial arbitration. Although this observation may be disheartening to those who support the autonomy of the international arbitral regime, the continued interaction between courts and tribunals is less troubling to those who view international commercial arbitration as a "hybrid" method of dispute resolution, with numerous opportunities for permissible "border crossings. "
That is not to say that courts can or should become involved with every aspect of arbitration. Instead, impermissible "border incursions" diminish the effectiveness of international commercial arbitration and could erode public or private support for the international arbitral regime. Therefore, …
The Word Commons And Foreign Laws,
2012
University of Nevada Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
The Word Commons And Foreign Laws, Thomas O. Main
Scholarly Works
Dual trends are colliding in U.S. courts. The first trend is a tidal wave of cases requiring courts to engage the domestic laws of foreign legal systems; globalization is the principal driver of this escalation. The second trend is a profound and ever-increasing skepticism of our ability to understand foreign law; the literature of pluralism and postmodernism has illuminated the uniquely local, language-dependent, and culturally embedded nature of law. Courts cope with this dissonance by finding some way to avoid the application of foreign law. But these outcomes are problematic because parties are denied access to court or have their …
The Future Of Cybertravel: Legal Implications Of The Evasion Of Geolocation,
2012
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
The Future Of Cybertravel: Legal Implications Of The Evasion Of Geolocation, Marketa Trimble
Scholarly Works
Although the Internet is valued by many of its supporters particularly because it both defies and defeats physical borders, these important attributes are now being exposed to attempts by both governments and private entities to impose territorial limits through blocking or permitting access to content by Internet users based on their geographical location—a territorial partitioning of the Internet. One of these attempts, for example, is the recent Stop Online Piracy Act (“SOPA”) proposal in the United States. This article, as opposed to earlier literature on the topic discussing the possible virtues and methods of erecting borders in cyberspace, focuses on …
Changes In The European Union's Regime Of Recognizing And Enforcing Judgments And Transnational Litigation In The United States,
2012
University of Akron
Changes In The European Union's Regime Of Recognizing And Enforcing Judgments And Transnational Litigation In The United States, Samuel P. Baumgartner
Akron Law Faculty Publications
The European Commission has proposed to amend (recast) the Brussels I Regulation, which governs jurisdiction to adjudicate, parallel proceedings, and judgments recognition within the European Union. Although much of the Brussels I Regulation is simply the 1968 Brussels Convention cast into European Union legislation, the proposed amendments are part of a deeper set of structural and conceptual changes in the law of transnational litigation within the Union over the past couple of decades. Understanding these changes is essential to understanding what drives the proposed amendments and what is likely to follow.
In this paper – presented at the symposium Our …
Choice Of Law As General Common Law: A Reply To Professor Brilmayer,
2012
William & Mary Law School
Choice Of Law As General Common Law: A Reply To Professor Brilmayer, Michael S. Green
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law In International Antitrust Law - A Us Perspective,
2012
Duke Law School
Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law In International Antitrust Law - A Us Perspective, Ralf Michaels, Hannah L. Buxbaum
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Race As A Legal Concept,
2012
University of Colorado Law School
Race As A Legal Concept, Justin Deystone
Publications
Race is a legal concept, and like all legal concepts, it is a matrix of rules. Although the legal conception of race has shifted over time, up from slavery and to the present, one element in the matrix has remained the same: the background rules of race have always taken a view of racial identity as a natural aspect of human biology. To be sure, characterizations of the rule have oftentimes kept pace with developments in race science, and the original invention of race as a rationale for the subordination of certain human populations is now a rationale with little …
Complex Dispute Resolution: Volume Iii: Introduction And Coda: International Dispute Resolution,
2012
Georgetown University Law Center
Complex Dispute Resolution: Volume Iii: Introduction And Coda: International Dispute Resolution, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Complex Dispute Resolution series collects essays on the development of foundational dispute resolution theory and practice and its application to increasingly more complex settings of conflicts in the world, including multi-party and multi-issue decision making, negotiations in political policy formation and governance, and international conflict resolution. Each volume contains an original introduction by the editor, which explores the key issues in the field. All three volumes feature essays which span an interdisciplinary range of fields, law, political science, game theory, decision science, economics, social and cognitive psychology, sociology and anthropology and consider issues in the uses of informal and …
From Multiculturalism To Technique: Feminism, Culture And The Conflict Of Laws Style,
2012
Duke Law School
From Multiculturalism To Technique: Feminism, Culture And The Conflict Of Laws Style, Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels, Annelise Riles
Faculty Scholarship
The German chancellor, the French president and the British prime minister have each grabbed world headlines with pronouncements that their state’s policy of multiculturalism has failed. As so often, domestic debates about multiculturalism, as well as foreign policy debates about human rights in non-Western countries, revolve around the treatment of women. Yet there is also a widely noted brain drain from feminism. Feminists are no longer even certain how to frame, let alone resolve, the issues raised by veiling, polygamy and other cultural practices oppressive to women by Western standards. Feminism has become perplexed by the very concept of “culture.” …
Untangling Jurisdiction And Contract Scope Issues Within Intellectual Property Licenses,
2012
University of Arkansas Little Rock
Untangling Jurisdiction And Contract Scope Issues Within Intellectual Property Licenses, Brandon Beam
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
Copyright license cases pose difficult issues regarding the mixture of federal copyright law and state contract law for courts and commentators alike. Specifically, a split exists over which cases "arise under" federal copyright law. This complication is compounded by the difficulty in predicting federal preemption of state contract law.
In an effort to stabilize these complications, this comment recommends an approach of split sovereignty that would empower different systems to control the areas they are designated to regulate. In particular, the author suggests that procedural issues in copyright license cases should be clarified by (1) governing exclusive federal jurisdiction under …
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?,
2012
University at Buffalo School of Law
Is Canada The New Shangri-La Of Global Securities Class Actions?, Tanya J. Monestier
Journal Articles
There has been significant academic buzz about Silver v. Imax, an Ontario case certifying a global class of shareholders alleging statutory and common law misrepresentation in connection with a secondary market distribution of shares. Although global class actions on a more limited scale have been certified in Canada prior to Imax, it can now be said that global classes have “officially” arrived in Canada. Many predict that the Imax decision means that Ontario will become the new center for the resolution of global securities disputes. This is particularly so after the United States largely relinquished this role in Morrison v. …
Once More Unto The Breach: Some Thoughts On The Future Of The Eez,
2011
Makarim & Tairs S Counsellors at Law, Indonesia
Once More Unto The Breach: Some Thoughts On The Future Of The Eez, Guy Des Rosiers
Indonesian Journal of International Law
By public international law standards, the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) maintains a relative newcomer, the product of State practice following the end of the Second World War and multilateral negotiations culminating with the entry into force, in November 1994, of the 1982 United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, In defining the EEZ, the Convention has created a sui generis legal regime over vast areas that were previously part of the high seas. Neither Grotian nor Seldenian in spirit, the EEZ regime forgoes the absolute language of territory and sovereignty in favor of discrete sets of rights and …
