Dead Man's Hand: Reshuffling Foreign Sovereign Immunities In U.S. Human Rights Litigation,
2014
Emory University School of Law
Dead Man's Hand: Reshuffling Foreign Sovereign Immunities In U.S. Human Rights Litigation, David J. Bederman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Germany V. United States In The International Court Of Justice: An International Battle Over The Interpretation Of Article Thirty-Six Of The Vienna Convention On Consular Relations And Provisional Measures Orders,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Germany V. United States In The International Court Of Justice: An International Battle Over The Interpretation Of Article Thirty-Six Of The Vienna Convention On Consular Relations And Provisional Measures Orders, Stephanie Baker
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
License To Discriminate: How A Washington Florist Is Making The Case For Applying Intermediary Scrutiny To Sexual Orientation,
2014
Seattle University School of Law
License To Discriminate: How A Washington Florist Is Making The Case For Applying Intermediary Scrutiny To Sexual Orientation, Kendra Lacour
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past few decades, the debate over sexual orientation has risen to the forefront of civil rights issues. Though the focus has generally been on the right to marriage, peripheral issues associated with the right to marriage—and with sexual orientation generally—have become more common in recent years. As the number of states permitting same-sex marriage—along with states prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation—increases, so too does the conflict between providers of public accommodations and those seeking their services. Never is this situation more problematic than when religious beliefs are cited as the basis for denying services to …
A Matter Of Compliance: How Do U.S. Multinational Corporations Deal With The Discrepancies In The Family And Medical Leave Act Of 1993 And The European Union Directive On Parental Leave; Is An International Standard Practical Or Appropriate In This Area Of Law?,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
A Matter Of Compliance: How Do U.S. Multinational Corporations Deal With The Discrepancies In The Family And Medical Leave Act Of 1993 And The European Union Directive On Parental Leave; Is An International Standard Practical Or Appropriate In This Area Of Law?, Kathryn L. Morris
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Lost In The Weeds Of Pot Law: The Role Of Ethics In The Movement To Legalize Marijuana,
2014
Barry University
Lost In The Weeds Of Pot Law: The Role Of Ethics In The Movement To Legalize Marijuana, Helia Garrido Hull
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Where Does The Authority Lie?: Constitutional Construction Of Alabama's Newest Bingo Amendments,
2014
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Where Does The Authority Lie?: Constitutional Construction Of Alabama's Newest Bingo Amendments, Brandon A. Jackson
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Mending Broken Promises: Analyzing The Legality Of U.S. Withdrawal Of United Nations Population Fund Appropriations And The Need For Binding Un Commitments,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Mending Broken Promises: Analyzing The Legality Of U.S. Withdrawal Of United Nations Population Fund Appropriations And The Need For Binding Un Commitments, Kristi Uhrinek
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Creditor Participation In The Hipc Debt Relief Initiatives: The Case Of Guyana,
2014
Oxford University
Creditor Participation In The Hipc Debt Relief Initiatives: The Case Of Guyana, Magnus Saxegaard
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Challenges To The Territorial Integrity Of Guyana: A Legal Analysis,
2014
American University in Cairo
Challenges To The Territorial Integrity Of Guyana: A Legal Analysis, Thomas W. Donovan
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002: Are Stricter Internal Controls Constricting International Companies?,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002: Are Stricter Internal Controls Constricting International Companies?, Jennifer K. Coalson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Big Success Or "Big Brother?": Great Britain's National Identification Scheme Before The European Court Of Human Rights,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Big Success Or "Big Brother?": Great Britain's National Identification Scheme Before The European Court Of Human Rights, Jennifer Morris
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The European Union, State-Sponsored Gambling, And Private Gambling Services: Time For Harmonization?,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
The European Union, State-Sponsored Gambling, And Private Gambling Services: Time For Harmonization?, Matthew W. Mauldin
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Must Treaty Violations Be Remedied?: A Critique Of Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon,
2014
Ohio State University
Must Treaty Violations Be Remedied?: A Critique Of Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon, John Quigley
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Beyond Carve-Outs And Toward Reliance: A Normative Framework For Cross-Border Insolvency Choice Of Law,
2014
University of Michigan Law School
Beyond Carve-Outs And Toward Reliance: A Normative Framework For Cross-Border Insolvency Choice Of Law, John A. E. Pottow
Articles
The title of this Article purports to develop a normative framework for cross-border insolvency choice of law. That can be a task of varying scope, so at the outset any pretense of ambition for a wholly new choice of law model should be dispelled. Indeed, at the most generalized level, bankruptcy choice of law theory has already been fully ventilated in the well-rehearsed universalism versus territorialism debates. And it has been settled. The universalists, at least as a normative matter, appear to have won: choice of law, as it is increasingly accepted, should be determined by the debtor's center of …
The Controversy Of Trade In Tobacco And Protection Ofpublic Health, A Study Of Tobacco Control Measures Andimpacts On Trademark Practice: The Stricter, The Better?,
2014
School of Law, Assumption University of Thailand
The Controversy Of Trade In Tobacco And Protection Ofpublic Health, A Study Of Tobacco Control Measures Andimpacts On Trademark Practice: The Stricter, The Better?, Nattapong Suwan-In
Indonesian Journal of International Law
This paper investigates the anticipated trademark problems may result from tobacco control regulations, particularly the warning label requirements implemented in WTO members and the stricter regulation of plain packaging promulgated in Australia (“tobacco measures”). Following the adoption of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”) in May 2003 (enforce by February 2005), member countries tend to seek for possibilities to implement and use stricter approach to achieve their public health policy. As the core concept and main goal of WTO is trade liberalization, regardless of types of goods traded among members, whereas the stricter restriction on trademark use means the …
Water In The 21st Century,
2014
California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo
Water In The 21st Century, Grayson Michael Shor
Social Sciences
The aim of this research project is to provide a comprehensive and global analysis of water use in order to provide the reader with a comprehensive grasp of current and impending issues. The included five (5) chapters discuss water distribution, conservation, purification, law, international development, economic debates, ethical consideration, as well as educated estimations of the effects water related issues may cause in the next one-hundred years.
An Overview Of The October 2006 Supreme Court Term,
2014
Duke University Law School
An Overview Of The October 2006 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chamber Of Commerce V. Whiting: A Law Student's Freewheeling Inquiry,
2014
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Chamber Of Commerce V. Whiting: A Law Student's Freewheeling Inquiry, Laura E. Ploeg
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
The Supreme Court, in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, should have found that federal law pre-empts the Arizona law, and that the Court’s holding will have serious consequences. Whiting departs from the Court’s traditional application of implied pre-emption and general pre-emption principles, which are well established and have been repeatedly applied over many years. The Court used implied pre-emption principles only a few years ago to strike down a state law with a similar relationship to federal law as the laws in Whiting. The Whiting Court should have found the Arizona law pre-empted by federal law because it undermines several …
When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding,
2014
Salmon P. Chase College of Law
When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding, Samantha Koeninger, Richard Bales
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
A federal court, at its discretion, may enjoin a parallel proceeding in a foreign court. Currently, there is a split among the federal courts of appeals as to the circumstances under which an anti-suit injunction should be granted. The Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have adopted the "liberal approach." These courts have found that a court may enjoin a foreign proceeding if the parallel litigation is vexatious and duplicative. In contrast, the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits have adopted the "restrictive approach." These courts require a higher standard, and have found that if the parallel litigation is …
Summary Of Progressive Gulf Ins. Co. V. Faehnrich, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 19,
2014
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of Progressive Gulf Ins. Co. V. Faehnrich, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 19, Jeffrey Pike
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether Nevada public policy precludes giving effect to a choice-of-law provision in an insurance contract made by parties residing outside Nevada that would deny Nevada residents injured in Nevada recovery under NRS 485.3091.
