Addressing Missingness In Serialized Bureaucratic Data: The Case Of Chinese Courts,
2025
University of California, San Diego
Addressing Missingness In Serialized Bureaucratic Data: The Case Of Chinese Courts, Xiaohan Wu, Margaret Roberts, Rachel E. Stern, Benjamin L. Liebman, Amarnath Gupta, Luke Sanford
Faculty Scholarship
Courts around the world are putting their data online, making information about caseloads, parties, and decisions available to the public. Yet, this data is far from complete, and often only reflects a portion of courts’ dockets. We offer and validate a set of tools for leveraging serialized bureaucratic data from courts to estimate the proportion of cases available to the public and the time courts take to make decisions. Using data from more than 3,000 courts in China, our methods allow us to assess patterns of missingness in court data across provinces and cities by type of case and to …
Reviving Exclusion,
2025
Texas A&M University School of Law
Reviving Exclusion, Leo Yu
Texas A&M Law Review
Over a century ago, 15 states enacted alien land laws designed to deprive Japanese immigrants of property rights. It took half a century for these laws to be repealed. Today, alien land laws are experiencing a strong revival in America. Twelve states have enacted new versions targeting the Chinese community, with seventeen states preparing to follow suit. This Paper provides a comprehensive analysis of this revival, tracing its legal roots to early 20th-century Supreme Court cases that upheld the constitutionality of the old alien land laws. These cases, referred to as “zombie cases,” remain on the books despite being irreconcilable …
Prevention Of And Response To International Crimes Against And Affecting Children,
2025
University of Georgia School of Law
Prevention Of And Response To International Crimes Against And Affecting Children, Diane Marie Amann
Scholarly Works
This submission endeavoured to aid the efforts of Parliament’s Standing Group on Atrocity Crimes to promote within the United Kingdom a comprehensive framework regarding international crimes. The submission stressed that prevention is the preferred course: ex ante prevention avoids present harms, inter-generational traumas, and future risks of retaliatory violence, while ex post responses, in the form of criminal proceedings, are likely to be random and selective, not comprehensive. It urged that when harm does occur, responses must aim not only to exact retribution, but also to repair injuries, heal societies, and foster peaceful settlements of disputes. To these ends, the …
Landaeta MejíAs Brothers Et Al. V. Venezuela,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Landaeta MejíAs Brothers Et Al. V. Venezuela, Cristina Tenorio
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miguel Castro Castro Prison V. Peru,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Miguel Castro Castro Prison V. Peru, Celene Afari
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Canales Huapaya Et Al. V. Peru,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Canales Huapaya Et Al. V. Peru, Alondra Gonzalez
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconceptualization Of Corporate Governance For Fintech Firms,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Reconceptualization Of Corporate Governance For Fintech Firms, Isa Alade
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
The scandals involving some major fintech firms/platforms such as FTX, Wirecard, Celsius, TerraLuna and Lending Club raise questions about the efficacy of the current corporate governance architecture for fintech firms. Comparing some of the factors that contributed to these recent scandals in the fintech industry against the weaknesses in the corporate governance arrangements for traditional financial firms in the period leading to the global financial crisis (GFC), this paper argues that the unique characteristics of fintech firms amplify some of the weaknesses in the corporate governance arrangements in the financial services industry that contributed to the GFC. The ubiquitous nature …
Fontevecchia And D’Amico V. Argentina,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Fontevecchia And D’Amico V. Argentina, Douglas Clark
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trabajadores Cesados De Petroperu V. Peru,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Trabajadores Cesados De Petroperu V. Peru, Douglas Clark
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Uzcátegui Et Al. V. Venezuela,
2025
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Uzcátegui Et Al. V. Venezuela, Gursimran Bhullar
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
Puerto Rico's Coast: Preservation Through Positive Obligations On Property Owners And The State In The Context Of Climate Change,
2025
University of Barcelona
Puerto Rico's Coast: Preservation Through Positive Obligations On Property Owners And The State In The Context Of Climate Change, Jaime Villeta-Garcia
Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy
The rise in sea level, the obvious rampant coastal erosion and the uncertain future due to climate change urge the need to rethink the coast, through property and administrative law. The security of life, property and the fair and orderly use of the ultra-valuable resources that is the coast depend on a new concept for properties in the coastal zone and its effective execution by a conscious and responsible State. Centered on the community of Ocean Park in San Juan, Puerto Rico, it’s no longer a question of whether coastal property rights can contribute to safeguarding the coast, but rather …
Introduction,
2025
Georgia State University College of Law
Introduction, Karen Johnston
Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy
This article provides an introduction to the Journal of Comparative Urban Law & Policy, the Study Space Program offered by Georgia State University College of Law, and the articles resulting from the Study Space Rio de Janeiro Program held in June 2024.
The Legal Acrobatics Of Dealing With International Arbitral Awards Rendered In The United States,
2025
University of Miami School of Law
The Legal Acrobatics Of Dealing With International Arbitral Awards Rendered In The United States, Damon R. Duchenne
University of Miami Law Review
International arbitration has become a preferred method for resolving cross-border commercial disputes, largely due to its efficiency and flexibility compared to traditional court litigation. However, the post-award phase, particularly the process of vacating or enforcing arbitral awards, presents significant complexities, especially in the United States. Despite the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “Convention”) guiding the international recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, the U.S. has introduced an anomaly by categorizing certain awards rendered within its jurisdiction as “nondomestic,” subjecting them to the Convention’s framework. This has led to confusion regarding whether such awards are …
Front Matter And Table Of Contents,
2025
University of Miami Law School
Front Matter And Table Of Contents
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Masthead,
2025
University of Miami Law School
Single-Owner Sociedades Within The Corporate Landscape Of Latin America,
2025
WPP
Single-Owner Sociedades Within The Corporate Landscape Of Latin America, Nicolás José Muñiz Arias
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
The concept of a sociedad in Latin America has undergone profound changes throughout this century. Following the example set by the French Code de commerce of 1807, the sociedad was initially viewed as a contractual arrangement between two or more partners who make contributions to a business for purposes of sharing in the resulting profit or loss, wherein a plurality of partners was an intrinsic component. Nonetheless, the notion of a sociedad has evolved to entail the establishment of a separate legal entity, making the plurality of partners requirement increasingly obsolete for its formation and/or operation.
This Article describes the …
Examining The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’S Expanded Powers In The Bolsonaro Era: A Win For Democracy Or A Turn Toward Autocracy?,
2025
University of Miami School of Law
Examining The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’S Expanded Powers In The Bolsonaro Era: A Win For Democracy Or A Turn Toward Autocracy?, Théo G. De Sá-Kaye
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
As Jair Bolsonaro rose to popularity and was elected the 38th president of Brazil in 2018, the global community grew concerned over his very public disdain for the country’s democratic institutions and admiration for Brazil’s 22-year-long military dictatorship. The Bolsonaro administration was marked by repeated attacks on the judiciary, a heavily criticized response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and, eventually, the storming of Congress and the Brazilian Supreme Court by Bolsonaro’s supporters– mirroring the January 6th insurrection in the U.S. However, the most significant aspect of the Bolsonaro presidency may not lie solely in his actions, but in the response from …
Front Matter And Table Of Contents,
2025
University of Miami Law School
Front Matter And Table Of Contents
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Front Matter And Table Of Contents,
2025
University of Miami Law School
Front Matter And Table Of Contents
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Lawyer, No Jail: A Critical Case Study Of Pragmatism And The Flaws Of “Purposeful” Decision Making In Argersinger V. Hamlin,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
No Lawyer, No Jail: A Critical Case Study Of Pragmatism And The Flaws Of “Purposeful” Decision Making In Argersinger V. Hamlin, Alisa Smith, Sarah K. Stice
Seattle University Law Review
By releasing conference notes and internal communications, Supreme Court Justices provide insight into the otherwise private decisionmaking process, shedding light on how case outcomes and legal reasoning are framed and negotiated. The watershed case of Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) extended the constitutional right to counsel to some, but not all, misdemeanor defendants. The case was argued twice, and the Court relied on empirical and authoritative sources to answer complex and practical questions about requiring counsel. This case study employs critical discourse analysis to uncover what influenced the Justices’ decisions and how they framed, shaped, and constructed social realities to foreground …
