Medellin V. Texas: The Roberts Court And New Frontiers For Federalism,
2010
University of Miami Law School
Medellin V. Texas: The Roberts Court And New Frontiers For Federalism, Robert Shawn Hogue
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Villegas Duran V. Arribada Beaumont: The Second Circuit Court's Interpretation Of Custody Rights Undermines The Purpose Of The Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child Abduction,
2010
University of Miami Law School
Villegas Duran V. Arribada Beaumont: The Second Circuit Court's Interpretation Of Custody Rights Undermines The Purpose Of The Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child Abduction, Emily Lynch
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Changing Media, Changing Courts,
2010
Columbia Law School
Changing Media, Changing Courts, Benjamin L. Liebman
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter examines court-media relations in China and argues that such relations are increasingly a two-way street. Media coverage is forcing the courts to act more carefully — and perhaps fairly. But pressure from the courts is also resulting in greater attention to factual reporting and professional standards in the media. This interactive relationship reflects the position of the courts and media as institutions competing for authority within the Chinese political system. It also suggests that there is significant room for ground-up development of both media and the courts.
The first section discusses the growth of media coverage of legal …
Methodological Challenges In Comparative Constitutional Law,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
Methodological Challenges In Comparative Constitutional Law, Vicki C. Jackson
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
My talk today, Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law, has two parts. The first part focuses on the relationship between the purposes of comparison and the methodological challenges of comparison. The second part asks whether there are particular methodological challenges in comparative constitutional law as compared with other comparative legal studies.
Forgive Me, Founding Fathers For I Have Sinned,
2010
Vanderbilt University Law School
Forgive Me, Founding Fathers For I Have Sinned, Carolyn A. Pytynia
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the authority to make the law of the land and, in turn, preempt state law that is incompatible with the federal government's legislative and treaty making efforts. In addition, other provisions of the Constitution authorize the federal government to participate in matters of foreign affairs, and the Supreme Court has found this authority to be exclusive to the federal government in a number of cases. However, the Constitution is silent on the issue of when federal preemption of state law is appropriate when states seek to legislate in matters …
Promoting Commercial Law Reform In Eastern Europe,
2010
Penn State Law
Promoting Commercial Law Reform In Eastern Europe, Samuel Bufford
Faculty Scholarship
This article is my account of what I did in a decade of advising governments and teaching judicial seminars on commercial law matters in Central and Eastern Europe, beginning in 1991. This article contains my individual reflections on more than a dozen visits to developing countries in Central and Eastern Europe to advise governments and to educate their judges, and several visits of judges from some of those countries to the United States. In many ways, my experiences are typical of United States judges who have done the same kind of work in developing countries. In some ways, my experiences …
Freeze-Outs: Transcontinental Analysis And Reform Proposals,
2010
Penn State Law
Freeze-Outs: Transcontinental Analysis And Reform Proposals, Marco Ventoruzzo
Faculty Scholarship
One of the most crucial, but systematically neglected, comparative differences between corporate law systems in Europe and in the United States concerns the regulations governing freeze-out transactions in listed corporations. Freeze-outs can be defined as transactions in which the controlling shareholder exercises a legal right to buy out the shares of the minority, and consequently delists the corporation and brings it private. Beyond this essential definition, the systems diverge profoundly.
This gap exists despite the fact that minority freeze-outs are one of the most debated issues in corporate law, in the public media, in a vast body of scholarly work …
The Merits Of ‘Merits’ Review: A Comparative Look At The Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
The Merits Of ‘Merits’ Review: A Comparative Look At The Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Jeffrey Lubbers, Michael Asimow
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article compares several systems of administrative adjudication. In the U.S., adjudication is typically performed by the same agency that makes and enforces the rules. However, in Australia, almost all administrative adjudication is performed by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), a non-specialized adjudicating agency, and several other specialized tribunals that are independent of the enforcing agency. These tribunals (which evolved out of concerns about separation of powers) have achieved great legitimacy. In the U.K., recent legislation (the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act) merged numerous specialized tribunals into a single first-tier tribunal with much stronger guarantees of independence than previously existed. …
Teaching International Law: Lessons From Clinical Education: Introductory Remarks,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Teaching International Law: Lessons From Clinical Education: Introductory Remarks, Richard J. Wilson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Panama And The Specter Of Climate Change,
2010
University of Miami Law School
Panama And The Specter Of Climate Change, Ruth Gordon
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miranda, Dickerson, And Jewish Legal Theory: The Constitutional Rule In A Comparative Analytical Framework,
2010
Touro Law Center
Miranda, Dickerson, And Jewish Legal Theory: The Constitutional Rule In A Comparative Analytical Framework, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
In this Essay, Professor Levine briefly explores Dickerson v. United States, the important 2000 decision in which a divided United States Supreme Court held that the standard established in Miranda v. Arizona continues to govern the admissibility of confessions, notwithstanding a federal statute enacted subsequent to Miranda that provided an alternative standard. Levine addresses broader theoretical implications of the approaches adopted by the majority and dissenting opinions in Dickerson. Drawing a parallel to the interpretation of the Torah in Jewish legal theory, he proposes a comparative framework for analyzing the division between the majority and dissent over the concept and …
Hate Speech And The Language Of Racism In Latin America: A Lens For Reconsidering Global Hate Speech Restrictions And Legislation Models,
2010
Fordham University School of Law
Hate Speech And The Language Of Racism In Latin America: A Lens For Reconsidering Global Hate Speech Restrictions And Legislation Models, Tanya K. Hernandez
Faculty Scholarship
In Latin America, like many countries in Europe, hate speech is prohibited. Yet Latin America is rarely included in the transnational discussion regarding the regulation of hate speech. Instead, the discourse focuses on a comparison of the advisability of Europe's hate speech regulations and free speech acceptance of hate speech in the United States. As a result, the ability to fundamentally examine the connections between hate speech and inequality, in addition to the most effective legal mechanisms for addressing it, is undermined. It is especially critical to broaden the hate speech debate now that we are seeing an apparent rise …
Feminism As Liberalism: A Tribute To The Work Of Martha Nussbaum Symposium: Honoring The Contributions Of Professor Martha Nussbaum To The Scholarship And Practice Of Gender And Sexuality Law: Feminism And Liberalism,
2010
Fordham University School of Law
Feminism As Liberalism: A Tribute To The Work Of Martha Nussbaum Symposium: Honoring The Contributions Of Professor Martha Nussbaum To The Scholarship And Practice Of Gender And Sexuality Law: Feminism And Liberalism, Tracy E. Higgins
Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, I revisit and expand an argument I have made with respect to the limited usefulness of liberalism in defining an agenda for guaranteeing women's rights and improving women's conditions. After laying out this case, I discuss Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach to fundamental rights and human development and acknowledge that her approach addresses to a significant degree many of the objections I and other feminist scholars have raised. I then turn to fieldwork that I have done in South Africa on the issue of custom and women's choices with regard to marriage and divorce. Applying Professor Nussbaum's capabilities …
Promoting Public Health Through Clinical Legal Education: Initiatives In South Africa, Thailand, And Ukraine,
2010
University of Miami School of Law
Promoting Public Health Through Clinical Legal Education: Initiatives In South Africa, Thailand, And Ukraine, Tamar Ezer
Articles
No abstract provided.
Three Transnational Discourses Of Labor Law In Domestic Reforms,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
Three Transnational Discourses Of Labor Law In Domestic Reforms, Alvaro Santos
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Current labor law debates, in the United States and elsewhere, reflect entrenched discursive positions that make potential reform seem impossible. This Article identifies and examines the three most influential positions, which it names the “social,” “the neoliberal,” and the “rights-based” approach. It shows that these discursive positions are truly transnational in character. In contrast with conventional wisdom, which accepts the incompatibility of these positions, this Article creates a conceptual framework that productively combines elements from each to enrich the debates over labor law reform and to foster institutional imagination. Applying this framework, the Article examines the collective bargaining systems of …
Betting On Dog Racing. The Next Legalised Gambling Opportunity In South Africa? A Cautionary Note From The Regulation Of Greyhound Racing In Great Britain,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Betting On Dog Racing. The Next Legalised Gambling Opportunity In South Africa? A Cautionary Note From The Regulation Of Greyhound Racing In Great Britain, Marita Carnelley
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
This article commences with a brief overview of the history of dog racing in South Africa. It provides a synopsis of South Africa’s current legal position on dog racing and the betting thereon. The main question this article addresses is whether there is any policy reason why dog racing and wagering should not be legalised and regulated. Furthermore, some comments are included discussing how such regulation should fit into the broader existing gambling regulatory framework should the legislature make the decision to legalise dog racing and wagering.
The article concludes with a discussion of the greyhound racing industry in Britain …
Rewarding Trespass & Other Enigmas: The Strange World Of Self-Exclusion & Casino Liability,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Rewarding Trespass & Other Enigmas: The Strange World Of Self-Exclusion & Casino Liability, Emir Aly Crowne-Mohammed, Meredith A. Harper
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
In this paper, the authors address many of the tortious and contractual issues associated with the liability of casinos to problem gamblers. The issues in tort are analyzed through the traditional elements of the action – duty of care, standard of care, proximity, and recognizable loss. Under contract law, the authors examine the problems associated with consideration and mental capacity when problem gamblers sign a contractual undertaking to be excluded from casinos and other gaming venues.
Many of the references cited in this work relate to the Province of Ontario because an earlier article (and report) on the issue of …
Luck Of The Irish: Will The Casinos Tranform From Gaelic Grey To Gaelic Green $$,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Luck Of The Irish: Will The Casinos Tranform From Gaelic Grey To Gaelic Green $$, William N. Thompson
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
As the first decade of the twenty-first century evolved, Ireland was one of only two countries in the European Union that did not have legal, regulated casinos. The Irish Gaming and Lotteries Act of 1956 does not prohibit games with equal chances. Moreover, games can be conducted lawfully, according to the Act, if promoters assess minor seat charges to players, and “the promoter derives no personal profit from the promotion of the game.” Additionally, Part III of the 1956 law indicates that amusement centers can have slot machines that award small prizes. The Act also includes provisions for private lotteries, …
Explanation Interpretation In Functionalist Comparative Law — A Response To Julie De Coninck,
2010
Duke Law School
Explanation Interpretation In Functionalist Comparative Law — A Response To Julie De Coninck, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
Response to Julie de Coninck, The Functional Method of Comparative Law: Quo Vadis?, 74 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 318–350 (2010) in which De Coninck criticizes existing functionalist comparative law for what she perceives as lack of interest in empirical foundations.
The Rule Of Law Unplugged,
2010
Duke Law School
The Rule Of Law Unplugged, Daniel B. Rodriguez, Mathew D. Mccubbins, Barry R. Weingast
Faculty Scholarship
The "Rule of Law" is a venerable concept, but, on closer inspection, it is a complex admixture of positive assumptions, inchoate political and legal theory, and occasionally wishful thinking. Although enormous investments have been made in rule of law reformism throughout the world, advocates of transplanting American-style legal and political institutions to developed and developing countries are often unclear about what they are transplanting and why they are doing so. The concept of rule of law has become unplugged from theories of law. Scholars clearly have more work to do in understanding the rule of law and designing institutions to …
