Why We Need Community Control Of The Police,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Why We Need Community Control Of The Police, Larry Redmond
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Black People Against Police Torture: The Importance Of Building A People-Centered Human Rights Movement,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Black People Against Police Torture: The Importance Of Building A People-Centered Human Rights Movement, Vickie Casanova Willis, Standish E. Willis
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Table Of Contents, Public Interest Law Reporter
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of The Closed Primary,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
In Defense Of The Closed Primary, Bethany Dixon
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Cyberbullying And The Victims Of Modern Technology,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Cyberbullying And The Victims Of Modern Technology, Wafeek Elafifi
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Voter Identification Laws And The 2016 Election,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Voter Identification Laws And The 2016 Election, Conor Grealish
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Pursuit Of Equitable Access To Reproductive Healthcare In The United States,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Pursuit Of Equitable Access To Reproductive Healthcare In The United States, Alexandra Lehr
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Continuing Barriers To Equal Educational Opportunities For Students With Disabilities,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Continuing Barriers To Equal Educational Opportunities For Students With Disabilities, Joanna Pawlowska
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Are We Contradicting Ourselves?: How The Stanford Rape Case Illustrates The Conflict Between Mandatory Sentencing And Judicial Discretion,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Are We Contradicting Ourselves?: How The Stanford Rape Case Illustrates The Conflict Between Mandatory Sentencing And Judicial Discretion, Kristine Ruhl
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Well-Intended Federal Drug Policies May Leave Minorities Behind,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Well-Intended Federal Drug Policies May Leave Minorities Behind, William Ryan
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Threat Of Predatory Lending,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Threat Of Predatory Lending, Marko Stojkovic
Public Interest Law Reporter
This Article is part one of a two-part series exploring the dangers of predatory lending and how Dodd-Frank and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have solved predatory lending and ended the possibility of another subprime debacle. In this part, what will be shown is that due to the U.S. government's deregulation and the greed of banks and predatory lenders in the housing market, predatory lending wreaked havoc on minority, low-income, and immigrant communities, and was the main cause of the 2008 economic collapse.
The Anti-Discrimination Paradox: How Federal Civil Rights Laws Afford Broader Protection From Discrimination Than The Constitutional Provisions That Authorize Them,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Anti-Discrimination Paradox: How Federal Civil Rights Laws Afford Broader Protection From Discrimination Than The Constitutional Provisions That Authorize Them, Henry Rose
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Everett Et Al V. Pitt County School (Everett I And Ii) And The Ominous Future Of Federal Court Desegregation Orders,
2016
FAMU College of Law
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Everett Et Al V. Pitt County School (Everett I And Ii) And The Ominous Future Of Federal Court Desegregation Orders, Mark Dorosin
Journal Publications
During the brief zenith of school desegregation litigation in the late 1960s and early 1970s, hundreds of school districts across the nation, and particularly across the South, were found liable for intentional racial discrimination and became subject to federal court supervision of approved plans to achieve integration. The period of aggressive enforcement was short-lived however, and by the mid-1970s, and accelerating through the 1980s and 1990s, an increasingly conservative Supreme Court and presidential administrations first slowed the scope and intensity of school integration, and then actively pushed to end judicial enforcement and oversight of existing desegregation cases. This was true …
Beyond The Basketball Court: How Brittney Griner's In My Skin Illustrates Title Ix's Failure To Protect Lgbt Athletes At Religious Institutions,
2016
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Beyond The Basketball Court: How Brittney Griner's In My Skin Illustrates Title Ix's Failure To Protect Lgbt Athletes At Religious Institutions, Leslie C. Griffin
Scholarly Works
Symposium: Playing with Pride: LGBT Inclusion in Sports.
Unlike schoolteachers, janitors, coaches, food-service directors, organists, and other workers, professional athletes usually command center stage in society. Their successes and failures loom larger than life. Sometimes their prominent lives highlight themes hidden from public discussion or neglected by the majority. Professional basketball player Brittney Griner's autobiography does just that, by illuminating how "religious freedom" can undermine equality, especially LGBT equality.
The Lgbt Piece Of The Underenforcement-Overenforcement Puzzle,
2016
University of Colorado Law School
The Lgbt Piece Of The Underenforcement-Overenforcement Puzzle, Aya Gruber
Publications
No abstract provided.
Gay Marriage And The Problem Of Property,
2016
Texas A&M University School of Law
Gay Marriage And The Problem Of Property, Andrea Beauchamp Carroll, Christopher K. Odinet
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s gay marriage decision in Obergefell has been hailed in almost all corners as a milestone in American jurisprudence. From topics as varied as adoption and taxes, a myriad of rights have now descended upon gay couples as a result of the Court’s ruling. In this Essay we explore the little discussed downsides of the decision when it comes to the property rights and debts of the spouses. This is particularly important when considering the rights of third parties and their settled expectations in the context of retroactivity, as well the ways in which the Court’s decision may …
Rationed Justice,
2016
Florida A & M University College of Law
Rationed Justice, Jennifer M. Smith
Journal Publications
In the United States, "equal justice under law" is at the very forefront of our American justice system. "Equal justice" is meant to guarantee equal access to the justice system. "Equal access to the judicial process is the sin qua non of a just society." Many Americans, however, do not have any access to the justice system, never mind that of equal access. "Equal justice" has not reached the nation's indigent, or even many of our moderate-income citizens.
Just A Miner Threat? The Fourth Circuit Refuses To Review Temporary Reinstatement Orders Through The Collateral Order Doctrine,
2016
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Just A Miner Threat? The Fourth Circuit Refuses To Review Temporary Reinstatement Orders Through The Collateral Order Doctrine, Lindsay N. Kistler
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protest Is Different,
2016
Vermont Law School
Protest Is Different, Jessica L. West
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Color Of Pain: Blacks And The U.S. Health Care System--Can The Affordable Care Act Help To Heal A History Of Injustice?, Part Ii,
2016
Florida A & M University College of Law
The Color Of Pain: Blacks And The U.S. Health Care System--Can The Affordable Care Act Help To Heal A History Of Injustice?, Part Ii, Jennifer M. Smith
Journal Publications
The state of Americans' health care has been troubling, especially before health care reform.The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is often touted as universal health care, and the initial intention was for the U.S. to have universal health care. However, with all of the compromises involved in its passage, the ACA resulted in comprehensive health insurance reform, significantly increasing the accessibility, affordability, and quality of health care for most, but not all, Americans. The ACA is a substantial step toward universal health care-a near-universal mandate-that may soon provide coverage to all Americans, and even include undocumented immigrants. Americans can find excellent …
