Violating Victims’ Right To Privacy And Personal Autonomy Under Virginia’S New Mandatory Reporting Requirements,
2017
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Violating Victims’ Right To Privacy And Personal Autonomy Under Virginia’S New Mandatory Reporting Requirements, Anne P. Steel
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Fallout From Obergefell: The Dissolution Of Unconventional Adoptions To Pave The Way For Same-Sex Marriage Equality,
2017
West Virginia University College of Law
Fallout From Obergefell: The Dissolution Of Unconventional Adoptions To Pave The Way For Same-Sex Marriage Equality, Jodi B. Mileto
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Silent Struggle: Constitutional Violations Against The Hearing Impaired In New York State Prisons,
2017
University at Buffalo School of Law
A Silent Struggle: Constitutional Violations Against The Hearing Impaired In New York State Prisons, Farina Barth
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Genealogy Of The Concept Of "Hate Crime": The Cultural Implications Of Legal Innovation And Social Change,
2017
CUNY Graduate Center
Genealogy Of The Concept Of "Hate Crime": The Cultural Implications Of Legal Innovation And Social Change, Roslyn Myers
Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects
The term "hate crime" is new to legislative and public discourse, as well as legal and social science scholarship. A decade after the concept of a "hate crime" was introduced in Congress, the 2009 Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA), to punish criminal actors who target victims because of their characteristics (race, color ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, gender, gender identity, or disability). Using relevant archival sources, this project uses genealogical qualitative methods to examine the interplay of cultural elements manifested in this provocative term, which reflect dominance and subjugation among social groups (In- and Out-Groups) …
Section 1: Moot Court: Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.,
2017
William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court: Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
On Nyc’S Paratransit, Fighting For Safety, Respect, And Human Dignity,
2017
New York Law School
On Nyc’S Paratransit, Fighting For Safety, Respect, And Human Dignity, Britney Wilson
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Trending @ Rwu Law: Dean Yelnosky's Post: Chelsea Manning, Professor David Coombs, And The "Wikileaks Trial" 08-28-2017,
2017
Roger Williams University
Trending @ Rwu Law: Dean Yelnosky's Post: Chelsea Manning, Professor David Coombs, And The "Wikileaks Trial" 08-28-2017, Edward Fitzpatrick, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Golocalprov: Vargas '20 On Trump And The Future Of The Ri Gop 08-17-2017,
2017
Roger Williams University
Newsroom: Golocalprov: Vargas '20 On Trump And The Future Of The Ri Gop 08-17-2017, Golocalprov Political Team, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: The Violence In Charlottesville 08-14-2017,
2017
Roger Williams University School of Law
Newsroom: The Violence In Charlottesville 08-14-2017, Michael J. Yelnosky
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Contemplating Masterpiece Cakeshop,
2017
Barry University School of Law
Contemplating Masterpiece Cakeshop, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
Next term, in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Supreme Court will consider whether a baker’s religious objection to same-sex marriage justifies his violation of Colorado’s public accommodation law in refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. At the centerpiece of Masterpiece Cakeshop is a clash between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause or, more precisely, the principles of equality in commercial life as grounded in Colorado’s public accommodation law. In exploring the purpose inherent in regulating private conduct through public accommodation laws, this Essay suggests that …
Sex, Race, And Motel Guests: Another Look At King V Barclay,
2017
University of London
Sex, Race, And Motel Guests: Another Look At King V Barclay, Sarah E. Hamill
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The 1961 case of King v Barclay is something of a footnote in the history of discrimination against Black Canadians. If it is cited at all, it is usually cited alongside the more famous racism cases, such as Christie v York, as proof of the widespread nature of racism in Canada. In this paper, I re-read the trial decision and examine the original case file to show that the facts of King and the racism in the case are more complex than usually realized. King emerged out of a series of errors from both King and Barclay’s Motel which resulted …
We Know Better: Shed Image Of Racist, Bigoted Community,
2017
University of Kentucky
We Know Better: Shed Image Of Racist, Bigoted Community, Christia Spears Brown
Center for Equality and Social Justice Position Papers
Following Mayor Jim Gray’s announcement about relocating the Confederate statues at Cheapside, Lexington received the attention of national news organizations, and the attention of several racist, xenophobic and anti-Semitic hate groups.
Equality After Brexit: Evaluating British Contributions To Eu Antidiscrimination Law,
2017
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Equality After Brexit: Evaluating British Contributions To Eu Antidiscrimination Law, Julie C. Suk
Articles
The article examines the significant contributions of the United Kingdom to the development of EU antidiscrimination law, particularly through its involvement in key cases and the opinions of British Advocates General. It highlights how Brexit may impact the future evolution of these legal principles within the EU.
Alternative Dispute Resolution For Election Access Issues In A Post-Voting Rights Act Section 5 Landscape,
2017
Penn State Law
Alternative Dispute Resolution For Election Access Issues In A Post-Voting Rights Act Section 5 Landscape, Casey Millburg
Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)
No abstract provided.
Bystander Intervention Policies For Campus Sexual Assault Should Be Framed As Civil Rights Programs, And Made Broadly Applicable To All Protected Class Offenses,
2017
New England Law Boston
Bystander Intervention Policies For Campus Sexual Assault Should Be Framed As Civil Rights Programs, And Made Broadly Applicable To All Protected Class Offenses, Wendy J. Murphy
Utah Law Review
The overarching goal of any campus sexual assault prevention program should be to reduce incidence rates. BIPs may accomplish this result more effectively than other programs because they engage students to become personally involved in actual incidents, thus directly influencing the way students think and feel about sexual assault. By framing BIPs as civil rights programs applicable to all protected class categories, schools ensure that students understand why intervening is appropriate, and underscores that everyone has a stake in promoting and protecting the safety and full equality of all women and girls on every campus.
Upstanders, Whistle-Blowers, And Rescuers,
2017
SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
Upstanders, Whistle-Blowers, And Rescuers, Martha Minow
Utah Law Review
Communities of responsibility and the cultures that nurture them take many steps to build. An important step is to honor remarkable individuals with courage and commitment. Raphael Lemkin, Benjamin Ferencz, Luis Moreno Ocampo, Emmanuel Uwurukundo, Samantha Power, filmmaker Edet Belzberg, and Victor Koningsberger deserve recognition and honor. At the same time, we need to emphasize that an upstander does not need extraordinary qualities. Ordinary people can and do stand up in small and big ways against oppression and injustice. Education can help. Speeches can help. When we honor heroes, we should not simply recognize individual courage. Doing so can help …
Just Discrimination: Arkansas Parochial Schools And The Defense Of Segregation,
2017
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Just Discrimination: Arkansas Parochial Schools And The Defense Of Segregation, Misty Landers
Graduate Theses and Dissertations
This thesis examines the continued segregation of parochial schools in the Little Rock Catholic Diocese after the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The thesis compares the failure of the parochial schools in Little Rock to integrate to the success of integration in Arkansas’s southern neighbors, St. Louis and New Orleans. In those cities, integration occurred after the appointment of new head prelates who threatened excommunication when confronted with segregationist protests and threats of violence. Bishop Albert Fletcher, the head of the Little Rock Diocese, has been perceived as supportive of integration efforts and aligned with his …
Gonzalez V. Douglas Trial Transcript Of Proceedings, Day 3,
2017
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
Gonzalez V. Douglas Trial Transcript Of Proceedings, Day 3, Steven A. Reiss, Luna N. Barrington, David Fitzmaurice, Richard M. Martinez, Robert Chang, James W. Quinn
Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality
Gonzalez v. Douglas
A Diverse Student Body Without Student Bodies?: Online Classrooms And Affirmative Action,
2017
Pepperdine University
A Diverse Student Body Without Student Bodies?: Online Classrooms And Affirmative Action, Ryan H. Nelson
Pepperdine Law Review
America’s public universities engage students in myriad classroom environments that range from traditional, entirely-in-person classroom environments to entirely-online, virtual classrooms, with every shade of grey in between. These varied learning environments pose a fascinating question with respect to the ways such universities use affirmative action in admissions. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court held that “student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions.” Indeed, student body diversity remains one of the few “compelling interests” that the Court has held satisfies the constitutional imperative that the “government may …
Gonzalez V. Douglas Trial Transcript Of Proceedings, Day 10,
2017
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
Gonzalez V. Douglas Trial Transcript Of Proceedings, Day 10, Steven A. Reiss, Luna N. Barrington, David Fitzmaurice, Richard M. Martinez, Robert Chang, James W. Quinn
Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality
Gonzalez v. Douglas
