Disenfranchisement Of People With Felony Records And The Racial Discrimination Behind It,
2020
Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Disenfranchisement Of People With Felony Records And The Racial Discrimination Behind It, Giovanni Padilla
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel For Asylum Applicants,
2020
Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Right To Counsel For Asylum Applicants, Romina Nemaci
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
1986 Mass Legalization: How The Irca Can Guide A Modern-Day Amnesty Act,
2020
Loyola University Chicago School of Law
1986 Mass Legalization: How The Irca Can Guide A Modern-Day Amnesty Act, Louisa Carhart
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Disgorging Harvey Weinstein's Salary,
2020
California Western School of Law
Disgorging Harvey Weinstein's Salary, Jessica K. Fink
Faculty Scholarship
Harvey Weinstein dramatically altered the way that people view sexual harassment in the workplace. While workplace sexual harassment is far from a new phenomenon – with many perpetrators of such harassment (including Weinstein himself) having gotten away with this misbehavior for decades – the exposure of Weinstein’s misdeeds opened the floodgates, leading countless women from a variety of work environments to share their own experiences with sexual harassment at work. As the #MeToo movement has continued to occupy the headlines, workplace harassment has begun to seem as ubiquitous as it is distressing.
This intensified spotlight on sexual harassment has exposed …
North Carolina's H.B.2: A Case Study In Lgbtq Rights, Preemption, And The (Un)Democratic Process,
2020
FAMU College of Law
North Carolina's H.B.2: A Case Study In Lgbtq Rights, Preemption, And The (Un)Democratic Process, Mark Dorosin
Journal Publications
In 2014, community advocates in Charlotte, North Carolina, began organizing to press the city to amend its antidiscrimination ordinance to add several new protected classes, including sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. After a contentious hearing where opponents argued that the change-which would allow transgender people to use public restrooms according to their gender identity-would subject women and children to "sexual predators," the city council voted down the amendment. Undaunted, advocates worked over the next several months to elect new council members and a mayor who supported LGBTQ rights. The amendments to the civil rights ordinance were then brought …
Doctrine Of Dignity: Making A Case For The Right To Die With Dignity In Florida Post-Obergefell,
2020
Florida A&M University College of Law
Doctrine Of Dignity: Making A Case For The Right To Die With Dignity In Florida Post-Obergefell
Florida A & M University Law Review
The discussions about the right to privacy have evolved, and the national landscape on physician-assisted suicide has changed since Krischer. Surely, it is time Floridian citizens are given the opportunity to decide whether the right to privacy guaranteed by the Florida constitution includes the right to die with dignity. Numerous states across the nation have adopted legislative provisions which afford those within that state’s borders the ability to die with dignity through physician-assisted suicide. In addition, the seemingly unrelated decision of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges has reopened the discussion of Glucksberg and its holding. In …
Ban Child Marriages: Florida Is Not Acting In The Best Interest Of The Child,
2020
Florida A&M University College of Law
Ban Child Marriages: Florida Is Not Acting In The Best Interest Of The Child
Florida A & M University Law Review
This Note argues that Florida must follow Delaware and New Jersey and ban all minor marriages, without exception. Although the right to marry is a fundamental right, the states have the power to set the age requirements to obtain a marriage license. Permitting any minor to marry, even with specific limitations, is harmful to a child. Thus, Florida must ban all marriages of any person under the age of eighteen. Florida’s current marriage statute sets the minimum age to marry at seventeen, once specific exceptions are met. The statute is an improvement from Florida’s previous marriage statute, which is now …
Damn It! A Conversation On Being Black, Female, And Marginalized During The Covid-19 Pandemic: Is The World Listening? A Conversation Between Black Female Law Professors,
2020
FAMU College of Law
Damn It! A Conversation On Being Black, Female, And Marginalized During The Covid-19 Pandemic: Is The World Listening? A Conversation Between Black Female Law Professors, Patricia A. Broussard
Journal Publications
We are African American women with a combined forty-four years in academia. We are professors of law and have seen firsthand how COVID-19 has ravaged African Americans across this country. As we conversed with one another in the Spring of 2020 about what we were witnessing, we began to look through the spectrum of the law and discrimination, and how this novel Coronavirus is laying bare the inequities and inequalities that have been evident for hundreds of years in the Black community. We felt compelled to put pen to paper and document our conversations in an attempt to give a …
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Procedural Law, The Supreme Court, And The Erosion Of Private Rights Enforcement, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Foreword, National Injunctions: What Does The Future Hold?, Suzette Malveaux
Publications
This Foreword is to the 27th Annual Ira C. Rothgerber Jr. Conference, National Injunctions: What Does the Future Hold?, which was hosted by The Byron R. White Center for the Study of American Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado Law School, on Apr. 5, 2019.
Citizenship Denied: Implications Of The Naturalization Backlog For Noncitizens In The Military,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Citizenship Denied: Implications Of The Naturalization Backlog For Noncitizens In The Military, Ming H. Chen
Publications
The immigration system is in crisis. Long lines of asylum seekers at the border and immigrants in the interior spend years waiting for their day in immigration court. This is true in the agencies that process applications for immigration benefits from legal immigrants as well. Since 2016, delays in naturalization have increased to historic proportions. The problem is even worse for military naturalizations, where delays are accompanied by denials and overall declines in military naturalizations. It is the latest front in the battle on legal migration and citizenship.
These impediments to citizenship demonstrate an extreme form of policies collectively dubbed …
Medicalization And The New Civil Rights,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Medicalization And The New Civil Rights, Craig Konnoth
Publications
In the last several decades, individuals have advanced civil rights claims that rely on the language of medicine. This Article is the first to define and defend these “medical civil rights” as a unified phenomenon.
Individuals have increasingly used the language of medicine to seek rights and benefits, often for conditions that would not have been cognizable even a few years ago. For example, litigants have claimed that discrimination against transgender individuals constitutes illegal disability discrimination. Others have argued that their fatigue constitutes chronic fatigue syndrome (which was, until recently, a novel and contested diagnosis) to obtain Social Security disability …
Discrimination, The Speech That Enables It, And The First Amendment,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
Discrimination, The Speech That Enables It, And The First Amendment, Helen Norton
Publications
Imagine that you’re interviewing for your dream job, only to be asked by the hiring committee whether you’re pregnant. Or HIV positive. Or Muslim. Does the First Amendment protect your interviewers’ inquiries from government regulation? This Article explores that question.
Antidiscrimination laws forbid employers, housing providers, insurers, lenders, and other gatekeepers from relying on certain characteristics in their decision-making. Many of these laws also regulate those actors’ speech by prohibiting them from inquiring about applicants’ protected class characteristics; these provisions seek to stop illegal discrimination before it occurs by preventing gatekeepers from eliciting information that would enable them to discriminate. …
While The Water Is Stirring: Sojourner Truth As Proto-Agonist In The Fight For (Black) Women’S Rights,
2020
University of Colorado Law School
While The Water Is Stirring: Sojourner Truth As Proto-Agonist In The Fight For (Black) Women’S Rights, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Publications
This Essay argues for a greater understanding of Sojourner Truth’s little-discussed role as a proto-agonist (a marginalized, long-suffering forerunner as opposed to a protagonist, a highly celebrated central character) in the process that led up to the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. Though the Nineteenth Amendment failed to deliver on its promise of suffrage for black women immediately after its enactment, black women were stalwarts in the fight for the Amendment and for women’s rights more broadly, well before the ratification of the Amendment and for many years after its passage. Women’s rights in general, and black women’s rights in …
Title Vii’S Deficiencies Affect #Metoo: A Look At Three Ways Title Vii Continues To Fail America’S Workforce,
2020
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Title Vii’S Deficiencies Affect #Metoo: A Look At Three Ways Title Vii Continues To Fail America’S Workforce, Taylor J. Freeman Peshehonoff
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Principle-Practice Gap: The Disconnect Between Diversity Beliefs And Actions In The Workplace,
2020
Georgetown University Law Center
The New Principle-Practice Gap: The Disconnect Between Diversity Beliefs And Actions In The Workplace, Jamillah Bowman Williams, Jonathan Cox
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Following increased calls for racial justice, many organizations have pledged to play their part in dismantling systemic racism. One common step leaders take is to invest in diversity and inclusion programs. Yet, despite organizations’ bold claims to value diversity and the investment of billions of dollars on related efforts, workplace discrimination continues to be a major factor in the lives of people of color. Additionally, existing research highlights a principle-policy gap, wherein people--particularly White Americans--espouse support for the principles of diversity, yet their support wanes for policies that address inequalities. In this survey study, we explore attitudes about organizational diversity …
Discarded Loyalty: The Deportation Of Immigrant Veterans,
2020
William & Mary
Discarded Loyalty: The Deportation Of Immigrant Veterans, Deenesh Sohoni, Yosselin Turcios
Lewis & Clark Law Review
The United States has a long history of using the foreign born to meet its mil- itary demands. For many immigrants, military service served both as a way to demonstrate loyalty to their adopted country, and to facilitate their naturali- zation process. However, over the past several decades an increasing number of foreign-born veterans have found themselves being deported, despite their honorable service, for having committed criminal acts. In many cases, these veterans were never given a chance to contest their deportations due to their status as non-citizens. This Article compares the deportation of non-citizen veterans today, with the failure …
Why And When Discrimination Is Discordant With Charitable Status: The Problem With “Public Policy”, The Possibility Of A Better Solution,
2020
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Why And When Discrimination Is Discordant With Charitable Status: The Problem With “Public Policy”, The Possibility Of A Better Solution, Adam Parachin
Articles & Book Chapters
When courts have considered when and why discrimination renders an institution ineligible for charitable status, they have resorted to the doctrine of public policy to explain the non-charitableness of discrimination. Public policy is not, though, up to the task. It is undisciplined, inspires courts to consider irrelevant factors and offers no principled explanation as to when and why discrimination should and should not vitiate charitable status. A better approach would be to address this issue using the traditional analytical tools of charity law — charitable purposes, charitable activities and public benefit. But this is a deceptively difficult task, which perhaps …
Trauma-Centered Social Justice,
2020
St. John's University School of Law
Trauma-Centered Social Justice, Noa Ben-Asher
Faculty Publications
This Article identifies a new and growing phenomenon in the American legal system. Many leading agendas for gender, racial, and climate justice are centered on emotional trauma as the primary injury of contemporary social injustices. By focusing on three social justice movements–#BlackLivesMatter; #MeToo, and Climate Justice–the Article offers the first comprehensive diagnosis and assessment of how emotional trauma has become an engine for legal and policy social justice reforms. From a nineteenth century psychoanalytic theory about repressed childhood sexual memories that manifest in female hysteria, through extensive medicalization and classification in the twentieth century, emotional trauma has evolved and expanded …
The Right Family,
2020
St. John's University School of Law
The Right Family, Noa Ben-Asher, Margot J. Pollans
Faculty Publications
The family plays a starring role in American law. Families, the law tells us, are special. They merit many state and federal benefits, including tax deductions, testimonial privileges, untaxed inheritance, and parental presumptions. Over the course of the twentieth century, the Supreme Court expanded individual rights stemming from familial relationships. In this Article, we argue that the concept of family in American law matters just as much when it is ignored as when it is featured. We contrast policies in which the family is the key unit of analysis with others in which it is not. Looking at four seemingly …
