Civil Procedure Commons^™

But What If The Court Reporter Is Lying? The Right To Confront Hidden Declarants Found In Transcripts Of Former Testimony, Peter Nicolas

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

U.S. Exclusionary Rule: A Comparative Analysis, Robert Bloom

Robert M. Bloom

No abstract provided.

The Curse Of Bigness And The Optimal Size Of Class Actions, Alexandra Lahav

Alexandra D. Lahav

How big is too big when it comes to class actions? This short essay, written for the Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc roundtable on Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. examines that question. Size in itself should not be a barrier to certification, but courts may rightly be concerned with variation within the class. Variation causes manageability problems, but in some cases (like Dukes) variation can be managed within the class context by judicious use of statistical methods. I also demonstrate why the related argument that this class ought not be certified because it is too big and Wal-Mart will be …

History Of American Legal Education, With An Emphasis On Clinical Education, Robert Bloom

Robert M. Bloom

No abstract provided.

Nulidad Procesal: ¿Es Realmente Una Sanción?, Renzo Cavani

Renzo Cavani

In civil law context, it is common to identify the nullity in civil procedure as a sanction or a penalty because of the influence of the legislative technique. This essay, however, pretends to show that nullity is, actually, a consequence from a violation of a legal rule and not a sanction.

É comum identificar a nulidade no processo civil como uma sanção ou uma pena, por causa da influência da técnica legislativa. Este ensaio, porém, pretende demonstrar que a nulidade é, na verdade, uma consequência da violação de uma regra e não uma sanção.

Es común identificar la nulidad en …

Civil Procedure, Stephen A. Weiner

Cal Law Trends and Developments

During the 1966-1967 period under scrutiny, California appellate courts rendered a multitude of decisions in the field of civil procedure, the most significant of which are discussed below by topics.

The 2009 Amendment To Federal Rule 15(A)(1) - A Study In Ambiguity, Susan E. Hauser

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Manifest Disregard And The Imperfect Procedural Justice Of Arbitration, Thomas V. Burch

Scholarly Works

Arbitration is an efficient dispute-resolution system that respects parties’ right to an accurate award. But because arbitration is designed to be efficient, accuracy is not guaranteed. This presents a challenge when courts are asked to confirm or vacate arbitrators’ decisions. Judges dislike approving inaccurate awards, especially in cases where parties have unequal bargaining power. Yet, judges also recognize arbitration’s limited-review principle. So they are forced to balance their desire for accuracy against arbitration’s efficiency policy. Efficiency typically wins at the expense of accurate outcomes.

This Article contends that courts place too much emphasis on the efficiency policy in mandatory arbitration. …

Iqbal, Twombly, And The Lessons Of The Celotex Trilogy, Hillel Y. Levin

Scholarly Works

This Essay compares the Twombly/Iqbal line of cases to the Celotex trilogy and suggests that developments since the latter offer lessons for the former. Some of the comparisons are obvious: decreased access and increased judicial discretion. However, one important similarity has not been well understood: that the driving force in both contexts has been the lower courts rather than the Supreme Court. Further, while we can expect additional access barriers to be erected in the future, our focus should be on lower courts, rather than other institutional players, as the likely source of those barriers.

Introduction: Dukes V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Scholarly Works

This short introduction to Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. aims to explain the case and to set the table for what promises to be thought-provoking roundtable discussion hosted by Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc. Accordingly, what follows is a concise overview of the legal background and current debate over the two procedural issues that the Ninth Circuit explored in detail – how to evaluate Rule 23(a)(2)’s commonality when common questions heavily implicate the case’s merits, and when a Rule 23(b)(2) class can include relief apart from injunctive or declaratory relief without endangering due process.

The Odyssey Of The United States Road To Torture-How Did The United States Become A Waterboarder?, Robert Bloom

Robert M. Bloom

United States after 9/11 decided to ignore various international laws and engaged in torture. Talk focused on how a democratic nation with high moral values could engage in such activity

¿Mezclando Agua Y Aceite? Consideraciones Críticas Respecto A La Configuración Y Eficacia De Las Cláusulas Abusivas En El Nuevo Código De Consumo, Fort Ninamancco Córdova

Fort Ninamancco Cordova

No abstract provided.

An Offensive Weapon?: An Empirical Analysis Of The 'Sword' Of State Sovereign Immunity In State-Owned Patents, Tejas N. Narechania

Tejas N. Narechania

Filling The Criminal Liability Gap For Private Military Contractors Abroad: U.S. V. Slough And The Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act Of 2010, Missye Brickell

Legislation and Policy Brief

To ensure that all contractors who commit crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan can be prosecuted effectively in the United States, Congress must pass legislation to update Federal criminal law and fill the gaps that may leave certain types of contractors free from any criminal liability. The Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2010 (CEJA) attempts to do just that, and while it may deter some PMCs from participating in the U.S. military and security contracting market, the benefits of having a fully accountable U.S. legal system outweigh the drawbacks for individual contracting companies.

Civil Procedure - Rule 11 Sanctions Revisited: Townsend V. Holman Consulting Corporation, Annette M. Wilson

Golden Gate University Law Review

This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sanctions. It further examines the development of Rule 11 sanctions in light of the liberal pleading standards introduced with the advent of the Federal Rules in 1938. Finally, the article reviews the criticisms and comments leveled at Rule 11, and speculates on its future and its impact on federal court litigation.

Civil Procedure - White V. Mcginnis: The Ninth Circuit Expands Civil Jury Trial Waiver, Herber Carlton Leney Jr.

Golden Gate University Law Review

In White v. McGinnis, the Ninth Circuit held that a civil litigant's knowing participation in a bench trial without objection constituted waiver of a timely jury demand. This case overruled Palmer v. United States in which the Ninth Circuit determined that acquiesence to a bench trial did not constitute waiver of a jury trial demand. This article will examine the Ninth Circuit's rejection of the literal statutory language of civil jury trial waiver under Rules 38(d) and 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Civil Procedure - Townsend V. Holman Consulting Corp.: Rule 11 Sanctions, Ignorance Or Vigorous Litigation Is No Excuse, Donna H. Mullen

Golden Gate University Law Review

In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., held that an attorney may be sanctioned under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a partially frivolous pleading. The court rejected the argument that the pleadings could not be the subject of sanctions because they also included non-frivolous requests for relief. Prior Ninth Circuit decisions had permitted imposition of Rule 11 sanctions only when the pleading as a whole was frivolous. This decision expands attorney liability under Rule 11 and vacates an earlier panel decision of the Ninth …

A Vaguely Jocular Guide To In Limine Motions, Curtis E.A. Karnow

Curtis E.A. Karnow

A short review of problematic in limine (pre trial) motions

Litigating Incest Torts Under Homeowner's Insurance Policies, Christine Cleary

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Comment will address insurers' liability for incest torts under standard homeowner's insurance policies. It primarily will examine potential liability in light of the intentional act and household exclusions which are typically contained in homeowner's policies.

Gender Issues And The Prosser, Wade And Schwartz Torts Casebook, Carl Tobias

Golden Gate University Law Review

The first section of the piece affords a general examination of many aspects of the Prosser casebook that involve issues of gender. This overview should enhance the understanding of readers, especially those persons not accustomed to thinking consciously in terms of gender, while providing a setting for the specific assessment in the second segment of the paper. That section explores how issues implicating gender can arise in the classroom context of learning and teaching from Prosser's materials on affirmative causes of action for intentional torts to persons and privileges to those torts. The final part reflects on the future of …