Book Review. Justin Vaisse, Neoconservatism: The Biography Of A Movement,
2011
Liberty University
Book Review. Justin Vaisse, Neoconservatism: The Biography Of A Movement, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
"Arise Out Of" Or "Related To": Textualism
And Understanding Precedent Through
Interpretatio Objectificata, "Objectified
Interpretation"—A Four Step Process To
Resolve Jurisdiction Questions Utilizing The
Third Circuit Test In O’Connor As A Uniform
Standard,
2011
Washington and Lee University School of Law
"Arise Out Of" Or "Related To": Textualism And Understanding Precedent Through Interpretatio Objectificata, "Objectified Interpretation"—A Four Step Process To Resolve Jurisdiction Questions Utilizing The Third Circuit Test In O’Connor As A Uniform Standard, Victor N. Metallo
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Self-Interest, Public Interest, And The Interests Of The Absent Client: Legal Ethics And Class Action Praxis,
2011
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Self-Interest, Public Interest, And The Interests Of The Absent Client: Legal Ethics And Class Action Praxis, Jasminka Kalajdzic
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Are existing ethical norms adequate to address the realities of class proceedings? In this article, the author explores the premise that current rules of professional conduct are effective when applied to class action praxis. In Part I, she discusses the peculiar features of class proceedings and how they create unique challenges to the ethical conduct of litigation. In Part II, the author confronts a fundamental (and often overlooked) question: Who is the client in a class proceeding to whom ethical duties are owed? Having identified the range of judicial and academic views on the unique dimensions of class actions, she …
Plausibility Pleading Employment Discrimination,
2011
William & Mary Law School
Plausibility Pleading Employment Discrimination, Charles A. Sullivan
William & Mary Law Review
The Supreme Court’s unanimous 2002 decision in Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., which took a very permissive approach to pleading discrimination claims, may or may not remain good law after Ashcroft v. Iqbal. As is well known, Iqbal took a restrictive approach to pleading generally under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and its application to employment discrimination cases could pose serious problems for plaintiffs attempting to get into federal court. In addition, there is certainly a tension between Swierkiewicz and Iqbal. This is in part because the former is a strong reaffirmation of notice pleading as it has traditionally been …
Sequencing The Issues For Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations From Jurisdictional Primacy And Intrasuit Preclusion,
2011
Cornell Law School
Sequencing The Issues For Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations From Jurisdictional Primacy And Intrasuit Preclusion, Kevin M. Clermont
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be very important, with a lot at stake for the court, society, and parties. Generally speaking, although the parties can control which issues they put before a judge, the judge gets to choose the decisional sequence in light of those various interests.
The law sees fit to put few limits on the judge's power to sequence. The few limits are, in fact, quite narrow in application, and even narrower if properly understood. The Steel Co.-Ruhrgas rule generally requires a federal court to decide …
The Preservation Obligation: Regulating And Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation In Federal Court,
2011
William & Mary Law School
The Preservation Obligation: Regulating And Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation In Federal Court, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
The issue of discovery misconduct, specifically as it pertains to the prelitigation duty to preserve and sanctions for spoliation, has garnered much attention in the wake of decisions by two prominent jurists whose voices carry great weight in this area. In Pension Committee of University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities LLC, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin-of the Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC2 e-discovery casespenned a scholarly and thorough opinion setting forth her views regarding the triggering of the duty to preserve potentially relevant information pending litigation and the standards for determining the appropriate sanctions for various breaches …
Are Class Actions Unconstitutional?,
2011
University of Connecticut School of Law
Are Class Actions Unconstitutional?, Alexandra D. Lahav
Michigan Law Review
Are class actions unconstitutional? Many people-defendants and conservative legislators, not to mention scholars at the American Enterprise Institute-would like them to be. For opponents of the class action, Martin Redish's book Wholesale Justice provides some of the most theoretically sophisticated arguments available. The book is a major contribution both to the scholarly literature on class actions and to the larger political debate about this powerful procedural device. The arguments it presents will surely be debated in courtrooms as well as classrooms.
Procedure, Substance, And Erie,
2011
Notre Dame Law School
Procedure, Substance, And Erie, Jay Tidmarsh
Journal Articles
This Article examines the relationship between procedure and substance, and the way in which that relationship affects Erie questions. It first suggests that "procedure" should be understood in terms of process-in other words, in terms of the way that it changes the substance of the law and the value of legal claims. It then argues that the traditional view that the definitions of "procedure" and "substance" change with the context-a pillar on which present Erie analysis is based-is wrong. Finally, it suggests a single process based principle that reconciles all of the Supreme Court's "procedural Erie" cases: that federal courts …
Revising The Analysis Of Personal Jurisdiction To Accommodate Internet-Based Personal Contacts,
2011
University of the District of Columbia School of Law
Revising The Analysis Of Personal Jurisdiction To Accommodate Internet-Based Personal Contacts, Matthew L. Perdoni
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
From online banking, to cyber-shopping, to the growth of social-networking websites, the Internet is a medium for human interaction as much as it is a part of modern commerce and business, and now encompasses nearly every facet of American life. By all indications, use will become more widespread and complex over time. The Internet now facilitates the modern functional equivalent of human interaction, and provides worldwide access to users with the mere click of a button. For these reasons, examining the role of the Internet in the law is critical. Particularly, it is necessary to consider whether and to what …
Summary Of City Of Reno V. Building & Construction Trades Council Of Northern Nevada, 127 Nev. Adv. Op.
No. 10,
2011
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of City Of Reno V. Building & Construction Trades Council Of Northern Nevada, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10, Marissa Pensabene
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from district court order granting judicial review in a prevailing wage action.
Law Day Oral Argument Session 5th District Court Of Appeal, 2011,
2011
Florida A&M University College of Law
Law Day Oral Argument Session 5th District Court Of Appeal, 2011, Honorable Kerry I. Evander, Presiding Judge, Honorable Jay P. Cohen, Honorable Bruce W. Jacobus
Law Day Presentations
As part of the fifth annual Law Day event, a three judge panel from the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal is hearing appellate oral arguments in the FAMU College of Law Ceremonial Moot Courtroom. The first arguments are regarding evidence and jury instruction issues; the second case involves real property, mortgages and liens, as well as jurisdiction issues; the final arguments are regarding juror non-disclosure. A question-and-answer session follows each set of arguments during which the justices and attorneys entertain questions about the appellate process and organization of the court.
Summary Of J.E. Dunn Northwest, Inc. V. Corus Construction Venture, Llc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10,
2011
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of J.E. Dunn Northwest, Inc. V. Corus Construction Venture, Llc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10, Christopher Scott Connell
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment in a mechanic’s lien priority action.
Summary Of Simmons Self-Storage Partners, Llc V. Rib Roof, Inc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 6,
2011
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Summary Of Simmons Self-Storage Partners, Llc V. Rib Roof, Inc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 6, Nevada Law Journal
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from mechanic’s lien action where the district court determined the lienable amounts, but failed to order the sale of the properties to satisfy the amount due under the lien.
Deadly Silence: An Assessment Of Emergency Alert Systems For Lincoln County, Georgia,
2011
Augusta State University
Deadly Silence: An Assessment Of Emergency Alert Systems For Lincoln County, Georgia, Gretchen B. Keneson,
Georgia Journal of Public Policy
Rural counties have a predisposition to sustaining catastrophic losses during natural emergencies. These counties tend to have poorer economic conditions that exacerbate attempts at hazard mitigation. Emergency Alerts Systems (EAS) are the most efficient and effective ways to provide information of impending danger. This study will compare and contrast different EAS to determine which would accommodate the needs of a community. The most successful way for most counties to alert citizens is through the use of a combination of redundant systems. For pastoral Lincoln County, Georgia the optimal systems are an alert siren and auto call capabilities. Both of these …
The Attorney–Client Privilege And Discovery Of Electronically-Stored Information,
2011
Duke Law
The Attorney–Client Privilege And Discovery Of Electronically-Stored Information, Adjoa Linzy
Duke Law & Technology Review
The attorney-client privilege is the most sacred and important privilege in our legal system. Despite being at the center of daily practice, the privilege still remains a mystery for many lawyers. This is primarily because the privilege is not absolute, and there are certain actions or non-actions that may waive it. The application of the privilege is further complicated by electronic discovery, which has both benefits and drawbacks. On one hand, it has made the practice of law more efficient. On the other hand, it has made it easier to inadvertently waive the attorney-client privilege in response to a discovery …
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century,
2011
University of California Hastings College of Law
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
Recent scholarship in comparative civil procedure has identified
“American exceptionalism” as a way to describe practices which set the
United States apart from most of the world, particularly the civil law world.
This Article focuses on two areas of “exceptionalism”: pleading standards
and the role of judges. Specifically, pleading requirements are considerably
less strict in the United States compared to other countries. Additionally,
U.S. judges are less active in conducting litigation than their counterparts
elsewhere, especially judges in the civil law tradition. This Article traces
some modern trends toward convergence between the United States and
the rest of the world. …
The Absence Of Legal Ethics In The Ali's Principles Of Aggregate Litigation: A Missed Opportunity - And More,
2011
Boston Univeristy School of Law
The Absence Of Legal Ethics In The Ali's Principles Of Aggregate Litigation: A Missed Opportunity - And More, Nancy J. Moore
Faculty Scholarship
There is little discussion of legal ethics in the American Law Institute’s recently adopted Principles of Aggregate Litigation, either in the black-letter rules or the comments. The primary exception is that the Principles devote several sections to the so-called aggregate settlement rule (Rule 1.8(g) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct), although the purpose of these sections appears to be a proposed modification of that rule to permit claimants to agree in advance to be bound by majority approval of a particular settlement. The purpose of this essay is not to discuss the controversial aggregate settlement proposal (which the …
Group Consensus, Individual Consent,
2011
University of Georgia School of Law
Group Consensus, Individual Consent, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Despite a rise in the number of personal-injury and product-liability cases consolidated through multi-district litigation, a decline in class-certification motions, and several newsworthy nonclass settlements such as the $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement and estimated $700 million Zyprexa settlements, little ink has been spilled on nonclass aggregation’s unique issues. Sections 3.17 and 3.18 of the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation are a noteworthy exception. This Article uses those principles as a lens for exploring thematic questions about the value of pluralism, group cohesion, governance, procedural justice, and legitimacy in nonclass aggregation.
Sections 3.17 and 3.18 make …
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
The Two-Trillion Dollar Carve-Out: Foreign Manufacturers Of Defective Goods And The Death Of H.R. 4678 In The 111th Congress, Andrew F. Popper
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Whatever happened to H.R. 4678, The Foreign Manufacturers Legal Accountability Act? While at first the bill looked like it would sail through, vocal and well-funded opposition from foreign manufacturers and their U.S. representatives placed its future in doubt – and ultimately killed the bill. Gross sales of foreign manufactured goods in the U.S. exceed two trillion dollars annually. Conservatively, there are tens of millions of defective, dangerous, and in some instances deadly goods produced abroad for sale in U.S. markets (e.g., Chinese dry-wall, toxic levels of lead paint on toys, contaminated pet food, allegedly lurching cars, infant cribs that to …
The Deep Seabed: The Laws Of Nature And Nature’S Manganese Nodules,
2011
Liberty University
The Deep Seabed: The Laws Of Nature And Nature’S Manganese Nodules, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
