Business Organizations Law Commons^™

The Curious Case Of Directors' And Officers' Liability For Supervision And Management: Exploring The Intersection Of Corporate And Tort Law, Martin Petrin

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The 1996 Arbitration And Conciliation Act: A Step Toward Improving Arbitration In India, Harpreet Kaur

UC Law Business Journal

This paper evaluates India's 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act and makes three points. First, it demonstrates that the Act improved the arbitration process since judicial intervention only occurs when necessary to police the process and to resolve and interpret ambiguities about Parliament's intent. Second, in spite of being a substantial improvement, the process can be even more effective in expediting the process with a few revisions. Arbitration in India can further improve if the arbitral tribunal had a more active role in dispute resolution. Finally, revising the act to only allow institutional arbitration is crucial for parties and attorneys to …

Comments: Uncertainty For Practitioners And The Judiciary As Well As The Need For A Minimum Standard Demonstrate That Fiduciary Duties Should Be Incorporated Into Maryland's Llc Act, Michael S. Spencer

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

You Can Come Under The Tarp, But First... The Bank Of America-Merrill Lynch Merger Was A Failure Of Corporate Governance, James K. Donaldson

Law Student Publications

In response to the financial credit crisis in the fall of 2008, Congress, the U.S. Treasury, and the Federal Reserve Board of Governors took unprecedented action to prevent both large and small financial institutions from insolvency. Ultimately, the Troubled Asset Relief Program was created to inject various banks with the cash necessary to prevent the banks' insolvency and the threat that bank failures posed to the nation's economy. In the midst of that crisis, Bank of America agreed to acquire Merrill Lynch. Each institution, in their individual capacity, received TARP funds from the Treasury several weeks after entering into the …

Aplikasi Al-Mudarabah Dan Al-Musyarakah Dalam Produk-Produk Perbankan Islam : Kajian Di Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Jakarta., Sarwedi Hasibuan

Student Works (2010-2019)

Abstrack

Fungsi Majlis Penasihat Syariah Dalam Amalan Perbankan Islam Di Malaysia : Kajian Terhadap Bank Muamalat Malaysia Berhad Dan Rhb Islamic Bank Berhad., Ahmad Faizol Ismail

Student Works (2010-2019)

The Syariah Advisory Council (SAC) is an advisory board established to provide an Islamic views on products offered by the banks. SAC supports these banks by ensuring that products and services provided are complied with the Islamic Law. The SAC has an important functions related to the Islamic mucamalat tenets. These functions include two aspects which are the aspect of Islamic legal setting or fatwa, and aspect of field monitoring on the implementation and application of fatwa that have been enforced. These aspects are rules by special committee, the committee for fatwa and research and the committee of implementation and …

A Standard Clause Analysis Of The Frustration Doctrine And The Material Adverse Change Clause, Andrew A. Schwartz

Publications

In the darkest depths of a corporate merger agreement lies the MAC clause, a term that permits the acquirer to walk away from a transaction if, between signing and closing, the target company experiences a "Material Adverse Change." Multibillion-dollar deals rise or fall based on the anticipated interpretation of a MAC clause, and invocation of the clause in a sensitive transaction could trigger the collapse of the global financial system. In short, the MAC clause is the most important contract term of our time. And yet--due to an almost total lack of case law--no one knows what it means.

In …

Business-Like: The Supreme Court's 2009-2010 Labor And Employment Decisions, Melissa Hart

Publications

The 2009-10 Term at the Supreme Court was a relatively quiet one for labor and employment law. While the Justices were in the news for decisions on corporate political donations and the Second Amendment, the Court’s work-related docket grabbed no headlines. In fact, though, the Court considered 7 work law cases this Term, in areas ranging from standards for arbitration agreements to employee privacy rights in new technology to time limitations for filing Title VII disparate impact claims. This article discusses the Court’s labor and employment cases for the Term. While they may not have made much news, several of …

State Responsibility In Promoting Environmental Corporate Accountability, Lakshman Guruswamy

Publications

No abstract provided.

The Anticipation Misconception, Colin P. Marks

Faculty Works

Many commentators and courts have cited to the Supreme Court decision of Hickman v. Taylor as the genesis of the work product doctrine and the requirement that, to be afforded protection, the material in question must be generated “in anticipation of litigation.” The oft quoted policy justification for the protection afforded is that attorneys should be allowed a “zone of privacy” within which to prepare their case for the client. This justification supports limiting protection only to work generated “in anticipation of litigation,” because, presumably, outside of this context there is no need for the “zone of privacy.” However, a …

Keynote Address: The Conflicted Trustee Dilemma, Steven L. Schwarcz

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Board’S Duty To Monitor, Eric J. Pan

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Carpe Crisis: Capitalizing On The Breakdown Of Capitalism To Consider The Creation Of Social Businesses, Celia R. Tayloe

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Sound Of Silence: The Continuing Legal Debate Over Class Action Rescission Under Tila, Jo Carrillo, Paul Kofoed

UC Law Business Journal

This paper analyzes federal law on the issue of whether consumers of mortgage products can sue as a class to rescind a mortgage loan under the Truth in Lending Act. Embedded in this question are deeper economic issues about the cost and availability of credit in the United States, and about who should bear the risk of faulty mortgage disclosures. The Truth in Lending Act governs these matters as an existing statutory scheme that provides pre-bankruptcy and pre-default remedies to consumers of credit.

A Crumbling Pyramid: How The Evolving Jurisprudence Defining Employee Under The Adea Threatens The Basic Structure Of The Modern Large Law Firm, Jessica Fink

UC Law Business Journal

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as well as other federal anti-discrimination laws, only "employees" as defined by the statute are permitted to sue. In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court and lower courts have provided guidance regarding when partners in large law firms might be deemed "employees" protected by these laws. What has emerged from the courts' decisions in these cases is a test that places significant emphasis on the amount of power and control that a partner has within a firm: Partners deemed to lack a sufficient amount of power and control within their firms may be …

Should I Stay Or Should I Go - Covenants Not To Compete In A Down Economy: A Proposal For Better Advocacy And Better Judicial Opinions, Kate O'Neill

UC Law Business Journal

This article is an effort to think about covenants not to compete from a theoretical and practical standpoint. Employee covenants not to compete generate a lot of legal disputes perhaps, in part, because they often bite when an employment relationship is already on the rocks and then they extend their restraints out past the time of any productive exchange between the parties. Employee covenants not to compete also generate scores of academic articles because there are always new cases to write about and because covenants dwell on a fault line that runs between freedom of contract and substantive control over …

Repeat Player Vs. One-Shotter: Is Victory All That Obvious, Bahaar Hamzehzadeh

UC Law Business Journal

This study tests Marc Galanter's theory in his work entitled Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. In his article, Galanter argues that classes of litigants with the greatest resources and the lowest relative risk in litigation have the highest rates of success in court. Galanter explains his theory by categorizing litigants as either repeat players or oneshotters. Repeat players consist of litigants who generally have the most resources and the lowest relative risk, and one-shotters consist of litigants who generally have the least resources and the greatest relative risk. To test his theory, …

The Governance Of Contemporary Sovereign Wealth Funds, Yvonne C. L. Lee

UC Law Business Journal

Recent contemporary sovereign wealth funds developments, viewed against the historical backdrop of international law and practice, particularly foreign investment law and practice, underscore the inter-action between economics, law and politics. This article first introduces the issues that have emerged as a result of sovereign wealth funds contemporary investments and observes how sovereign wealth funds and recipient countries have reacted to these developments. It proposes a model of sovereign wealth fund governance based on consultation, cooperation and coordination. This model draws on the experience of current deliberative fora such as the G20 summits and the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth …

Every Rose Has Its Thorn: A New Approach To Deaccession, Andrew W. Eklund

UC Law Business Journal

In January 2009, Brandeis University announced that it planned to sell off the entire art collection of the Rose Art Museum. The purpose of this Note is to compare the situation at Brandeis against three previously-suggested methods of dealing with "deaccession," the sale of artwork by museums, and to suggest a fourth, hybrid approach to deaccession. The approach takes elements of the other models, and based on the American Association of Museum's Code of Ethics for Museums, proposes a new standard. Part I gives an overview of the American Association of Museum's Code of Ethics for Museums and a brief …

Lights, Camera, Sanction - Whether A Proposed Anti-Paparazzi Ordinance Would Limit Investigative Journalism In The News Business, Shelly Rosenfeld

UC Law Business Journal

While the value of paparazzi-driven journalism is very low, it would be a detriment to the public if paparazzi regulations would potentially limit, or even have a chilling effect on valuable investigative news, merely because there were similar ways the two acquired information. Certain newsgathering torts permit one to consider the newsworthiness, and hence public interest of the stories in question in evaluating the claim. Just as a driver who runs a red light on the way to visit a sick relative in the hospital has still broken the law, if a reporter breaks the more stringent regulations imposed on …