Article Iii And Bankruptcy Code Standing: Preserving A Party’S Right To Object To A Proposed Reorganization Plan,
2014
St. John's University School of Law
Article Iii And Bankruptcy Code Standing: Preserving A Party’S Right To Object To A Proposed Reorganization Plan, James Scahill
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In a chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, a troubled company can either restructure or liquidate through a confirmed chapter 11 plan. To encourage more participation in reorganization cases, courts have broadly interpreted section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which determines who may object to a plan. Section 1109(b) states that “a party in interest, including the debtor, the trustee, a creditors’ committee, an equity security holders’ committee, a creditor, an equity security holder, or any indenture trustee, may raise and may appear and be heard on any issue in a case under this chapter.” A party wishing to object to …
Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code Preempts Provisions Of State Dealer Statutes,
2014
St. John's University School of Law
Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code Preempts Provisions Of State Dealer Statutes, Andrew Ziemianski
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In bankruptcy proceedings, the rejection of an executory contract by a trustee under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code constitutes a prepetition breach of contract, which gives rise to a general unsecured claim. The rejection damages claim, which is governed by state common law, will generally not be paid in full in bankruptcy.
The Bankruptcy Code will impliedly preempt state statutes that impose additional statutory damages, as these statutes impose damages for economic benefit of the counterparty and “‘frustrate section 365’s purpose of giving a debtor the power to decide which contracts it will assume and assign or reject …
Contract Claims And The Willful And Malicious Injury Exception To The Discharge In Bankruptcy,
2014
Florida International University College of Law
Contract Claims And The Willful And Malicious Injury Exception To The Discharge In Bankruptcy, Scott F. Norberg
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Undue Hardship Thicket: On Access To Justice, Procedural Noncompliance, And Pollutive Litigation In Bankruptcy,
2014
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
The Undue Hardship Thicket: On Access To Justice, Procedural Noncompliance, And Pollutive Litigation In Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article offers new insights into understanding the complexities and costs of the litigation burden that Congress has imposed on debtors who seek a fresh start in bankruptcy. In order to explore the problems inherent in a system that necessitates litigation as the path for obtaining certain types of bankruptcy relief, this Article focuses on the particular example of debtors who seek to discharge their student loans in bankruptcy. Such debt may be discharged only if the debtor can establish through a full-blown lawsuit that repaying the loans would impose an undue hardship. The procedure and burdens of proof governing …
The Challenges Of The New Defalcation Standard,
2014
Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
The Challenges Of The New Defalcation Standard, Jonathon S. Byington
Faculty Law Review Articles
The crux of bankruptcy law is giving debtors a fresh start by discharging their debts. Yet society has recognized that some debts should not be discharged because they either have a high level of societal importance or derive from a debtor’s culpable conduct. One of these exceptions from discharge is for defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity. The legal meaning of defalcation has been unclear for 172 years, ranging from a breach of trust by one who has charge of money to the misappropriation of money in one’s keeping. A three-way federal circuit split developed on whether a state …
Rollover Risk: Ideating A U.S. Debt Default,
2014
Duke Law School
Rollover Risk: Ideating A U.S. Debt Default, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
This article examines how a U.S. debt default might occur, how it could be avoided, its potential consequences if not avoided, and how those consequences could be mitigated. To that end, the article differentiates defaults caused by insolvency from defaults caused by illiquidity. The latter, which are potentiated by rollover risk (the risk that the government will be temporarily unable to borrow sufficient funds to repay its maturing debt), are not only plausible but have occurred in the past. Moreover, the ongoing controversy over the federal debt ceiling and the rise of the shadow-banking system make these types of defaults …
Activist Investors, Distressed Companies, And Value Uncertainty,
2014
University of Maryland Francis King CareySchool of Law
Activist Investors, Distressed Companies, And Value Uncertainty, Michelle M. Harner, Jamie Marincic Griffin, Jennifer Ivey-Crickenberger
Faculty Scholarship
Hedge funds, private equity firms, and other alternative investment funds are frequently key players in corporate restructurings. Most commentators agree that the presence of a fund can change the dynamics of a chapter 11 case. They cannot agree, however, on the impact of this change—i.e., do funds create or destroy enterprise value? This essay contributes to the dialogue by analyzing data from chapter 11 cases in which funds are in a position to influence the debtor’s exit strategy. The data shed light on what such funds might achieve in chapter 11 cases and the potential implications for debtors and their …
When Churches Reorganize,
2014
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
When Churches Reorganize, Pamela Foohey
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The article complements and expands the author’s prior article, Bankrupting the Faith. This article primarily relies on interviews with attorneys who represented religious organizations in chapter 11 bankruptcy to assess whether reorganization has the potential to offer an effective solution to religious organizations’ financial problems. In doing so, it makes three contributions. First, it tracks the post-bankruptcy outcomes of a portion of the debtors to find that approximately 65% remained operating post-bankruptcy; these outcomes contradict previous studies of small business bankruptcy and are important to current debates about reforming small business bankruptcy. Given this—and in keeping with the ABLJ’s …
Pensioners, Bondholders, And Unfair Discrimination In Municipal Bankruptcy,
2014
University of Miami School of Law
Pensioners, Bondholders, And Unfair Discrimination In Municipal Bankruptcy, Andrew B. Dawson
Articles
Detroit recently confirmed its plan of debt adjustment under which the city has endeavored to adjust its pension obligations. The court's confirmation order and oral opinion on the record present what is perhaps the most significant decision regarding a key question facing any city attempting to adjust pensions in bankruptcy: can a city propose to pay its pension claimants significantly more than its other unsecured creditors? This question involves interpreting the Bankruptcy Code's unfair discrimination rule.
The Detroit bankruptcy court applied a novel interpretation of unfair discrimination, eschewing the relatively thin body of case law interpreting this rule, and suggesting …
Derivatives And Collateral: Balancing Remedies And Systemic Risk,
2014
Duke Law School
Derivatives And Collateral: Balancing Remedies And Systemic Risk, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Uneasy Case Against Tax Lien Subordination,
2014
Duke Law School
The Uneasy Case Against Tax Lien Subordination, Shu-Yi Oei
Faculty Scholarship
I.R.C. § 6323, which governs how the federal tax lien ranks against the interests of the taxpayer’s other creditors, subordinates the tax lien to the claims of other creditors in various ways. Tax lien subordination is commonly justified on the grounds that it enhances taxpayer asset value, facilitates commercial transactions, and reduces monitoring costs for private creditors. This short essay argues, however, that these benefits may be illusory. Tax lien subordination may, in fact, create costs and distortions and may lead to unfair distributive results. This essay suggests that the tax lien priority scheme might be made less costly by …
Taxing Bankrupts,
2014
Duke Law School
Taxing Bankrupts, Shu-Yi Oei
Faculty Scholarship
When a debtor goes bankrupt and limited assets have to be divided between competing creditors, should unpaid taxes owed to the government be paid before the debts owed to other creditors? This Article defends the notion that some tax debts should be awarded priority. Insofar as bankruptcy protection transfers the risk of financial distress from a debtor to her creditors, the tax priority debate should be understood as a fight about how much debtor default risk the government should have to assume relative to other creditors. This Article argues that the government’s share of debtor default risk should be limited …
Towards A “Rule Of Law” Approach To Restructuring Sovereign Debt,
2014
Duke Law School
Towards A “Rule Of Law” Approach To Restructuring Sovereign Debt, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Where Do We Go Now? The Uncertain Future For 29 U.S.C. § 1301(B)(1), Private Equity Funds, And Multiemployer Pension Plans After Sun Capita,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Where Do We Go Now? The Uncertain Future For 29 U.S.C. § 1301(B)(1), Private Equity Funds, And Multiemployer Pension Plans After Sun Capita, Crighton T. Allen
Georgia Law Review
The United States faces a growing problem concerning corporate indebtedness to pension plans, specifically, multi-employer pension plans (MEPPs). MEPPs are group pension plans in which a number of employers join together to contribute to a fund benefitting all employees of the participating companies. If an employer seeks to withdraw from a MEPP by ceasing to contribute into it, the company faces a withdrawal penalty-its proportionate share of the plan's vested but unfunded benefits. The recent decision by the First Circuit in Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund has the potential to greatly …
Clearinghouses As Liquidity Partitioning,
2014
Fordham University School of Law
Clearinghouses As Liquidity Partitioning, Richard Squire
Faculty Scholarship
To reduce the risk of another financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Act requires that trading in certain derivatives be backed by clearinghouses. Critics mount two main objections: a clearinghouse shifts risk instead of reducing it; and a clearinghouse could fail, requiring a bailout. This Article’s observation that clearinghouses engage in liquidity partitioning answers both. Liquidity partitioning means that when one of its member firms becomes bankrupt, a clearinghouse keeps a portion of the firm’s most liquid assets, and a matching portion of its short-term debt, out of the bankruptcy estate. The clearinghouse then applies the first toward immediate repayment of the …
Preferences Are Public Rights,
2013
University of Missouri School of Law
Preferences Are Public Rights, Brook E. Gotberg
Faculty Publications
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v. Marshall, there is widespread uncertainty as to what other proceedings may constitutionally fall within a bankruptcy court’s core jurisdiction. Supreme Court jurisprudence has been cryptic regarding the constitutional limitations of non-Article III courts, but the Court has identified a "public rights exception" to the general rule that the judicial power must be exercised only by judges with life tenure and salary protection. This public rights exception has not yet been explicitly extended to a bankruptcy proceeding, but the reasoning of the Court strongly suggests that a trustee’s motion to …
The Chapter 11 Efficiency Fallacy,
2013
Seattle University School of Law
The Chapter 11 Efficiency Fallacy, Diane Lourdes Dick
Faculty Articles
This article challenges the persistent claim that Chapter 11's increasing utilization of market mechanisms will help facilitate economically efficient resolutions of corporate financial distress. Using two recent case studies, this article shows that, in fact, these mechanisms are used by stakeholders with existing market power to take control of the restructuring process and extract rents at the expense of other constituents: creditors, equity holders, and—in the case of companies that receive governmental bailouts—taxpayers. These distortionary effects are obscured by a dominant, neoclassical legal paradigm that ignores institutional and political dynamics. This article advances a new explanatory model that draws upon …
The Unlucky Penny: How $0.01 In Collateral Value Can Limit The Debtor's Ability To Strip Off A Junior Mortgage In A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Proceeding,
2013
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
The Unlucky Penny: How $0.01 In Collateral Value Can Limit The Debtor's Ability To Strip Off A Junior Mortgage In A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Proceeding, Keri Mahoney
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance Vs. Form: Rethinking The Scope Of Dodd-Frank's End-User Clearing Exception In Light Of Systemic Risk,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Substance Vs. Form: Rethinking The Scope Of Dodd-Frank's End-User Clearing Exception In Light Of Systemic Risk, David Hamid
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
No abstract provided.
Central Falls Retirees V. Bondholders: Assessing Fear Of Contagion In Chapter 9 Proceedings,
2013
Boston University School of Law
Central Falls Retirees V. Bondholders: Assessing Fear Of Contagion In Chapter 9 Proceedings, Maria O'Brien
Faculty Scholarship
Modern Chapter 9 litigation has been characterized by extraordinary protections for municipal bondholders, and Central Falls is no exception. Although not well understood by politicians, fear of contagion has encouraged the adoption of legal arrangements that have limited the bankruptcy courts’ ability to include bondholders in the cost of restructuring municipal debt. This preference for bondholders (and, by extension, their insurers) has meant increased misery for taxpayers and retirees. Given that all of these actors appear to have been complicit to some degree in the creation and maintenance of the fiscally imprudent conditions that triggered bankruptcy and that evidence of …
