Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Whether Undistributed Chapter 13 Payment Plan Funds Held By A Chapter 13 Trustee Should Be Distributed To The Debtor Or The Debtor’S Creditors After Conversion From Chapter 13 To Chapter 7, Rosa Aliberti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Qualified individuals seeking to reorganize their debts may file under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under chapter 13, a debtor makes payments according to a court approved payment plan, which is administered by a chapter 13 trustee, and remains in possession of all the property of the estate. Once a debtor makes all his payments under the chapter 13 payment plan, he has a right to seek a discharge, provided that he meets certain requirements. These requirements include that the debtor: (1) certifying that he paid all domestic support obligations prior to the certification being made; (2) received …

Chapter 11 Liquidations And The Termination Of Collective Bargaining Agreements, Cecilia Ehresman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code governs the modification or rejection of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) by a chapter 11 trustee or debtor-in-possession. To modify or reject a CBA, a trustee or debtor-in-possession must (1) make a proposal to the union which provides the “necessary modifications in the employees benefits and protections that are necessary to permit the reorganization of the debtor”; (2) provide the union with relevant information as is necessary to evaluate the proposal; and (3) meet with the union and confer in good faith. For the modification or rejection to take place, the union must …

Self-Employed Debtors Face A Hard Truth When Calculating Their Current Monthly Income For The Applicable Commitment Periods Under Chapter 13 Plans, Arthur Rushforth

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A bankruptcy court may confirm a debtor’s chapter 13 plan of reorganization if the requirements of section 1325(a) of the Bankruptcy Code are satisfied. If the chapter 13 trustee or an unsecured creditor objects to the confirmation of the plan, however, the bankruptcy court may only confirm the plan if it either provides for the repayment in full of claims or that the debtor must devote all of his projected disposable income towards payments of his unsecured creditors during the plan’s “applicable commitment period.” The debtor’s applicable commitment period is five years if the debtor’s current monthly income exceeds …

Rule 9011 Of The Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure, Nancy Bello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Rule 9011(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the bankruptcy counterpart to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 11”), provides, that in presenting a pleading to the court, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, that: (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by …

The Earmarking Doctrine: Can It Be Used To Protect Late-Recorded Mortgages In Preference Action?, Michael Benzaki

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Borrowers often seek to refinance their home loan mortgages in order to attain more favorable interest rates and other terms. Essentially, in these refinancing transactions, “the parties are looking simply to exchange one more expensive secured loan for another less expensive secured loan.” Typically, as part of the transaction, a refinancing lender will discharge the original mortgage and record a new mortgage. It is not uncommon for a delay to occur such that the new mortgage is recorded over thirty days after the lender transferred the funds to pay off the original loan. In such a case, if the …

Does The Fdcpa Apply In Bankruptcy?, Garam Choe

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In 1977, Congress enacted the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) to remedy rampant abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors. A year later, the Bankruptcy Code was enacted under Title 11 of the United States Code. Conflicts arise as to whether which law applies when debt collectors use abusive debt collection practices while seeking to recover from a debtor in a bankruptcy case. Circuit courts are split as to whether the Bankruptcy Code displaces the FDCPA in the bankruptcy context. Some circuit courts have concluded that the Bankruptcy Code displaces the FDCPA in the bankruptcy context. Alternatively, some …

Borrowers And Bankruptcy Trustees’ Unsuccessful Attempts To Avoid A Mortgage Under The “Splitting-The-Note” Theory, Alana Friedberg

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In 1993, the mortgage industry created the electronic database Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”) in order to “track ownership interests in residential mortgages.” MERS “serves as the mortgagee in the land records for loans registered on the MERS System, and is a nominee (or agent) for the owner of the promissory note.” To date, MERS holds title to around 60 million home mortgages, about half of all home mortgages in the United States.

Borrowers and bankruptcy trustees have attempted unsuccessfully to argue a mortgage or deed of trust is void if a third party, such as MERS, was designated …

Professional Fee Enhancements: Determining Whether A Professional Is Entitled To A Fee Enhancement Under Section 330 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Adrianna R. Grancio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code governs the compensation of a professional person employed under section 327 or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under section 330(a), the court may award a professional “reasonable compensation for actual [and] necessary services.” Section 330 provides a non-exclusive list of factors for a court to consider in determining whether the proposed compensation is reasonable. In addition to these statutory factors, courts also analyze the proposed fee by using two methods utilized in pre-bankruptcy code cases; (1) “Lodestar” method and (2) factors from Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc (the “Johnson Factors”).

The determination of whether the …

Student Loans Can Be Discharged (At Least Partially) In Bankruptcy After All, Carmella Gubbiotti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth debts that are not dischargeable. Among the non-dischargeable debts, which a debtor will still owe after they receive a bankruptcy discharge, are debts from educational loans. As such, these student loan debts may prevent many debtors from receiving a truly fresh start following bankruptcy. Courts historically have approached the undue hardship exception to this rule narrowly, applying it only where the debtor, under the circumstances, could not reap the benefit of her education.

This Article will discuss the various tests courts use to determine whether an educational debt is dischargeable. Part …

An Oversecured Creditor’S Post-Petition Attorneys’ Fees, Governed By State Law Or Federal Law’S 11 U.S.C. 506(B), Charles Lazo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy, an oversecured creditor is generally entitled to post-petition interest on their underlying claims, and post-petition reasonable fees, costs, or charges provided for under a contract or state statute. Although an oversecured creditor might be entitled to attorneys’ fees under a contract provision or a state statute, bankruptcy courts will review such fees for reasonableness. However, the Bankruptcy Code does not provide what laws govern on the issue of whether fees are reasonable. Currently, there is a three-way split among courts: (1) the majority of courts rule that federal law preempts state law as to the enforceability and …

The Exception To The Automatic Stays: Determining Whether Revenues Are Pledged Special Revenues, Debra March

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides two automatic stays in cases under chapter 9. These automatic stays, with limited exceptions, prevent both direct and indirect collection efforts against a municipal debtor. The first automatic stay provided by section 362(a) generally stays all direct collection efforts against the debtor. In addition, section 922(a) provides for an automatic stay that, with limited exception, also stays the commencement and continuation of claims against an officer as inhabitant of a municipal debtor, and the enforcement of a lien on or arising out of taxes or assessments of the municipal debtor. However, section 922(a) imposes a …

Same-Sex Couple Deemed “Spouses” For Purposes Of The Bankruptcy Code, Michael Rich

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code states that a legally married couple may file a joint bankruptcy petition pursuant to section 302(a). However, this right to joint filing is narrowly limited to an “individual that may be a debtor under such chapter and such individual’s spouse.” Generally, courts have rejected joint filings under section 302(a) filed by debtors who are not legally married. For example, a parent and child cannot file a joint bankruptcy petition under section 302(a). Further, a couple that is living together without being legally married may not file a joint petition. The Bankruptcy Code is silent as to …

Deeping Insolvency: A Cause Of Action, A Tool Of Measuring Damages, Or Nothing At All?, Nicholas Santoro

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

“Deepening Insolvency” is a rather new theory of either liability or damages in cases brought by a plaintiff (typically a bankruptcy trustee, litigation trust, or some other party “filling in” for an insolvent corporation, or debtor) against directors, officers, attorneys, or other professionals, based on their dealings with the debtor. “Deepening insolvency” has been defined as “injury to the debtors' corporate property from the fraudulent expansion of corporate debt and prolongation of corporate life.” The theory of deepening insolvency has become a highly debated by attorneys, creditors, and the courts.

The courts, both state and federal, have continued to …

Are Government Creditors Exempt From U.C.C. Article 9 Filing And Perfection Requirements?, Thomas Sica

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”) requires a creditor to perfect its security interests against its collateral in order to recover the creditor’s priority in such collateral. Former versions of the UCC that predate 2001 provided that the Article 9’s perfection requirements did not apply “[t]o a transfer by a government or a governmental unit of the state.” This exception was eliminated from the UCC in 2001. Thirty-two states, however, still have versions of the UCC that contain some version of this exception. Within the states that still enforce this exception for governmental units, there are …

Judicial Estoppel: Essentially Locking In Representations Made During Bankruptcy Proceeding, Sophie Tan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor is required to file with the bankruptcy, among other things, “a list of [its] creditors,” a “schedule of [its] assets and liabilities,” and “a statement of [its] financial affairs.” With the filing of its schedules, the debtor asserts a position with respect to its assets, liabilities, and financial affairs, which is relied on by the bankruptcy court, the debtor’s creditors, and the other parties in interest. Accordingly, various circuit courts have recognized that “the success of our bankruptcy laws requires a debtor’s full and honest disclosure,” and that there needs to be …

The Irs Can Offset Post-Petition Tax Overpayments Against Pre-Petition Tax Liabilities, Kyle J. Tumsuden

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy cases, creditors have the powerful right of “setoff,” i.e., the right to “net” or cancel payments. The right to set off usually arises in cases of mutual debt obligations where a debtor owes a debt to a creditor who in turn owes a unilateral debt back to the same debtor. The rationale for the right to setoff it obvious, as it allows the parties to apply their mutual debt obligations against each other, “thereby avoiding the absurdity of making A pay B when B owes A.” In other words, the court will reduce the two competing judgments …

The Continued Growth Of The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality And Its Impact On The Bankruptcy Code’S Avoidance Provisions, Michael Vandermark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

Over the past several years, ever since the United States Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Limited, the presumption against extraterritoriality has steadily expanded across much of the legal field. In doing so, the presumption has again become the dominant standard in deciding whether Congressional legislation may be used on an extraterritorial basis. This expansion has recently encompassed portions of the Bankruptcy Code, specifically, its avoidance provisions.

The presumption, as noted in detail below, relies on the premise that although the legislature has the authority to regulate beyond the borders of the United States, …

Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule, Brianna Walsh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The absolute priority rule sets forth a hierarchical scheme for the distribution of proceeds obtained through liquidating the assets of a debtor. The scheme provides that property of an estate shall be distributed to secured creditors, then to administrative and priority unsecured creditors, then to unsecured creditors, and lastly to equity holders. Under Chapter 11, section 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) for a dissenting class of impaired creditors, a plan is “fair and equitable” only if the allowed value of such creditors claims are paid in full, or the holder of any claim or equity that is junior to the dissenting creditors will …

Recent Developments In Estoppel And Preclusion Doctrines In Consumer Bankruptcy Cases; Volume Ii Of Ii: Preclusion, Kevin M. Lewis, Paul M. Lopez, Scott Lawrence, Tim Springer

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bankruptcy And Higher Education Institutions, St. John’S University School Of Law Symposium, Scott F. Norberg

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.