Forum Non Conveniens And Chapter 15 Bankruptcy,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Forum Non Conveniens And Chapter 15 Bankruptcy, Tyler Levine
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Exceprt)
When pursuing a case under Chapter 15 of Title 11 in the United States, Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) a plaintiff can litigate all claims in a single forum or in certain cases they may be able to pursue additional claims stemming from the same case in a foreign forum. Many parties will want to litigate all of the claims in a single forum and will file a forum non conveniens motion when their adversary tries to pursue claims in multiple forums. Forum non conveniens is a discretionary power that allows courts to dismiss a case where another court, or …
Application Of Safe Harbor Provisions To Early Termination Of Swap Agreement,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Application Of Safe Harbor Provisions To Early Termination Of Swap Agreement, William Accordino Jr.
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Credit default swap agreements (“swaps”) are contracts between two entities in which the counterparties are effectively taking opposing positions on the credit worthiness of a debt instrument that acts as the collateral underlying the swap. For example, counterparty A makes payments to counterparty B in the hopes that the debtor defaults or a counterparty commits an event of default specified in the agreement, such as filing for bankruptcy. Swaps are generally executory contracts and thus may generally be rejected by a trustee or a debtor in bankruptcy pursuant to section 365 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). …
Property Of The Estate And Creditors Rights To Bring Individual Suits,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Property Of The Estate And Creditors Rights To Bring Individual Suits, Ryan Dolan
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Once bankruptcy proceedings begin, section 541 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) defines the scope of a debtor’s property as including all legal and equitable interests of the debtor. Courts have adopted an expansive interpretation of this section, noting that “every conceivable interest of the debtor, future, nonpossessory, contingent, speculative, and derivative, is within reach of the bankruptcy estate.” As a result, a trustee of the debtor’s estate, or a debtor-in-possession, obtains standing to assert general claims which are common to the creditors, and creditors are thus bound by the outcome of the trustee’s actions.
If …
Non-Dischargeability Of Foreign Student Loans,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Non-Dischargeability Of Foreign Student Loans, Andrew Brown
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Educational loans made, insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit are not dischargeable in a bankruptcy case, unless the debtor obtains a hardship determination. This is true even if the loan is made, insured, or guaranteed by a foreign governmental unit. The rationale behind making it difficult to discharge student loans via the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) is to prevent abuses of the educational loan system, specifically students filing for bankruptcy shortly after graduation to discharge their loans.
Various circuit courts have adopted two tests when applying the undue hardship provision of section 532(a)(8). In 1987, the …
Bankruptcy Courts May Alter Final Sale Orders And Findings Of Good Faith Purchasers,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Bankruptcy Courts May Alter Final Sale Orders And Findings Of Good Faith Purchasers, Louis Calabro
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
For many years, a policy of finality has existed in the legal sphere to protect purchasers after a sale has been completed. This policy serves to create stability and predictability for investors and incentivizes activity in the marketplace. In bankruptcy cases, issues of finality are implicated when a debtor engages in an asset sale, and the court grants a final sale order. The purchasing party wants the sale to be final, so courts have promoted the policy of finality to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of bankruptcy plans. Sometimes, however, an adverse party claims to have an interest in …
Chapter 11 Liquidation And Its Effect On Collective Bargaining Agreements,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Chapter 11 Liquidation And Its Effect On Collective Bargaining Agreements, Dylan Coyne
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Sections 1113 and 1114 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) allow a debtor to reject its collective bargaining agreements and payment of retiree benefits, subject to certain statutory conditions being met. These provisions apply to companies that employ unionized workers who receive compensation and benefits pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Both sections, however, only apply to a debtor that is “reorganizing.” Moreover, courts have held that section 1114, which governs the payment of insurance benefits to retirees, permits modification of obligations under a statute, such as the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act …
Effects Of Veil Piercing, Alter Ego And Substantive Consolidation On Bankruptcy,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Effects Of Veil Piercing, Alter Ego And Substantive Consolidation On Bankruptcy, Lauren Gross
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
At times, bankruptcy can seem like a game of cat and mouse between debtors and creditors. By filing for bankruptcy in the first place, debtors change the rules of the game with various bankruptcy mechanisms, such as the automatic stay provision set forth in section 361 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). An important inquiry exists in what creditors can to do promote their interests in bankruptcy. An even more important inquiry lies in determining what doctrines may satisfy generally recognized principles of equity for all.
One option for creditors who deal with corporate entities is …
Creditors Cannot Contract Around Their Fiduciary Duties And Withhold Their Consent From A Debtor To File For Bankruptcy,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Creditors Cannot Contract Around Their Fiduciary Duties And Withhold Their Consent From A Debtor To File For Bankruptcy, Samantha Guido
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Many courts have found that a debtor may not contract away their right to voluntarily file for bankruptcy. However, debtors and creditors have implemented creative measures to avoid this principle. For example, a creditor may seek the appointment of a so-called “blocking director” on a company’s board of directors, who would control the company’s bankruptcy filing. Additionally, some creditors seek a “golden share” in order to have veto power over changes to the company’s charter, including veto power over whether the company can file for bankruptcy. In determining whether these mechanisms are void under public policy, courts will consider …
A Dragnet Clause And A Future Advances Clause Can Reach The Collateral Of A Loan That Has Already Been Repaid,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
A Dragnet Clause And A Future Advances Clause Can Reach The Collateral Of A Loan That Has Already Been Repaid, Stephanie Hung
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
This memorandum will explore the secured transactions issues that arose in In re Omni Enterprises. In that case, the Bankruptcy Court in Alaska held that a bank may enforce the security interest of a prior loan that has already been repaid to cure a new loan that was in default. The prior loan was secured by the debtor’s deposit accounts, and contained a cross-collateralization clause and future advances clause; however, the new loan did not mention the deposit accounts at all. When the debtor defaulted on the new loan, the bank argued, among other things, that it continued …
When Are Debtors And Creditors Bound To The Provisions Of Confirmed Reorganization Plans?,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
When Are Debtors And Creditors Bound To The Provisions Of Confirmed Reorganization Plans?, Gabriella Labita
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Generally, when a debtor files for protection under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a plan of reorganization is filed at some point with the bankruptcy court. The court then holds a hearing to determine whether the judge will confirm the reorganization plan. The judge will confirm the plan if it meets the criteria of Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires, among other things, that any payments made in connection with the plan are reasonable. A plan of reorganization is a significant component of a debtor’s emergence from bankruptcy, as it affects …
Federal Preemption And The Bankruptcy Code: At What Point Does State Law Cease To Apply During The Claims Allowance Process?,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
Federal Preemption And The Bankruptcy Code: At What Point Does State Law Cease To Apply During The Claims Allowance Process?, Dylan Lackowitz
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Anything you do in bankruptcy can and will be used against you in bankruptcy. Prior to the commencement of a bankruptcy case, perhaps courts should issue this Miranda-esque warning to the parties. At least, if the bankruptcy court had, Plymouth LLC (“Plymouth”) might have saved approximately $800,000 that it spent acquiring a lien against Princeton LP’s (“Princeton”) vacant office park in the Township of Lawrence, New Jersey. Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that Plymouth’s claim against Princeton in Princeton’s bankruptcy case was disallowed for violating New Jersey’s tax sale law pursuant to …
All Talk, But No Action Leads To The Loss Of Ground Breaking Cancer Research,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
All Talk, But No Action Leads To The Loss Of Ground Breaking Cancer Research, Nicholas Marcello
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Each year, the government awards millions of dollars in federal grants to fund scientific research. Despite this huge allocation of resources, the government’s claim in such funded research may be limited should the receiving institution become a debtor in bankruptcy. Last year, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts allowed the destruction of government funded research to benefit the debtor estate.
The Inconsistent Application Of Section 1113 To Expired Collective Bargaining Agreements,
2017
St. John's University School of Law
The Inconsistent Application Of Section 1113 To Expired Collective Bargaining Agreements, Courtney Creighton Sokol
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) allows a trustee a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) to assume or reject a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). Courts are split on whether a trustee or DIP may reject an expired collective bargaining agreement under section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code. In general, a collective bargaining agreement may be rejected notwithstanding the labor standards afforded to employees by the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). In particular, under the NLRA, an employer that is party to a CBA is obligated to bargain with its employees until the employer either enters into a new contract or …
'No Money Down' Bankruptcy,
2017
University of Georgia School of Law
'No Money Down' Bankruptcy, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Katherine Porter, Deborah Thorne
Scholarly Works
This Article reports on a breakdown in access to justice in bankruptcy, a system from which one million Americans will seek help this year. A crucial decision for these consumers will be whether to file a chapter 7 or chapter 13 bankruptcy. Nearly every aspect of their bankruptcies — both the benefits and the burdens of debt relief — will be different in chapter 7 versus chapter 13. Almost all consumers will hire a bankruptcy attorney. Because they must pay their attorneys, many consumers will file chapter 13 to finance their access to the law, rather than because they prefer …
Lender Discrimination, Black Churches, And Bankruptcy,
2017
University of Georgia School of Law
Lender Discrimination, Black Churches, And Bankruptcy, Pamela Foohey
Scholarly Works
Based on my original empirical research, in this Article, I expose a disparity between the demographics of the roughly 650 religious congregations that have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy during part of the last decade and congregations nationwide. Churches with predominately black membership — Black Churches — appeared in chapter 11 more than three times as often as they appear among churches across the country. A conservative estimate of the percentage of Black Churches among religious congregation chapter 11 debtors is 60%. The likely percentage is upward of 75%. Black Churches account for 21% of congregations nationwide.
Why are Black …
Consumer Bankruptcy Pathologies,
2017
Columbia Law School
Consumer Bankruptcy Pathologies, Edward R. Morrison, Antoine Uettwiller
Faculty Scholarship
This paper questions several long-standing descriptions of consumer bankruptcy in the United States. We focus on Chapter 13, which discharges debts after consumers pay disposable income to creditors for up to five years. Many studies document pathologies, including high failure rates, racial disparities, low creditor recoveries, and attorney biases. We observe the same patterns in new data drawn from Cook County, Illinois, but show that these pathologies are central tendencies that ignore substantial heterogeneity across consumers. Several pathologies are driven by subsets of consumers; some disappear once we take account of consumer heterogeneity. We present new evidence that some pathologies …
Courts As Institutional Reformers: Bankruptcy And Public Law Litigation,
2017
University of Pennsylvania
Courts As Institutional Reformers: Bankruptcy And Public Law Litigation, Kathleen G. Noonan, Jonathan C. Lipson, William H. Simon
Faculty Scholarship
This article compares two spheres in which courts induce and oversee the restructuring of organizations that fail systematically to comply with their legal obligations: bankruptcy reorganization and public law litigation (civil rights or regulatory suits seeking structural remedies). The analogies between bankruptcy and public law litigation (PLL) have grown stronger in recent years as structural decrees have evolved away from highly specific directives to “framework” decrees designed to induce engagement with stakeholders and make performance transparent. We use the comparison with bankruptcy, where the value and legitimacy of judicial intervention are better understood and more accepted, to address prominent criticisms …
Easy Credit And The Erosion Of Dischargeable Debt In Bankruptcy: Advocating For A Broad Interpretation Of 11 U.S.C. § 523(A)(2)(A) & (B)'S "Statement Respecting.. . Financial Condition",
2017
University of Georgia
Easy Credit And The Erosion Of Dischargeable Debt In Bankruptcy: Advocating For A Broad Interpretation Of 11 U.S.C. § 523(A)(2)(A) & (B)'S "Statement Respecting.. . Financial Condition", Tyler Sandifer
Georgia Law Review
The Bankruptcy Code largely exists to provide a
"fresh start" to debtors. But not everyone gets a free
pass. If a debtor has intentionally lied in order to
obtain money, property, services, or an extension,
renewal, or refinancing of credit, he receives no
protection. However, there is an exception built into the
code to protect debtors from predatory lenders intent on
gaming the system in an effort to eliminate insolvency
risk. The size of this exception has become a matter of
judicial debate over the past thirty-eight years as a
circuit split has slowly developed over the
interpretation of 11 …
Tightenting The Loophole: The Role Of Fee-Shifting Statutes In Resolving The Growing Problem Of Servicing America's Student Loan Debt,
2016
West Virginia University College of Law
Tightenting The Loophole: The Role Of Fee-Shifting Statutes In Resolving The Growing Problem Of Servicing America's Student Loan Debt, Katheryn E. Marcum
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kaplan V. Dutra, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 80 (Dec. 1, 2016) (En Banc),
2016
Nevada Law Journal
Kaplan V. Dutra, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 80 (Dec. 1, 2016) (En Banc), Hayley Cummings
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court, sitting en banc, reviewed a certified question from the United States Bankruptcy Court, determining that under NRS 21.010(1)(u) a debtor is entitled to a personal injury exemption of $16,150 for each personal injury claim.
