Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Why Police Should Protect Complainant Autonomy, Randall K. Johnson

Faculty Works

This Essay does its work in, at least, three ways. First, it encourages better use of scarce public sector resources by calling for reform of the police complaint intake process. Next, this Essay identifies the causes of police complaint inefficiencies by critically-assessing how intake is done by the Chicago Police Department (CPD). Lastly, it provides guidance about how to achieve CPD intake reform by better protecting complainant autonomy. Complainant autonomy, at least in this Essay, is defined as a real party in interest’s (i.e. an injured citizen’s) right to control how its allegations are framed by a nominal plaintiff (i.e. …

The Impact Of Law On The State Pension Crisis, Elizabeth S. Goldman, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

While some state and municipal pension plans have funds sufficient to meet obligations to retirees without imposing onerous obligations on current and future taxpayers, underfunding of plans in other states has reached disastrous proportions, raising the possibility of default on pension obligations, cuts in public services, steep tax increases, or some combination of the three. The substantial differential in pension funding might be attributed to divergent political pressures, different responses to uncertainty about investment returns, or other factors. Our examination of pension funding law in ten states-five with the best-funded plans and five with the worst-funded plans-highlights the role of …

Three Against Two: On The Difference Between Property And Contract And The Example Of Deposit Accounts In Bankruptcy, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson

Articles

In Citizen's Bank v. Strumpf (1995), Justice Scalia announced that deposit accounts are not "property". Five years later, the Uniform Commercial Code was amended to make deposit accounts collateral for the depositary bank maintaining the account, thereby crowding the field previously occupied by the common law right of setoff. Security interests attach to personal "property." Security interests attach to deposit accounts. Deposit accounts, by syllogistic logic, are property. Does this mean that the UCC has overruled the Supreme Court? We argue not. A deposit account is a mere contract in the two-person universe that contract law presupposes. A deposit account …

Beyond Bankruptcy: Resolution As A Macroprudential Regulatory Tool, Steven L. Schwarcz

Notre Dame Law Review

Postcrisis efforts to extend bankruptcy-resolution techniques to protect the stability of the financial system have been insufficient, in part because regulators have been conflating bankruptcy’s traditional goals of resolving troubled firms individually with the need to resolve critical elements of the financial system to ensure its continued operation as a “system.” This requires resolving troubled firms collectively, as well as resolving securities-trading markets and the infrastructure that serves to facilitate that trading. The Article examines how to design that regulation, differentiating three approaches: reactive regulation, which comprises variations on traditional bankruptcy; proactive regulation, which consists of preplanned enhancements that are …

Stern Claims And Article Iii Adjudication - The Bankruptcy Judge Knows Best, Laura B. Bartell

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Tempering Bankruptcy Nondischargability To Promote The Purposes Of Student Loans, John P. Hunt

SMU Law Review

Student loans, unlike other debts, are not dischargeable in bankruptcy unless the debtor starts a special proceeding and proves that repayment would cause “undue hardship.” This requirement probably accounts for the fact that only a tiny fraction of bankrupt debtors succeed in discharging their student loans. This article is the first to make the case that student- loan nondischargeability interferes with achieving the student-loan pro- grams’ goals and to propose solutions that courts and the Department of Education (the Department) can employ under current law.

The article draws on the legislative history of the student-loan programs to establish that they …

Fiduciary Principles In Bankruptcy And Insolvency, John A. E. Pottow

Book Chapters

This chapter examines fiduciary duties in bankruptcy and insolvency, focusing on the bankruptcy trustee’s duties, which are triggered by virtue of appointment in a case. It first provides a background on bankruptcy law in order to elucidate the doctrines and rules affecting fiduciary responsibilities in bankruptcy, citing a number of relevant provisions in the Bankruptcy Code. It then considers the fiduciary, non-fiduciary, and anti-fiduciary obligations of the trustee under the Bankruptcy Code before discussing the fiduciary duties of care and loyalty. In particular, it highlights bankruptcy-related issues raised by the duty of loyalty with respect to secured creditors, priority unsecured …

Pragmatism Vs. Principle: Bankruptcy Appeals And Equitable Mootness, Christopher W. Frost

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Bankruptcy reorganizations are often thought to present unique problems requiring specialized doctrines. Equitable mootness is one such doctrine. This judge-made prudential limitation on appeal rights permits reviewing courts to dismiss otherwise justiciable appeals of bankruptcy court confirmations of reorganization plans. It applies where granting relief would disrupt the implementation of the plan or would harm reliance interests of parties affected by the plan.

Chapter 11 reorganizations present complex multilateral negotiation problems. The bankruptcy represents a general default, pitting stakeholder against stakeholder in conflicts that require a global settlement. The plan of reorganization provides that global settlement through an interconnected web …

The Creditors' Bargain Reconstituted: Comments On Barry Adler's The Creditors' Bargain Revisited, Edward J. Janger

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

The Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is said to embody the concept of modified universalism for cross-border insolvency matters. In a pure universalist system, a single proceeding would deal with all of the debtor’s assets and debts globally. This is in contrast to a purely territorial approach, where multiple local proceedings would be required; one in each jurisdiction where the debtor had assets or debts, but each limited to the assets and debts located in that jurisdiction. While universalism emphasizes the economic goals of insolvency theory – to maximize the value of the estate and minimize the expense of …

How Far Does The Rabbit Hole Go: The Interaction Between Set-Off Rights And The Voidable Preference Hypothetical In Chapter 7 Liquidation, Josh Rutstein

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

This Note highlights the tension between Section 547 and Section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code, with specific attention paid to the interaction between set-off rights and the hypothetical liquidation invoked by a court in a voidable preference action, and proposes adopting the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning as a bankruptcy court standard when confronted with a similar conflict between the formalized tests in Sections 547 and 553, in an attempt to achieve a more equitable outcome.

A New Deal For Debtors: Providing Procedural Justice In Consumer Bankruptcy, Pamela Foohey

Scholarly Works

Across the criminal and civil justice systems, research regarding procedural justice — feeling that one has a voice, is respected, and is before a neutral and even-handed adjudicator — shows that people’s positive perceptions of legal processes are fundamental to the legal system’s effectiveness and to the rule of law. About a million people file bankruptcy every year, making the consumer bankruptcy system the part of the federal court system with which people most often come into contact. Given the importance of bankruptcy to American families and the credit economy, there should exist a rich literature theorizing and investigating how …

Graying Of U.S. Bankruptcy: Fallout From Life In A Risk Society, Deborah Thorne, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Katherine Porter

Scholarly Works

The social safety net for older Americans has been shrinking for the past couple decades. The risks associated with aging, reduced income, and increased healthcare costs, have been off-loaded onto older individuals. At the same time, older Americans are increasingly likely to file consumer bankruptcy, and their representation among those in bankruptcy has never been higher. Using data from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project, we find more than a two-fold increase in the rate at which older Americans (age 65 and over) file for bankruptcy and an almost five-fold increase in the percentage of older persons in the U.S. bankruptcy system. …

Asset Partitioning And Financial Innovation, Christopher Bruner

Scholarly Works

Review of the article by Ofer Eldar and Andrew Verstein titled “The Enduring Distinction between Business Entities and Security Interests”, 92 Southern California Law Review, no. 2 (2019).

In Re Minter-Higgins, Deanna Scorzelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A Chapter 7 trustee cannot recover from the debtor, through a turnover motion, postpetition transfers that were made out of the debtor’s bank account that resulted from pre-petition checks and debit expenditures that were not transferred by the bank to the payees until after the debtor filed for bankruptcy. The § 362(b)(11) exception from the automatic stay insulates a consumer debtor from the trustee’s attempt to require her to “turnover” these amounts.

It Is Possible To Incriminate Yourself In The United States Bankruptcy Courts, Andre Brittis-Tannenbaum

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution’s Self Incrimination Clause provides that, “[n]o person shall . . . be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right protects an individual from “answer[ing] official questions put to him in any [] proceeding . . . where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” While the drafters of the Constitution only included language related to criminal cases, the Supreme Court has extended the privilege to civil proceedings, including bankruptcy cases. However, this privilege is not absolute, and can be waived …

Circuit Split Created Over Enactment Of Section 510(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code And Its Effect On The Rule Of Explicitness, Rossella Scarpa

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy law seeks to equitably distribute a debtor’s remaining assets among creditors. However, prior to bankruptcy, creditors can contract around their pro rata equitable distribution by executing inter-creditor agreements. Inter-creditor agreements are executed to delegate the rights and priorities of creditors as to a common borrower in the event the borrower defaults. Subordination agreements are a type of inter-creditor agreement, where junior creditors consent to senior creditors having their loans repaid in full before junior creditors receive their payment. Bankruptcy courts enforce subordination agreements through section 510(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), which …

Determining When The Granting Of Relief Is Deemed Abuse Of The Bankruptcy Code Under Section 707, Angela Bonica

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

There is no constitutional right for an individual to have their debts discharged. A discharge is a privilege offered to the honest but unfortunate debtor pursuant to title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). A bankruptcy court considers different standards and/or tests to determine when a debtor may be abusing the relief provided under the Bankruptcy Code. The specific provision that restricts relief because of abuse was originally enacted in 1984, and then amended in 2005 under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”). A main purpose of the BAPCPA was to deter abuses …

Constructive Fraudulent Transfers—Determining Insolvency, Tyler Beach

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, all of the debtor's assets and liabilities are automatically transferred into a bankruptcy estate. These assets are then used either to help a debtor reorganize or to repay all of the debtor’s creditors in liquidation. Under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), to preserve the estate assets a bankruptcy trustee can avoid certain transfers made by debtors as fraudulent transfers. Without this power to avoid transactions that occur prior to a debtor filing for bankruptcy, debtors could engage in transactions that drain the company of any of its valuable assets and …

Filing A Proof Of Claim In A Bankruptcy Court Subjects The Filing Party To The Court’S Jurisdiction. Anti-Waiver Clauses In The Proof Of Claim Are Not The Same Thing As Objecting To Jurisdiction, Christina Buru

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the United States, a federal court must have both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction to hear and rule on a case. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be met by satisfying the requirements under §1331 or §1332 of title 28 of the United States Code. These are typically referred to as “federal question” jurisdiction and “diversity” jurisdiction. §1331(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”. §1332(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over civil actions “where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000…and …