Why Police Should Protect Complainant Autonomy,
2019
University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Law
Why Police Should Protect Complainant Autonomy, Randall K. Johnson
Faculty Works
This Essay does its work in, at least, three ways. First, it encourages better use of scarce public sector resources by calling for reform of the police complaint intake process. Next, this Essay identifies the causes of police complaint inefficiencies by critically-assessing how intake is done by the Chicago Police Department (CPD). Lastly, it provides guidance about how to achieve CPD intake reform by better protecting complainant autonomy. Complainant autonomy, at least in this Essay, is defined as a real party in interest’s (i.e. an injured citizen’s) right to control how its allegations are framed by a nominal plaintiff (i.e. …
Bankruptcy,
2019
Northern District of Texas
Bankruptcy, The Honorable Harlin D. Hale, Emma L. Persson
SMU Annual Texas Survey
No abstract provided.
A New Deal For Debtors: Providing Procedural Justice In Consumer Bankruptcy,
2019
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
A New Deal For Debtors: Providing Procedural Justice In Consumer Bankruptcy, Pamela Foohey
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Across the criminal and civil justice systems, research regarding procedural justice — feeling that one has a voice, is respected, and is before a neutral and even-handed adjudicator — shows that people’s positive perceptions of legal processes are fundamental to the legal system’s effectiveness and to the rule of law. About a million people file bankruptcy every year, making the consumer bankruptcy system the part of the federal court system with which people most often come into contact. Given the importance of bankruptcy to American families and the credit economy, there should exist a rich literature theorizing and investigating how …
America Is Selling Its Seniors Short,
2019
Fordham University School of Law
America Is Selling Its Seniors Short, Constantine N. Katsoris
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Stern Claims And Article Iii Adjudication - The Bankruptcy Judge Knows Best,
2019
Wayne State University
Stern Claims And Article Iii Adjudication - The Bankruptcy Judge Knows Best, Laura B. Bartell
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Pragmatism Vs. Principle: Bankruptcy Appeals And Equitable Mootness,
2019
University of Kentucky
Pragmatism Vs. Principle: Bankruptcy Appeals And Equitable Mootness, Christopher W. Frost
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Bankruptcy reorganizations are often thought to present unique problems requiring specialized doctrines. Equitable mootness is one such doctrine. This judge-made prudential limitation on appeal rights permits reviewing courts to dismiss otherwise justiciable appeals of bankruptcy court confirmations of reorganization plans. It applies where granting relief would disrupt the implementation of the plan or would harm reliance interests of parties affected by the plan.
Chapter 11 reorganizations present complex multilateral negotiation problems. The bankruptcy represents a general default, pitting stakeholder against stakeholder in conflicts that require a global settlement. The plan of reorganization provides that global settlement through an interconnected web …
Fifty Years After The Consumer Credit Protection Act: The High Price Of Wage Garnishment,
2019
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Fifty Years After The Consumer Credit Protection Act: The High Price Of Wage Garnishment, Faith Mullen
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Relational Preferences In Chapter 11 Proceedings,
2019
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Relational Preferences In Chapter 11 Proceedings, Brook E. Gotberg
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Debt Collectors Allowed To Play Hide And Hope Nobody Seeks: Midland Funding, Llc V. Johnson And The Future Of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy,
2019
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Debt Collectors Allowed To Play Hide And Hope Nobody Seeks: Midland Funding, Llc V. Johnson And The Future Of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, Allison Meinders
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Challenges And Implications Of Fiscal Health,
2019
North Carolina State University
The Challenges And Implications Of Fiscal Health, Bruce D. Mcdonald Iii
South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business
No abstract provided.
Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role, G. Ray Warner
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
The Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is said to embody the concept of modified universalism for cross-border insolvency matters. In a pure universalist system, a single proceeding would deal with all of the debtor’s assets and debts globally. This is in contrast to a purely territorial approach, where multiple local proceedings would be required; one in each jurisdiction where the debtor had assets or debts, but each limited to the assets and debts located in that jurisdiction. While universalism emphasizes the economic goals of insolvency theory – to maximize the value of the estate and minimize the expense of …
Tempering Bankruptcy Nondischargability To Promote The Purposes Of Student Loans,
2019
University of California - Davis
Tempering Bankruptcy Nondischargability To Promote The Purposes Of Student Loans, John P. Hunt
SMU Law Review
Student loans, unlike other debts, are not dischargeable in bankruptcy unless the debtor starts a special proceeding and proves that repayment would cause “undue hardship.” This requirement probably accounts for the fact that only a tiny fraction of bankrupt debtors succeed in discharging their student loans. This article is the first to make the case that student- loan nondischargeability interferes with achieving the student-loan pro- grams’ goals and to propose solutions that courts and the Department of Education (the Department) can employ under current law.
The article draws on the legislative history of the student-loan programs to establish that they …
How Far Does The Rabbit Hole Go: The Interaction Between Set-Off Rights And The Voidable Preference Hypothetical In Chapter 7 Liquidation,
2019
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
How Far Does The Rabbit Hole Go: The Interaction Between Set-Off Rights And The Voidable Preference Hypothetical In Chapter 7 Liquidation, Josh Rutstein
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
This Note highlights the tension between Section 547 and Section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code, with specific attention paid to the interaction between set-off rights and the hypothetical liquidation invoked by a court in a voidable preference action, and proposes adopting the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning as a bankruptcy court standard when confronted with a similar conflict between the formalized tests in Sections 547 and 553, in an attempt to achieve a more equitable outcome.
Asset Partitioning And Financial Innovation,
2019
University of Georgia School of Law
Asset Partitioning And Financial Innovation, Christopher Bruner
Scholarly Works
Review of the article by Ofer Eldar and Andrew Verstein titled “The Enduring Distinction between Business Entities and Security Interests”, 92 Southern California Law Review, no. 2 (2019).
Graying Of U.S. Bankruptcy: Fallout From Life In A Risk Society,
2019
University of Idaho
Graying Of U.S. Bankruptcy: Fallout From Life In A Risk Society, Deborah Thorne, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Katherine Porter
Scholarly Works
The social safety net for older Americans has been shrinking for the past couple decades. The risks associated with aging, reduced income, and increased healthcare costs, have been off-loaded onto older individuals. At the same time, older Americans are increasingly likely to file consumer bankruptcy, and their representation among those in bankruptcy has never been higher. Using data from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project, we find more than a two-fold increase in the rate at which older Americans (age 65 and over) file for bankruptcy and an almost five-fold increase in the percentage of older persons in the U.S. bankruptcy system. …
Federally Funded Slaving,
2019
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Federally Funded Slaving, Rafael I. Pardo
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article presents a new frame of reference for thinking about the federal government’s complicity in supporting the domestic slave trade in the antebellum United States. While scholars have accounted for several methods of such support, they have failed to consider how federal bankruptcy legislation during the 1840s functionally created a system of direct financial grants to slave traders in the form of debt discharges. Relying on a variety of primary sources, including manuscript court records that have not been systematically analyzed by any published scholarship, this Article shows how the Bankruptcy Act of 1841 enabled severely indebted slave traders …
In Re Minter-Higgins,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
In Re Minter-Higgins, Deanna Scorzelli
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
A Chapter 7 trustee cannot recover from the debtor, through a turnover motion, postpetition transfers that were made out of the debtor’s bank account that resulted from pre-petition checks and debit expenditures that were not transferred by the bank to the payees until after the debtor filed for bankruptcy. The § 362(b)(11) exception from the automatic stay insulates a consumer debtor from the trustee’s attempt to require her to “turnover” these amounts.
It Is Possible To Incriminate Yourself In The United States Bankruptcy Courts,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
It Is Possible To Incriminate Yourself In The United States Bankruptcy Courts, Andre Brittis-Tannenbaum
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution’s Self Incrimination Clause provides that, “[n]o person shall . . . be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right protects an individual from “answer[ing] official questions put to him in any [] proceeding . . . where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” While the drafters of the Constitution only included language related to criminal cases, the Supreme Court has extended the privilege to civil proceedings, including bankruptcy cases. However, this privilege is not absolute, and can be waived …
Circuit Split Created Over Enactment Of Section 510(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code And Its Effect On The Rule Of Explicitness,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
Circuit Split Created Over Enactment Of Section 510(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code And Its Effect On The Rule Of Explicitness, Rossella Scarpa
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Bankruptcy law seeks to equitably distribute a debtor’s remaining assets among creditors. However, prior to bankruptcy, creditors can contract around their pro rata equitable distribution by executing inter-creditor agreements. Inter-creditor agreements are executed to delegate the rights and priorities of creditors as to a common borrower in the event the borrower defaults. Subordination agreements are a type of inter-creditor agreement, where junior creditors consent to senior creditors having their loans repaid in full before junior creditors receive their payment. Bankruptcy courts enforce subordination agreements through section 510(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), which …
Determining When The Granting Of Relief Is Deemed Abuse Of The Bankruptcy Code Under Section 707,
2019
St. John's University School of Law
Determining When The Granting Of Relief Is Deemed Abuse Of The Bankruptcy Code Under Section 707, Angela Bonica
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
There is no constitutional right for an individual to have their debts discharged. A discharge is a privilege offered to the honest but unfortunate debtor pursuant to title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). A bankruptcy court considers different standards and/or tests to determine when a debtor may be abusing the relief provided under the Bankruptcy Code. The specific provision that restricts relief because of abuse was originally enacted in 1984, and then amended in 2005 under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”). A main purpose of the BAPCPA was to deter abuses …
