The Taxing Ambiguity: Defining "Return" In Bankruptcy Dischargeability Cases,
2026
Cleveland State University College of Law
The Taxing Ambiguity: Defining "Return" In Bankruptcy Dischargeability Cases, Elizabeth Tsai
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note examines the circuit split over the dischargeability of tax debts tied to late-filed returns, which has led to inconsistent bankruptcy outcomes and inequitable treatment of debtors across jurisdictions. Some courts, adopting the strict “one-day-late” rule, hold that any tax return filed even a single day past its deadline is not a “return” for bankruptcy discharge purposes, permanently barring relief. Others apply a more flexible standard grounded in the Beard test, considering a debtor’s good-faith compliance efforts. This inconsistency contradicts the fresh start principle of bankruptcy law, disproportionately harms low-income debtors, and fails to serve the government’s tax collection …
The Business Bankruptcy “Big 3” And The Unanticipated Benefits Of Subchapter V,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
The Business Bankruptcy “Big 3” And The Unanticipated Benefits Of Subchapter V, Marshall V. Ringwood
BYU Law Review
The liberal bankruptcy venue rules in the United States have their defenders and advocates. Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code came into effect in 2020, justified as a bipartisan solution to a longstanding problem in corporate bankruptcy where restructuring under Chapter 11 was prohibitively expensive for small-business debtors. On June 21, 2024, Subchapter V’s extended debt limit of $7,500,000 in liabilities reverted back to a statutorily defined $3,024,725. In addition to the justifications offered by organizations such as the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) for both Subchapter V, generally, and a permanent increase to its debt limit, I argue that Subchapter …
Debt’S Dominion: A New Epilogue,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Debt’S Dominion: A New Epilogue, David Skeel
BYU Law Review
This Essay, written for the “Who Governs Debt’s Dominion” symposium, looks back on Debt’s Dominion: A History of Bankruptcy Law in America as the twenty-fifth anniversary of the book’s publication nears. The Essay begins, in Part I, by briefly describing how Debt’s Dominion came about. Part II identifies and seeks to explain a striking decline in optimism about American bankruptcy law since Debt’s Dominion was first published. Part III explores a few of the major recent developments in consumer bankruptcy, small business bankruptcy, and large-scale corporate reorganization that I would have analyzed in the book if it were written today. …
Specialization And The Permanence Of Federal Bankruptcy Law,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Specialization And The Permanence Of Federal Bankruptcy Law, Rafael I. Pardo
BYU Law Review
Traditional historical accounts posit that federal bankruptcy specialization in the United States first developed under the system established by the Bankruptcy Act of 1898. That view assumes that the structural and temporal conditions necessary to foster specialization did not exist under the nation’s earlier federal bankruptcy systems—those created by the Bankruptcy Acts of 1800, 1841, and 1867. This Article theorizes that federal bankruptcy specialization very likely occurred under the pre-1898 systems and marshals evidence to that effect, primarily focusing on the Bankruptcy Act of 1841 (the 1841 Act). That statute marked a critical turning point in federal bankruptcy law, shifting …
Disinterestedness In Bankruptcy Cases: Does It Really Matter?,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Disinterestedness In Bankruptcy Cases: Does It Really Matter?, Michelle M. Harner
BYU Law Review
The title of this Essay asks whether disinterestedness (of professionals) in bankruptcy cases really matters. Spoiler alert: Yes, it really does.
The Bankruptcy Judge And The Generalist Tradition,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
The Bankruptcy Judge And The Generalist Tradition, Alexander Gouzoules
BYU Law Review
The prevailing academic consensus is that bankruptcy judges are specialists presiding over specialized courts. This Article contends that this description is incomplete and, in some respects, inaccurate. Drawing on scholarly models of judicial specialization and historical surveys of the field, this Article contends that bankruptcy judges reflect a hybrid design choice: procedural specialization combined with substantive generalism. This model delivers many of the observed benefits of judicial specialization (including efficiency and technical competence) while preserving the cross-pollination of ideas and other benefits associated with the generalist tradition of American judging.
This Article also reflects on contemporary developments—most notably the rise …
Elite Bankruptcy,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Elite Bankruptcy, Laura N. Coordes
BYU Law Review
“The influence of bankruptcy lawyers over bankruptcy law seems almost inevitable.” —David Skeel
In Debt’s Dominion, David Skeel wrote that bankruptcy professionals have played a key role in shaping U.S. bankruptcy law. He predicted that these professionals would continue to shape the bankruptcy process long into the future. Today, we can see that Skeel’s prediction has come true. Although Congress has yet to overhaul the Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy professionals have succeeded in their own form of overhaul by creating what this Essay calls “elite bankruptcy:” a type of bankruptcy accessible only to the rich and powerful. Elite bankruptcy is practiced …
Finding Debtor’S Counsel,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Finding Debtor’S Counsel, Anthony Casey, Emma Lotts
BYU Law Review
In this Essay, we explore the question of how to assess the independence of debtor’s counsel in Chapter 11. The question has arisen in recent high-profile bankruptcy cases, attracting renewed attention from commentators. We examine these cases and revisit the unique role that debtor’s counsel serves.
From this analysis, a few guiding principles emerge for determining independence and managing conflicts that may arise. First, consistent with the rules outside of bankruptcy, sophisticated parties are capable of waiving conflicts and should be free to do so when their interests alone are affected by the conflict. Second, the possibility of conflicts—both real …
Bankruptcy Judging After Williamson,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Bankruptcy Judging After Williamson, Vincent S.J. Buccola
BYU Law Review
This Essay asks how bankruptcy judges ought to orient their substantial, statutory discretion in business reorganization cases. The motivating observation is that bankruptcy law enacts a kind of forced integration of productive assets. To shed light on the contemporary problems that bankruptcy judges face, I thus look to two classic approaches to the economic theory of the firm—from Oliver Williamson and from Oliver Hart. I conclude that nonjudicial institutions have largely surmounted the problems to which their theories point, leaving a different, and probably narrower, set of issues to worry about. Bankruptcy judges who have a notion that their job …
Governing Debt’S Dominion: Then And Now, Here And Abroad,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Governing Debt’S Dominion: Then And Now, Here And Abroad, Brook E. Gotberg
BYU Law Review
Widely regarded as a landmark in bankruptcy scholarship, Professor David Skeel’s Debt’s Dominion charts the evolution of American corporate bankruptcy law and the forces that have governed it.1 In this seminal work, Skeel traces federal bankruptcy laws from their roots in the U.S. Constitution through their development over the twentieth century, detailing the political dynamics that shaped their scope and administration. Among those dynamics, he identifies the emergence of a specialized bankruptcy bar as one of the most influential forces shaping the law. As he explains, “bankruptcy professionals have spearheaded a relentless expansion of both the scope of the bankruptcy …
Volume 14 Masthead,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
The Bankruptcy Judge And The Generalist Tradition,
2026
University of Missouri School of Law
The Bankruptcy Judge And The Generalist Tradition, Alexander Gouzoules
Faculty Publications
The prevailing academic consensus is that bankruptcy judges are specialists presiding over specialized courts. This Article contends that this description is incomplete and, in some respects, inaccurate. Drawing on scholarly models of judicial specialization and historical surveys of the field, this Article contends that bankruptcy judges reflect a hybrid design choice: procedural specialization combined with substantive generalism. This model delivers many of the observed benefits of judicial specialization (including efficiency and technical competence) while preserving the cross-pollination of ideas and other benefits associated with the generalist tradition of American judging.
This Article also reflects on contemporary developments—most notably the rise …
Does Bidder Complexity Affect Market Reactions To M&A Decisions?,
2026
Pennsylvania State University
Does Bidder Complexity Affect Market Reactions To M&A Decisions?, Rajib Chowdhury, John A. Doukas
Finance Faculty Publications
We examine whether and how bidder complexity influences investor reactions to merger and acquisition (M&A) announcements. Using an established measure of complexity, we find a significant positive relationship between acquiring firm complexity and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR). This suggests that investors perceive more complex firms as capable and value-enhancing participants in M&A activities. The association is particularly strong for bidders with high operating risk, greater R&D intensity, and larger firm size. We also find that complex bidders tend to offer higher takeover premiums. Overall, our study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that bidder complexity is an important determinant of …
A Bankruptcy Resuscitation: Addressing Private Equity’S Role In Healthcare Insolvencies,
2026
Emory University School of Law
A Bankruptcy Resuscitation: Addressing Private Equity’S Role In Healthcare Insolvencies, Peyton K. Perry
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
The healthcare sector, traditionally driven by a commitment to patient well-being and quality of care, has increasingly been influenced by financialization, particularly through private equity investments. This Comment explores the impact of private equity on healthcare companies, especially those facing bankruptcy by highlighting how private equity’s profit-driven motives often compromise patient care and lead to financial distress for healthcare providers and companies.
Specifically, this Comment examines the historical context of healthcare as a healing profession and the ethical implications of its financialization. It then delves into the mechanics of private equity as a business model and utilizes recent case studies …
Introduction: A Tribute To Jack Butler,
2026
Emory University School of Law
Introduction: A Tribute To Jack Butler, Jackson A. Brown
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
No abstract provided.
Priority Treatment Of Fraud Claims In Bankruptcy,
2026
Emory University School of Law
Priority Treatment Of Fraud Claims In Bankruptcy, John P. Hunt
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
No abstract provided.
Bankruptcy’S Blind Spot: An Examination Of How The System Turns Its Back On Mentally Ill Debtors,
2026
Emory University School of Law
Bankruptcy’S Blind Spot: An Examination Of How The System Turns Its Back On Mentally Ill Debtors, Ashley Deady
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
No abstract provided.
Fresh Start Or False Promise? Addressing Black Student Loan Debt Through Bankruptcy,
2026
Emory University School of Law
Fresh Start Or False Promise? Addressing Black Student Loan Debt Through Bankruptcy, Adji Ostin
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
No abstract provided.
Cashman Equip. Corp., Inc. V. Cardi Corp., Inc., 335 A.3d 430 (R.I. 2025).,
2026
Candidate for Juris Doctor, Roger Williams University School of Law
Cashman Equip. Corp., Inc. V. Cardi Corp., Inc., 335 A.3d 430 (R.I. 2025)., India E. Awe
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
