Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Penalizing Compliance: The Case For Paying Chapter 13 Trustees In The Event Of Pre-Confirmation Dismissal, Hannah L. Fink

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Standing trustees provide a critical function of fairness in chapter 13 bankruptcy, but a jurisdictional split regarding their fees means that trustees in multiple circuits are not paid for a large percentage of their work. Under Ninth and Tenth Circuit precedents, standing trustees may not collect the percentage fee when the debtor’s case is dismissed before confirmation. This creates a different result for standing trustees as opposed to single-case trustees, hurts debtors and creditors, creates adverse incentives, and even constitutional conundrums.

Permitting some debtors to enjoy the benefits of chapter 13 without paying their fair share creates a system where …

Chapter 13: Let’S Call The Whole Thing Off, Lawrence Ponoroff

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Courts cannot agree on much of anything about chapter 13, and legislators cannot agree and are confused over what to do about it. This state of affairs benefits no one and shows no signs of abating. So, in this Article, I propose to throw in the towel by imagining a world without chapter 13. Spoiler alert: although I am not superstitious, with just a few tweaks and tucks to chapter 7, I think the Bankruptcy Code might just be better off operating like a high-rise elevator that goes directly from floor twelve to floor fourteen. I will lay it out …

Rural Health Care In The Age Of Hospital Bankruptcies, Sonal Rastogi

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

In recent years, the United States has witnessed a surge in bankruptcy filings within the healthcare sector. Inflation, rising expenses, shifts in payment models, labor shortages, legislative uncertainty, and mounting pharmaceutical costs have impacted all healthcare organizations, casting a shadow over communities. This is particularly evident in rural America where hospital closures have shrunk access to healthcare services. This Comment delves into the challenges and interests at play when healthcare entities and nonprofit organizations navigate bankruptcy proceedings, paying particular attention to the challenges faced by health care business bankruptcy proceedings.

This Comment argues that the current bankruptcy framework requires adjustments …

Bankrupting The Matrix: Daos And The Code, Ryan Levin

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The utilization of the novel Decentralized Autonomous Organization (“DAO”) structure to conduct business activity creates substantial challenges for the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”). The characteristics of this unregulated, extralegal entity, built entirely on a blockchain and controlled by anonymous members through digital tokens, provides endless opportunities to avoid legal enforcement and exploit the Code. While the Code has provisions to apply to both individuals and organized actors, such as partnerships and corporations, neither DAOs nor their individual token holders fit neatly into these molds. When a DAO, or a DAO token holder, eventually faces bankruptcy, the current state of the …

The Rise Of Uptier Transactions In The Leveraged Loan Market, Joshua Bichovsky

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The use of uptier transactions has exploded in the leveraged loan market, precipitated by economic pressure, flexible debt documentation, and permissive treatment by courts. In an uptier transaction, a borrower typically issues senior debt to a new or pre-existing group of lenders by exchanging outstanding debt for superpriority debt, thereby subordinating an existing class of lenders. The principal result of these transactions is that the borrower may obtain follow-on secured financing without offering the investment to all its lenders, thereby materially decreasing the value of each excluded lender’s investment. Due to the material effects of these transactions to unsuspecting lenders, …

Liquidating Fiduciary Warning: Do Not Follow The Yellow (Corp.) Brick Road, Jeremiah A. Carew Iii

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Yellow Corporation, the 99-year-old trucking giant, filed for bankruptcy on August 6, 2023. A week before filing, the company abruptly shut down its operations and laid off its entire workforce of thirty thousand employees. Under the Warn Act, employers like Yellow are required to notify their employees 60 days before conducting any mass layoffs or plant closings. Yellow, however, claimed that it did not need to give any advanced notice to its employees because it qualified for an obscure exception to the Warn Act known as the liquidating fiduciary exception.

Under the sliding scale test established in In re United …

The Consumer’S Choice To Boycott, Agnes Bresee

Seattle University Law Review

In the wake of employees losing their jobs upon voicing their political opinions concerning Israel, Harvard and Columbia law students’ job offers being rescinded upon expressing support for Palestine, and the names and social media profiles of individuals who support Palestine being collected and listed on Canary Mission, such backlash may leave many Americans wondering what form of resistance to settler-colonialist apartheid is acceptable in the twenty-first century. Recently, the movement to collectively boycott brands like Starbucks, which sued its Worker’s Union for a tweet expressing support for Palestine; Disney, which donated money to Israel; and McDonald’s, where a location …

A Different Approach To Agency Theory And Implications For Esg, Jonathan Bonham, Amoray Riggs-Cragun

Seattle University Law Review

In conventional agency theory, the agent is modeled as exerting unobservable “effort” that influences the distribution over outcomes the principal cares about. Recent papers instead allow the agent to choose the entire distribution, an assumption that better describes the extensive and flexible control that CEOs have over firm outcomes. Under this assumption, the optimal contract rewards the agent directly for outcomes the principal cares about, rather than for what those outcomes reveal about the agent’s effort. This article briefly summarizes this new agency model and discusses its implications for contracting on ESG activities.

Overseeing The Administrative State, Jill E. Fisch

Seattle University Law Review

In a series of recent cases, the Supreme Court has reduced the regulatory power of the Administrative State. Pending cases offer vehicles for the Court to go still further. Although the Court’s skepticism of administrative agencies may be rooted in Constitutional principles or political expediency, this Article explores another possible explanation—a shift in the nature of agencies and their regulatory role. As Pritchard and Thompson detail in their important book, A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court was initially skeptical of agency power, jeopardizing Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)’s ambitious New Deal plan. The Court’s acceptance …

The Sec, The Supreme Court, And The Administrative State, Paul G. Mahoney

Seattle University Law Review

Pritchard and Thompson have given those of us who study the SEC and the securities laws much food for thought. Their methodological focus is on the internal dynamics of the Court’s deliberations, on which they have done detailed and valuable work. The Court did not, however, operate in a vacuum. Intellectual trends in economics and law over the past century can also help us understand the SEC’s fortunes in the federal courts and make predictions about its future.

A Hard Pill To Swallow: The Abysmal Mental Health Standards Of Detained Immigrant Children In The United States, Rama Bankesly

Seattle University Law Review

After setting foot into the U.S., unaccompanied children must learn to navigate academic and legal systems while receiving little support and carrying the heavy burden of effects of trauma on their mental health. They need access to mental health care from qualified professionals, but as this Comment will explain, they systematically fail to receive care, as can be seen in cases like Doe v. Shenandoah Valley Juv. Ctr. Comm’n. In Shenandoah, an unaccompanied child arrived in the U.S. and was placed in a facility that failed to provide remotely adequate mental health care and in fact was subjected …

Rethinking Antebellum Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo

Scholarship@WashULaw

Bankruptcy law has been repeatedly reinvented over time in response to changing circumstances. The Bankruptcy Act of 1841—passed by Congress to address the financial ruin caused by the Panic of 1837—constituted a revolutionary break from its immediate predecessor, the Bankruptcy Act of 1800, which was the nation’s first bankruptcy statute. Although Congress repealed the 1841 Act in 1843, the legislation lasted significantly longer than recognized by scholars. The repeal legislation permitted pending bankruptcy cases to be finally resolved pursuant to the Act’s terms. Because debtors flooded the judicially understaffed 1841 Act system with over 46,000 cases, the Act’s administration continued …

Law In Books Versus Law In Action In The Landmark Shenzhen, China, Personal Bankruptcy Regime, Jason J. Kilborn

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The first personal bankruptcy regime in Mainland China celebrated its second anniversary on March 1, 2023. An empirical assessment of the law in action during these first two years reveals some troubling deviations from the early promises of the new law on the books. In the first year, a handful of judges were charged with an arduous in-person review process for over 1,000 applicants, and they accepted only twenty-five for case initiation. In the second year, initial case review was delegated to an administrative body—an important efficiency enhancement that tripled the number of opened cases. Nonetheless, most debtors continue to …

Introduction: A Tribute To The Honorable Thomas L. Ambro, Z Arima

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Acceptance Remarks For The 2024 Distinguished Service Award For Lifetime Achievement, Thomas L. Ambro

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Access To Justice: A Roadmap To Creating And Launching Consumer Bankruptcy Experiential Programs In Law Schools, Ishaq Kundawala

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Just Consumer Financial Protection: Prevention Or Cure, Andrea J. Boyack

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Foreclosure Sales As Fraudulent Transfers, David G. Carlson

Articles

The Supreme Court has declared that noncollusive, regularly conducted foreclosure sales are not “constructive” fraudulent transfers voidable by a bankruptcy trustee Uniform state legislation ratifies this instinct for private creditor enforcements. But collusive or irregular foreclosure sales or sales that are intended to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors are subject to creditor attack, even though unsecured creditors are not proper parties to the foreclosure process. In such cases, unsecured creditors can cloud the title obtained from foreclosure in the cases of collusion, irregularity or fraudulent intent. This article examines precisely when foreclosure sales can be avoided by unsecured creditors of …

Regulating Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Analysis Of U.S. And Eu Approaches, Xander Xueyang Peng

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note compares the regulatory approaches of the U.S. and the EU regarding cryptocurrency, focusing on sanctions and anti-money laundering (AML). It argues that while the EU has implemented a comprehensive regulatory framework, the U.S. relies on fragmented enforcement actions and lacks a unified approach. The EU's structured regulations, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, are more effective in addressing the challenges posed by cryptocurrency, including traceability and compliance. The note advocates for the U.S. to adopt a more robust regulatory framework, including know-your-customer (KYC) requirements and stricter AML measures, to enhance accountability and security in the crypto …

Stronger - Not Together: The Needed Elimination Of Mandatory Arbitration For Sexual Misconduct Claims Against The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee & International Olympic Committee, Peri L. Ayzidor

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Mandatory arbitration clauses have acted as litigation blocks in employment and commercial contracts for decades. The downfall of such clauses was catalyzed by the infamous trial of Olympic doctor, Larry Nassar. The grueling evidence and testimony sparked the creation of acts such as the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act ("EFSASHA"), which barred the enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses in claims involving sexual misconduct. Mandatory/forced arbitration clauses keep any claims made by employees or individuals private and limits their right to take a claim to court. Such clauses make it almost impossible for sexual misconduct survivors …