Iosco: The World Standard Setter For Globalized Financial Markets,
2012
University of Richmond
Iosco: The World Standard Setter For Globalized Financial Markets, Antonio Marcacci
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
As the current endless crisis clearly proves, world financial markets are closely interconnected. In order to provide a legal backdrop, a soft-law body, named the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), was established and tasked with encouraging an efficient flow of capital. Funded as a Pan-American, and subsequently worldwide, forum more than thirty years ago, IOSCO is a multilateral regulatory network whose members are the public regulators of more than ninety percent of the world’s securities and futures markets. It is devoted to promoting common and efficient regulations, setting the floor for the exchange of information between its members, improving …
What Is Competition?,
2012
University of Tennessee College of Law
Reforming Wto Discipline On Export Duties: Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, Economic Development And Environmental Protection,
2012
Wayne State University
Reforming Wto Discipline On Export Duties: Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, Economic Development And Environmental Protection, Julia Ya Qin
Law Faculty Research Publications
The current World Trade Organization (WTO) regime on export restraints comprises two extremes: at one end is the near-complete freedom to levy export duties enjoyed by most Members, which renders theWTO discipline on export restrictions largely ineffective; at the other end, the rigid obligations imposed on several acceding Members prohibiting the use of export duties for any purpose.The recent WTO ruling in China-Raw Materials has only solidified the latter extreme. This article seeks to expose the irrationality of the current regime, especially the problems created by the rigid obligations of the several acceding Members. It contends that such obligations deprive …
Zgody Szczególne W Prawie Kontroli Koncentracji,
2012
University of Warsaw
Zgody Szczególne W Prawie Kontroli Koncentracji, Tadeusz Skoczny
Monografie CARS/CARS Monographs
Kolejna (dziesiąta) monografia z serii wydawniczej „Podręczniki i Monografie” CARS autorstwa prof. Tadeusza Skocznego jest poświęcona praktycznie najważniejszemu elementowi prewencyjnej kontroli koncentracji – materialno- i formalnoprawnym podstawom udzielania zgód szczególnych na dokonanie koncentracji. U podstaw pracy leży teoretyczna koncepcja zgód szczególnych, dla których wydania nie wystarczy stwierdzenie, że zamiar koncentracji nie prowadzi do istotnego ograniczenia konkurencji (jak w sytuacji zgody zwykłej) lub które muszą być wydane, mimo że zamierzona koncentracja do istotnego ograniczenia konkurencji prowadzi i powinna zostać zakazana. Przedmiotem analiz autora są trzy rodzaje zgód szczególnych: zgody wyjątkowe, wydawane wtedy, gdy zakaz dokonania koncentracji jest niedopuszczalny z uwagi na …
Trolling For Standards: How Courts And The Administrative State Can Help Deter Patent Holdup And Promote Innovation,
2012
Vanderbilt University Law School
Trolling For Standards: How Courts And The Administrative State Can Help Deter Patent Holdup And Promote Innovation, Niels J. Melius
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Antitrust law and patent law share the common goal of improving economic welfare by facilitating competition and innovation. But these legal fields conflict when baseless claims of patent infringement disrupt the competitive process. In its eBay decision, the Supreme Court muddied the precedential waters by promulgating a vague doctrine of injunctive relief in patent infringement cases. In the years since, a split has emerged in the district courts on the question of which entities generally qualify for injunctive relief as an additional remedy to damages. This uncertainty has failed to mitigate an antitrust phenomenon known as "patent holdup," whereby an …
The Perils Of Armchair Analysis: Evaluating Merger Enforcement During The Obama Administration,
2012
American University Washington College of Law
The Perils Of Armchair Analysis: Evaluating Merger Enforcement During The Obama Administration, Jonathan Baker, Carl Shapiro
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This brief comment responds to the analysis of Obama administration merger policy in Daniel A. Crane, Has the Obama Justice Department Reinvigorated Antitrust Enforcement? 65 STAN. L. REV. ONLINE 13 (2012).
Cocos Can Drive Markets Cuckoo,
2012
American University Washington College of Law
Cocos Can Drive Markets Cuckoo, Hilary Allen
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Bank-issued contingent-convertible capital instruments (known colloquially as "cocos ") are assumed to be a less costly substitute for common equity that will improve the stability of banks in a crisis situation. However, cocos are new and untested instruments. In a future financial crisis they are likely to incentivize behaviors and trading strategies (notably panic selling short selling, and the use of credit default swaps) that have the potential to harm confidence in banks. Without confidence, banks will have difficulty funding themselves and the likely consequences of bank difficulties (credit crunches and possible bailouts) will be felt by society at large. …
Anticompetitive Product Design In The New Economy,
2012
University of Miami School of Law
Anticompetitive Product Design In The New Economy, John M. Newman
Articles
Claims alleging anticompetitive product design and redesign lie at the very core of one of antitrust law's most challenging dilemmas: the intersection between innovation and regulation, invention and intervention. For over three decades, courts and scholars have struggled to determine the proper analytical framework within which to address such cases. Meanwhile, the very industries in which challenged conduct occurs have been undergoing fundamental changes.
As demonstrated by the ongoing and recent antitrust litigation involving high technology firms Apple, Intel, and Microsoft, distinctive features characterize most product markets in what has been called the 'New Economy'"--and what increasingly has become simply …
Unraveling The Chicago/Harvard Antitrust Double Helix: Applying Evolutionary Theory To Guard Competitors And Revive Antitrust Jury Trials,
2012
University of South Dakota School of Law
Unraveling The Chicago/Harvard Antitrust Double Helix: Applying Evolutionary Theory To Guard Competitors And Revive Antitrust Jury Trials, Thomas J. Horton
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Element" Of Surprise: The Third Circuit Bucks The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Trend In Animal Science Products, Inc. V. China Minmetals Corp.,
2012
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The "Element" Of Surprise: The Third Circuit Bucks The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Trend In Animal Science Products, Inc. V. China Minmetals Corp., Daniel Wotherspoon
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Extraterritorial Protection Of Trade Secret Rights In China: Do Section 337 Actions At The Itc Really Prevent Trade Secret Theft Abroad?, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 523 (2012),
2012
UIC School of Law
Extraterritorial Protection Of Trade Secret Rights In China: Do Section 337 Actions At The Itc Really Prevent Trade Secret Theft Abroad?, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 523 (2012), Steven E. Feldman, Sherry L. Rollo
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
With an ever increasing number of United States ("U.S.") companies conducting business abroad or conducting business with foreign entities there is more need than ever for the U.S. companies to consider how they can protect their intellectual property assets. The Federal Circuit‘s recent TianRui Grp.Co. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n and Amsted Indus. decision highlights the potential of section 337 of the U.S. Patent Act as a tool to prevent the exploitation of misappropriated trade secrets embodied in products that are imported into the United States. This article explores the potential impact of the TianRui decision on business practices abroad, particularly …
Continuing The Conversation Of "The Economic Irrationality Of The Patent Misuse Doctrine",
2012
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University
Continuing The Conversation Of "The Economic Irrationality Of The Patent Misuse Doctrine", Christa J. Laser
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article seeks to use economic tools and insights to find the best way for courts to construe or for Congress to modify the patent misuse doctrine. As the title suggests, it attempts to continue the conversation begun by Professor Mark Lemley in his often-cited Comment, The Economic irrationality of the Patent Misuse Doctrine.
Part I provides a brief history of the doctrine of patent misuse. Part II begins with a premise that a partial economic equilibrium can be achieved by attempting to match Congress's intended patent scope with the actual patent scope, even assuming that economic tools can never …
The Predicament Of China's "Wto-Plus" Obligation To Eliminate Export Duties: A Commentary On The China-Raw Materials Case,
2012
Wayne State University
The Predicament Of China's "Wto-Plus" Obligation To Eliminate Export Duties: A Commentary On The China-Raw Materials Case, Julia Ya Qin
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Adopting Accountable Care Through The Medicare Framework,
2012
University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Law
Adopting Accountable Care Through The Medicare Framework, Barbara Zabawa, Louise G. Trubek, Felice Borisey-Rudin
Faculty Works
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) attempts to provoke change in the status quo in American health care delivery and payment. PPACA created two programs, the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and the Pioneer ACO model, which work to bring the concept of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to the Medicare program. At its core, accountable care matches payment for care with performance-based measures, a bold move away from current volume-based models. The paper makes the case that the Medicare-based programs serve as a suitable launch pad for the accountable care movement. The paper explores the emergence …
Antitrust, Innovation, And Product Design In Platform Markets: Microsoft And Intel,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Antitrust, Innovation, And Product Design In Platform Markets: Microsoft And Intel, William H. Page, Seldon J. Childers
UF Law Faculty Publications
The Antitrust Division’s Microsoft case and the Federal Trade Commission’s Intel case both rested on claims that antitrust intervention was necessary to preserve innovation in technological platforms at the heart of the personal computer. Yet, because those very platforms support markets that are among the most innovative in the American economy, injudicious intervention might well have jeopardized the very innovation that antitrust should promote. In this article, we review the role of platforms in technological innovation and consider how antitrust standards should apply to them. We then examine how Microsoft resolved antitrust issues affecting platform design at various stages of …
Beyond Labor Rights: Which Core Human Rights Must Regional Trade Agreements Protect?,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Beyond Labor Rights: Which Core Human Rights Must Regional Trade Agreements Protect?, Stephen J. Powell, Trisha Low
UF Law Faculty Publications
As World Trade Organization ("WTO") Members relentlessly pursue new regional trade agreements to achieve even faster economic growth than the extraordinary numbers posted by global trade rules, the smaller number of parties and their greater cultural affinity have led negotiators to address the intersection of trade and human rights to an extent unparalleled in the culturally disparate and near-unmanageable, 150-plus member WTO itself. These new provisions have used trade's huge power to improve worker rights, secure environmental protections, and make initial inroads toward defending indigenous populations from trade's adverse effects. Employing the perspectives both of trade negotiators and students of …
Standard Oil And U.S. Steel: Predation And Collusion In The Law Of Monopolization And Mergers,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Standard Oil And U.S. Steel: Predation And Collusion In The Law Of Monopolization And Mergers, William H. Page
UF Law Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court’s 1911 decision in Standard Oil gave us embryonic versions of two foundational standards of liability under the Sherman Act: the rule of reason under Section 1 and the monopoly power/exclusionary conduct test under Section 2. But a case filed later in 1911, United States v. United States Steel Corporation, shaped the understanding of Standard Oil’s standards of liability for decades. U.S. Steel, eventually decided by the Supreme Court in 1920, upheld the 1901 merger that created "the Corporation," as U.S. Steel was known. The majority found that the efforts of the Corporation and its …
A Neo-Chicago Approach To Concerted Action,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
A Neo-Chicago Approach To Concerted Action, William H. Page
UF Law Faculty Publications
In this article, I offer an approach to concerted action that builds on traditional Chicago School analyses of the issue, but adds a focus on the role of communication. Chicago scholars uniformly identify cartels as the primary target of antitrust enforcement. They have also established much of the framework within which courts and economists analyze concerted action. George Stigler’s seminal theory of oligopoly, which sought to identify the determinants of effective collusion, has spawned an enormous literature in game theory that models the pricing behavior of oligopolists. Richard Posner’s early analysis of tacit collusion - rivals’ coordination of noncompetitive pricing …
The Rule Of Reason And The Goals Of Antitrust: An Economic Approach,
2012
University of Florida
The Rule Of Reason And The Goals Of Antitrust: An Economic Approach, Roger D. Blair, D. Daniel Sokol
UF Law Faculty Publications
In this paper, we discuss the problem of the rule of reason and the welfare standard in antitrust. We begin with the Introduction (Section I), which provides an overview of the problem. In Section II, we review the Supreme Court’s guidance on the standard for conducting a rule of reason analysis. Put simply, the Supreme Court has failed to identify clearly what standard to use in conducting a rule of reason inquiry. After a careful — albeit selective — reading of Supreme Court opinions it is simply not clear. While a case can be made for total welfare as the …
Cartels, Corporate Compliance, And What Practitioners Really Think About Enforcement,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Cartels, Corporate Compliance, And What Practitioners Really Think About Enforcement, D. Daniel Sokol
UF Law Faculty Publications
This article shows the limitations to the optimal deterrence-inspired cartel enforcement policy currently used by the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. This article employs both quantitative and qualitative survey evidence of cartel practitioners to shed light upon the realities of US cartel enforcement policy. The empirical evidence provided by the practitioner surveys challenges the traditional assumptions behind the success of the DOJ’s cartel program. Perhaps the most interesting finding is that firms regularly game the leniency program to punish their competitors. For various reasons, firms and the DOJ have strong incentives to settle rather than to litigate cases in which …
