Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons^™

Misappropriation Of Trade Secrets, Leonard M. Niehoff

Book Chapters

This is an action for injunctive and monetary relief brought by Plaintiff pursuant to the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1998, MCL 445 .1901 et seq. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant {corporation I individual}, in violation of state law, has {acquired Plaintiff's trade secrets knowing, or having reason to know, that the trade secrets were acquired by improper means I disclosed or used Plaintiff's trade secrets without Plaintiff's consent}.

Implementation Of The Eu Damages Directive In Central And Eastern European Countries, Anna Piszcz

Monografie CARS/CARS Monographs

Ukazała się właśnie w wersji papierowej (i będzie tylko w wersji papierowej) 24. publikacja CARS z serii „Textbooks and Monographs” pt. Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Edited by Anna Piszcz, Warsaw 2017, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press. Książka zawiera raporty z implementacji tzw. Dyrektywy Odszkodowawczej przez wszystkie 11 państw członkowskich UE z Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (Bułgarię, Chorwację, Czechy, Estonię, Litwę, Łotwę, Polskę, Rumunię, Słowację, Słowenię i Węgry). Książkę można nabyć w Księgarni Wydziałowej Tomasz Biel, PL – 02-678 Warszawa, ul. Szturmowa 3; tel. (+48) 22 822-90-42; fax (+48) 22 …

Ocena Siły Rynkowej Przedsiębiorcy W Nadzorze Nad Horyzontalnymi Koncentracjami Przedsiębiorców, Dariusz Aziewicz

Monografie CARS/CARS Monographs

Książka jest pierwszą w Polsce publikacją traktującą wyłącznie o ocenie skutków ekonomicznych horyzontalnych koncentracji przedsiębiorców. Celem książki jest skonstruowanie modeli oceny skutków koncentracji, opartych o dostępna wiedzę ekonomiczna, a których stosowanie powinno w prowadzić do zwiększenia skuteczności nadzoru państwa nad tego typu operacjami gospodarczymi. Książka jest oparta o pracę doktorską obroniona z wyróżnieniem w Instytucie Nauk Prawno-Administracyjnych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Publikacja oparta jest w głównej mierze na ekonomicznej analizie prawa. Książka zawiera też elementy analizy prawno-porównawczej Polskiego porządku prawnego a także praw antymonopolowych Niemiec, Wielkiej Brytanii, Francji, Unii Europejskiej oraz USA. Konstruowane modele oceny skutków koncentracji podzielone …

Retooling The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Intersection: Insights From Behavioral Economics, 69 Baylor L. Rev. 124 (2017), Daryl Lim

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

This Article argues that courts should operationalize insights offered by behavioral economics in developing jurisprudence at the patent-antitrust interface.

I Dissent: The Federal Circuit’S “Great Dissenter,” Her Influence On The Patent Dialogue, And Why It Matters, 19 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. 873 (2017), Daryl Lim

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

This Article is the first study to comprehensively explore the centrality of the patent dialogue at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the nation’s principal patent court from empirical, doctrinal, and policy perspectives. It offers several insights into how the Federal Circuit reaches consensus and when it does not, serving as a window into its inner workings, a reference to academics, judges, and attorneys alike. More broadly, this Article provides a template to study the “legal dialogue” of other judges at the Federal Circuit, those in other Circuits, as well as those in other areas of the law. …

Debating Employee Non-Competes And Trade Secrets, Sharon Sandeen, Elizabeth A. Rowe

Faculty Scholarship

Recently, a cacophony of concerns have been raised about the propriety of noncompetition agreements (NCAs) entered into between employers and employees, fueled by media reports of agreements which attempt to restrain low-wage and low-skilled workers, such as sandwich makers and dog walkers. In the lead-up to the passage of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of2016 (DTSA), public policy arguments in favor of employee mobility were strongly advocated by those representing the "California view" on the enforceability of NCAs, leading to a special provision of the DTSA that limits injunctive relief with respect to employee NCAs. Through our lens as …

The Courts' Interpretations Of Legitimate Business Purposes, With Applications To Lexmark, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 411 (2017), W. Lesser

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Courts frequently must assess 'intent'. This article applies to the interpretation the intent of "legitimate business purposes" as a justification for restrictive use licensing agreements for patented products. Generally, the 'first sale' doctrine terminates the use rights of the patent holder. However, if the sale is conditioned on some use limitations and violators of those terms are liable for infringement. The courts, suggested in Mitchell v. Hawley (1872) and formalized in Mallinckrodt v. Medipart (1992), have allowed use restrictions based on license terms. Restrictions are disallowed under the affirmative defense of patent invalidity, such as from an antitrust violation. This …

Insider Trading Flaw: Toward A Fraud-On-The-Market Theory And Beyond, Kenneth R. Davis

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Big Pharma Monopoly: Why Consumers Keep Landing On "Park Place" And How The Game Is Rigged, Mark S. Levy

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Patents V. Antitrust: Preempting Conflict, Matthew G. Sipe

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny (internet Quarterly on Antitrust and Regulation)

Table of contents

2016 Survey Of Rhode Island Law: Cases And Public Laws Of Note

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

E. Bement & Sons V. National Harrow Company: The First Skirmish Between Patent Law And The Sherman Act, Amelia Rinehart

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

In the 1890s, the Sherman Act presented a host of unknowns for patent owners and lax enforcement enabled the proliferation of trusts like the Harrow Trust embodied in the practices of National Harrow. Bement, a profligate license violator, ended up fighting the trust all the way to the Supreme Court, but the surprising outcome left an enduring impression on the interplay between antitrust and patent law. In this way, the case has been both important and forgotten over time. Given the outcome in Actavis, and the possibility for a change of personnel on the Court that may shift it further …

The Bds Movement: That Which We Call A Foreign Boycott, By Any Other Name, Is Still Illegal, Marc A. Greendorfer

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Untangling The Market And The State, Wentong Zheng

UF Law Faculty Publications

The government plays increasingly active and diversified roles in the modern economy. How to draw the boundary between the market and the state has emerged as a contentious issue in various areas of law, including constitutional law, antitrust, and international trade. This Article surveys and critiques the law’s current approaches to the market-versus-state divide, embodied in four tests based on ownership, control, function, and role, respectively. This Article proposes an alternative market-versus-state test based on the nature of the power being exercised in the challenged action. This power-based test not only better distinguishes between the market and the state, but …

Promoting Access Over Ownership: Realigning Antitrust And Intellectual Property Law To Usher In An Era Of Collaborative Consumption, Adrian Kuenzler

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Following the US Supreme Court's endorsement of the promotion of consumer welfare as the single goal of antitrust and intellectual property laws, many courts have reasserted their commitment to the market access doctrine for antitrust and intellectual property law liability. These courts have rejected the Court's submission in GTE Sylvania to adhere to a strict output/profitability test concentrating predominantly on the positive and negative welfare effects regarding allegedly infringing conduct. This Article examines several important antitrust and intellectual property law decisions and locates within them a common flaw to express an intelligible, distinct doctrinal function for giving precedence to market …

Major League Soccer's Exceptionalism In Fifa's Transfer System: For How Much Longer?, Remo Decurtins

Marquette Sports Law Review

None

Not Everyone Qualifies: A Comparative Look At Antitrust Law And Nascar's Charter System, Tyler M. Helsel

Marquette Sports Law Review

None

Retooling The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Intersection: Insights From Behavioral Economics, Daryl Lim

Faculty Scholarly Works

This Article argues that courts should operationalize insights offered by behavioral economics in developing jurisprudence at the patent-antitrust interface.

I Dissent: The Federal Circuit's "Great Dissenter," Her Influence On The Patent Dialogue, And Why It Matters, Daryl Lim

Faculty Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.