Conflicting Canons Of Construction: The Aftermath In Veterans’ Law,
2025
Brooklyn Law School
Conflicting Canons Of Construction: The Aftermath In Veterans’ Law, Carlissa R. Carson
Brooklyn Law Review
Until June 28, 2024, when the United States Supreme Court overturned decades of administrative law precedent, veterans' law judges, veterans, and practitioners alike would gather in the administrative law arena to watch an unpredictable battle: Chevron vs. Gardner. The outcome of bouts between these heavyweights was as unexpected as the plot twist in an M. Night Shyamalan film. As a result, our nation’s veterans were defeated. Federal courts tended to apply either Chevron (agency deference) or Gardner (veteran friendliness) and courts rarely mentioned both canons of construction in the same opinion. It was difficult to predict which canon of construction …
Dental Board Of California,
2025
University of San Diego
Dental Board Of California, Isaiah Artis, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy,
2025
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, Ariana Hussing, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board,
2025
University of San Diego
Veterinary Medical Board, Isiah Artis, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Financial Protection And Innovation,
2025
University of San Diego
Department Of Financial Protection And Innovation, Maya Patel, Marcus Friedman
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
State Bar Of California,
2025
University of San Diego
State Bar Of California, Jamie Russo, Marcus Friedman
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Masthead,
2025
University of San Diego
Public Utilities Commission,
2025
University of San Diego
Public Utilities Commission, Wyatt Page, Selena Sanchez, Steven Soldani, Marcus Friedman, Erol Kilic
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy,
2025
University of San Diego
California Board Of Accountancy, Shun Lam, Erol Kilic
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Medical Board Of California,
2025
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Byanca Hutchins, Katie González, Erol Kilic
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau Of Private Postsecondary Education,
2025
University of San Diego
Bureau Of Private Postsecondary Education, Caitlin D. Barón, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Insurance,
2025
University of San Diego
Department Of Insurance, Lisette Cruz, Erol Kilic
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing,
2025
University of San Diego
Board Of Registered Nursing, Ariana Hussing, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Key,
2025
University of San Diego
Department Of Managed Health,
2025
University of San Diego
Department Of Managed Health, Zoe Bulls, Marcus Friedman, Erol Kilic
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Contractors State License Board,
2025
University of San Diego
Contractors State License Board, Shun Lam, Katie González
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Working With Statutes,
2025
Boston University School of Law
Working With Statutes, Anya Bernstein, Cristina Rodriguez
Faculty Scholarship
In its decision overruling the Chevron doctrine—which directed judges to accept an agency’s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous statutory language—the Supreme Court declares: “[A]gencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do.” This Article shows why this statement exhibits a profoundly blinkered judicial hubris. Our interview-based empirical study, involving dozens of agency officials across the administrative state, shows agencies’ special, indeed unique, competence in working with statutes to make democratic enactments real.
Agencies, we show, act as a statute’s custodians, managing the statutory regime over a life cycle that exceeds any single governing coalition. Borrowing ideas from private law, …
Deference Or Preference: Analyzing The Treatment Of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Nrdc As A Precedent At The Supreme Court,
2025
University of South Carolina
Deference Or Preference: Analyzing The Treatment Of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Nrdc As A Precedent At The Supreme Court, Allison Dehart
Senior Theses
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. is one of the most cited Supreme Court cases in history, with over 18,000 citations in federal courts alone (Merrill, 2012). It has reached doctrinal status and was widely considered a vital precedent, one that guided the fields of environmental and administrative law. However, in June of 2024, the Supreme Court released their opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned Chevron. With the ubiquity of Chevron in US Courts, this decision caused widespread confusion and worry over what would replace the precedent. In an era where environmental …
Table Of Contents,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Re-Imagining Tomorrow: A Technology, Innovation Law, And Ethics Symposium On Addictive Technology And Children,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Re-Imagining Tomorrow: A Technology, Innovation Law, And Ethics Symposium On Addictive Technology And Children, Margaret Chon
Seattle University Law Review
In this Foreword, Professor Margaret Chon introduces Seattle University's Technology, Innovation Law, and Ethics (TILE) program, the 2024 TILE Symposium, and Dr. Gaia Bernstein’s Unwired: Gaining Control Over Addictive Technologies.
