State Bar Of California,
2019
University of San Diego
State Bar Of California, Ashley Kearney, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
V.24-2, 2019 Masthead,
2019
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California,
2019
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Mason Bettencourt, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing,
2019
University of San Diego
Board Of Registered Nursing, Heather Morse, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board,
2019
University of San Diego
Veterinary Medical Board, Kelsey Burns, Betsy Gopinath
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Contractors’ State License Board,
2019
University of San Diego
Contractors’ State License Board, Natasha Pulido, Betsy Gopinath
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Public Utilities Commission,
2019
University of San Diego
California Public Utilities Commission, Charles Kreuzberger, Thomas G. Routson, Negin Taleb, R. C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Insurance,
2019
University of San Diego
Department Of Insurance, Sarah Marie Burgh, Joseph Cheng, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau Of Cannabis Control,
2019
University of San Diego
Bureau Of Cannabis Control, Nicole Cohen, Guinness Castello, R. C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy,
2019
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, John Lacrosse, John Mysliwiec, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education,
2019
University of San Diego
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Junhee Park, R. C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Committee Of Bar Examiners,
2019
University of San Diego
Committee Of Bar Examiners, Samantha Steed, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy,
2019
University of San Diego
California Board Of Accountancy, Brian Attard, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Why Does The Sec Hate Lawyers And Will The Bitterness Ever Go Away: A Review Of The Reasons For The Current State Of This Relationship And A Proposed Path Forward,
2019
Brooklyn Law School
Why Does The Sec Hate Lawyers And Will The Bitterness Ever Go Away: A Review Of The Reasons For The Current State Of This Relationship And A Proposed Path Forward, Ernest Edward Badway, Joshua Horn, Christie Mcguinness
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) and its staff (“Staff”) have brought numerous actions against lawyers in a variety of contexts over the last several years. These enforcement actions have arguably prevented zealous advocacy as well as potentially leaving lawyers reluctant to make certain arguments on behalf of their clients so as to avoid potential disciplinary actions against them. While it is important for the Commission and its Staff to ensure that lawyers do not engage in violative conduct, this Article notes that the SEC and its Staff’s actions should be limited to only those occasions …
Activist Shareholders At De Facto Controlled Companies,
2019
Brooklyn Law School
Activist Shareholders At De Facto Controlled Companies, Gaia Balp
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Activist campaigns are likely to increasingly target controlled companies. Studies concerning activism at controlled companies focus on shareholder-empowering tools, such as the right to nominate and elect minority directors on the board, as a pathway for limiting the principal-principal agency problem. However, not enough attention has been paid to the distinction between de jure and de facto controlled companies. Building on a recent case concerning a leading Italian corporation, this Article analyzes the possible unexpected corporate governance consequences of successful activist intervention at de facto controlled companies, showing that, where minority shareholders are granted the right to appoint directors on …
Hoopa Valley Tribe V. Ferc,
2019
University of Montana
Hoopa Valley Tribe V. Ferc, Fredrick Aaron Rains
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay of state water quality certification review of water discharged from a series of dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the states of Oregon and California, and PacifiCorp, a hydroelectric operator, were implementing an administrative scheme designed to circumvent a one-year temporal requirement for review imposed on states by the Clean Water Act. This scheme allowed PacifiCorp to operate the series of dams for over a decade without proper state water quality certification. The United States …
How Chevron Deference Is Inappropriate In U.S. Fishery Management And Conservation,
2019
N/A
How Chevron Deference Is Inappropriate In U.S. Fishery Management And Conservation, Charles T. Jordan
Seattle Journal of Environmental Law
Well managed fisheries represent an excellent source of sustainable food making the management of which incredibly important. The management of fisheries in the United States is governed by The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA). While the Act creates strong goals and mandates to ensure the best management of fisheries as an important natural resource, there are issues of delegation within the act. The MSFCMA ultimately delegates authority to eight regional councils which are made up of unelected and un-appointed members. The membership of these councils is at risk of industry influence with little legal protections. Critical in how …
Standing For Standing Rock?: Vindicating Native American Religious And Land Rights By Adapting New Zealand's Te Awa Tupua Act To American Soil,
2019
Penn State Dickinson Law
Standing For Standing Rock?: Vindicating Native American Religious And Land Rights By Adapting New Zealand's Te Awa Tupua Act To American Soil, Malcolm Mcdermond
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
On February 23, 2017, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (“Tribe”) was forced to disband its nearly year-long protest against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which threatened the integrity of its ancestral lands. The Tribe sought declaratory and injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, but the court ruled against the Tribe and failed to protect its interests. While the United States was forcibly removing Indigenous protesters, other countries were taking steps to protect Indigenous populations. In unprecedented legislative action, New Zealand took radical steps to protect the land and cultural rights of …
Prosecutorial Discretion: The Difficulty And Necessity Of Public Inquiry,
2019
Penn State Dickinson Law
Prosecutorial Discretion: The Difficulty And Necessity Of Public Inquiry, Bruce A. Green
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Prosecutors’ discretionary decisions have enormous impact on individuals and communities. Often, prosecutors exercise their vast power and discretion in questionable ways. This Article argues that, to encourage prosecutors to use their power wisely and not abusively, there is a need for more informed public discussion of prosecutorial discretion, particularly with regard to prosecutors’ discretionary decisions about whether to bring criminal charges and which charges to bring. But the Article also highlights two reasons why informed public discussion is difficult—first, because public and professional expectations about how prosecutors should use their power are vague; and, second, because, particularly in individual cases, …
Table Of Contents,
2019
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
