Administrative Law Commons^™

Perjanjian Internasional Tak Tertulis Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Internasional, Wayan Parthiana, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pma Dan Uupma Harapan Dan Kenyataan (Sebuah Telaah Mengenai Kebijaksanaan Penanaman Modal), T. Mulya Lubis, S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Arbitrase International Mengenai Perselisihan Penanaman Modal, Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hukum Perhubungan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kerjasama Asean, Dr. Sunaryati Hartono, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pembajakan Udara Dan Extradisi Pembajak, K. Martono S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemakai Angkutan Dalam Hukum Perhubungan Indonesia, E. Suherman S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pengertian Keuangan Negara, A. Hamid S. Attamimi, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pengoperasian Kapal Di Perairan Indonesia, Tamalia Alisyahbana

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Mengenal Perjanjian Multifiber : Praktek Di Negara-Negara Mee, Sook Young Yeu, Felik Oentoeng Soebagjo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Obligasi Salah Satu Pilihan Untuk Ber-Investasi, M. Irsan Nasaruddin

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Tindakan-Tindakan Republik Indonesia Diuji Oleh Badan-Badan Peradilan Luar Negeri, Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Reason Enough: The Wrongful Extension Of Asylum’S “One Central Reason” Nexus Standard To Withholding Of Removal, Elaine Hernandez Flores

Washington Law Review

Noncitizens often come to the United States seeking protection from violence, persecution, or life-threatening conditions in their home countries. However, upon arrival, many noncitizens are placed in removal proceedings and face deportation back to the very dangers they escaped. U.S. immigration law provides various forms of relief from deportation, most notably asylum and withholding of removal. Both forms require the applicant to show a connection—or “nexus”—between the persecutor’s motive for persecuting them and one of five protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.

Although asylum and withholding of removal both require a noncitizen …

Immigration’S Prejudice Problem, S. Ellie Norton

Nevada Law Journal

With immigration enforcement sharply rising, noncitizens increasingly face deportation with few constitutional protections. Yet many remain at least entitled to a fundamentally fair hearing before an immigration court. Even before the current administration, however, immigration courts had become notorious for systematically violating noncitizens’ due process rights. And while other scholars have suggested broadscale reforms to tackle this problem, statutory and regulatory change has become all but unachievable. This Article offers a new and timely solution: reforming the framework for direct review of immigration court due process violations. In most jurisdictions, noncitizens asserting these violations must prove on appeal not only …

A Right Without A Remedy: The Court’S Failure To Quantify The Agua Caliente’S Federal Reserved Water Rights, Lauren Block

Washington Law Review

The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians has inhabited the Coachella Valley region since time immemorial. Through a series of 1870s executive orders, the United States government reserved land for the Tribe to establish a permanent home within the bounds of their ancestral homeland. Underlying this permanent home is the Coachella Valley aquifer, a groundwater source that has been in a continuous state of overdraft for decades. Against the backdrop of climate change, water scarcity, and other concerns, the Tribe sued Coachella Valley’s water management agencies in 2013, alleging the Tribe owned a portion of the water in the aquifer …

Performing Legality: When And Why Chinese Government Leaders Show Up In Court, Rachel E. Stern, Jieun Kim, Benjamin L. Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

Since 2015, Chinese government leaders have been required by law to appear in court when citizens sue their unit or to designate an employee to take their place. We frame this policy as a demand on leaders to “perform legality,” sacrificing their time to demonstrate how seriously the government takes legal proceedings. Drawing on an original dataset of 127,529 administrative lawsuits decided between 2015 and 2018, we investigate how often government leaders appear in Chinese courtrooms, and for which kinds of cases. Overall, leaders attended 24.72% of hearings. Contrary to the State Council’s instructions to prioritize attendance in lawsuits that …

Post-Chevron Deference In Asylum Proceedings, Shawn E. Fields

Cardozo Law Review

The Supreme Court held for four decades that Chevron deference should apply in all immigration proceedings. How, then, will asylum proceedings change in a post-Chevron world? When, and under what circumstances, will courts continue to defer to the findings of immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)? And why does it matter? This Article answers those questions.

These issues require urgent examination for three reasons. First, they directly confront an issue pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi: Without the protection of Chevron insulating BIA decisions from meaningful judicial review, can certain legal questions like …

The Law Of For Cause Removal, Jane Manners, Lev Menand

Faculty Scholarship

For the first time in American history, the Supreme Court is poised to decide what it means for the president to remove a principal officer “for cause.” The case — which arises from the attempted removal of Lisa Cook, a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System — has major implications for central bank independence in the United States and, more broadly, for the U.S. administrative state. But given how long it has been since such offices were formally contested, courts and commentators have forgotten many aspects of the legal tradition governing “for cause” removal. In …

Selective Service And The Separation Of Powers, Jeremy K. Kessler

Faculty Scholarship

The legal history of the U.S. military draft is a case study in creative statutory interpretation. Throughout the twentieth century, this interpretive creativity tended both to expand draft registrants’ substantive and procedural rights, and to recalibrate the roles played by Congress, the courts, and various executive branch factions in the governance of tens of millions of young men. Today’s Military Selective Service Act (“MSSA”) reads much like the law that governed the land when the country last went to war with conscripts during the 1950s and 1960s. But between U.S. entry into the Korean War and its withdrawal from Vietnam, …

Perkembangan Dan Ruang Lingkup Sosiologi Hukum, Mulyana W. Kusumah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Masalah Voting Dalam Praktek Demokrasi Pancasila, Razali Abdullah, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract