Zoning As Taxidermy: Neighborhood Conservation Districts And The Regulation Of Aesthetics,
2015
Yale Law School
Zoning As Taxidermy: Neighborhood Conservation Districts And The Regulation Of Aesthetics, Anika S. Lemar
Indiana Law Journal
Over the last thirty years, municipalities across the country have embraced neighborhood conservation districts, regulations that impose design standards at the neighborhood level. Despite their adoption in thirty-five states, in municipalities from Boise to Cambridge, neighborhood conservation districts have evaded critical analysis by legal scholars. By regulating features such as architectural style, roof angle, and maximum eave overhang, conservation districts purport to protect “neighborhood character” or “cultural stability.” Implicit in these regulations is the unsupported assumption that the essential feature of a neighborhood’s character is its architectural design at a single point in time. The unfortunate result is zoning as …
From Fedspeak To Forward Guidance: Regulatory Dimensions Of Central Bank Communications,
2015
Texas A&M University School of Law
From Fedspeak To Forward Guidance: Regulatory Dimensions Of Central Bank Communications, Robert B. Ahdieh
Faculty Scholarship
In the face of the financial crisis that engulfed the globe beginning in 2007, the U.S. Federal Reserve quickly found itself without the key lever of monetary policy on which it had traditionally relied: short-term interest rate adjustments designed to move long-term rates, and thereby expected levels of lending, investment, and capital retention. By late 2008, short-term rates were already close to zero, yet unemployment remained strikingly high – with no sign of any likely renewal of bank lending or commercial investment.
Famously, the Fed embraced so-called quantitative easing – the purchase of massive volumes of public and private debt …
Procedural Triage,
2015
Penn State Dickinson Law
Procedural Triage, Matthew J.B. Lawrence
Faculty Scholarly Works
Prior scholarship has assumed that the inherent value of a “day in court” is the same for all claimants, so that when procedural resources (like a jury trial or a hearing) are scarce, they should be rationed the same way for all claimants. That is incorrect. This Article shows that the inherent value of a “day in court” can be far greater for some claimants, such as first-time filers, than for others, such as corporate entities and that it can be both desirable and feasible to take this variation into account in doling out scarce procedural protections. In other words, …
Deferred Action And The Bounds Of Agency Discretion: Reconciling Policy And Legality In Immigration Enforcement,
2015
Roger Williams University School of Law
Deferred Action And The Bounds Of Agency Discretion: Reconciling Policy And Legality In Immigration Enforcement, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Presidential Control Across Policymaking Tools,
2015
Brooklyn Law School
Presidential Control Across Policymaking Tools, Catherine Y. Kim
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Dmca Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail Or Safe?,
2015
University of Washington School of Law
The Dmca Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail Or Safe?, Maryna Koberidze
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
This Article analyzes seventeen years under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) rulemaking mechanism and suggests changes to reinforce its successes while remedying its failures. Part I briefly discusses the legislative history of the rulemaking mechanism and policy justifications for its adoption within the DMCA scheme. Part II reviews legal and evidentiary standards of the rulemaking and recent changes to its administrative procedure. Part III provides an overview of the prior rulemakings and their impact on non-infringing uses, with a particular focus on the “e-book” and “cellphone unlocking” exemptions. Part IV applauds the Breaking Down Barriers to Innovation Act of …
Procedural Triage,
2015
Harvard Law School
Procedural Triage, Matthew J.B. Lawrence
Fordham Law Review
Prior scholarship has assumed that the inherent value of a "day in court" is the same for all claimants, so that when procedural resources (like a jury trial or a hearing) are scarce, they should be rationed the same way for all claimants. That is incorrect. This Article shows that the inherent value of a "day in court" can be far greater for some claimants, such as first-time filers, than for others, such as corporate entities and that it can be both desirable and feasible to take this variation into account in doling out scarce procedural protections. In other words, …
"A Distinction Without A Difference"?: Bartlett Going Forward,
2015
Fordham University School of Law
"A Distinction Without A Difference"?: Bartlett Going Forward, Steven A. Schwartz
Fordham Law Review
This Note addresses the question of whether federal law preempts state design defect claims against generic drug manufacturers regardless of which test state law uses to determine whether a drug is defective. This issue, arising out of the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of preemption jurisprudence and fundamental tort law as stated in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, is significant because it plays a large role in determining to what extent generic drug manufacturers are immune to civil liability arising out of injuries caused by their generic drugs. In an age of rising medical costs and jury awards, both plaintiff …
Regulatory Exit,
2015
Vanderbilt University Law School
Regulatory Exit, J.B. Ruhl, James Salzman
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Exit is a ubiquitous feature of life, whether breaking up in a marriage, dropping a college course, or pulling out of a venture capital investment. In fact, our exit options often determine whether and how we enter in the first place. While legal scholarship is replete with studies of exit strategies for businesses and individuals, the topic of exit has barely been touched in administrative law scholarship. Yet exit plays just as central a role in the regulatory state as elsewhere welfare support ends; government steps out of rate-setting. In this article, we argue that exit is a fundamental feature …
Reinventing The Core U.S. Technology Through The Push Of New Regulation Leveraging Market Pull,
2015
Suffolk University Law School
Reinventing The Core U.S. Technology Through The Push Of New Regulation Leveraging Market Pull, Steven Ferrey
Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works
Unilateral Presidential executive action is now used to implement new law and regulation, without participation of the Congress pursuant to Article I of the Constitution. Such actions create a visible and controversial legal confrontation regarding separation of powers. Certain unilateral executive action examined in this article is forcing technological and environmental change which is fundamentally transforming society. This article critically analyzes the revolutionary maelstrom forged by the interface of unilateral executive regulatory orders, law, and the ‘invisible hand’ of market dynamics on climate change.
After 800 years of Greenhouse Gas concentration levels hovering in the atmosphere between 175-250 part per …
Regulatory Exit,
2015
Vanderbilt University Law School
Regulatory Exit, J. B. Ruhl, James Salzman
Vanderbilt Law Review
Exit is a ubiquitous feature of life, whether breaking up in a marriage, dropping a college course, or pulling out of a venture capital investment. In fact, our exit options often determine whether and how we enter in the first place. While legal scholarship is replete with studies of exit strategies for businesses and individuals, administrative law scholarship has barely touched the topic of exit. Yet exit plays just as central a role in the regulatory state as elsewhere- -welfare support ends, government steps out of rate-setting. In this Article, we argue that exit is a fundamental feature of regulatory …
Constituencies And Contemporaneousness In Reason-Giving: Thoughts And Direction After T-Mobile,
2015
Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law
Constituencies And Contemporaneousness In Reason-Giving: Thoughts And Direction After T-Mobile, Donald J. Kochan
Cardozo Law Review
This Article presents a framework for reason-giving requirements in administrative law that includes a demand on agencies that reasons be produced contemporaneously with an agency's decisions where multiple constituencies (including regulated entities), not just the courts (and judicial review), are served and respected as consumers of the reasons. The Article postulates that the January 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision in T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell may prove to be groundbreaking and stir this framework to the forefront of administrative law decision-making. There are some fundamental, yet very understated, lessons in the T-Mobile opinion that prompt further attention and …
Rent Certainty Is Not Rent Control,
2015
Technological University Dublin
Rent Certainty Is Not Rent Control, Tom Dunne
Reports
The housing crisis and the debate about rent control should result in a beneficial change to the regulation of the sector but the opportunity could be lost for want of clarity of thinking about the nature of rent certainty and the distinction between it and rent control. At present rent is regulated by the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 (RTA 2004) which provides that rent can only change once a year and cannot be more than the market rent. Many argue a greater degree of rent certainty is required and that rent should not be allowed to increase by more than …
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Perempuan Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Pemasyarakatan: Studi Kasus Rumah Tahanan Klas Ii A Jakarta Timur,
2015
Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Perempuan Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Pemasyarakatan: Studi Kasus Rumah Tahanan Klas Ii A Jakarta Timur, Cassandra Nadia Arviani, Achmad Fatony, Antonius Aditantyo, Dion Valerian, Dhurandhara Try Widigda, Kezia Minar Paladina
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
The writer(s) of this article try to explain the rights of protection for the people in detention center. Many legal rules made by the state. But practicaly, the authorities in the detention center focused on the liability and responsibility of the prisoners rather then considered about their rights. So, this research group found some findings in their research site at the detention center, about the unfair treatment, discrimination, rights violation, and other mistreatment.
Benson V. State Engineer, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 409 (Sep. 24, 2015),
2015
Nevada Law Journal
Benson V. State Engineer, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 409 (Sep. 24, 2015), Cassandra Ramey
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water permit to exhaust all available administrative remedies before seeking judicial review, even if the State Engineer is not authorized to provide the particular remedy that the party seeks. If the State Engineer is authorized by NRS § 533.395 to provide a party with a remedy, then the doctrine of futility does not apply to excuse the NRS § 533.394(4) exhaustion requirement. Therefore, the party must first show that the administrative process would afford him or her “no relief at all” before seeking …
The Minty Taste Of Death: State And Local Options To Regulate Menthol In Tobacco Products,
2015
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
The Minty Taste Of Death: State And Local Options To Regulate Menthol In Tobacco Products, Michael Freiberg
Catholic University Law Review
Explaining why the additive menthol in tobacco products creates major public health risks, this article advocates for restricting the addition of menthol in cigarettes as a way to reduce smoking-related disease and death. Author Michael Freiberg describes how the decision to regulate menthol in tobacco products, on a federal level, was historically delegated by Congress to the discretion of the U.S. FDA, outlines the U.S. FDA’s subsequent failure to regulate menthol, and surveys state and local government efforts to regulate menthol in response to the FDA’s inaction. The article proposes additional actions that these state and local governments could take …
Enhancing Accountability At The Department Of Veterans Affairs: The Legality Of The Veterans Access, Choice, And Accountability Act Of 2014 Under The Due Process Clause,
2015
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Enhancing Accountability At The Department Of Veterans Affairs: The Legality Of The Veterans Access, Choice, And Accountability Act Of 2014 Under The Due Process Clause, Ashton Habighurst
Catholic University Law Review
In April 2014, news of long delays at the Phoenix VA Medical Center and the subsequent deaths of forty Veterans awaiting medical appointments shocked the nation. Based on this perceived failure among VA’s senior medical staff, legislation swept through the House and the Senate in an attempt to enhance accountability at the VA. By August 2014, President Obama signed the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014 into law. This Act revises the termination procedures concerning the VA’s senior executives, by eliminating the notice requirement, significantly reducing the appellate procedures for adverse employment decision to the Merit Systems Protection …
Appeal No. 0895: Gary L. Teeter Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And R.E. Gas Development, Llc,
2015
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Appeal No. 0895: Gary L. Teeter Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And R.E. Gas Development, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2014-544 (R.E. Gas Development, LLC; Grunder North Unit)
Tate V. State, Bd. Of Med. Exam’Rs, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 67 (Sep. 10, 2015),
2015
Nevada Law Journal
Tate V. State, Bd. Of Med. Exam’Rs, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 67 (Sep. 10, 2015), Nancy Snow
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order denying an injunction challenging the constitutionality of a statute prohibiting stay of Board of Medical Examiners decision. The Court revered and remanded the district court’s order because the statute prohibiting district courts from entering a stay of a decision of the Board of Medical Examiners pending judicial review violates the separation of powers doctrine as a matter of first impression.
The Brazilian Clean Company Act: Using Institutional Multiplicity For Effective Punishment,
2015
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
The Brazilian Clean Company Act: Using Institutional Multiplicity For Effective Punishment, Mariana Mota Prado, Lindsey Carson, Izabela Correa
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
In Brazil’s battle against corruption over the past two decades, there has been significant progress associated with the systems of oversight and investigation but very little progress in holding corrupt actors legally accountable for their transgressions. We suggest that until very recently this could be partially explained by the fact that there was institutional multiplicity (i.e., duplication of functions) in oversight and investigative institutions, while at the punishment stage, a single and underperforming institution—the judiciary—exercised monopolistic authority. To circumvent the limits associated with Brazilian courts, the government is increasingly relying on administrative sanctions for corruption. It is in this context …
