Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Neither Party,
2018
Pepperdine University
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Neither Party, Richard J. Pierce Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Of Amicus Curiae The Forum Of United States Administrative Law Judges In Support Of Neither Party,
2018
Pepperdine University
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Of Amicus Curiae The Forum Of United States Administrative Law Judges In Support Of Neither Party, Gerald Marvin Bober
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference In Support Of Neither Party,
2018
Pepperdine University
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference In Support Of Neither Party, John M. Vittone
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission,
2018
Pepperdine University
Introduction To Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission, Selina Malherbe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Liberty And Separation Of Powers In Judicial Review Of Privatized Governance Regimes,
2018
Pepperdine University
Liberty And Separation Of Powers In Judicial Review Of Privatized Governance Regimes, Jeffrey Kleeger
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This article examines the power difference between homeowner association (HOA) owners, members, and their governing boards. Administrative adjudication can remedy the imbalance to better secure member rights. What is necessary is a heightened standard of judicial review and a requirement to produce a comprehensive record for review. Boards enjoy an advantage in disputes with members—courts uphold board actions unless they are arbitrary and capricious. Boards also possess largely unrestricted state-delegated authority to make and enforce rules, as well as decide penalties for infractions. These clearly governmental functions are not restrained by the state action doctrine. Tools of administrative adjudication are …
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others,
2018
Pepperdine University
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others, Edwin L. Felter Jr., Oyku Didem Aydin
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
State Laws For Due Process Hearings Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act,
2018
Lehigh University
State Laws For Due Process Hearings Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Perry A. Zirkel
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Dedication To The Honorable Larry Jay Craddock,
2018
Pepperdine University
Dedication To The Honorable Larry Jay Craddock, Julian Mann Iii, Selina Malherbe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Administrative Constitutionalism And The Unity Of Public Law,
2018
University of Alberta
Administrative Constitutionalism And The Unity Of Public Law, Matthew Lewans
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between law and constitutional values like equality, due process, and the rule of law. However, in their quest to reveal the morality of public law, common lawyers often focus their attention on judicial interpretations of constitutional values to the exclusion of other sources of constitutional jurisprudence. The author argues that the traditional fascination with courts as the primary or exclusive arbiters of constitutional values should be tempered and supplemented by recognizing the valuable contributions of administrative officials who interpret and enforce constitutional norms when exercising statutorily …
Judge Kavanaugh, Chevron Deference, And The Supreme Court,
2018
University of Georgia School of Law
Judge Kavanaugh, Chevron Deference, And The Supreme Court, Kent H. Barnett, Christina L. Boyd, Christopher J. Walker
Popular Media
How might a new U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh review federal agency statutory interpretations that come before him on the Court?
To find at least a preliminary answer, we can look to his judicial behavior while serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—and there is plenty of relevant Kavanaugh judicial behavior to observe. Since starting his service on the D.C. Circuit in 2006, Judge Kavanaugh has participated in the disposition of around 2,700 cases and has authored more than 300 opinions. Over a third of those authored opinions involved administrative law.
The Politics Of Selecting Chevron Deference,
2018
University of Georgia School of Law
The Politics Of Selecting Chevron Deference, Kent H. Barnett, Christina L. Boyd, Christopher J. Walker
Scholarly Works
In this article, we examine an important threshold question in judicial behavior and administrative law: When do federal circuit courts decide to use the Chevron deference framework and when do they select a framework that is less deferential to the administrative agency's statutory interpretation? The question is important because the purpose of Chevron deference is to give agencies-not judges-policy-making space within statutory interpretation. We expect, nonetheless, that whether to invoke the Chevron framework is largely driven by political dynamics, with judges adopting a less deferential standard when their political preferences do not align with the agency's decision. To provide insight, …
Agencies, Courts, First Principles, And The Rule Of Law,
2018
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Agencies, Courts, First Principles, And The Rule Of Law, Todd S. Aagaard
Faculty Publications
An inherent tension exists between the roles of agencies and courts in administrative enforcement cases. Those cases are initiated by agencies to enforce the statutes and regulations they administer but are then subject to judicial review by courts. Agencies tend to focus on creating and then implementing administrative enforcement systems that produce consistent results pursuant to the agency’s bureaucratic processes and informed by the agency’s expertise. In reviewing such decisions, by contrast, courts tend to focus on ensuring that the agency’s administrative system comports with fundamental legal principles. The two roles embody different goals: for agencies, rendering predictable and consistent …
Appeal No. 0956: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management,
2018
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Appeal No. 0956: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0957: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management,
2018
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Appeal No. 0957: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0955: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management,
2018
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Appeal No. 0955: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
State Bar Of California,
2018
University of San Diego
State Bar Of California, Edith Jimenez, Andrew J. Van Arsdale, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Managed Health Care,
2018
University of San Diego
Department Of Managed Health Care, Jennifer Pardue, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Medical Board Of California,
2018
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Kayla Watson, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy,
2018
University of San Diego
Board Of Pharmacy, Mariam J. Saleh, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing,
2018
University of San Diego
Board Of Registered Nursing, Ashkan Hayatdavoudi, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
