Strange Bedfellows: How Child Welfare Agencies Can Benefit From Investing In Multidisciplinary Parent Representation,
2015
University of Michigan Law School
Strange Bedfellows: How Child Welfare Agencies Can Benefit From Investing In Multidisciplinary Parent Representation, Vivek S. Sankaran, Patricia L. Rideout, Martha L. Raimon
Other Publications
This is the second of a series of articles that examines the role that advocates for parents and families can play in furthering the wellbeing and safety of children. This article highlights emerging parent representation models that expedite the safe reunification of children already in foster care.
The Posse Comitatus Act Of 1878 And The End Of Reconstruction.,
2015
St. Mary's University
The Posse Comitatus Act Of 1878 And The End Of Reconstruction., Andrew Buttaro
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Indemnification Agreements For Intentional Misconduct: Balancing Public Policy And Freedom To Contract In Texas.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Indemnification Agreements For Intentional Misconduct: Balancing Public Policy And Freedom To Contract In Texas., Meagan Mckeown
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
"Home Rule" Vs. "Dillon's Rule" For Washington Cities,
2015
University of Washington School of Law
"Home Rule" Vs. "Dillon's Rule" For Washington Cities, Hugh D. Spitzer
Articles
This Article focuses on the tension between the late-nineteenth-century “Dillon’s Rule” limiting city powers, and the “home rule” approach that gained traction in the early and mid-twentieth century. Washington’s constitution allows cities to exercise all the police powers possessed by the state government, so long as local regulations do not conflict with general laws. The constitution also vests charter cities with control over their form of government. But all city powers are subject to “general laws” adopted by the legislature. Further, judicial rulings on city powers to provide public services have fluctuated, ranging from decisions citing the “Dillon’s Rule” doctrine …
Push, Pull, And Spill: A Transdisciplinary Case Study In Municipal Open Government,
2015
University of Washington School of Law
Push, Pull, And Spill: A Transdisciplinary Case Study In Municipal Open Government, Jan Whittington, Ryan Calo, Mike Simon, Jesse Woo, Meg Young, Perter Schmiedeskamp
Articles
Municipal open data raises hopes and concerns. The activities of cities produce a wide array of data, data that is vastly enriched by ubiquitous computing. Municipal data is opened as it is pushed to, pulled by, and spilled to the public through online portals, requests for public records, and releases by cities and their vendors, contractors, and partners. By opening data, cities hope to raise public trust and prompt innovation. Municipal data, however, is often about the people who live, work, and travel in the city. By opening data, cities raise concern for privacy and social justice.
This article presents …
Agreements To Alter The Limitation Period Imposed By U.C.C. Section 2-725: Some Overlooked Complications.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Agreements To Alter The Limitation Period Imposed By U.C.C. Section 2-725: Some Overlooked Complications., Gregory Crespi
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Cueing Democracy: Replacing The Texas Election Code's Title Prohibition.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Cueing Democracy: Replacing The Texas Election Code's Title Prohibition., Christopher M. Childree
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Resolving Drug Manufacturer Liability For Generic Drug Warning Label Defects.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Resolving Drug Manufacturer Liability For Generic Drug Warning Label Defects., Frank Scaglione
St. Mary's Law Journal
Although generic drugs are beneficial to consumers because they are offered as a more cost effective alternative to brand-name prescriptions, brand-name manufacturers are vulnerable to potential lawsuits because of generic drugs. Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Hatch-Waxman Act), generic manufacturers are able to quickly enter the market following the termination of a brand-name drug’s patent. As a result of the Hatch-Waxman Act, 75% of all drugs on the market are generic. The Hatch-Waxman Act, however, also requires generic drug manufacturers to duplicate the brand-name drug’s warning label. As an unintended consequence, injuries have …
Texas Inventory Tax: Appraisal Districts' Misunderstanding Of The Law Causing Texas Retailers To Pay The Price.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Texas Inventory Tax: Appraisal Districts' Misunderstanding Of The Law Causing Texas Retailers To Pay The Price., Timothy Johnson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Employee Recourses To Manager-Revealed Private Health Information.,
2015
St. Mary's University
Employee Recourses To Manager-Revealed Private Health Information., Molly Thomson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
When Private Property Rights Collide With Growth Management Legislation,
2015
University of Washington School of Law
When Private Property Rights Collide With Growth Management Legislation, Steve P. Calandrillo, Chryssa V. Deliganis, Andrea Woods
Articles
Over the past century, ever-expanding urban and suburban growth in the United States has offered a clear sign of America’s economic vitality, but it has not come without unique challenges of its own. Indeed, efforts to promulgate “smart growth” legislation as an antidote to suburban “sprawl” have proliferated in the past three decades, but it is time we ask ourselves whether their benefits outweigh their unintended consequences. States and local governments that once enthusiastically touted such legislation are beginning to confront unforeseen obstacles–and litigation–that raise the need for immediate reform.
This Article explores the impact of growth management acts on …
Preventing Government Shutdowns: Designing Default Rules For Budgets,
2015
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Preventing Government Shutdowns: Designing Default Rules For Budgets, David Gamage, David Scott Louk
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In nearly every area of law and governance, default policies exist when lawmakers cannot pass new legislation — typically, the status quo simply remains in effect. To its detriment, U.S. budget making at both the state and federal levels lacks effective defaults. If a new budget isn’t passed by year end, there is no budget, and the government shuts down. This lack of defaults, coupled with a dysfunctional era of budgetary politics, has led to a number of recent high-profile and costly state and federal government shutdowns at the state and federal levels.
To date, legal scholarship has failed to …
Using Taxes To Improve Cap And Trade, Part I: Distribution,
2015
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Using Taxes To Improve Cap And Trade, Part I: Distribution, David Gamage, Darien Shanske
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this article, the first of a series, we analyze the distributional issues involved in implementing U.S. state level cap-and-trade regimes. Specifically, we will argue that the structure of California’s AB 32 regime will unnecessarily disadvantage lower-income Californians under the announced plan to give away approximately half of the permits to businesses and pollution-emitting entities.
Without A Pilot: Navigating The Space Between The First Amendment And State And Federal Directives Affecting Drone Journalism,
2015
University of Georgia School of Law
Without A Pilot: Navigating The Space Between The First Amendment And State And Federal Directives Affecting Drone Journalism, Leah M. Davis
Georgia Law Review
A new player in American airspace, the drone, creates greater opportunities for news gathering. But with new opportunities, come new rules. Current legislatures, regulators and courts face the challenge of creating and enforcing a legal framework by which this new technology can be integrated into American airspace. The debate surrounding proper drone directives is influenced by competing policies of privacy, security, and First Amendment concerns. This Note surveys past and present state and federal directives on drone use, and argues for the creation of a separate set of guidelines for Press drones. Separate directives would ensure that news outlets are …
Is An Apartment A Nuisance?,
2015
Touro Law Center
Is An Apartment A Nuisance?, Michael Lewyn
Scholarly Works
In an ongoing Texas lawsuit, some homeowners allege that a nearby apartment building will constitute a nuisance. This article asserts that courts should generally reject nuisance claims against multifamily housing, based on the public interest in favor of increased housing supply and infill development.
Further Developments In Land Use Ethics,
2015
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Further Developments In Land Use Ethics, Patricia E. Salkin, Darren Stakey
Scholarly Works
Ethical considerations continue to play a fundamental role in shaping the course of land use and developmental regulatory proceedings throughout the country. From an innocuous donation by one public official to his alma mater, to the outright bribery of a former mayor, the past year has been rife with a range of conduct implicating professional responsibility and land use.
Modern-Day Nullification: Marijuana And The Persistence Of Federalism In An Age Of Overlapping Regulatory Jurisdiction,
2015
Duke Law School
Modern-Day Nullification: Marijuana And The Persistence Of Federalism In An Age Of Overlapping Regulatory Jurisdiction, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Controversial Defenses To Legal Malpractice Claims: Are Attorney Experts Being Asked To Be Advocates?,
2015
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Controversial Defenses To Legal Malpractice Claims: Are Attorney Experts Being Asked To Be Advocates?, David S. Caudill
Faculty Publications
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily distinguishable from experts offering science-based testimony, attorney expertise is similar to that of witnesses offering experience-based testimony, and very much like the expertise of a physician in a medical malpractice case. An attorney-expert is, however, somewhat unique among experts in terms of the type of expertise offered, the inherent risk that the expert’s testimony will invade the province of the judge or jury, and, I believe, the risk of over-testifying. First, there is a problem of defining the attorney-expert’s “expertise” to ensure that the expert is not testifying …
Local Governments And Global Commons,
2014
Brigham Young University Law School
Local Governments And Global Commons, Jonathan Rosenbloom
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Celaj,
2014
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Celaj, Danielle Dupré
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
