Loot Boxes May Exploit Gamers, But Their Sale Does Not Constitute Unlawful Gambling,
2024
Roger Williams University School of Law
Loot Boxes May Exploit Gamers, But Their Sale Does Not Constitute Unlawful Gambling, John J. Chung
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constructing Ai Speech,
2024
University of Colorado Law School
Constructing Ai Speech, Margot E. Kaminski, Meg Leta Jones
Publications
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT can now produce convincingly human speech, at scale. It is tempting to ask whether such AI-generated content “disrupts” the law. That, we claim, is the wrong question. It characterizes the law as inherently reactive, rather than proactive, and fails to reveal how what may look like “disruption” in one area of the law is business as usual in another. We challenge the prevailing notion that technology inherently disrupts law, proposing instead that law and technology co-construct each other in a dynamic interplay reflective of societal priorities and political power. This Essay instead deploys …
Getting Real About Protecting Privacy,
2024
University of Colorado Law School
Getting Real About Protecting Privacy, Scott Skinner-Thompson
Publications
No abstract provided.
Voices In, Voices Out: Impacted Stakeholders And The Governance Of Ai,
2024
University of Colorado Law School
Voices In, Voices Out: Impacted Stakeholders And The Governance Of Ai, Margot Kaminski
Publications
This Essay addresses reasons for impacted stakeholder involvement in AI governance, ranging from democratic accountability norms to principles of regulatory design. It evaluates several recent examples of both soft and hard law, noting a range of examples of impacted stakeholder participation. It closes with a critique: none of these laws adequately contemplates how to craft transparency and provide expertise so as to meaningfully empower impacted stakeholders.
Section 230'S Debts,
2024
University of Colorado Law School
Section 230'S Debts, Blake Reid
Publications
Much attention has been paid to the unknown First Amendment permissibility of the government regulating social media platforms' carriage practices. The Supreme Court's impending resolution of the NetChoice cases poses a high-stakes First Amendment question: "Can the government permissibly dictate what types of content platforms publish?"
But how did the First Amendment stakes in NetChoice get so high? This Article identifies a long-standing gap in the Supreme Court's First Amendment jurisprudence for platform regulation following its decision in Reno v. ACLU. This Article attributes that gap to the accumulation of both interpretive and legislative debts by Section 230 of the …
Data In Business & Society,
2024
Lewis & Clark Law School
Data In Business & Society, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Lewis & Clark Law Review
Data, it is sometimes said, is the world’s new oil. Unlike the days when information was transmitted in print form, data is transmitted at the touch of a fingertip through the click of a mouse or a push of an icon on a phone app. Algorithms and computing systems have drastically expanded the scope, speed, and volume of access and use of data for consumers. Additionally, businesses, in variety of forms, including business-to-business, business-to-consumer, online, and even brick-and-mortar, have employed data to interact with other businesses and with consumers. Data has drastically expanded in use throughout business and society, and …
Ai Malpractice,
2024
University of Colorado Law School
The Copyright Work Of Authorship,
2024
Santa Clara Law
The Copyright Work Of Authorship, Hemnes, Thomas
Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal
The “work of authorship” lies at the heart of the Copyright Act of 1976. It is what copyright protects. Central though the concept is, the Act never defines what a work of authorship might be. According to the Act, it can be perceived in tangible fixations, but is distinct from the fixations. The Act also provides examples: writings, drawings, computer programs, but never describes how these might be distinguished from their fixations. Unlike the Patent Act, where “metes and bounds” of a patentable invention are defined by a patent’s claims, the Copyright Act provides no guidance as to what the …
Navigating The Frontiers Of Medtech,
2024
St. John's University School of Law
Navigating The Frontiers Of Medtech, Benjamin Sundholm
Faculty Publications
The medical community is increasingly focused on the rise of adaptive and opaque artificial intelligence tools. These systems improve over time but produce results through complex calculations that are difficult for humans to fully understand. Although promising, these features challenge existing legal doctrines. To date, efforts to overcome these challenges have been too fragmented and limited in scope. As a result, the full promise of adaptive and opaque artificial intelligence systems remains untapped.
This Article proposes a framework for unleashing the potential of these systems through a blend of forward- and backward-looking reforms. The ex ante feature of my framework …
The Consumer’S Choice To Boycott,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
The Consumer’S Choice To Boycott, Agnes Bresee
Seattle University Law Review
In the wake of employees losing their jobs upon voicing their political opinions concerning Israel, Harvard and Columbia law students’ job offers being rescinded upon expressing support for Palestine, and the names and social media profiles of individuals who support Palestine being collected and listed on Canary Mission, such backlash may leave many Americans wondering what form of resistance to settler-colonialist apartheid is acceptable in the twenty-first century. Recently, the movement to collectively boycott brands like Starbucks, which sued its Worker’s Union for a tweet expressing support for Palestine; Disney, which donated money to Israel; and McDonald’s, where a location …
Unblocking The Chain: Leveraging Mediation And Negotiation In Crypto Exchange User Disputes,
2024
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Unblocking The Chain: Leveraging Mediation And Negotiation In Crypto Exchange User Disputes, Jane Perov
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intelligence And Mediation Ethics,
2024
Hamad bin Khalifa University
Artificial Intelligence And Mediation Ethics, Zachary R. Calo
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Artificial intelligence ("Al") presents many opportunities to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and accessibility of mediation. More than that, it has potential to transform the nature of how mediation is practiced and what mediation is. While Al might not yet play a significant role in many mediations, there is widespread recognition that the technology is disrupting many established dispute resolution practices. What mediation will look like on the other side is unclear, but it will not be the same.
Squatters Squabbles: The Use Of Mediation To Provide Beneficial Solutions To Adverse Possession Claims In New Jersey,
2024
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Squatters Squabbles: The Use Of Mediation To Provide Beneficial Solutions To Adverse Possession Claims In New Jersey, Bayla Zohn
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
In our society, law is a complex and ever-evolving field, constantly adapting to fit our needs. Yet, there are certain legal matters we would expect to have clear and obvious resolutions. Property ownership should be simple and unambiguous, governed by "established legal rules and precepts." Examine a deed, survey the stated legal owner of the tract of land, and your answer should be uncomplicated. Yet, there are a multitude of complex laws that allow individuals to obtain legal ownership of land in a seemingly illicit fashion.
Table Of Contents,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
A Different Approach To Agency Theory And Implications For Esg,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
A Different Approach To Agency Theory And Implications For Esg, Jonathan Bonham, Amoray Riggs-Cragun
Seattle University Law Review
In conventional agency theory, the agent is modeled as exerting unobservable “effort” that influences the distribution over outcomes the principal cares about. Recent papers instead allow the agent to choose the entire distribution, an assumption that better describes the extensive and flexible control that CEOs have over firm outcomes. Under this assumption, the optimal contract rewards the agent directly for outcomes the principal cares about, rather than for what those outcomes reveal about the agent’s effort. This article briefly summarizes this new agency model and discusses its implications for contracting on ESG activities.
Overseeing The Administrative State,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Overseeing The Administrative State, Jill E. Fisch
Seattle University Law Review
In a series of recent cases, the Supreme Court has reduced the regulatory power of the Administrative State. Pending cases offer vehicles for the Court to go still further. Although the Court’s skepticism of administrative agencies may be rooted in Constitutional principles or political expediency, this Article explores another possible explanation—a shift in the nature of agencies and their regulatory role. As Pritchard and Thompson detail in their important book, A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court was initially skeptical of agency power, jeopardizing Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)’s ambitious New Deal plan. The Court’s acceptance …
The Sec, The Supreme Court, And The Administrative State,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
The Sec, The Supreme Court, And The Administrative State, Paul G. Mahoney
Seattle University Law Review
Pritchard and Thompson have given those of us who study the SEC and the securities laws much food for thought. Their methodological focus is on the internal dynamics of the Court’s deliberations, on which they have done detailed and valuable work. The Court did not, however, operate in a vacuum. Intellectual trends in economics and law over the past century can also help us understand the SEC’s fortunes in the federal courts and make predictions about its future.
The Sffa V. Harvard Trojan Horse Admissions Lawsuit,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
The Sffa V. Harvard Trojan Horse Admissions Lawsuit, Kimberly West-Faulcon
Seattle University Law Review
Affirmative-action-hostile admissions lawsuits are modern Trojan horses. The SFFA v. Harvard/UNC case—Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, et. al., decided jointly—is the most effective Trojan horse admissions lawsuit to date. Constructed to have the distractingly appealing exterior façade of a lawsuit seeking greater fairness in college admissions, the SFFA v. Harvard/UNC case is best understood as a deception-driven battle tactic used by forces waging a multi-decade war against the major legislative victories of America’s Civil Rights Movement, specifically Title VI and Title VII …
Feeding The Good Fire: Paths To Facilitate Native-Led Fire Management On Federal Lands,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Feeding The Good Fire: Paths To Facilitate Native-Led Fire Management On Federal Lands, Kevin Burdet
Seattle University Law Review
In 2003, nearly twenty Native American reservations were devastated by wildfires that originated on adjacent federal lands. The San Pasqual Reservation’s entire 1,400 acres were burned along with over a third of its homes, and seventy-five percent of the Rincon Reservation was burned, taking twenty homes with it. These devastating fires, along with others in 2002, brought about the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 (TFPA), which offered hope for Tribes to propose projects on bordering or adjacent federal lands and protect reservation lands in the process. Unfortunately, twenty years later, the TFPA has had a marginal effect in enabling …
A Hard Pill To Swallow: The Abysmal Mental Health Standards Of Detained Immigrant Children In The United States,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
A Hard Pill To Swallow: The Abysmal Mental Health Standards Of Detained Immigrant Children In The United States, Rama Bankesly
Seattle University Law Review
After setting foot into the U.S., unaccompanied children must learn to navigate academic and legal systems while receiving little support and carrying the heavy burden of effects of trauma on their mental health. They need access to mental health care from qualified professionals, but as this Comment will explain, they systematically fail to receive care, as can be seen in cases like Doe v. Shenandoah Valley Juv. Ctr. Comm’n. In Shenandoah, an unaccompanied child arrived in the U.S. and was placed in a facility that failed to provide remotely adequate mental health care and in fact was subjected …
