Complicity In The Perversion Of Justice: The Role Of Lawyers In Eroding The Rule Of Law In The Third Reich,
St. Mary's University
Complicity In The Perversion Of Justice: The Role Of Lawyers In Eroding The Rule Of Law In The Third Reich, Cynthia Fountaine
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
A fundamental tenet of the legal profession is that lawyers and judges are uniquely responsible—individually and collectively—for protecting the Rule of Law. This Article considers the failings of the legal profession in living up to that responsibility during Germany’s Third Reich. The incremental steps used by the Nazis to gain control of the German legal system—beginning as early as 1920 when the Nazi Party adopted a party platform that included a plan for a new legal system—turned the legal system on its head and destroyed the Rule of Law. By failing to uphold the integrity and independence of the profession, …
Public Understanding Of Ai-Enabled Cyber Threats And Its Impact On Cybersecurity Governance In The United States,
Louisiana State University
Public Understanding Of Ai-Enabled Cyber Threats And Its Impact On Cybersecurity Governance In The United States, Charlotte Barbrick
LSU Master's Theses
Artificial intelligence is spreading quickly in workplaces and everyday life, and that fast growth is creating cybersecurity and privacy risks that current laws and organizational practices do not fully address. This thesis asks whether AI-specific knowledge shapes public support for cybersecurity governance of AI-enabled systems in the United States. Using nationally representative survey data from the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP) Wave 119, fielded December 12--18, 2022, I estimate weighted regression models to test how objective AI knowledge shapes support for cybersecurity governance. I also test whether concern about data misuse helps explain that relationship and whether AI …
No, The Firing Squad Is Not Better Than Lethal Injection: A Response To Stephanie Moran’S A Modest Proposal,
Seattle University School of Law
No, The Firing Squad Is Not Better Than Lethal Injection: A Response To Stephanie Moran’S A Modest Proposal
Seattle University Law Review
In the article A Modest Proposal: The Federal Government Should Use Firing Squads to Execute Federal Death Row Inmates, Stephanie Moran argues that the firing squad is the only execution method that meets the requirements of the Eighth Amendment. In order to make her case, Moran unjustifiably overstates the negative aspects of lethal injection while understating the negative aspects of firing squads. The entire piece is predicated upon assumptions that are not only unsupported by the evidence but often directly refuted by the evidence. This Essay critically analyzes Moran’s claims regarding the alleged advantages of the firing squad over …
Play Like A Girl, Get Paid Like A… Man?,
University of New Hampshire
Play Like A Girl, Get Paid Like A… Man?, Amanda Malool
UNH Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Value Creation By Business Lawyers: Legal Skills And Asset Pricing,
Columbia Law School
Value Creation By Business Lawyers: Legal Skills And Asset Pricing, Ronald Gilson
Faculty Scholarship
What do business lawyers really do? Embarrassingly enough, at a time when lawyers are criticized with increasing frequency as nonproductive actors in the economy, there seems to be no coherent answer. That is not, of course, to say that answers have not been offered; there are a number of familiar responses that we have all heard or, what is worse, that we have all offered at one time or another without really thinking very hard about them. The problem is that, for surprisingly similar reasons, none of them is very helpful.
Negara Hukum Indonesia Ditinjau Dar! Sudut Teorl Tujuan Negara,
Universitas Indonesia
Negara Hukum Indonesia Ditinjau Dar! Sudut Teorl Tujuan Negara
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Abstract
How To Write, Edit, And Review Persuasive Briefs: Seven Guidelines From One Judge And Two Lawyers,
Seattle University School of Law
How To Write, Edit, And Review Persuasive Briefs: Seven Guidelines From One Judge And Two Lawyers
Seattle University Law Review
The ability to write and recognize a persuasive brief is important to lawyers throughout their careers. Junior attorneys are often responsible for initially writing a brief. Senior attorneys often review those briefs and either rewrite or edit them (as circumstances require). In-house counsel may then review the briefs once more, providing additional edits and comments and addressing concerns. Wherever you happen to be in your career, it is important to know how to write, rewrite, edit, recognize, and review an effective brief. This Article offers a number of guidelines for crafting such briefs and provides a number of practical pointers …
The Bluebook: An Insider’S Perspective,
University of Michigan Law School
The Bluebook: An Insider’S Perspective
Michigan Law Review
A review of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. Edited by Columbia Law Review Association, Harvard Law Review Association, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and The Yale Law Journal.
Basic Bluebooking In Legal Documents,
Pace University
Basic Bluebooking In Legal Documents, Cynthia Pittson
Pace Law Faculty Publications
Three tip sheets on basic Bluebooking in legal documents presented as tables. The tables include the relevant rules, formulas for the basic citations, and examples for federal and state cases, federal and state statutes, and secondary sources (law review articles, newspaper articles, books and treatises, and other frequently used sources). These were developed for use in the first-year Legal Skills course at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University.
Reflections On Good (Law) Teaching,
SelectedWorks
Seattle University School of Law
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Georgetown University Law Center
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
American University Washington College of Law
University of Miami Law School
Featured Publications
