Law Commons^™

Ncaa V. Board Of Regents 2.0: Potential Antitrust Law Claims Arising From The Ncaa’S Regulation Of College Athletes’ Nil, Alicia Jessop, Esq.

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Finding Another Way: The Ncaa’S Regulation Of Nil And Recruiting, Alfred C. Yen

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Maintaining Due Process By Extending Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. To Federal Class Actions, Felicia D. Sych

American University Law Review

In 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its seminal decision in Bristol Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, subsequently altering the scope of personal jurisdiction and further narrowing its interpretation of specific jurisdiction. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. held that a state court can only assert specific personal jurisdiction over a defendant when there is a meaningful nexus between the forum state and the claims at issue. The Court purposefully refrained from deciding whether its holding applies to federal courts adjudicating federal class actions. After denying a petition for writ of certiorari to resolve the issue in 2021, the question …

A Research Agenda For Standards-Essential Patents, Jorge L. Contreras

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

This Chapter discusses the current state of legal, economic and policy research on standards-essential patents (SEPs) and fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing of SEPs, and recommends additional research directions for the future. Areas for future research include the investigation of market adoption of standardized products subject to FRAND licensing and available on a royalty-free basis, measurement of various characteristics of SEPs including disclosure, validity, essentiality and transfer, the evolution of SDO and consortia patent policies, SEP licensing behavior, both by SEP holders and product manufacturers, SEP and FRAND disputes and litigation, including arbitration, and competition among patent pools for …

Constitutional Confidentiality, Natalie Ram, Jorge L. Contreras, Laura M. Beskow, Leslie E. Wolf

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

Federal Certificates of Confidentiality protect sensitive information about human research subjects from disclosure and use in judicial, administrative, and legislative proceedings at both the state and federal levels. While Certificates originally covered sensitive information collected in research about drug addiction use when they were authorized by Congress in the 1970s, today they extend to virtually all personal information gathered by biomedical research studies. The broad reach of Certificates, coupled with their power to override state subpoenas and warrants issued in the context of law enforcement, abortion regulation, and other police powers reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment, beg …

Policy's Place In Pedestrian Infrastructure (Book Review), Michael L. Smith

Faculty Articles

Angie Schmitt's Right of Way: Race, Class, and the Silent Epidemic of Pedestrian Deaths in America delves into the complex, multi-layered phenomenon of how traffic infrastructure and policies systematically disadvantage pedestrians and contribute to thousands of deaths and injuries each year. Despite the breadth of the problem and its often-technical aspects, Schmitt presents the problem in an engaging and approachable manner through a step-by-step analysis combining background, statistics, and anecdotes.

While Right of Way tends to focus on infrastructure design, it offers much for legal scholars, lawyers, and policymakers. Schmitt addresses several policy issues at length in the book. But …

Idaho's Law Of Seduction, Michael L. Smith

Faculty Articles

Seduction is a historical cause of action that permitted women's fathers to bring suit on their daughters' behalf in sexual assault and rape cases. This tort emerged long ago when the law's refusal to recognize women's agency left this as the only means of recovering damages in these cases. As time went on, the tort evolved, and women were eventually permitted to bring lawsuits for seduction on their own behalf. Today, most states have abolished seduction, along with other torts permitting recovery for damages arising from intimate conduct. One could be easily forgiven for thinking that such an archaic tort …

Is, Ought, And The Limited Competence Of Experts, Adam J. Macleod

Faculty Articles

The moral innovators whom C. S. Lewis criticized in The Abolition of Man supposed that they could draw imperatives out of their superior understanding of sentiment and instinct. They assumed that to know what human beings want to do is to know what human beings should do. But people want to do all sorts of things that are irrational, pointless, harmful, and even downright evil. And people want inconsistent things. So the innovators are incoherent. As Lewis correctly affirmed, no amount of knowledge about nature or the world is sufficient by itself to direct us to do what is good …

Gun Range Immunity: An Argument Against Legalized Nuisance And Non-Governmental Takings, Match Dawson

Faculty Articles

People exhausted by the increasingly fast-paced life and loud noises of the big city will often seek refuge in the solitude of quiet country living. Perhaps naive, the romantic thought of waking to the scenic views of an early morning sunrise burning an orange hue across the pasture or the sweet sounds of a Bachman's sparrow singing from the birdhouse placed neatly within view of the kitchen window is abruptly squashed when rural landowners fall victim to the excessively loud sport of outdoor firearm shooting.

Protecting rural landowners' rights to the quiet use and enjoyment of their property has been …

A Vague, Overconfident, And Malleable Approach To Constitutional Law, Michael L. Smith

Faculty Articles

In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, the Supreme Court overturned a century-old firearms licensing scheme that required people seeking concealed carry permits to demonstrate that they had a special need for self-defense. The Court did so by applying a “historical tradition” approach to determine the scope of Second Amendment protection. Under this approach, where the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, a law restricting that conduct must be consistent with “the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” At first glance, the historical tradition approach may seem objective and easier than an empirical analysis …

Change Is Inevitable. Exhaustion Is Optional: Get Your Students Nextgen Ready With An Upcycled Mpt, Maggie Eilertson, Melissa Bezanson Shultz

Faculty Articles

Despite an understandable desire to play ostrich—to dig our heads into the sand so we cannot see and, therefore, can entirely ignore what is about to happen—change is coming to legal education. In July of 2026, the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) will begin to phase out the Uniform Bar Exam (UBE) and will administer a new national licensing exam for law school graduates. This reality means that, depending on the jurisdiction, at least some part-time students who matriculated in 2022 and full-time students who will matriculate in 2023 will be faced with a new final hurdle before attorney …

The First Amendment, Discrimination, And Public Accommodations At Common Law,, Adam J. Macleod

Faculty Articles

This Article explains the different rights and duties of each class of public accommodation. And it shows how common-law adjudication, especially the jury trial, resolves public accommodation disputes in a principled way while avoiding zero-sum definitions of civil rights. The Article does not aspire to settle conclusively controversies over the relative scopes of First Amendment liberties and nondiscrimination laws. Not every jurist agrees that history, background legal principles, and foundational legal norms and institutions are important or helpful to determine the boundaries between civil and constitutional rights. And some public accommodation laws do more than merely restate common-law doctrines. But …

Table Of Contents

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

No abstract provided.

The Impact Covid-19 On The Healthcare Industry’S Systems And Policies: A Case Study, Jameyshia Franklin

West Chester University Doctoral Projects

People worldwide experienced some impacts from the 2019 Coronavirus at various degree. The healthcare industry worldwide was significantly affected by the high volume of patients being infected with the Coronavirus. The COVID-19 virus brought on several challenges for the healthcare industry and the federal government in the United States. Hospitals operated under severe circumstances to treat sick COVID-19 patients and keep their employees safe from contracting the disease. Government mandated social distancing, mask wearing, and cancelation and closing of services to assist with stopping the spread of the virus. This study aimed to identify how the pandemic affected the healthcare …

Equitable Funding For Trauma Informed Social Policy: A Critical Analysis Of The 2019-2020 Pennsylvania Department Of Education School Safety And Security Grant Program, Heather Bickley

West Chester University Doctoral Projects

This study is a critical analysis of the funding distribution of the 2019-2020 Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) School Safety and Security Grant (SSSG) to identify if there is evidence of inequity in the grant's funding distribution. It used a theoretical framework that includes a transformative paradigm with trauma informed social policy as a theoretical lens, with the conceptual lenses education debt and distributive justice, applied to a concurrent mixed methods design. The research followed a QuantCrit methodology, and the features of a critical policy analysis were used to present the findings.

The quantitative tests found several significant …

2023–2024 Bulletin Of Information, Notre Dame Law School

Bulletins of Information

CONTENTS

• Admissions Information
• Academic Calendar
• Tuition and Fees
• Academic Requirements
• Off-Campus Programs
• Senior Administrative Leadership
• Hoynes Code

Table Of Contents

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Democratic Imperative To Make Margins Matter, Daniel Wodak

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Other View Of The Cathedral, Yotam Kaplan

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Trap Chronicles Vol. 2: A Call To Reconsider “Risk” In Federal Supervised Release, Lahny Silva

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cybersecurity And Data Breach Harms: Theory And Reality, David W. Opderbeck

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Disclosure Procedure, Andrew K. Jennings

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

State V. Matthews: Maryland Fails To Measure Up To Its New Expert Testimony Standard, Thomas Kiley

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On Stare Decisis, Judge Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foreword: The Lincoln-Douglas(S) Debates And The Problem Of Constitutional Evil, Mark A. Graber

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

“I Shall Not Forget Or Entirely Forsake Politics On The Bench”: Abraham Lincoln, Dred Scott, And The Political Culture Of The Judiciary In The 1850s, Rachel A. Shelden

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Lincoln, Douglass, Fugitive Slave Law, And Constitutional Evil, Robinson Woodward-Burns

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

“Our Constitution . . . Should Be Read By Intelligent And Patriotic Men”: A Statistical Analysis Of Constitutional Rhetoric, William D. Blake

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.