Law Commons^™

Civil Cipa: A Defense Against The Government's Unchecked State Secrets Privilege, Morgan Cleary

Journal of Legislation

No abstract provided.

Combatting Suggestiveness In Lineups: Can Legislation Be The Answer?, Samantha Kay Krasker

Journal of Legislation

No abstract provided.

Omnibus Legislation And Separation Of Powers: Too Big To Fail?, Evan Wright

Journal of Legislation

No abstract provided.

The Financial Impact Of Suspended Licenses In Illinois, Colleen Chien

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Post-Grad Job Search Drop-In Session, Cardozo Office Of Career Services

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Abortions At Sea: In Search Of Creative Reproductive Healthcare Solutions Post-Dobbs, William Fox

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, access to reproductive healthcare and the right to abortion have been severely restricted across the United States. Indeed, within days of the decision, multiple states implemented trigger laws criminalizing abortion (in some cases without exceptions for instances of rape or incest) to the detriment of millions women across the country. This infringement on a woman's right to choose her own healthcare needs has profoundly impacted women living in conservative-led states, particularly minorities and those in the American South.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice …

The Local Pages Of Nevada, Llc, Plaintiff/Appellant V. Plumb Line Mechanical, Inc., Defendant/Appellee : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)

Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah Honorable Laura Scott, District Court Judge, Case No. 190901187

Jordan K. Cameron, Attorneys for Appellee

D. Scott Crook, Attorney for Appellant

Cardozo Aelj Then And Now Interview Series: Marc H. Simon, Cardozo Law Class Of 2001, Marc H. Simon

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

Marc H. Simon, Cardozo Law Class of 2001, is a Partner at Fox Rothschild who serves as the Chair of the firm’s Entertainment & Sports Law Department. During law school, Marc was a member of the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, and his Note was published in Volume 19.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on March 13, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Why Criminal Defendants Cooperate: The Defense Attorney's Perspective, Jessica A. Roth, Anna D. Vaynman, Steven D. Penrod

Northwestern University Law Review

Cooperation is at the heart of most complex federal criminal cases, with profound ramifications for who can be brought to justice and for the fate of those who decide to cooperate. But despite the significance of cooperation, scholars have yet to explore exactly how individuals confronted with the decision whether to pursue cooperation with prosecutors make that choice. This Article—the first empirical study of the defense experience of cooperation—begins to address that gap. The Article reports the results of a survey completed by 146 criminal defense attorneys in three federal districts: the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District …

Obey Or Abey: An Empirical Examination Of Abeyance Agreements In Public School Discipline, Rachael K. Cox

Northwestern University Law Review

“Exclusionary discipline” is widely understood to mean the typical responses to student misbehavior in public schools: suspension and expulsion. But sometimes their lesser-known counterpart, the abeyance agreement, swoops in before the suspension or expulsion is effectuated and gives the student a “second chance” to avoid such exclusionary discipline—provided the student complies with the terms of the agreement. It sounds simple, but the reality is far more complicated. Without a clearly defined, regulated, and tracked practice, abeyance agreements are an off-record discipline device used at the sole discretion of public school district administrators. Joining a landscape of urgent concerns over the …

The Architecture Of Discretion: Implications Of The Structure Of Sanctions For Racial Disparities, Severity, And Net Widening, Ryan T. Sakoda

Northwestern University Law Review

About four million people are serving a term of probation, parole, or post-release supervision in the United States. Due to the extensive use of incarceration as a punishment for conditions violations, these community supervision programs are a major factor contributing to mass incarceration and, as this Article shows, can play a significant role in exacerbating racial disparities in the criminal legal system.

In recent years, jurisdictions throughout the United States have made reforms to their community supervision programs. A major trend in community supervision reform is the integration of new sanctioning structures, such as “swift and certain” sanctions, for conditions …

The Failure Of Judicial Recusal And Disclosure Rules: Evidence From A Field Experiment, Dane Thorley

Northwestern University Law Review

U.S. courts rely predominately on judicial self-recusal and in-court disclosure to address judicial conflicts of interest and maintain a critical perception of impartiality. But these approaches fail to account for the legal, institutional, and social dynamics that surround the relationship between judges, attorneys, and the adjudicative process. In reality, judges rarely use their discretion to disclose conflicts or recuse themselves, and attorneys do not ask them to do so. If we understand both the legal and extralegal incentives at play in these decisions, none of these outcomes should be surprising. The shortcomings of recusal and disclosure rules are particularly salient …

Rectifying An Empty Gesture: Why Placement On Paid Administrative Leave Should Constitute "Adverse Employment Action" For The Purposes Of A First Amendment Retaliation Claim, Andrew White

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Elderly Or Disabled Registered Sex Offenders: Are They Experiencing Cruel And Unusual Punishment Under Ohio Sex Offender Classification And Registration Laws?, Susana Tolentino

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Stop The Games: How Broker-Dealer Gamification Affronts Antitrust, Tanner Dowdy

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

We[Ed] The People: How A Broader Interpretation Of The Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment Effectuates The Changing Social Policy Surrounding Medical Marijuana, Tess A. Chaffee

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taking The American Dream – A Remedy For Home Equity Theft Following The Sixth Circuit's Ruling In Harrison V. Montgomery County, Ohio, Elizabeth Black

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Vision Of The Anti-Racist Public Corporation, Steven A. Ramirez

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fixing Standard-Form Contracts, Shirly Levy

University of Cincinnati Law Review

Consumers are at a disadvantage when it comes to standard-form contracts – information gaps, weak bargaining power, and behavioral biases are all at work against them. Moreover, in the digital age, many consumers do not even attempt to read the lengthy contracts they instantaneously approve. Manipulation by sophisticated commercial parties is therefore guaranteed.

The literature offers various ways to alleviate this problem, including nudges and carefully crafted contractual default rules, but the question remains - how can the content of a consumer contract that no one reads be improved? This article draws lessons from the financial market, where shareholders and …

The Eleventh Amendment And Nondiverse Suits Against States, Collin Hong

University of Cincinnati Law Review

Since Hans v. Louisiana (1890), the Supreme Court has maintained that the Eleventh Amendment protects states from suits by plaintiffs who are citizens of other states and by citizens of that state, despite the text of the Eleventh Amendment specifying that only suits from citizens of other states are barred. Scholars have noted that what therefore protects the states from suits against their own citizens is not the Eleventh Amendment, but rather a common-law immunity that existed between nations at the founding. That immunity applied both to states and to foreign nations. This article argues that just as Congress has …

Freedom Of Algorithmic Expression, Inyoung Cheong

University of Cincinnati Law Review

Can content moderation on social media be considered a form of speech? If so, would government regulation of content moderation violate the First Amendment? These are the main arguments of social media companies after Florida and Texas legislators attempted to restrict social media platforms’ authority to de-platform objectionable content.

This article examines whether social media companies’ arguments have valid legal grounds. To this end, the article proposes three elements to determine that algorithms classify as “speech:” (1) the algorithms are designed to communicate messages; (2) the relevant messages reflect cognitive or emotive ideas beyond mere operational matters; and (3) they …

Markets As Legal Constructions, Gregory Brazeal

University of Cincinnati Law Review

Since at least the late 1970s, popular political and economic debates in the United States have often been framed in terms of a choice between “government” and “the market.” In addition, debates have often assumed that “the market” is associated with freedom while government “regulation” or “interference in the market” constitutes oppression.

This article begins by making the familiar observation that the distinction between “government” and “the market,” at least when taken at face value, makes no sense. Even idealized laissez-faire markets are creatures of the state and its market-structuring laws, including criminal law and the laws of property, contracts, …

Brief Of Amici Curiae Fred T. Korematsu Center For Law And Equality, Teamchild, And Washington Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers In Support Of Petitioner, Jessica Levin, Melissa R. Lee, Robert S. Chang, Fred T. Korematsu Center For Law And Equality, Teamchild, Washington Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality

In re the Personal Restraint of Keonte Smith, Petitioner.

Core And Periphery In Constitutional Law, R. George Wright

William & Mary Law Review Online

This paper embarks on an excursion through a number of the most vital constitutional rights cases, and other contexts as well, and seeks to show that the recurring judicial attempts to distinguish between core and peripheral areas within any given broad constitutional right are unnecessary and distracting. Intriguingly, the case for this conclusion varies significantly depending upon the nature of the general constitutional right in question. But the overall lesson is that courts should abandon their attempts to distinguish between core and peripheral areas of any given broad constitutional right. Courts should instead focus—directly or indirectly—on their best assessment of …

Brief Of Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Clinic As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, John A. Meiser, Meredith Holland Kessler

Court Briefs

No. 22-741
Faith Bible Chapel International v. Gregory Tucker

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

From the Summary of Argument

The First Amendment demands that courts refrain from intruding into disputes over a religious organization’s selection of important leaders. The ministerial exception enforces that demand. And thus, nearly every court to consider the issue has agreed: the ministerial exception promises something akin to an immunity from suit, which must be resolved early in litigation to be effective.

Cardozo Law News Brief: March 10, 2023, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2023

Featured Faculty:

• Kate Shaw
• Jessica Roth
• Pamela Foohey
• Young Ran (Christine) Kim
• Lindsay Nash

Campus News:

• Cardozo Civil Rights Clinic's Lawsuit Against Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons Discussed in The Nation

Events:

• The 2023 Cardozo-Columbia Colloquium on Sovereignty, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights in an Era of National and International Turmoil
• The Rise and Regulation of Sports Gambling
• PLAYMAKERS for EQUALITY: Title IX, USWNT & Landmark Cases in Women's Soccer
• Gloria Steinem To Receive 22nd International Advocate for Peace Award

Towards Meaningful Research And Engagement: Indigenous Knowledge Systems And Great Lakes Governance, Deborah Mcgregor, Nicole Latulippe, Rod Whitlow, Kristi Leora Gansworth, Lorrilee Mcgregor, Stephanie Allen

Articles & Book Chapters

For thousands of years, Indigenous peoples governed their relations in the Great Lakes region, guided by distinct political, legal, governance, and knowledge systems. Despite historic and ongoing exclusion of Indigenous peoples from Great Lakes governance in the Canadian context and other assaults on Indigenous sovereignty, authority, jurisdiction and responsibilities, Indigenous peoples have maintained their relationships with the Great Lakes. In recent years, Indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) have made inroads in Great Lakes governance, thanks primarily to First Nation political advocacy. However, it remains a challenge to include Indigenous knowledge and implement approaches that bridge Indigenous and Western ways of knowing. …

440 North Sf, Llc, Plaintiff And Appellant, V. Vista Heights Investments, Llc,, And Sii Megadiamond, Inc., Defendants And Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)

Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court of Utah County The Honorable Robert Lund, Case No. 210400480

Spencer MacDonald, Attorneys for Appellant

James K. Tracy, Joshua L. Lee, Steve Lundwall, Attorneys for Defendants and Appellees

440 North Sf, Llc, Plaintiff And Appellant, V. Vista Heights Investments, Llc,, And Sii Megadiamond, Inc., Defendants And Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)

Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court of Utah County The Honorable Robert Lund, Case No. 210400480

Spencer MacDonald, Attorneys for Appellant

James K. Tracy, Joshua L. Lee, Steve Lundwall, Attorneys for Defendants and Appellees

Dignity And Respect At All Times: How Federal Agencies Can Measure Up In Complying With Nagpra And Related Statutes, Catherine E. Kanatas, Maxwell Smith

Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

No abstract provided.