Law Commons^™

Rucho In The States: Districting Cases And The Nature Of State Judicial Power, Chad M. Oldfather

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The Gloria And Stanley Plesent Lecture: “Parents’ Rights” And Transgender Children With Professor Dara E. Purvis Penn State Law, Gertrud Mainzer Program In Family Law, Policy And Bioethics, Cardozo Outlaw, Cardozo Family Law Society

2023 Event Invitations

This year’s Gloria and Stanley Plesent Lecture will be given by Professor Dara E. Purvis, a scholar of family law, feminist legal theory, sexuality, gender identity and the law who teaches at Penn State Law. Her work examines gendered impacts of the law and proposes neutralizing reforms, most recently in the context of how the law defines parenthood. Professor Purvis will be discussing the recent spate of state bills and laws related to transgender children.

Spendthrift Trusts: The Tension Between Testamentary Freedom And Public Policy Concerns, Hailey Dobin Reichel

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

In 1875, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller delivered the opinion of the court in a case pertaining to the construction of a woman’s trust created for her children. The matter focused on a provision in the testamentary trust that stated that the trust would terminate with respect to a son’s interest if he were to go bankrupt or insolvent, and that the resulting funds were to be collected by the trustees. Despite arguments presented to the court about how this inclusion acted as an attempt to evade notions of bankruptcy law, Justice Miller upheld the provision of the trust.

This …

Chatgpt – What An Attorney Needs To Know When Using This New Tool, Grant Gamm

SLU Law Journal Online

There is a large potential impact of ChatGPT, an AI language processing model, on the legal industry. In this article, Grant Gamm highlights the various benefits and limitations of the new technology, while emphasizing ethical considerations that attorneys must keep in mind when using it. The article also touches on the broader issues of bias and "hallucinations" that can arise with AI tools and their potential impact on society. Overall, the article highlights the need for attorneys to maintain competence in technological advancements and be vigilant about ethical implications when adopting new tools like ChatGPT.

Vol. 64, No. 10 (March 27, 2023)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

Mmu: 03/27/23–04/02/23, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

Mass Times

Commons Daily Menu

General Announcements

NDLS Faculty & Staff Spotlights: Margaret Lloyd

Ask a 3L: Guillermo Ramon Maria Perez Warnisher

Sport Report by Stephen Nugent

Jackie's Corner

The Evidentiary Challenges Of Confessions In Co-Defendant Trials, Jeffrey Bellin

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

2023 Employer Forum, Cardozo Office Of Student Services & Advising, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

1l 2023 Fall Recruitment Employer Forum, Cardozo Office Of Student Services & Advising

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Cardozo Jlsa Presents: Recovery Of Art Looted During The Holocaust, Cardozo Jewish Law Student Association (Jlsa)

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The Ip Of Gaming Law, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Gaming Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center

2023 Event Invitations

Join two Cardozo Alumni, Daniel Koburger ’17 from KBL Roche and Mikaela Gross ’16 from Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., who will discuss the nuances of IP in Gaming Law as well as their career experiences. This panel will be moderated by Professor Victor Wang, Director of the Cardozo Patent Diversity Project and Acting Director of the Tech Startup Clinic.

No Harm, No Problem (In State Court): Why States Should Reject Injury In Fact, Rebekah G. Strotman

Duke Law Journal

New judicial federalism urges states to extend their constitutional protections beyond the federal Constitution’s. Yet the scholarship has largely ignored justiciability doctrines—including standing—that dictate the requirements for suing in court. Meanwhile, the federal injury in fact requirement has been debated for years, with critics claiming it is ahistorical and overly restrictive. States, though, are not bound by Article III and can reject the federal standing doctrine. Some states have. In fact, the same year the Supreme Court doubled down on injury in fact by stating “no concrete harm, no standing,” the North Carolina Supreme Court rejected injury in fact and …

The Accidental Innovation Policymakers, Rachel E. Sachs

Duke Law Journal

Health care policymakers in the United States, particularly at the federal level, have recently considered a range of proposals that would lower prices for prescription drugs. The pharmaceutical industry and many politicians have argued that these proposals would harm innovation incentives, resulting in fewer new drugs coming to market in the future. This Article identifies and explores a key problem with this argument: that it is typically deployed both accidentally and asymmetrically in nature. Specifically, this Article considers previous changes to health laws that had the impact of increasing innovation incentives by providing large new subsidies to pharmaceutical companies—chiefly the …

Ndls Communicator: Week Of 03.27.23, Notre Dame Law School

NDLS Communicator

The Latest News

• Paol0 Carozza was asked to serve as an expert witness before Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Court in the Beatriz et al. v. El Salvador case. The case relates to the alleged violations of the rights of Beatriz and her family due to the prohibition of the voluntary termination of pregnancy in El Salvador, which allegedly prevented her from the possibility of accessing a legal, early and timely termination when dealing with of a situation of alleged risk to life, health and personal integrity; as well as the non-viability of the fetus outside the womb. Paolo testified …

Effecting Free Exercise And Equal Protection, Laura Portuondo

Duke Law Journal

There is an emerging discrepancy in free exercise and equal protection law. For decades, the Supreme Court has maintained that a law’s effects on a protected group are usually insufficient to trigger heightened scrutiny under either the Free Exercise or Equal Protection Clause. This longstanding rule has rendered it virtually impossible to challenge facially neutral laws on constitutional race, sex, and religious discrimination grounds, even where such laws inflict substantial harms on protected groups. Recent free exercise decisions, however, have abandoned this traditional barrier to enforcing constitutional equality rights. In doing so, they have subverted the usual rule that a …

Journal Staff

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Not Up For Deliberation: Expanding The Peña-Rodriguez Protection To Cover Jury Bias Against Lgbtq+ Individuals, Brett V. Ries

Duke Law Journal

Discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals persists within the United States criminal justice system, which is no surprise given the history of LGBTQ+ discrimination in the United States. Evidence of jurors convicting LGBTQ+ defendants—or, in some extreme cases, sentencing them to death—because of the defendant’s queer identity is especially concerning.

Standing in the way of protecting LGBTQ+ defendants from LGBTQ+ bias in jury deliberations is Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which prohibits defendants from using juror testimony regarding jury deliberations to impeach the jury’s verdict. However, in 2017, the Supreme Court in Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado provided an exception to this “no-impeachment rule” …

Always A Suspect: Law Enforcement’S Use Of Location History Data In Criminal Investigations, Aaron A. Bengart

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

Imagine taking your dog on a walk around the neighborhood or visiting an ill parent in a nursing home and suddenly being considered a prime suspect in a serious criminal investigation. This has happened to a multitude of people over the past few years as law enforcement has increasingly used Location History data to identify perpetrators of criminal activity in every US state. For example, Zachary McCoy found himself as a suspect in a local home invasion simply for riding his bike past the house at issue multiple times on the day of the invasion. Consequently, Mr. McCoy felt obligated …

Facial Recognition Law: Why Should We Care?, Xueyang Peng

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

What if you are a lawyer and you would like to spend an evening enjoying your favorite artist’s concert at the Radio City Music Hall? Or a Knicks game at Madison Square Garden? The first thing you should check is not the ticket price, but rather whether you, or your law firm, has made the MSG blacklist. Even though for years, the owner of MSG has been using the blacklist to exclude its enemies (and their associates) from setting foot in any MSG-owned venue, the facial recognition technology (“FRT”) just brought this practice to a new level.

This post was …

Deterrence, Punishment, Or Retribution: American Criminal Prosecution Of Sayfullo Saipov And Intern, Madeline Epstein

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

On Halloween in 2017, Sayfullo Saipov drove a large truck into dozens of people on the cycling and pedestrian pathway near the West Side Highway in Manhattan, causing eight deaths and numerous injuries. Saipov was allegedly acting on behalf of the Islamic State (“ISIS”), and the Southern District of New York charged him with twenty-eight counts, including murder and attempted murder in aid of racketeering and provision of material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, among other included charges. Saipov, a citizen of Uzbekistan, was found guilty by the American jury on all counts during the guilt phase of …

Purpose Or Profit?: The Rise Of Public Benefit Corporations In The Technology Industry, Alanna Potter

Duke Law & Technology Review

Over the last several years, the demand for socially responsible companies has exploded. Many states have responded to this demand by offering a new corporate form, the public benefit corporation (“PBC”), which arguably allows companies to prioritize social benefit in a way that traditional corporations cannot. The technology industry has adopted the PBC structure at higher rates than corporations in other industries. This Note offers reasons for the appeal of PBCs to corporations generally and to the technology sector in particular. This Note also explores why technology companies may be able to achieve the goals discussed without the need for …

Decolonizing Legal Influence: China's Role In The Changing Landscape Of The Ethiopian Legal Profession, 2000-2018, Mekonnen Firew Ayano

Journal Articles

Over the last two decades, the legal profession in Ethiopia has changed fundamentally. The government has increased the number of law schools from one in 1993 to more than three dozen by 2021. It has introduced strict licensure rules to formalize and regulate legal services and, more recently, in 2022, it has proclaimed the creation of law firms and an independent bar association. The market for legal services has expanded, allowing lawyers to reach out to clients in the country’s peripheries and move onward to attract global clients. These changes are inextricably tied to global currents that have diffused Anglo-American …

Cardozo Invitational Negotiation On Entertainment, Media And Art Competition, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Causation And Conception In American Inventorship, Dan L. Burk

Duke Law & Technology Review

Increasing use of machine learning or “artificial intelligence” (AI) software systems in technical innovation has led some to speculate that perhaps machines might be considered inventors under patent law. While U.S. patent doctrine decisively precludes such a bizarre and counterproductive result, the speculation leads to a more fruitful inquiry about the role of causation in the law of inventorship. U.S. law has almost entirely disregarded causation in determining inventorship, with very few exceptions, some of which are surprising. In this essay, I examine those exceptions to inventive causality, the role they play in determining inventorship, and their effect in excluding …

Keynote Address, Roy Hadley, Matthew Grocoff

Georgia Law Review Symposia

Keynote address by two distinguished Georgia Law alumni, Roy E. Hadley Jr., whose many positions include Independent Counsel, Adams and Reese LLP, Atlanta, and Matthew Grocoff, whose many positions include founding principal of THRIVE Collaborative, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Panel Iii: Regulatory Problems With New Technology, Amanda Reid, Dan L. Burk, Sharon Cop, Adam D. Orford

Georgia Law Review Symposia

Panel discussion on regulating new technology with Professors Amanda Reid, University of North Carolina Law, Dan Burk, University of California-Irvine Law, and Sharon Cop, University of Haifa Law. Moderated by Georgia Law Professor Adam Orford.

Panel Ii: Innovations In Space And War, Rebecca J. Hamilton, Monika U. Ehrman, Melissa J. Durkee

Georgia Law Review Symposia

Panel discussion on space and war with Professors Rebecca Hamilton, American University Law, and Monika Ehrman, SMU Law. Moderated by Georgia Law Professor Melissa J. “MJ” Durkee, who is also the law school’s Associate Dean for International Programs and Director of its Dean Rusk International Law Center.

Panel I: Cyber Regulation, Asaf Lubin, Gregory M. Dickinson, Thomas E. Kadri

Georgia Law Review Symposia

Panel discussion on cyber regulation with Professors Asaf Lubin, Indiana-Bloomington Law, and Gregory Dickinson, St. Thomas Law. Moderated by Georgia Law Professor Thomas Kadri.

Five Indiana Law Faculty Members Honored With Teaching Awards, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

Great instructors are at the heart of any great school, and the Indiana University Maurer School of Law was proud to recognize five of its best at the school’s annual Teaching Awards March 24.

This year’s recipients include BestLawyers’ 2022 Indianapolis Corporate Governance Law Lawyer of the Year, a beloved clinical professor and director, one of the world’s foremost authorities on the intersection of law and globalization, a top U.S. tax scholar, and a professor known for flipping homemade pancakes to students.

Professor Jeff Stake was honored with the Leon H. Wallace Teaching Award, the highest teaching recognition a faculty …

A Matter Of Motive: Malice In The Law Of Torts In The Age Of Connectivity, Greg Bowley

Dalhousie Law Journal

To meet the challenges posed by the novel modes of interpersonal relationships of contemporary society, Canadian tort law must develop a general principle of liability for the intentional infliction of harm. This principle would recognize the normatively-significant common thread of the wrongdoer’s intention to cause harm to another person in phenomena as varied as doxing, swatting, revenge porn, cyberstalking, impersonation, trolling, and harassment. The recent development of discrete, context-specific torts in response to problematic social media conduct is an inherently limited approach to novel interpersonal conduct. However, it also offers an opportunity for the enunciation of a general principle of …