Law Commons^™

Virtual Technology And The Changing Rituals Of Courtroom Justice, Meredith Rossner, David Tait

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Race, Peremptory Challenges, And State Courts: A Blueprint For Change, Nancy S. Marder

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nisha King, Appellant V. Provo City, Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)

Trial Court Case No. Not Applicable

Steven C. Tycksen #3300 TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, LLC Attorneys for Appellant

J. Brian Jones #4769 Provo City Attorney Robert West Provo Civil Service Commission Attorneys for Appellees

Freedom Of The Press And Supreme Court Ethics, Louis J. Virelli

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ai Accountability & Social-Technical Solutions For The Regulation Of Internet Free Speech, Michael Martin Losavio

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Warning: Civil Rights In California May Vary By County Due To Unconsitutional Bail Schedules, Marcie Murtha

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

No Dice: Sports Betting In California, Tristan Hanna

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Covid-19 Risk Factors And Boilerplate Disclosure, Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati, Xuan Liu, Adam C. Pritchard

Law & Economics Working Papers

The SEC mandates that public companies assess new information that changes the risks that they face and disclose these if there has been a “material” change. Does that theory work in practice? Or are companies copying and repeating the same generic disclosures? Using the shock of the COVID-19 pandemic, we explore these questions. Overall, we find considerable rote copying of boilerplate disclosures. Further, the factors that correlate with deviations from the boilerplate seem related more to the resources that companies have (large companies change updated disclosures more) and litigation risks (companies vulnerable to shareholder litigation update more) rather than general …

The Eu's Regulation Of Speech: A Critical View, Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Remedies For "Disinformation", Russell L. Weaver

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judicial Process, Free Speech, And Ordered Liberty, Luke M. Milligan, Robert E. Ranney

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Regulation Of Online Speech In The Uk, Mariette W. Jones

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Misinformation, Social Media, And Opportunities For Content-Based Regulation Within The Constraints Of The United States Constitution's Free Speech Guarantee, Leslie Gielow Jacobs

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Acting On Media Freedom: The Proposed European Media Freedom Act (Emfa) Of The European Union, Mark D. Cole

University of the Pacific Law Review

No abstract provided.

Snitches Get Stitches: An Analysis Of The Eighth Circuit’S But-For Causation Requirement In False Claims Act Litigation “Resulting From” Anti-Kickback Violations, Travis R. Linn

Arkansas Law Review

Following the expansion of Social Security in the 1960s, Congress enacted the Anti-Kickback Statute or AKS in 1972 to ensure that items and services charged to Medicaid were only those necessary to the beneficiary’s health. Part II of this Note will analyze three pieces of legislation and Congress’s reasons for passing them: the FCA, the AKS, and a 2010 amendment to the AKS passed under the Affordable Care Act that connects the two. Part III will analyze the Third and Eighth Circuits’ conflicting interpretations of the 2010 amendment and why the Eighth Circuit’s commitment to textualism has disregarded Congress’s reasons …

The Data Heist: Protecting Consumers And Their Information Through Opt-In Consent, John A. Hudson

Arkansas Law Review

This Comment will: (1) compare and contrast the data privacy laws in the United States and the European Union; (2) demonstrate the significant risk American consumers are subject to under the United States’ current laws and regulations; and (3) address the protections provided by the European Union’s explicit opt-in consent requirement that would ensure safer conditions for American consumers.

Money Talks: Implementing Open Banking In The United States, Hailey Marie Petit

Arkansas Law Review

An open banking system exists when a third-party financial service provider has access to consumer financial information. What if the United States could be on the forefront of the next banking industry change? A well implemented system would mean a new, accessible way to make a transaction. This Comment will explore how the United States can implement an open banking system. First, this Comment defines open banking against the backdrop of the traditional transaction model. Next, this Comment describes the United Kingdom’s adoption of open banking, focusing on the benefits and detriments created by its adoption. Third, this Comment describes …

Not-So-Smartphone Disclosures, Jeff Sovern, Nahal Heydari

Arkansas Law Review

The consumer credit market, and particularly the credit card market, lacks perfect competition. Though usury laws and regulation of charges are germane to our findings, this Article focuses largely on disclosure. Specifically, we examine whether consumers understand the disclosures mandated for credit cards in the medium in which many consumers now engage in financial transactions. This Article proceeds as follows: Part I presents some basics on consumer protections for credit cards. Part II reviews the literature concerning disclosures on smartphones. Part III discusses our methodology. Part IV reports our findings. Part V suggests some normative implications.

Contents, Journal Editors

Arkansas Law Review

No abstract provided.

Torts And Personhood, Melissa Mortazavi

Arkansas Law Review

Perhaps more so than ever, legal personhood is contested. Part I of this Article lays out an overview of existing tort theories exposing the limitations of existing paradigms. This positions the reader to consider in Part II the core assertion of this paper: that a fundamental role of torts is to define personhood. As such, it explores the idea that a principal project that each tort case and litigant is engaged with is not truly about money, property, or even pain per se—it is about determining who is seen.

Arkansas Law Review - Volume 76 Issue 3, Journal Editors

Arkansas Law Review

No abstract provided.

Drawing The Line Of Scrimmage: Global Perspective Of Daily Fantasy Sports In The Advertising Space, Michael Sekich

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Budding Solutions: Weeding Out Obstacles To Bankruptcy Protections For Marijuana Ventures, Jessica Lowen

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Environmental, Social, And Governance (Esg) Reporting: Attempting To Bridge The Gap On Reporting Standards And The Need For Uniform Standards, Emilee Kula

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Data Privacy And China's “Super App” Wechat, Wan Li

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

The Trips Trap Revisited, Roya Ghafele, Adam Chaddock

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Sovereignty As Responsibility With References To The Framework Of R2p, Tor Dahl-Eriksen

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Foreword

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Dedication

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.