Law Commons^™

The Non-Obvious Razor & Generative Ai, Raina Haque, Simone Rose, Nick Desetto

North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Congress's Untapped Authority To Certify U Visas, Elora Mukherjee, Fatma Marouf, Sabrineh Ardalan

Faculty Scholarship

A crucial path to legal status for immigrant victims of crimes is the U visa, which Congress established with strong bipartisan support to protect victims of particular crimes who are helpful to law enforcement. Because the U visa was intended to encourage reporting of crimes, the application requires a certification form to be completed by a federal, state, or local authority that is investigating or prosecuting the alleged offense. Arbitrary and inconsistent certification decisions by state and local authorities make it especially important to identify relevant federal authorities that can serve as certifying authorities for U visas. This Piece argues …

Researcher Access To Social Media Data: Lessons From Clinical Trial Data Sharing, Christopher J. Morten, Gabriel Nicholas, Salomé Viljoen

Faculty Scholarship

For years, social media companies have sparred with lawmakers over how much independent access to platform data they should provide researchers. Sharing data with researchers allows the public to better understand the risks and harms associated with social media, including areas such as misinformation, child safety, and political polarization. Yet researcher access is controversial. Privacy advocates and companies raise the potential privacy threats of researchers using such data irresponsibly. In addition, social media companies raise concerns over trade secrecy: the data these companies hold and the algorithms powered by that data are secretive sources of competitive advantage. This Article shows …

The Brady Database, Brandon L. Garrett, Adam M. Gershowitz, Jennifer Teitcher

Faculty Publications

The Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Brady v. Maryland turns sixty this year. The Brady doctrine, which requires the government to disclose favorable and material evidence to the defendant, is one of the most frequently litigated criminal procedure issues. Yet, despite decades of Brady cases in federal and state courts, we still know relatively little about how Brady claims are litigated, adjudicated, and what such claims can tell us about the criminal justice system writ large. Scholars are in the dark about how often Brady violations occur, whether it is primarily the fault of prosecutors or the police, whether violations …

A Practitioner's Approach To Examining Title Ix, Jordan Tegtmeyer, Ashley Nicoletti

BYU Education & Law Journal

With the 52nd anniversary of Title IX happening this spring amid recent issues related to gender equity in college sports, we thought it important to examine Title IX’s three-part test. The past year’s Title IX stories indicate a gap in understanding around compliance with its three-part test. Whether it be disparate accommodations for NCAA women’s basketball and softball players or institutions citing Title IX as one of the rationales for dropping sports, Title IX has been all over the news. This article seeks to establish a legal and regulatory framework practitioners can use when thinking about compliance with Title IX’s …

The Antidote Of Free Speech: Censorship During The Pandemic, Christopher Keleher

Catholic University Law Review

Free speech in America stands at a precipice. The nation must decide if the First Amendment protects controversial, unconventional, and unpopular speech, or only that which is mainstream, fashionable, and government-approved. This debate is one of many legal battles brought to the fore during Covid-19. But the fallout of the free speech question will transcend Covid-19.

During the pandemic, the federal government took unprecedented steps to pressure private entities to push messages it approved and squelch those it did not. The Supreme Court will soon grapple with the issue of censorship during the pandemic. This article examines this litigation, along …

Over-The-Air In Personam: Purposeful Availment Through Over-The-Air Updates, Samuel R. Boyd

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sackett V. Epa: The Narrowing Of "Waters Of The United States" Under The Clean Water Act And Its Downstream Effects On South Carolina Wetland Regulation, Simpson Z. Fant Jr.

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rehabilitating South Carolina's Drug Court System, Hugh G. Gooding

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Religious Accommodations: The New Standard For South Carolina Employers Following Groff V. Dejoy, Dorothy Jane P. Modla

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Somewhere In Between All-Or-Nothing: Suggestions For Alternatives To Marriage In South Carolina, Andrea C. Moises

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Enhancing Law Enforcement Or Compromising Privacy? The Problem With South Carolina's Use Of Automatic License Plate Readers, William K. Rees

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Child's Right To Real Representation In Dependency Cases: A Proposal To Modify South Carolina's Child Representation System, Elizabeth G. Ward

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Inadequate Choice In School Choice: An Analysis Of South Carolina's House Bill 3843 And The Implications For Public School Students And Rural Schools, J. Meadows Welch

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Framework For Managing Disputes Over Intellectual Property Rights In Traditional Knowledge, Stephen R. Munzer

Michigan Journal of Race and Law

Major controversies in moral and political theory concern the rights, if any, Indigenous peoples should have over their traditional knowledge. Many scholars, including me, have tackled these controversies. This Article addresses a highly important practical issue: Can we come up with a solid framework for resolving disputes over actual or proposed intellectual property rights in traditional knowledge?

Yes, we can. The framework suggested here starts with a preliminary distinction between control rights and income rights. It then moves to four categories that help to understand disputes: nature of the traditional knowledge under dispute; dynamics between named parties to disputes; unnamed …

Reviving Indian Country: Expanding Alaska Native Villages’ Tribal Land Bases Through Fee-To-Trust Acquisitions, Alexis Studler

Michigan Journal of Race and Law

For the last fifty years, the possibility of fee-to-trust acquisitions in Alaska has been precarious at best. This is largely due to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (ANCSA), which eschewed the traditional reservation system in favor of corporate land ownership and management. Despite its silence on trust acquisitions, ANCSA was and still is cited as the primary prohibition to trust acquisitions in Alaska. Essentially, ANCSA both reduced Indian Country in Alaska and prohibited any opportunities to create it, leaving Alaska Native Villages without the significant territorial jurisdiction afforded to Lower 48 tribes. However, recent policy changes from …

State Constitutional Limitations To Cities Taxing The Digital Economy, Lauren Shores Pelikan

Faculty Publications

The digital economy’s rapid evolution, most recently with the rise of artificial intelligence, demands a reevaluation of state constitutional limitations on local taxation of digital transactions. Citizens have long feared excessive or unfair tax burdens, hence the adoption of constitutional amendments that prohibit legislators from increasing taxes or imposing new taxes without a public vote. However, these constitutional limitations are now preventing cities from taxing digital transactions that are taking over the economy. This is a serious financial problem for cities whose traditional sources of tax revenue, such as sales taxes and property taxes, are dwindling due to the digitalizing …

"I Am Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds": Applying Strict Liability To Artificial Intelligence As An Abnormally Dangerous Activity, Renee Henson

Faculty Publications

Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tools have produced a myriad of injuries, up to and including death. This burgeoning technology has caused scholars to ask questions, such as, How do we create a legal framework for AI? Because AI creators have acknowledged that even they do not know the capacities of their technology for good or bad outcomes, this Article argues that an existing framework, strict liability, is an appropriate fit for harms arising from this new technology because a party need not prove negligence to prevail. Strict liability was uniquely developed to handle those activities that are “abnormally dangerous.” An abnormally …

Nonviolent Drug Offenders Need Treatment--Not Prison: The Solution To Prison Overcrowding In West Virginia, Kendra Amick

West Virginia Law Review

A tenfold increase in prison populations has occurred due to the policies and laws enacted by the War on Drugs campaign in the United States. This increase is the direct result of a rise in the incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders. Rearrest rates for nonviolent drug-related offenders sentenced to prison are 50%. For those offenders permitted to participate in a drug court program, this rate decreases by over half. In West Virginia, the battle against the opioid epidemic has caused it to become one of the fastest-growing prison populations in the nation. With a fast-emerging crisis on the rise, West …

Slaughtering Slaughter-House: An Assessment Of 14th Amendment Privileges Or Immunities Jurisprudence, Caleb Webb

Senior Honors Theses

In 1872, the Supreme Court decided the Slaughter-House Cases, which applied a narrow interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the 14^th Amendment that effectually eroded the clause from the Constitution. Following Slaughter-House, the Supreme Court compensated by utilizing elastic interpretations of the Due Process Clause in its substantive due process jurisprudence to cover the rights that would have otherwise been protected by the Privileges or Immunities Clause. In more recent years, the Court has heard arguments favoring alternative interpretations of the Privileges or Immunities Clause but has yet to evaluate them thoroughly. By applying the …

Ensuring Just Compensation: Imposing A Reasonable Time Limit On Payment Of Money Judgments Under The Fifth Amendment, Paul Mackey

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

The government’s use of eminent domain power to take private property for public use remains a controversial and fast-moving area of law. The Fifth Amendment was ratified as a check on the state’s use of eminent domain power by requiring just compensation after a taking. There is great variation among the states regarding the requirements of just compensation in an eminent domain claim. Some states are unwilling to provide any compensation at all, while others ensure full compensation. Property owners whose land has been taken face a dilemma when, after winning a money judgment in state court, they are unable …

Impact Ipsa Loquitur: A Reverse Hand Rule For Consumer Finance, Edward Janger, Susan Block-Lieb

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Safeguarding Wetlands Post-Sackett V. Epa: Protecting Indigenous Territories And Environmental Health, Anna J. Mahler, Emily Richardson

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

The Clean Water Act (CWA) has been a tool for federally recognized tribes to protect the waters within their borders and sacred lands that exist outside the borders of the tribe. Sackett v. EPA limited the scope of the CWA to cover only wetlands that have a continuous surface connection. This restricts the ability of Tribes to protect important waters. The Sackett decision decreases the nation’s ability to protect the chemical, physical, and biological aspects of the waters. This paper explores past legislative remedies and proposes federal wetland protection.

The Price Of Dignity: How Medicare Requirements Shape End-Of-Life Care, Juliette K. Ball, Dallin M. Mildenhall

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

End-of-life care comes with several challenges: the level of care required is often complex and difficult to administer, fraud goes unchecked, facilities are understaffed, and the enforcement of care requirements is minimal. As a result, these conditions lead to neglect and abuse of an extremely vulnerable population with few options for recourse for elderly victims and their families. As the elderly population continues to rise in the United States, the need for reform will only continue to increase. The federal government provides substantial funding for end-of-life care through Medicare, and significant changes must be made to address current health disparities …

Parched Rights, Thirsty Lands: Improving Paiute Water Rights With A Proactive State Solution, Hailey Russell

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

This paper critically examines the impact of the Winters Doctrine on water rights for Native American tribes, focusing on the Paiute Tribe of Utah (PITU). While the doctrine has facilitated significant achievements, challenges persist, particularly in differentiating between “paper” and “wet water rights”. The complexities of the doctrine of prior appropriation, as revealed in the PITU case, underscore the need for a nuanced approach to water allocation. Disparities in "wet water rights" among PITU bands highlight the urgent requirement for comprehensive State-led solutions that address environmental factors and the preservation of Paiute culture.

Free Speech Or Fair Elections? A Call For Campaign Finance Reform And A New Definition Of Corruption, Annabelle Crawford

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

This paper argues that to protect free speech, the Supreme Court must authorize stricter limits on independent expenditures and expand the legal definition of corruption. It scrutinizes the historical trajectory of Supreme Court rulings concerning the control of political expenditure, emphasizing the delicate balance between safeguarding freedom of expression and mitigating corruption in electoral processes. The paper highlights the Court's limited interpretation of corruption, advocating for a broader conceptualization that encompasses not only direct quid pro quo transactions but also subtler forms of corruption including undue influence and distortion. The paper illustrates how unregulated independent expenditures can subvert democratic principles …

Clearing The Air: Addressing Utah’S Pollution Crisis Through Legal Reform And Environmental Justice, Eduardo A. Rios, Catherine Patino-Celedon

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

Within the context of structural racism and economic inequality, Black and Latino communities confront disproportionate exposure to environmental hazards, amplifying health inequities. This article emphasizes the imperative for advancing environmental justice in Utah, where pervasive pollution exacerbates disparities. Furthermore, the disregard for community input by Utah's authorities perpetuates disparities in resource allocation. This narrative aligns with a nationwide trend wherein marginalized populations confront grave environmental risks. Concurrently, escalating concerns regarding air quality in Utah highlights the far-reaching consequences of pollution on public health, necessitating comprehensive legislative action to safeguard vulnerable communities.

Authorship In The Age Of Algorithms: Adapting Copyright Law For Ai -Generated Content, Sydney Thomas

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

In the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the relationship between technological advancement and legal protection for human creators has become increasingly critical. From Stephen Hawking's admonition of the potential risks of unregulated AI to Sam Altman's advocacy for proactive regulation, this paper navigates the evolving landscape of AI innovation and copyright law. By examining the challenges posed by AI-generated content, including issues of intellectual property infringement and privacy concerns, it highlights the need for adaptive legal frameworks. Strategic enhancements to copyright law must be developed, such as bolstering fair use doctrine and expanding creator rights, to ensure the protection of …

Front Matter

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

No abstract provided.

Domino Effect: How Scalia Lives On Through The Controversial Texas Immigration Law And Which States Are Itching To Pull The Trigger, Kristin Hommel

Immigration Law Blog

This article examines Texas’s immigration enforcement law, SB 4, and the Supreme Court’s surprising ruling overturning the injunction which prohibited its enforcement. This article posits that SB 4 is by no means a “lone wolf,” but rather is the latest in a series of state laws which seek, quietly or boldly, to take immigration into the state’s hands.