Law Commons^™

A Canadian Perspective On U.S. Administered Protection And The Free Trade Agreement, Alan M. Rugman

Maine Law Review

The negotiation of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement over the 1986-1988 period builds upon over 130 years of bilateral trade and investment policy. With Canada's economy being roughly one-tenth the size of that of the United States, the negotiation of commercial arrangements to govern the bilateral trade and investment relationship assumes great importance in the smaller partner. The size asymmetry means that Canada, as the smaller nation, needs to secure a rules-based system rather than a power-based system in its trading relationship with the United States, which accounts for nearly 80% of its exports. Canada is also the largest …

Foreword, Charles S. Colgan

Maine Law Review

The Free Trade Agreement concluded between the United States and Canada, and signed on January 2, 1988, has a number of features that distinguish it among the trade agreements of the United States. It eliminates all tariffs, reduces restrictions on business travel, and establishes ground rules for trade in services and for foreign investment. In this latter respect, the Agreement is unique among major international trade agreements of the world. But one of the most enduring aspects of the Agreement is likely to be the provisions establishing a series of dispute settlement mechanisms. This last observation would probably surprise almost …

Alternative Dispute Resolution In International Trade And Business, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Maine Law Review

This workshop, which was held at the University of Maine School of Law on May 27, 1987, consisted of an informal discussion among an interdisciplinary group of experts. The purpose of the workshop was to generate ideas and recommendations regarding the utility of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in international trade and business, with special reference to Canadian-United States trade relations. The discussion also explored the possible commonalties of domestic and international dispute resolution in the hope of developing a basis for a generic alternative dispute resolution methodology.

Editorial Board Vol. 40 No. 2 (1988), Patricia A. Nelson-Reade Editor-In-Chief

Maine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction To Symposium: Alternative Dispute Resolution In Canada-United States Trade Relations, George J. Mitchell

Maine Law Review

The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) movement in law arose domestically as the pressures on our court system threatened to deprive individual citizens of their "day in court." Maine is a leader in the development and elaboration of the principles and practicalities that must be mastered for ADR mechanisms to function. The University of Maine School of Law symposium examining the application of ADR principles to international disputes focuses specifically on the trade relationship between the United States and Canada. But its examination of both the innovations and limitations of ADR to the resolution of international disputes is broader than this …

Maine Debtor-Creditor Law By Dennis M. Patterson, David J. Jones

Maine Law Review

Dennis M. Patterson, Esquire, has written a brief, practical guide to selected areas of collection practice entitled Maine Debtor-Creditor Law. Two immediate observations come to mind: first, that I plan to keep a copy of the book in my office library for future reference; second, that I am disappointed that the author omitted reference to several challenging issues that confront the attorney having a regular collection or foreclosure practice. This latter observation is both an indication of the usefulness of the book's treatment of the areas covered and a hopeful invitation to the author to expand on his subject matter …

Maine Civil Remedies By Andrew M. Horton & Peggy L. Mcgehee, Eric R. Herlan

Maine Law Review

If there is any ongoing dispute within the legal community that one could properly characterize as a Great Debate, that dispute concerns the nature and sources of judicial power. Most recently that debate has manifested itself in nuanced and subtle disagreements about how a court ought to interpret enacted law, whether found in statutes or written constitutions. That argument about judicial interpretation, and more precisely about the philosophical possibility of correct textual interpretations, is itself simply a more scholarly manifestation of an earlier dispute over whether judges should "legislate" when they resolve difficult legal issues, or should instead constrain themselves …

City Of Portland V. Depaolo: Defining The Role Of Stare Decisis In State Constitutional Decisionmaking, Thad B. Zmistowski

Maine Law Review

Five years ago, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, aligned itself with a growing number of states by adopting the primacy method of state constitutional decisionmaking. Under the primacy method, a state court decides an issue of constitutional law by first looking to that state's own constitution; if the issue is resolvable on state constitutional grounds, the federal constitutional grounds are not reached. Adoption of the primacy method by numerous state courts has generated considerable debate concerning issues of state constitutional law. Little discussion, however, has focused on the methodology of state constitutional adjudication. As a …

Maine Recognizes The Independent Tort Of Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: Gammon V. Osteopathic Hospital, Jaye E. Rooney

Maine Law Review

Gerald Gammon opened his deceased father's hospital bag, expecting to find his personal effects. Instead, he discovered a bloodied leg, severed below the knee and bluish in color. Recoiling in horror, he yelled, "Oh my God, they have taken my father's leg off.” His aunt later recalled at trial that "he was as white as a ghost" and she thought he was going to have a heart attack. Gerald received a call on November 7, 1982, from the Osteopathic Hospital of Maine informing him that his father, Linwood Gammon, had succumbed to cancer that morning. A funeral home employee picked …

Taxpayer Standing And The Preventive-Remedial Distinction: A Call For Reform, Alicia E. Flaherty

Maine Law Review

The Maine Law Court has observed that, "a central function of American courts [is] to protect and relieve the individual from injurious unconstitutional conduct by government officials." Apart from the political process, the judicial process is the only means through which citizens can ensure that government conforms to the law. The courts provide a forum for citizens to challenge the legality of official acts, and serve as a "means of correcting illegal practices of government officials which would otherwise be irreparable." The question of standing is a critical element of the court's task of balancing the individual's right to challenge …

Maine Refuses To Recognize A Cause Of Action For Loss Of Parental Consortium: Durepo V. Fishman, Nancy Wanderer Mackenzie

Maine Law Review

In Durepo v. Fishman, two minor children filed suit to recover for the loss of parental consortium resulting from injuries allegedly suffered by their mother when she was negligently treated by a physician. The defendant moved to dismiss the claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, sitting as the Law Court. The case invited the Law Court to declare for the first time in Maine whether a minor child should possess an independent right of action for …

Coping With Confusion: A Unitary Procedure For Judicial Review Of The Referendum Process, Daniel L. Cummings

Maine Law Review

Although our state and national political systems are models of representative government, the Maine Constitution provides an important mechanism for direct democracy. Indeed, the people of Maine expressly reserve in the state constitution "power to propose laws and to enact or reject the same at the polls independent of the Legislature." Maine people propose such laws by means of the referendum process. Use of the referendum has become an increasingly widespread mechanism for addressing pervasive societal concerns such as land use regulation, environmental policy and public health issues. The prevalence of interest group politics undoubtedly influences Maine's electorate to use …

Federal Nuclear Policy And The 1987 Maine Nuclear Referendum: Viable Initiative Or Legal Cul-De-Sac?, David P. Crocker

Maine Law Review

On November 3, 1987, Maine voters once again rejected a proposal which would have forced closure of the Maine Yankee nuclear power plant, the state's only nuclear utility. The vote was the most recent in a series of attempts to close the plant, utilizing the vehicle of popular referendum. This latest initiative was in large part a consequence of intense public outcry against the possible location of a permanent nuclear waste repository in the state. It is therefore uniquely and personally linked to current passions concerning the future of nuclear electrical generation in the nation. The previous referenda to close …

General Discretion Under Maine's Site Location Of Development Law, Tybe Ann Brett

Maine Law Review

The 1960s brought nationwide concern about the environmental impact of post-World War II development and industrial growth. Efforts to protect the environment took many different forms. Part of Maine's response to the growing need for environmental improvement measures was the Legislature's enactment in 1970 of the Site Location of Development Law (Site Law). The Site Law gives the state control over the location of developments that would substantially affect the environment, rather than leaving such decisions to single towns and individual developers. The Law also addresses concerns beyond those dealt with in air and water pollution control legislation. The Site …

Allocating The Gst Exemption Under The Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax, Michael B. Lang

Maine Law Review

One of the most significant aspects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 for estate planners was the retroactive repeal of the original 1976 generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax and the enactment of an entirely new generation-skipping transfer tax. The new generation-skipping transfer tax, unlike the 1976 version, generally applies to transfers that constitute "direct skips," such as outright gifts to grandchildren. Like the earlier tax, the new tax also applies to "taxable terminations,” such as a termination of the life estate of the transferor's child resulting in the grandchild receiving possession of the transferred property in fee simple under the …

Brief Of Lindsay And Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, John A. Meiser, Domenic Canonico

Court Briefs

No. 24-319
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. Adrienne A. Harris

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the New York State Court of Appeals

From the Summary of Argument

New York’s abortion-coverage mandate requires many faith-based organizations to violate their deeply held religious beliefs about the sanctity of life. The exemption New York offers to only a narrowly drawn, ill-defined subset of preferred religious groups does not remedy that dramatic intrusion into free exercise rights. Indeed, it only compounds the problem.

Maurer School Of Law Professor, Iu Vice President Elected President Of The American Society Of Comparative Law, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

The American Society of Comparative Law has elected Indiana University Maurer School of Law Professor Hannah L. Buxbaum as its next president, the organization announced last week at its annual meeting.

Buxbaum is an internationally recognized scholar in the areas of private international law and international litigation and jurisdiction, and has most recently served as vice president of the ASCL. She is the John E. Schiller Chair in Legal Ethics at the Law School as well as Indiana University’s Vice President for International Affairs.

Vol. 67, No. 08 (October 21, 2024)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

Where Is China Now On Pillar 2?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

China has been relatively quiet about pillar 2 of the G20/OECD base erosion and profit-shifting 2.0 project. In a recent Tax Notes article, Xiaoli Ortega wrote:

Will China join the global tax reform club? If so, when? Although the Chinese government has made repeated positive statements about the importance of the global minimum tax reform, it has not clarified when it would modify its domestic tax laws to incorporate the pillar 2 rules. However, this does not mean that China is not preparing itself for the reform. Recall that on August 1, 2022, the State Taxation Administration issued a governmental …

The Biden Administration’S Negotiations With Pharmaceutical Companies, Isabel Anthony

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The Biden administration has conducted the government’s first ever negotiations with pharmaceutical companies on the cost of life saving drugs. They have been able to negotiate prices down by nearly 80%. The drugs at the center of negotiations are ones that people are prescribed for years at a time in order to manage illnesses such as heart disease, Crohn’s disease, and more. In order to conduct these negotiations, the Biden administration used march-in rights built into the Bayh-Dole Act.

The print edition of the issue has also been released. This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict …

10.21.2024 Orsp Connect, Liz Williamson

ORED Newsletter

Jerry Martin

NIH Grants Process Primer Training

Nature Masterclasses Writing a Review Paper Course

Pizza Hut L.L.C. V. Pandya: Exploring The Validity Of Pre-Dispute Jury Waivers, Logan Allen

Texas A&M Law Review

This Note analyzes a 2023 Fifth Circuit opinion concerning whether a contractual pre-dispute jury waiver is enforceable utilizing the knowing and voluntary factors and when challenged under general fraud allegations. The Fifth Circuit incorrectly weighed two of the voluntary and knowing factors—conspicuousness and unequal bargaining power—to be in favor of enforcing the jury waiver when the facts of the case and prior case law prove otherwise. The Fifth Circuit should have first applied a historical analysis in analyzing a constitutional right, but the court was reasonable in applying the arbitration rule to jury waiver provisions because waiving a jury right …

Glenn Howard Griffin, Petitioner/ Appellant V. State Of Utah, Respondent/ Appellee : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)

Appeal from an order granting summary judgment and denying a petition for postconviction relief, Case No. 170100200, in the First Judicial District Court, Box Elder County, the Honorable Spencer Walsh presiding.

DAVID FERGUSON, Counsel for Appellant

ERIN RILEY, SEAN D. REYES, Counsel for Appellee

The Bauer Lecture With Judge Asim Rehman, Cardozo Law Review

2024–2025 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The Public In Action: The Potential For Public Inquiries To Realize Deliberative Democracy A Case Study Of The Mass Casualty Commission, Grace Bryson

Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies

Public inquiries have the potential to promote deliberative democracy. However, the current structure and procedures employed in public inquiries do not promote this goal. Rather, the procedures are based in adversarial methods that do not align with the diverse functions of public inquiries. This paper addresses these procedural shortcomings and seeks to encourage more fulsome public participation. Using the Mass Casualty Commission in Nova Scotia as a case study, this paper proposes procedural changes that could enhance the role of the public in future inquiries to lead to transformative and beneficial policy change.

Abuse Of Right To Divorce And Voluntary Separation : Prospects For Compensation In Uae Law - Analytical Study, Hani Ahmad Dalati

Thesis/ Dissertation Defenses

This study aims to explore the possibility of compensation for the abuse of the right to divorce and voluntary separation under the current UAE law. The study begins by identifying the cases excluded from the scope of abuse, with the objective of accurately defining the cases that warrant compensation. It examines the potential forms of abuse in the context of divorce and voluntary separation, and addresses the adequacy of current legal standards in assessing appropriate compensations.
The study employed an analytical methodology to achieve its objectives, analyzing relevant texts in the Personal Status Law and Civil Transactions Law, along with …

Divisive Concepts Legislation: Perceptions Of Georgia Social Studies Teachers, Karen Terry, Forrest R. Parker Iii

Teaching Social Studies in the Peach State

This study examines Georgia social studies teachers' perceptions of House Bill 1084, which seeks to limit the teaching of divisive topics in K–12 classrooms. With growing concerns nationwide about how educators address controversial subjects, this bill represents Georgia's stance in the debate, potentially affecting social studies teaching in the state.

The research employs a survey-methods approach, focusing on Georgia's social studies teachers. Using a Delphi method, a pilot survey was first distributed to gather feedback and refine the survey. The study aims to understand teachers' views on House Bill 1084, its impact on their teaching practices, and its broader implications …

Professor Matthew Wansley Quoted In The Washington Post About Tesla Self-Driving Car Federal Investigation, Matthew Wansley

Cardozo News 2024

“Matthew Wansley, a professor at Yeshiva University’s Cardozo School of Law in New York who specializes in emerging automotive technologies, said the new investigation could be linked to Tesla’s decision to prioritize cameras in its automated systems. Other kinds of sensors like radar and the laser-based lidar can help detect obstacles even when visibility is poor. Musk has previously said that lidar was unnecessary and that automakers who relied on it were ‘doomed.’

U.S. Court Of Appeals For The Seventh Circuit To Hold Oral Argument At The Maurer School Of Law, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit—one of 13 appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary—will hear oral argument at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law on Thursday, October 24.

The arguments are scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Law School’s DeLaney Moot Court Room. The proceedings are open to the public, with seating available on a first-come, first-served basis starting at 9 a.m. An overflow room will be available if needed. The arguments are expected to conclude by 12:30 p.m.

“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has a …

Compagni V. Klemesrud : Reply Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )

ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE HONORABLE JARED ELDRIGE

Kristin A. VanOrman Jessica J. Johnston Scarlet R. Smith STRONG & HANNI Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees

Jefferson W. Gross (#8339) Seamus W. Appel (#17783) GROSS & ROONEY Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant