Law Commons^™

Integrating Humanities Into Cybersecurity Education: Enhancing Ethical, Historical, And Sociopolitical Understanding In Technical Training, Joseph Frusci

Journal of Cybersecurity Education, Research and Practice

The increasing complexity of cybersecurity challenges necessitates a holistic educational approach that integrates both technical skills and humanistic perspectives. This article examines the importance of infusing humanities disciplines such as history, ethics, political science, sociology, law, and anthropology—into cybersecurity education. Through a pilot course developed for Staten Island Technical High School, aligned with the New York State K-12 Computer Science and Digital Fluency Standards, students were introduced to an interdisciplinary curriculum that combined technical cybersecurity training with historical analysis, ethical reasoning, and sociopolitical context. The results of pre- and post-course assessments demonstrated significant improvements in critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and …

The Arrest Of Telegram Ceo Pavel Durov & What It Says About Europe’S Approach To Privacy, Soraya Mazarei

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

On August 24, 2024, Pavel Durov, the CEO of the messaging app Telegram, was arrested in Paris. French authorities have charged him with various crimes, including complicity in the distribution of child pornography, the sale of illegal drugs, and the distribution of hacking software. Durov is banned from leaving France and must check in at a police station twice a week. If convicted, Durov faces a ten-year prison sentence. French prosecutors are holding Durov criminally liable for permitting criminal activity to go unchallenged on Telegram. This indictment is possible under France’s LOPMI law, which was passed in January 2023. Under …

Mandatory Public Service Summer Stipend Meetings, Cardozo Center For Public Service Law

2024–2025 Flyers

Session 1: November 18, 1pm; room 424

Session 2: November 20, 1pm; room 424

Session 3: November 22, 1:30pm; room 423

The Future Of Immigrant Rights, Center For Rights And Justice, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2024–2025 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Fall 2024 Gift Bag Giveaway, Cardozo Office Of Student Services & Advising

2024–2025 Flyers

Monday, November 18th, 2024

Wednesday. November 20th, 2024

Ndls Communicator: Week Of 11.18.24, Notre Dame Law School

NDLS Communicator

The Latest News

• What Would You Fight For? Fighting for Religious Liberty
• ND Education Law Project files amicus brief in support of families excluded from California program because of their faith
• Notre Dame BLSA visits NYC for networking with top law firms and insights on DEI initiatives
• University of San Diego Law Professor Steven Smith delivers the Rice-Hasson Distinguished Lecture
• Notre Dame Law students provide critical legal aid through Appalachia Externship
• Notre Dame Law School co-hosts Law and Finance Conference, faculty members present research.

Faculty News and Briefs

• Bruce Huber wrote an article for The Conversation about the challenges of …

Arrest The President, Hypothetically, Leo Lombardi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

By what authority does one dare direct that famous phrase, “j’accuse!” at the state’s supreme executor of law? Is there a mechanism, through which a citizen can hold a national government to account? Can the citizen's arrest serve as a symbolic insistence that international humanitarian law be enforced? International humanitarian law is coming to be defined by the dereliction of duty. Where a rules-based international order once stood as a lofty ideal, the reality of a nuclear-armed world now looms over the field’s failures.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review on November 14, …

Paying For Performance? Attorneys' Fees In Fraud Class Actions, Stephen J. Choi, Jessica M. Erickson, Adam C. Pritchard

Articles

This paper studies whether plaintiffs' lawyers matter in securities class actions. We use inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) to compare the results in cases led by top-tier firms against those brought by lower-tier firms. This technique addresses case selection effects by using all of the cases led by a top-tier firm and then weighting the cases led by lower-tier firms based on how similar these cases are to the cases led by top-tier firms. We do find that top-tier lawyers obtain better outcomes for shareholders in a subset of securities class actions, specifically the cases against the larger (although not …

Energy Transition Enhanced By The European Green Deal – How National Competition Authorities Should Tackle This Challenge In Central And Eastern Europe?, Marcin Kamiński

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

The European Green Deal (EGD) provides very ambitious policy goals, particularly related to energy transition and decarbonisation. Competition law also plays a role in the accomplishment of the objectives set in the European Green Deal. While many National Competition Authorities (NCAs) have already issued relevant acts and taken significant actions regarding practices related to the EGD, the NCAs from Central and Eastern Europe (CCE) have not yet instituted any initial actions towards this policy. This article proposes relevant institutional actions which may be used by NCAs in the CEE region given the current situation in their national energy markets, energy …

Square Peg In A Round Hole? Sustainability As An Aim Of Antitrust Law, Michał Konrad Derdak

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

The ongoing debate on sustainability in antitrust only briefly refers to the established legal methodologies of interpretation. In particular, there seems to be hardly any reflection on the teleological interpretation of competition law in the context of making sustainable development the aim thereof. This is problematic, because a methodologically sound construction of the aims of law is instrumental not only for the interpretation of its provisions, but also for ensuring the rule of law and safeguarding the rights of individuals. This article is an attempt to trigger a discussion in this area by analysing whether promoting sustainability is, or can …

The Judicial Review Of The Standard Of Proof In Cartel Cases: Raising The Bar For The Croatian Competition Authority Case Comment To The Judgment Of The Constitutional Court Of The Republic Of Croatia No. U-Iii-2791/2016 Of 1 February 2018 (Sokol Marić D.O.O.), Alexandr Svetlicinii

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

The Security agencies case represents another example of the procedural diversity among Member States in applying national competition rules that mirror Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In its infringement decision the Croatian NCA specified that the presence at the meeting with competitors and participation in the discussion concerning minimum prices was sufficient to impute to the parties participation in an anti-competitive agreement prohibited under the national equivalent of Article 101 TFEU. As the Croatian NCA investigated an agreement ‘by object’, it considered itself relieved of the burden to demonstrate the anti-competitive effects. The Constitutional Court has taken a different approach …

The Santa Clara, 2024-11-15, Santa Clara University

The Santa Clara

No abstract provided.

Reconceiving Corporate Rights And Regulation In The Ai Era, Michael R. Siebecker

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Can existing corporate governance principles properly guide the relationship between shareholders and directors as artificial intelligence (“AI”) plays an increasingly prominent role in corporate management, planning, and operations? Without a doubt, AI technologies allow corporations to enjoy enhanced efficiency and innovation. But the vast range of AI capabilities—from sophisticated data analytics to autonomous decision-making—raises profound questions about whether traditional governance principles remain sufficiently robust to cabin the proper development and deployment of such a powerful and rapidly evolving set of new technologies. Current corporate governance structures that focus on human actors and traditional business decision-making mechanisms seem ill-suited to address …

Education’S Inextricable Ties To Democracy: Brown V. Board Of Education And Its Democratic Aspirations, Kayla Griffin Green

Cleveland State Law Review

On October 27, 2023, Cleveland State Law Review hosted an in-person Symposium to convene academics, legal practitioners, community advocates, and judges for a robust and timely conversation about democracy’s promise and the fight for its future. This Symposium piece will reiterate some of the conversations by panelists discussing the use of law to become Guardians of Justice, the relationship between education and democracy, and the Ohio Constitution as a tool for recapturing the state’s democratic values.

Shadows Of The Crown: The Virtue Of Equilibrium In American Sovereign Immunity, William T. Olmstead

Cleveland State Law Review

Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the federal and state governments of the United States cannot be sued or prosecuted unless they voluntarily waive their own impunity. In recent decades, the Supreme Court has expanded the scope of the sovereign immunity of the state governments. This Note argues that such an expansion is a profound and shortsighted mistake. It proposes that the most effective way to balance governmental functionality with civic accountability is to pass and ratify a constitutional amendment that solidifies national sovereign immunity and abolishes state sovereign immunity. It argues that such action is necessary to ensure the …

The Dignitary Harms Of Racism In Public Education: Expanding The Lens Of Brown Beyond Segregation, Kumar Ramanathan, Matthew D. Nelsen

Cleveland State Law Review

Reflecting on the 70th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, we reconsider the landmark ruling’s conception of dignitary harm in public education. In its argument against the separate-but-equal standard that undergirded segregated schools in the South, the Supreme Court focused on the psychological harm that segregation imposed on Black children. Building on past critiques, we argue that the Court’s analysis was too narrow: the psychological harm it identified is only one of many forms of dignitary harm that racially marginalized students can face in schools. Importantly, dignitary harms can persist even in integrated schools and classrooms, through practices …

Masthead, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright Statement, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Symposium Remarks Table Of Contents, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Democracy & The Ohio Constitution – Recapturing The Innovative Spirit Of The 1912 Ohio Constitutional Convention, Melody J. Stewart

Cleveland State Law Review

On October 27, 2023, Cleveland State Law Review hosted an in-person Symposium to convene academics, legal practitioners, community advocates, and judges for a robust and timely conversation about democracy’s promise and the fight for its future. This Symposium piece will reiterate some of the conversations by panelists discussing the use of law to become Guardians of Justice, the relationship between education and democracy, and the Ohio Constitution as a tool for recapturing the state’s democratic values.

The Decline Of Representation Reinforcement In The Supreme Court: Increasing Deference To The Political Process, Jonathan L. Entin

Cleveland State Law Review

The Supreme Court has often interpreted the Constitution with an eye toward ameliorating failures of the political process. Over the past two decades, however, the Court has retreated from that concern with representation reinforcement. This article examines decisions upholding restrictive voter identification laws, making it more difficult to prove violations of the Voting Rights Act, and preventing federal courts from hearing claims of partisan gerrymandering. Some decisions that seem sympathetic to failures of the political process will not really promote representation reinforcement, and the Court’s most recent cases further reinforce the Court’s skepticism of claims of failures of the political …

Threading The Needle In Extreme Partisan Gerrymandering Cases, Michael Gentithes

Cleveland State Law Review

Recent Supreme Court jurisprudence paints a grim picture for future reform to address extreme partisan gerrymandering. The decisions in Rucho v. Common Cause and Moore v. Harper appear to foreclose progress at both the federal and state level. Reformers must neither create unmanageable legal standards for adjudication in federal litigation, nor ask state courts to transgress ordinary bounds of judicial review when interpreting state laws that might address gerrymandering.

But there remains a path forward that focuses on clear and detailed state constitutional mandates to curb gerrymandering practices. Beneath their rhetoric, these decisions support clear legal rules over broader democratic …

Cover, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cardozo Law News Brief: November 15, 2024, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2024

Featured Faculty:

• Andrea Schneider
• Matthew Wansley
• Emmanuel H. Arnaud
• Michel Rosenfeld
• Edward Zelinsky

Campus News:

• Cardozo’s IJC Files Immigration Bond National Class-Action Lawsuit

Table Of Contents, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Custodians Of Civility, Defenders Of Democracy, Guardians Of Justice, Lee Fisher

Cleveland State Law Review

On October 27, 2023, Cleveland State Law Review hosted an in-person Symposium to convene academics, legal practitioners, community advocates, and judges for a robust and timely conversation about democracy’s promise and the fight for its future. This Symposium piece will reiterate some of the conversations by panelists discussing the use of law to become Guardians of Justice, the relationship between education and democracy, and the Ohio Constitution as a tool for recapturing the state’s democratic values.

A Proposal To Rebalance Direct Democracy In The Ohio Constitution, Mark Wagoner

Cleveland State Law Review

On October 27, 2023, Cleveland State Law Review hosted an in-person Symposium to convene academics, legal practitioners, community advocates, and judges for a robust and timely conversation about democracy’s promise and the fight for its future. This Symposium piece will reiterate some of the conversations by panelists discussing the use of law to become Guardians of Justice, the relationship between education and democracy, and the Ohio Constitution as a tool for recapturing the state’s democratic values.

Direct Democracy: Ohio Style, Steven H. Steinglass, Ernest M. Oleksy

Cleveland State Law Review

This Article is an expansion of comments by Steven H. Steinglass at a Symposium on Democracy sponsored by the Cleveland State Law Review and held on October 27, 2023. The Symposium looked broadly at threats to democracy, but the panel on which he participated focused more narrowly on the Ohio Constitution and Democracy. The Article reviews the history of direct democracy in Ohio with an emphasis on the constitutional initiative. Part I of this Article discusses the historical origins of direct democracy in Ohio and the iconic Ohio Constitutional Convention of 1912 that proposed Ohio’s direct democracy amendment. Particular …

Improper Indeterminate Incarceration: Navigating The Constitutional Quandaries Of The Reagan Tokes Law's Powers And Procedures, Sophie M. Piteo

Cleveland State Law Review

This Article advocates for an amendment to the statutory provisions that make up Ohio’s indefinite sentencing scheme to better protect offender’s constitutional rights. Through an analysis of the Reagan Tokes Law and the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling in State v. Hacker, this Article traces the evolution of Ohio’s indefinite sentencing framework, which was reinstated in 2019. It contrasts the current scheme with the previously invalidated, but very similar, Bad Time Law, which was struck down in 2000 for violating the separation of powers clause and due process rights. While the Reagan Tokes Law emerged from concerns for public safety …

Something Is Rotten In The State Of Healthcare: Accountability, Affordability, And The Court Of Public Opinion, Isabelle Breier

Duke Law & Technology Review

Many countries worldwide recognize a right to health and provide legal recourse for securing that right. By contrast, for many Americans, there is no legal right or remedy that enables them to access healthcare if they cannot afford it. While there are some statutes and measures in place, such as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and Medicaid, coverage remains piecemeal and access to healthcare is not guaranteed. Conditioning people’s access to healthcare upon their ability to pay violates the foundational bioethical principle of justice. In the United States, individuals and advocates use social media to fill …