Law Commons^™

Bornstein, Tim Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Feldman, Marvin Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Finkin, Matthew Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Collins, Daniel Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Concepcion, David Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gentile, Joe Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Goetz, Raymond Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Agenda: Navigating The Future Of The Colorado River, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Western Water Policy Program

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

Competition for scarce Colorado River water resources is nothing new, but the conflicts that prompted the seven basin states to negotiate the 1922 Colorado River Compact have grown considerably fiercer and more complex in recent decades. In 2007, responding to the challenges of increasing demand and sustained drought, the seven basin states and a number of other affected interests agreed to a set of interim guidelines for allocating Colorado River water in the event of shortages. This agreement represents an important evolution in the governance of the Colorado River, suggesting that the many interests in the basin can work together …

Report Surveys Colorado River Basin Leaders: Collaborative Approaches To Dwindling Supplies Are Highlighted, Sarah Bates, University Of Montana Missoula. Center For Natural Resources And Environmental Policy

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

4 pages.

Press release "April 14, 2011"

"Executive Summary April 2011" of report, Thinking Like a River Basin: Leaders' Perspectives on Options and Opportunities in Colorado River Management

Full report available at:

http://www.carpediemwest.org/wp-content/uploads/Thinking_Like_A_River_Basin_8-20-13.pdf

Arbitration Case Law Update 2011, Jill I. Gross

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Parties to arbitration agreements sometimes invoke the judicial system to litigate collateral issues arising out of the arbitration process, such as arbitrability of some or all of the claims, arbitrator bias, and award enforcement or vacatur. When deciding these collateral issues arising out of securities arbitration, courts interpret and apply the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (2010) (FAA). In this chapter, we identify recent judicial decisions in the area of arbitration law, and analyze their impact on securities arbitration practice.

A Report On Ambassador Clayton Yeutter's Lectureclimate Change, Agriculture, And International Trade: Challenges And Opportunities, Jaime N. Cavanaugh

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence Obtained By Cruel, Inhuman Or Degrading Treatment: Why The Convention Against Torture’S Exclusionary Rule Should Be Inclusive, Akmal Niyazmatov

Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers

Convention against Torture (CAT) prohibits admissibility of evidence obtained by torture but fails to extend similar prohibition to evidence obtained by cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (CIDT evidence). Manfred Nowak argues that CAT's failure to prohibit CIDT evidence can be resolved if in interpreting torture we take the purposive element, instead of severity, as the main element that distinguishes torture from CIDT. He argues that both torture and CIDT require infliction of severe pain and thus it must be the purpose for which severe pain was inflicted that distinguishes torture from CIDT. If the purposive element is key in distinguishing …

Alleyne, Reginald Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Duff, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gaunt, Janet Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Helburn, Beber Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

2011 Exchanged Figures Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Exchanged Figures Charts

No abstract provided.

Clarke, Jack Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Sinicropi, Anthony Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

June 6, 2011: Just What Or Who Is God And Who Believes In God?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Just What or Who is God and Who Believes in God?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

A Report On Professor Edward Ziegler's Lecture-The Future American Landscape: Urban Planning Law Reform And Sustainable Development, Caroline Baker

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Expanding Environmental Justice After War: The Need For Universal Jurisdiction Over Environmental War Crimes, Ryan Gilman

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Universal Jurisdiction Not So Universal: A Time To Delegate To The International Criminal Court, Dalila V. Hoover

Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers

The exercise of universal jurisdiction in cases involving crimes under international law remains highly debated and underlines a certain number of legal and political issues in its implementation. Because the principle of universal jurisdiction relies on national authorities to enforce international prohibitions, pivotal decisions are expected to reflect, to a greater or lesser extent, domestic decision-makers’ positions as to the interests of justice, the national interest and other criteria. In many States, the legal system lacks the means to investigate or prosecute on the basis of universal jurisdiction. Indeed, many legal systems do not define the term “crimes” that can …

Overcoming Barriers To Indigenous Peoples' Participation In Forest Carbon Markets, Katie Patterson

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

June 3, 2011: The Debt Limit Is Somehow A Theological Dispute, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Debt Limit is Somehow a Theological Dispute“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

The International Legal Challenges Of Climate-Induced Migration: Proposal For An International Legal Framework, Benoit Mayer

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Money On The Table: Why The U.S. Should Tax Inbound Capital Gains, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Law & Economics Working Papers

In 1992, Chairman Rostenkowski introduced legislation that imposed US capital gains tax on foreign sellers of large blocks of shares (10 percent or more) in US corporations. The legislation was not a treaty override, although it added an anti-treaty shopping provision similar to those adopted for the branch profit tax in 1986. It also had anti-abuse provisions that addressed holding company structures. Today, the US faces a large budget deficit and seeks to impose higher burdens on its own multinationals. While that is also justified, there is no reason to let foreigners off the hook, especially since there is much …

Order On Defendants' Motion For Attorneys' Fees (Greenwald), Elizabeth Long

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Choices That Matter: Three Propositions On The Individual, Private Property, And Anthropogenic Climate Change, Paul Babie

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Aguilar-Raygoza V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 27, Michael Li

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal from a judgment denying eligibility for an alcohol treatment diversion program following Appellant’s conviction from a jury trial.