Law Commons^™

Holden, Lawrence Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Holley, William Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Jaffe, Ira Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Kagel, Sam Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

June 8, 2011: My Fellow American, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “My Fellow American“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Alexander, Gabriel Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Christenson, Thomas Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Benewitz, Maurice Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Creo, Robert Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Berger, Ralph Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Bloch, Richard Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Bornstein, Tim Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Feldman, Marvin Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Finkin, Matthew Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Collins, Daniel Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Concepcion, David Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gentile, Joe Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Goetz, Raymond Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Agenda: Navigating The Future Of The Colorado River, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Western Water Policy Program

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

Competition for scarce Colorado River water resources is nothing new, but the conflicts that prompted the seven basin states to negotiate the 1922 Colorado River Compact have grown considerably fiercer and more complex in recent decades. In 2007, responding to the challenges of increasing demand and sustained drought, the seven basin states and a number of other affected interests agreed to a set of interim guidelines for allocating Colorado River water in the event of shortages. This agreement represents an important evolution in the governance of the Colorado River, suggesting that the many interests in the basin can work together …

Report Surveys Colorado River Basin Leaders: Collaborative Approaches To Dwindling Supplies Are Highlighted, Sarah Bates, University Of Montana Missoula. Center For Natural Resources And Environmental Policy

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

4 pages.

Press release "April 14, 2011"

"Executive Summary April 2011" of report, Thinking Like a River Basin: Leaders' Perspectives on Options and Opportunities in Colorado River Management

Full report available at:

http://www.carpediemwest.org/wp-content/uploads/Thinking_Like_A_River_Basin_8-20-13.pdf

Arbitration Case Law Update 2011, Jill I. Gross

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Parties to arbitration agreements sometimes invoke the judicial system to litigate collateral issues arising out of the arbitration process, such as arbitrability of some or all of the claims, arbitrator bias, and award enforcement or vacatur. When deciding these collateral issues arising out of securities arbitration, courts interpret and apply the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (2010) (FAA). In this chapter, we identify recent judicial decisions in the area of arbitration law, and analyze their impact on securities arbitration practice.

A Report On Ambassador Clayton Yeutter's Lectureclimate Change, Agriculture, And International Trade: Challenges And Opportunities, Jaime N. Cavanaugh

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence Obtained By Cruel, Inhuman Or Degrading Treatment: Why The Convention Against Torture’S Exclusionary Rule Should Be Inclusive, Akmal Niyazmatov

Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers

Convention against Torture (CAT) prohibits admissibility of evidence obtained by torture but fails to extend similar prohibition to evidence obtained by cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (CIDT evidence). Manfred Nowak argues that CAT's failure to prohibit CIDT evidence can be resolved if in interpreting torture we take the purposive element, instead of severity, as the main element that distinguishes torture from CIDT. He argues that both torture and CIDT require infliction of severe pain and thus it must be the purpose for which severe pain was inflicted that distinguishes torture from CIDT. If the purposive element is key in distinguishing …

Alleyne, Reginald Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Duff, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gaunt, Janet Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Helburn, Beber Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

2011 Exchanged Figures Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Exchanged Figures Charts

No abstract provided.

Clarke, Jack Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Sinicropi, Anthony Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.