Law Commons^™

Jury 2.0, Caren Myers Morrison

UC Law Journal

When the Framers drafted the Sixth Amendment and provided that the accused in a criminal case would have the right to a speedy and public trial by an “impartial jury,” it is unlikely that they imagined the members of that impartial jury becoming Facebook friends during deliberations, or running the defendant’s name through Google during trial. But in the past few years, such cases have increasingly been making headlines. The impact of the Internet on the functioning of the jury has generated a lot of press, but has not yet attracted scholarly attention. This Article is the first to focus …

Race Audits, R. A. Lenhardt

UC Law Journal

The persistence of the problems that attend the American color line makes clear the need for greater experimentation and innovation in the area of race. For years now, we have looked primarily to courts for solutions. But current jurisprudence offers very little that is useful in dealing with the modern realities of durable racial inequality and segregation. As cases such as Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Ricci v. DeStefano make clear, it limits dramatically the tools available to address racial inequality, regarding as “bad cities” localities that try affirmatively to grapple with matters …

Network Accountability For The Domestic Intelligence Apparatus, Danielle Keats Citron, Frank Pasquale

UC Law Journal

A new domestic intelligence network has made vast amounts of data available to federal and state agencies and law enforcement officials. The network is anchored by “fusion centers,” novel sites of intergovernmental collaboration that generate and share intelligence and information. Several fusion centers have generated controversy for engaging in extraordinary measures that place citizens on watch lists, invade citizens’ privacy, and chill free expression. In addition to eroding civil liberties, fusion center overreach has resulted in wasted resources without concomitant gains in security.While many scholars have assumed that this network represents a trade-off between security and civil liberties, our study …

International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem With A Domestic Solution, Matthew S. Jenner

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies

Forty years ago, the world declared war on drugs. Today, after decades of failing to adequately control drug consumption, an even graver problem has emerged: violent drug traffickers have taken the industry hostage and will stop at nothing to preserve their power. Governments have instituted dozens of programs to dismantle the illicit drug industry, but they have seen only marginal success. One strategy, however, has yet to be fully tested: universal legalization. Universal legalization of all drugs would attack the illicit drug market head-on, destroying the profit incentive for drug traffickers and placing control of the industry in the hands …

Data Note: State Intellectual And Developmental Disability Agencies' Funding For Employment Services, Jean E. Winsor, Frank A. Smith

Data Note Series, Institute for Community Inclusion

Employment has been identified as a priority outcome in federal policy and state employment-first initiatives, and by individuals with IDD. Members of Self Advocates Becoming Empowered have issued a call to increase access to integrated employment and eliminate facility-based work (2009). In many states, the IDD agency and/or statewide advocacy coalitions have developed and implemented employment-first initiatives (State Employment Leadership Network, 2011). However, there is limited data available on the cost of integrated employment services compared to facility-based work services to guide the implementation of these initiatives.

Regulation, Deregulation, And Happiness, Jeffrey L. Harrison

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Truth, Justice, And The Libertarian Way(S), Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

More than twenty years ago, I was commissioned to write an article – my very first scholarly article – on “the ethics of insider trading” (this was hot on the heels of the Ivan Boesky insider-trading scandal of the mid-1980s).1 After tracing philosophical debates concerning the morality of exchanges based on unequal information from Cicero and Aquinas through Henry Manne and Frank Easterbrook,2 I had to decide what I could responsibly say in a scholarly work as a matter of substantive moral theory about the practice of insider trading – and derivatively what it would be appropriate to say normatively …

Intermediaries And Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship For Our Information Age, Danielle K. Citron, Helen Norton

Faculty Scholarship

No longer confined to isolated corners of the web, cyber hate now enjoys a major presence on popular social media sites. The Facebook group “Kill a Jew Day,” for instance, acquired thousands of friends within days of its formation, while YouTube has hosted videos with names like “How to Kill Beaners,” “Execute the Gays,” and “Murder Muslim Scum.” The mainstreaming of cyber hate has the troubling potential to shape public expectations of online discourse.

Internet intermediaries have the freedom and influence to seize this defining moment in cyber hate’s history. We believe that a thoughtful and nuanced intermediary-based approach to …

The Exclusion Of Non-English-Speaking Jurors: Remedying A Century Of Denial Of The Sixth Amendment In The Federal Courts Of Puerto Rico, Jasmine Gonzales Rose

Faculty Scholarship

This Article explores the constitutional implications of the Jury Selection and Service Act’s English language juror prerequisite, as applied in the federal courts in Puerto Rico. The language requirement results in the exclusion of approximately 90% of the age-eligible population of Puerto Rico from federal jury service and disproportionately excludes Puerto Ricans of color and the poor. The Article argues that application of the language requirement in Puerto Rico violates monolingual Spanish speakers’ fundamental Sixth Amendment right to a jury selected from a fair cross section of the community in federal criminal proceedings. It also examines the English language juror …

Respecting Freedom And Cultivating Virtues In Justifying Constitutional Rights, Linda C. Mcclain, James E. Fleming

Faculty Scholarship

What’s new in the long-standing debate between civic republicans and liberals about how best to understand and justify rights? This article picks up the thread with political philosopher Michael Sandel’s recent, internationally-renowned book, Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do? The article evaluates the sharp contrasts his book draws between justice as cultivating virtues and justice as respecting freedom, using his example of contemporary arguments for and against opening up civil marriage to same-sex couples. Sandel contends that “liberal neutrality” and a public square denuded of religious arguments and convictions are impossible on this issue. Drawing on Aristotle, he contends …

A Short History Of Sex And Citizenship: The Historians' Amicus Brief In Flores-Villar V. United States, Kristin Collins

Faculty Scholarship

The historians’ amicus brief that accompanies this essay was submitted to the Supreme Court in Flores-Villar v. United States, an equal protection challenge to federal statutes that regulate the citizenship status of foreign-born children of American parents. When the parents of such children are unmarried, federal law encumbers the ability of American fathers to secure citizenship for their children, while providing American mothers with a nearly unfettered ability to do the same. The general question before the Court in Flores-Villar – and a question that the Court has addressed in sum and substance on two other occasions during the last …

Sandel On Religion In The Public Square, Hugh Baxter

Faculty Scholarship

In the final chapter of "Justice" (2009), Sandel calls for a “new politics of the common good,” which he presents as an alternative to John Rawls’s idea of public reason. Sandel calls “misguided” Rawls’s search for “principles of justice that are neutral among competing conceptions of the good life.” According to Sandel, “[i]t is not always possible to define our rights and duties without taking up substantive moral questions; and even when it’s possible it may not be desirable.” In taking up these moral questions, Sandel writes, we must allow specifically religious convictions and reasons into the sphere of public …

Brown Shoe Versus The Horizontal Merger Guidelines, Keith N. Hylton

Faculty Scholarship

The new Horizontal Merger Guidelines, if treated by courts as a source of law, would reduce the discretion traditionally exercised by courts in defining relevant markets and market power in merger cases. This is an undesirable shift in the balance of power because courts have used the market power inquiry stage of merger analysis as a general checkpoint or weigh station for evaluating factors relevant to the welfare effects of a merger.

Appellate Practice And Procedure, Robert G. Boliek Jr.

Mercer Law Review

In 2010 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed a number of cases of significance to appellate practitioners, including cases presenting issues of apparent first impression for the Eleventh Circuit on questions of mootness and justiciability as well as a number of such cases dealing with the preservation of error. In addition, the Eleventh Circuit decided a number of interesting cases relating to interlocutory appeals of orders involving injunctive relief, to questions of the finality of judgments, and to the timeliness of the filing of a notice of appeal.

Perhaps the most interesting case from the …

Bankruptcy, James D. Walker Jr., Amber Nickell

Mercer Law Review

The past few years have been somewhat uneventful in terms of the development of bankruptcy law in Eleventh Circuit courts. The year 2010 was no exception. The lack of significant cases in the lower courts, however, has been offset by notable activity in the Supreme Court of the United States, which has decided five bankruptcy cases since last year's Survey.

Employment Discrimination, Peter Reed Corbin, John E. Duvall

Mercer Law Review

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a significantly higher number of published decisions in the area of employment discrimination during the 2010 survey period. It is too early to tell whether this will become a new trend or is a one year aberration. However, the Eleventh Circuit handed down eight published Title VII decisions during the survey period (as opposed to only one published decision the year before), and thirteen published employment discrimination opinions overall (as opposed to only three during the 2009 survey period). Three of these decisions were in the ever troublesome area …

Admiralty, Colin A. Mcrae, Edgar M. Smith

Mercer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Whistle While You Work: The Fairytale-Like Whistleblower Provisions Of The Dodd-Frank Act And The Emergence Of "Greedy," The Eighth Dwarf, Lucienne M. Hartmann

Mercer Law Review

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act) is arguably the most sweeping and significant expansion of financial regulatory reform since the Great Depression. The Act, stimulated by Congress's perceived failures of government banking regulations, is intended to promote financial stability in the United States. Amidst the Act's thousands of pages are a handful of sections that significantly enhance the awards and protections available to whistleblowers. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act's whistle-blower bounty provisions and protections gives a hefty award to whistleblowers, strengthens and expands the whistleblower protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley), creates …

Labor And Employment, Patrick L. Coyle, Alexandra V. Garrison

Mercer Law Review

Courts within the Eleventh Circuit handed down a number of important opinions affecting labor and employment during the January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 survey period. The following is a discussion of those opinions.

• FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT
• FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT
• LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACT
• COMPUTER FRAUD ABUSE ACT

State V. Jackson And The Explosion Of Liability For Felony Murder, Brian E. Brupbacher

Mercer Law Review

In The Discourses, Niccold Machiavelli wrote, "The dangers involved in conspiracies[] ... are considerable, and go on all the time, for in a conspiracy dangers crop up alike in forming the plot, in carrying it out, and as a result of its having been carried out."' Although by its context this remark refers to conspiracies to commit regicide and the problems these conspiracies pose to the conspirators, this remark well describes practical and legal problems that can result from conspiracies to commit felonies. In Georgia this is particularly true following the June 28, 2010 ruling in State v. Jackson …

Trial Practice And Procedure, John O'Shea Sullivan, Ashby L. Kent, Amanda Wilson

Mercer Law Review

The 2010 survey period yielded several noteworthy decisions relating to federal trial practice and procedure in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, several of which involved issues of first impression. This Article analyzes several recent developments in the Eleventh Circuit, including significant rulings in the areas of statutory interpretation, removal, subject matter jurisdiction, and civil procedure.

Adr And Divotce In Light Of The Elkins Legislation, Jennifer Adams

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

No Bloch Head: Arbitrator's Decision Brings Change To The Nhl, Andrew M. Kroeckel

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

The Color Of Water: Observations Of A Brown Buffalo In Ten Stanzas, Tom Romero

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rascuache Lawyering, Alfredo Mirandé

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

No abstract provided.

Lawyers And Slaves: A Remarkable Case Of Representation For The Antebellum South, Jason A. Gillmer

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gonzales V. City Of Bozeman: The Public Duty Doctrine's Unconstitutional Treatment Of Government Defendants In Tort Claims, Lee C. Baxter

Montana Law Review

Gonzales v. City of Bozeman: The Public Duty Doctrine

Ethics For American Lawyers In The Age Of Twitter And The Cloud, Roberta Cooper Ramo

Montana Law Review

Ethics for American Lawyers

Recent Decisions Affecting The Montana Practitioner

Montana Law Review

Recent Decisions

The New Common Law: Courts, Culture, And The Localization Of The Model Penal Code, Anders Walker

UC Law Journal

Few tropes in American legal teaching are more firmly entrenched than the criminal law division between Model Penal Code and common law states. Yet even a cursory look at current state codes indicates that this bifurcation is outmoded. No state continues to cling to ancient English common law, nor does any state adhere fully to the Model Penal Code. In fact, those states that adopted portions of the Code have since produced a substantial body of case law—what this Article terms “new common law”—transforming it. Taking the controversial position that criminal law pedagogy is antiquated, this Article proposes a radical …