Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 18421 - 18450 of 544812

Full-Text Articles in Law

State V. Curlew: Assessing The Sufficiency Of Evidence Under The Corpus Delicti Rule, Brett D. Baber Dec 2024

State V. Curlew: Assessing The Sufficiency Of Evidence Under The Corpus Delicti Rule, Brett D. Baber

Maine Law Review

In State v. Curlew, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, reversed a conviction for unlawful sexual contact. The court predicated reversal upon a reaffirmation of both the substantive aspect and the evidentiary aspect of the corpus delicti rule. The substantive aspect of the corpus delicti rule requires the state "to produce, exclusive of any confession or admission by the defendant, such credible evidence as will create a substantial belief that the crime charged has been committed by some person." The evidentiary aspect of the corpus delicti rule requires proof of the corpus delicti prior to the …

Go to article

Comparative Negligence: The Multiple Defendant Dilemma, Karen P. O'Sullivan Dec 2024

Comparative Negligence: The Multiple Defendant Dilemma, Karen P. O'Sullivan

Maine Law Review

Maine's comparative negligence statute provides that a plaintiff who is partly at fault for his or her own injury may recover so long as he or she is not "equally at fault." The statute is simple to apply when there is only one defendant. In cases that involve two or more defendants, however, neither the Maine Supreme Judicial Court nor the Legislature has indicated whether the plaintiff's fault is compared with the fault of each defendant individually or all defendants combined.

Go to article

Maine's Iolta Proposal: A Source Of Supplemental Funding For Legal Services, J. Gordon Scannell Jr. Dec 2024

Maine's Iolta Proposal: A Source Of Supplemental Funding For Legal Services, J. Gordon Scannell Jr.

Maine Law Review

Lawyers often hold certain client funds for short periods of time. Generally, those funds must be kept separate from funds belonging to the lawyer or law firm. Occasionally the clients' funds are deposited in individual, interest bearing accounts and the interest generated is credited to the particular client, but more often the amount or length of the deposit does not warrant the opening of an individual account and the funds are aggregated in a general, noninterest bearing trust account. A number of states have implemented programs, commonly referred to as Interest on Lawyers' Trust. Accounts (IOLTA), which allow attorneys to …

Go to article

Local Land Use Controls: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed, Orlando E. Delogu Dec 2024

Local Land Use Controls: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed, Orlando E. Delogu

Maine Law Review

The suggestion that local land use control powers are not working well—that they may not be susceptible to modest but useful reforms or modifications and thus ought to be more drastically altered or abandoned altogether—is not new. Beginning nearly twenty years ago with Richard Babcock's publication of The Zoning Game, the literature and case law in the field is rife with express and implied suggestions that too much land use control power has been given to local governments. More recently Professor Jan Krasnowiecki suggested we abolish zoning, and the New Jersey court in its latest Mount Laurel decision underscored the …

Go to article

Antitrust Scrutiny Of The Medical Staff Plan, Cynthia Teresa Churchill Dec 2024

Antitrust Scrutiny Of The Medical Staff Plan, Cynthia Teresa Churchill

Maine Law Review

Advances in medical technology over the past 50 years have made access to a hospital, its medical staff, and the support facilities and equipment it provides essential for many physicians. Until recently it was not difficult for a qualified physician to obtain staff privileges. In recent years, however, an increasing number of hospital governing boards across the United States have begun to design and implement what are known as "medical staff plans." The often-stated purpose of these plans is to alleviate hospital overcrowding and unstructured staff growth by applying an ordered approach to future medical staff growth, taking into account …

Go to article

A Quarter Of A Century Of Rulemaking With Particular Attention To The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Frank J. Remington Dec 2024

A Quarter Of A Century Of Rulemaking With Particular Attention To The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Frank J. Remington

Maine Law Review

It is a happy coincidence that Edward Thaxter Gignoux completes twenty-five years on the bench at about the same time that the present rulemaking procedures in the federal system reach their twenty-fifth anniversary. In the quarter of a century of the present system for rulemaking there have been three distinguished chairmen of the Standing Committee—the committee to which there is delegated overall responsibility for rulemaking by the Judicial Conference of the United States. The three chairmen are Senior Circuit Judge Albert Maris, generally thought of as the modern "Father" of federal rulemaking, Senior District Judge Rozell Thomson and the present …

Go to article

The Federal Civil Rules After Half A Century, Maurice Rosenberg Dec 2024

The Federal Civil Rules After Half A Century, Maurice Rosenberg

Maine Law Review

The name Gignoux is not exactly a household word among the lay citizens of this country and would not qualify as one even if we count all the varied pronunciations people choose to accord it. Indeed, there are probably quite a few members of the bar who do not recognize the name or know anything about its bearer's works. That is their loss. Edward T. Gignoux has been doing so much for the betterment of justice in this country in so many ways and for so many years that he has clearly earned a place of high honor in the …

Go to article

State Courts' Interest In Federal Rulemaking: A Proposal For Recognition, Vincent L. Mckusick Dec 2024

State Courts' Interest In Federal Rulemaking: A Proposal For Recognition, Vincent L. Mckusick

Maine Law Review

As we approach the half-century anniversary of the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we should take stock of the extent that they have served as a model for state rulemaking. At least thirty states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, now have civil rules substantially identical to the federal rules. Of the remaining states, only three have statutes or rules of civil procedure that bear little or no resemblance to the federal model Even those states such as Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania that have not modeled their civil procedure generally on the federal …

Go to article

The Constitution At Sea, Louis Henkin Dec 2024

The Constitution At Sea, Louis Henkin

Maine Law Review

Time was when it was assumed that the United States Constitution, like a deity of old, ruled only in its territory and did not apply outside the United States. Since 1957 we know that the Constitution applies wherever the United States exercises authority. If, as the Supreme Court then held, the Constitution governs the acts of the United States in the territory of a foreign state, where the Constitution might be deemed a foreign "intruder" on local sovereignty, it would seem to apply also — indeed a fortiori — to acts of the United States on the high seas, where …

Go to article

Judge Edward T. Gignoux — A Personal Appreciation, Frank M. Coffin Dec 2024

Judge Edward T. Gignoux — A Personal Appreciation, Frank M. Coffin

Maine Law Review

Most occasions for encomia about judges occur when the subject has departed the scene of his accomplishments. Happily, the subject of this issue of the Maine Law Review is still with us and likely to be so for a long time. He also happens to measure up precisely to the overused word "paragon." I use it in the original Latin sense of "whetstone," something to sharpen against or to compare oneself with. My thesis is that Judge Gignoux gives observers of any age, but particularly the young, an inspiring role model. This volume is felicitously dedicated. The ever-present problem is …

Go to article

Ouellette V. Sturm, Ruger & Co. And Jones V. North American Aerodynamics: The Effectiveness Of Maine's Borrowing Statute In Cases Involving Corporations, J. Gordon Scannell Jr. Dec 2024

Ouellette V. Sturm, Ruger & Co. And Jones V. North American Aerodynamics: The Effectiveness Of Maine's Borrowing Statute In Cases Involving Corporations, J. Gordon Scannell Jr.

Maine Law Review

Maine's borrowing statute provides that a person may not bring an action in Maine that has been barred by the laws of another jurisdiction wherein all parties resided. In effect, the statute permits "borrowing" the limitation period of the other jurisdiction. In Ouellette v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, interpreted the residency requirement of the borrowing statute as it relates to a corporation and held that for purposes of the statute a corporation is a resident of only the state in which it is incorporated. Because of the peculiar wording of …

Go to article

Deadlocked Juries And The Allen Charge, Karen Pelletier O'Sullivan Dec 2024

Deadlocked Juries And The Allen Charge, Karen Pelletier O'Sullivan

Maine Law Review

Juries in cases requiring a unanimous verdict have three alternatives: a guilty verdict, a not guilty verdict, or no verdict for lack of unanimity. Deadlocked juries have long created a problem for efficient judicial administration. Early common law judges carried hung jurors around in oxcarts until a verdict "bounced out." More recent methods of forcing jurors to reach verdicts have included requiring them to deliberate all night and threatening to deprive them of water and heat. A more subtle method of encouraging jurors to reach verdicts is a trial judge's supplemental instruction to deadlocked jurors. A verdict-urging instruction is commonly …

Go to article

The Government Contract Defense: Should Manufacturer Discretion Preclude Its Availability?, John D. Pelletier Dec 2024

The Government Contract Defense: Should Manufacturer Discretion Preclude Its Availability?, John D. Pelletier

Maine Law Review

The government contract defense developed in cases involving suits against private contractors for damages arising out of the performance of government public works projects. These cases held private contractors immune from liability for damages necessarily incident to the performance of such projects. In several recent cases, manufacturers have been allowed to raise the government contract defense as a bar to liability for injuries caused by design defects in military products supplied to the United States government. In two of these cases, the defense barred liability on behalf of military suppliers who merely executed the government's mandatory design specifications. In subsequent …

Go to article

The Public Trust Doctrine In Maine's Submerged Lands: Public Rights, State Obligation And The Role Of The Courts, Mitchell M. Tannenbaum Dec 2024

The Public Trust Doctrine In Maine's Submerged Lands: Public Rights, State Obligation And The Role Of The Courts, Mitchell M. Tannenbaum

Maine Law Review

The State of Maine has within its borders over three thousand miles of coastline and numerous navigable rivers and lakes. The productive use of these waterways and the lands which lie beneath them historically has been linked to the quality of life within Maine and continues to be essential to the social and economic development of the state. Both the state's control over its thousands of acres of submerged lands and the public's right to use these lands derive from what has come to be known as the "public trust doctrine." The basic tenet of the doctrine is that the …

Go to article

United States Ex Rel. Arrow Electronics, Inc. V. G.H. Coffey Co.: Judicial Interpretation Of Timely Notice Under Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 15(C), Brett Dwight Baber Dec 2024

United States Ex Rel. Arrow Electronics, Inc. V. G.H. Coffey Co.: Judicial Interpretation Of Timely Notice Under Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 15(C), Brett Dwight Baber

Maine Law Review

In 1966, the United States Supreme Court amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) to eliminate lower court confusion regarding "relation back" of pleading amendments which sought to change the party against whom the claim was asserted. The Rule, as presently formulated, permits a plaintiff to add or change a party defendant after the statute of limitations has run provided that . . . . While the current Rule is more precise than the pre-1966 Rule in defining when "relation back" is permissible, it has not eliminated the sharp divergence among judicial opinion regarding the proper application of the Rule. …

Go to article

Restraining The Prosecutor: Restrictions On Threatening Prosecution For Civil Ends, James A. Trowbridge Dec 2024

Restraining The Prosecutor: Restrictions On Threatening Prosecution For Civil Ends, James A. Trowbridge

Maine Law Review

Prosecutors in some cases agree to dismiss criminal charges, admit a defendant to a diversion program, or enter a nolle prosequi in exchange for the defendant signing a waiver of any civil claims against law enforcement agents, governments, or private persons. The practice of a prosecutor bargaining for the release of law enforcement personnel or others from civil liability raises serious questions concerning the independence of the prosecutorial function, the relationship of prosecutors to other legal institutions, and the application of rules of professional responsibility. Generally, courts have been critical of these arrangements. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (Code) …

Go to article

Group Homes For The Mentally Retarded In Maine: Legislative Intent And Administrative Process, James C. Hunt Dec 2024

Group Homes For The Mentally Retarded In Maine: Legislative Intent And Administrative Process, James C. Hunt

Maine Law Review

Historically, mentally retarded citizens of Maine have been confined to Pineland Center, the state's principal institution for the mentally retarded. In 1975 a class action suit, Wuori v. Zitnay, was filed in federal district court on behalf of "involuntarily confined" Pineland residents and "conditionally released" residents "in need of care . . . in a humane and healthful . . . environment." Three years later agencies and officials of the State of Maine entered into a consent judgment which laid down a "comprehensive plan designed to bring about speedy and meaningful relief" to the plaintiff class. The relief granted was …

Go to article

Personal Injury Compensation As A Tax Preference, Lawrence A. Frolik Dec 2024

Personal Injury Compensation As A Tax Preference, Lawrence A. Frolik

Maine Law Review

Samuel Johnson tells us "[d]epend on it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully." Projected federal budget deficits in the realm of $200 billion a year for the foreseeable future ought to have a similar effect: a concentration on means of reducing these unacceptable deficits. The simple answer is either to spend less or tax more, or perhaps, a bit of both. If we choose to tax more, we must either raise tax rates or widen the tax base, or both. The former, a general rise in tax rates, …

Go to article

In Re Daniel C.: Reunification Efforts And The Termination Of Parental Rights, James W. Claus Dec 2024

In Re Daniel C.: Reunification Efforts And The Termination Of Parental Rights, James W. Claus

Maine Law Review

In In re Daniel C., the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, affirmed an order terminating a father's parental rights pursuant to title 22, section 4055 of the Maine Revised Statutes. The issue on appeal concerned the effect of a failure by the Department of Human Services (DHS) to make efforts toward family reunification. The appellant, Daniel C.'s father, Everett Co., argued that the DHS failed to make adequate reunification efforts as required by title 22, section 4041 of the Maine Revised Statutes and that this failure precluded the termination of his parental rights. The Law Court …

Go to article

In Re Caulk: A Prisoner's Right To Die—The Factor Of Intent, Laurence H. Leavitt Dec 2024

In Re Caulk: A Prisoner's Right To Die—The Factor Of Intent, Laurence H. Leavitt

Maine Law Review

In prisons throughout the United States, prisoners commonly use hunger strikes as an avenue of protest to make personal demands, to call attention to poor prison conditions, or to make various political statements. Prisoners typically choose this route because they view their own bodies as one of the few things over which they actually have control and because the extreme slowness of a hunger strike gives others the chance to meet their political or personal demands. When confronted with such attempts at starvation, prison officials almost invariably have resorted to force-feeding the hunger strikers, although in recent years some prison …

Go to article

State V. Durepo: Toward A Principled Maine Version Of The Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Andre D. Bouffard Dec 2024

State V. Durepo: Toward A Principled Maine Version Of The Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Andre D. Bouffard

Maine Law Review

As one might have anticipated, the broad substantive mandates of the major Warren Court exclusionary rule decisions have not been left completely intact by later Supreme Court decisions. Instead, the scope of the evidentiary exclusionary doctrine established by the Warren Court has been significantly narrowed by later Supreme Court decisions that have created numerous exceptions to the general command of the exclusionary rule that evidence obtained through unconstitutional means is inadmissible in a criminal trial. Although some members of the present Court argue that the exceptions to the exclusionary rule are consistent with the purposes of the rule, and therefore …

Go to article

State V. Farnham: The Defendant's Exercise Of The Right To Stand Trial As Negative Character Evidence, Richard F. Buckley Dec 2024

State V. Farnham: The Defendant's Exercise Of The Right To Stand Trial As Negative Character Evidence, Richard F. Buckley

Maine Law Review

A defendant in a criminal case may not receive a more severe sentence because he exercised his sixth amendment right to stand trial. However, determining when a court has more severely sentenced a defendant for exercising his constitutional right to a jury trial is a difficult task. Some argue that a defendant's choice to stand trial is relevant to the sentencing process as character evidence. The decision to stand trial, the argument goes, indicates a defendant's lack of remorse and an unwillingness to take the first step toward redemption by admitting his guilt. Others take the position that consideration in …

Go to article

Home Rule And The Pre-Emption Doctrine: The Relationship Between State And Local Government In Maine, Robert W. Bower Jr. Dec 2024

Home Rule And The Pre-Emption Doctrine: The Relationship Between State And Local Government In Maine, Robert W. Bower Jr.

Maine Law Review

The legal relationship between a state government and a municipal government determines the powers and responsibilities of these two political entities. In Maine this relationship is complex and uncertain due to ambiguities in the constitutional and statutory scheme governing it and due to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court's narrow and inconsistent interpretation of that scheme. This Comment discusses the various methods for delegating power to municipalities, including the traditional method which was used in Maine prior to 1970. In addition, this Comment examines the "home rule" scheme enacted in 1970 and its subsequent judicial interpretation and application. Any statutory or …

Go to article

American Home Assurance Co. V. Ingeneri: Misrepresentations In Insurance Applications, Richard P. Bennett Dec 2024

American Home Assurance Co. V. Ingeneri: Misrepresentations In Insurance Applications, Richard P. Bennett

Maine Law Review

In American Home Assurance Co. v. Ingeneri, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, addressed the issue of when an incorrect response to a question on an insurance application constitutes a sufficient misrepresentation to render the policy voidable under Maine law. Reversing the trial court, the Law Court held that to render the policy voidable, the applicable statutory provision required the insurer to prove that the insured's misrepresentation was fraudulent, material to the insured risk, and actually relied upon by the insurer. The Law Court determined that the word "or" in the misrepresentation statute should be read …

Go to article

Keeping Big Issues Off The Table: The Supreme Court On Entrepreneurial Discretion And The Duty To Bargain, James Friedman Dec 2024

Keeping Big Issues Off The Table: The Supreme Court On Entrepreneurial Discretion And The Duty To Bargain, James Friedman

Maine Law Review

Over the past decade a number of major American industries have declined or radically restructured in the face of foreign competition. In 1982, for example, more than 1.2 million American workers were either temporarily or permanently laid off as companies curtailed operations or moved abroad. Two hundred thousand people lost their jobs in 1982 due to plant shutdowns. In recent times the steel and auto industries have provided the most visible examples of massive cutbacks in employment, but jobs have also disappeared in other industries such as electrical manufacturing, machine manufacturing and textiles. Although much public debate and disagreement exists …

Go to article

Public School Integration Of Children With Handicaps After Smith V. Robinson: "Separate But Equal" Revisited?, Robert J. Goodwin Dec 2024

Public School Integration Of Children With Handicaps After Smith V. Robinson: "Separate But Equal" Revisited?, Robert J. Goodwin

Maine Law Review

Under the direction of Chief Justice Burger the United States Supreme Court has issued several opinions limiting the availability of federal causes of action. While one benefit of this trend may be a reduction in the volume of federal litigation, the costs may include the limitation of substantive federal rights. The recent Supreme Court decision in Smith v. Robinson narrowly construed the availability of certain federal causes of action, and it illustrates how such a ruling, although procedural on its surface, in reality can operate to erode substantive rights. In Smith the Court concluded that a handicapped child could not …

Go to article

Prejudice And Promise In The Early Years Of The Federal Judiciary, George L. Haskins Dec 2024

Prejudice And Promise In The Early Years Of The Federal Judiciary, George L. Haskins

Maine Law Review

Preserving the dignity of the human individual and protecting individual rights from the excesses of governmental power have been endemic problems for politically organized society in the western world for centuries. From antiquity and the early middle ages comes the thought that "government" became necessary because of he sinfulness or depravity of man. But it was not suggested that rulers should be all-powerful nor that the people who are governed should be entirely at the mercy of government. Indeed, our classic ideal of the democratic state first emerged in Greece, then briefly again in Rome, and later — but for …

Go to article

The Blm's Public Lands Rule And "Periodic Adjustments In Use To Conform To Changing Needs And Conditions" Under The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, Jamie Pleune Dec 2024

The Blm's Public Lands Rule And "Periodic Adjustments In Use To Conform To Changing Needs And Conditions" Under The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, Jamie Pleune

Pace Environmental Law Review

On May 9, 2024, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) finalized new regulations, cumulatively referred to as the “Public Lands Rule.” According to the preamble for the rule, the purpose of the regulations is “to advance the BLM’s multiple use and sustained yield mission by prioritizing the health and resilience of ecosystems across public lands.” When making land management decisions, the definition of multiple use requires the BLM to take into account “the long-term needs of future generations.” Those resource needs include “recreation, range, timber, minerals, watershed, wildlife and fish, and natural scenic, scientific and historical values.” Despite this directive, …

Go to article

Beyond The Greenwash: Identifying Genuine Corporate Sustainability, Victoria Agbakwuru Dec 2024

Beyond The Greenwash: Identifying Genuine Corporate Sustainability, Victoria Agbakwuru

Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive

As sustainability becomes a critical factor in corporate strategy and consumer decision-making, the rise of greenwashing—where companies exaggerate or falsify environmental claims—poses a significant challenge. This article delves into the legal landscape of greenwashing in the United States and the European Union. It considers regulations specifically tailored to combating greenwashing and encouraging sustainability in those regions. Genuine sustainability practices that companies can engage in are identified and recommended. These include embracing ESG reporting, truth in advertising, transparency, certification and compliance, consistency, and accountability.

Go to article

An Examination Of The Impact Of A Dishonorable Discharge Upon Second Amendment Rights., Heidi Timmerman Dec 2024

An Examination Of The Impact Of A Dishonorable Discharge Upon Second Amendment Rights., Heidi Timmerman

Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive

I participated in multiple court-martials and administrative discharges during my time of active-duty military service, primarily representing the servicemember’s command. Twenty years later, a federal criminal law course in law school drew my attention to specific consequences of military discharges. This article explores U.S. discharge policies, practices, consequences of discharge types, and the possible recourse paths. This examination started with research on discharge impacts on one’s Second Amendment right to bear arms; however, an array of discharge impacts emerged.While the U.S. Code provides discharge guidelines, each branch of the U.S. military is given a wide berth in application of the …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last