Law Commons^™

Reproductive Innovation And Reproductive Exceptionalism: How Private Health Insurance Coverage Of Fertility Treatment Complements Hostile Governmental Action And Expands Access To Assisted Reproduction In The United States, Myrisha S. Lewis

Faculty Publications

The use of fertility treatment and assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States and globally is increasing over time. As of April 2023, the World Health Organization estimates that approximately one in six individuals have faced infertility globally. Fertility treatment includes the use of drugs to stimulate egg production, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and, for some, the use of gestational surrogacy to aid in childbirth. Debates have abounded and continue to abound in federal legislatures, state legislatures, and society more broadly about the morality of abortion, contraception, and assisted reproduction, as well as whether governments, public insurers, and private …

Active Learning Seminar Assignment: Broken Windows Perusall Activity, Penny Geyer

Open Educational Resources

This collaborative reading assignment created by Professor Penny Geyer was created as part of a seminar on Active Learning using OERs in 2025. The assignment uses the social annotation tool, Perusall, to transform a traditional reading assignment into an active learning exercise that encourages close reading, peer engagement and structured discussion of the foundational text, "Broken Windows" by James Wilson and George Kelling.

Using Public Nuisance Litigation To Address Industrywide Misconduct: Common-Law Statutes, Nondelegation, And Regulation, Hillel Y. Levin, Timothy D. Lytton

Scholarly Works

In this Article, we assert that broad, open-ended public nuisance statutes offer a legitimate legal tool to curb public health harms caused by the unreasonable design, marketing, and distribution practices of product manufacturers. We argue that these statutes are "common-law statutes" by which legislatures authorize courts to apply the concept of public nuisance to new situations using common-law-style reasoning. We demonstrate that this understanding of public nuisance statutes is consistent with well-established interpretive traditions regarding the codification of common law. Statutory delegation of broad interpretive discretion to courts concerning the application of public nuisance law constitutes a legislative choice to …

Charting New Frontiers: A Legal Literature Review Of Social Entrepreneurship And Impact Investing 2018–2023, Anne M. Tucker, Deborah Burand

Scholarly Works

This Article surveys 177 articles published in U.S. law reviews and journals between 2018–2023 that contribute to the fields of social enterprise, social finance and impact investing. The Article extends our earlier legal literature review of the same fields from 2007-2017.Our collective 17-year review of this span of legal literature documents the legal issues examined by scholars with respect to the development of sophisticated alternative business forms, like the Delaware Public Benefit Corporation; the growth in impact investing; the enduring academic interest in corporate purpose; and the effects that developments related to ESG and corporate sustainability are having on the …

What Lawyers Could Learn From The Corporate Practice Of Medicine, Melissa D. Mortazavi

Faculty Articles

Proponents of the United States’ domestic experiments in non-lawyer ownership (NLO) of legal practice justify them in terms of increasing “access to justice.” But what if opening ownership of legal practice to investment capital only exacerbates market failures (leading to further consolidation and increased costs to clients), while also compromising professional autonomy and fiduciary duty? The legal profession must be clear-eyed about who are the real winners and losers of such a shift and avoid being blinded by wishful thinking. Prominent legal scholars have repeatedly touted NLO as a solution to the access to justice crisis. However, there is scant …

Artificial Intelligence And The Hipaa Privacy Rule: A Primer, Stacey A. Tovino

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Homelands Not Graveyards, M. Alexander Pearl

Faculty Articles

Within the last five years, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up several transformative cases affecting Native nations and federal Indian law jurisprudence. The Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. Navajo Nation is no different. This Article examines that decision and situates it within that legal history as well as the realities of present-day water resource availability. While recent decisions have shown the Court’s willingness to confirm fundamental components of federal Indian law, such as the legal tests for determining the persistence of reservation and the authority of Congress to enact the Indian Child Welfare Act, the Court’s examination of …

An Unreliable Reporter, Jon J. Lee

Faculty Articles

As part of the legal profession’s tradition of self-regulation, attorneys have an ethical obligation to ensure that those within it are fit to practice. Given the gravity associated with accusing another lawyer of misconduct, it is not surprising that many are reticent to speak up. But what would happen if attorneys were pressured to vigorously pursue sanctions against their opponents, even if those sanctions may be unwarranted? President Trump’s recently-issued memorandum arguably does just that, mandating the Attorney General to seek court and disciplinary sanctions for lawyers and law firms that appear to violate ethics rules. This Essay explains how …

The First Amendment, Global Corporate Responsibility Standards, & The Quest For Online "Speech Nirvana", Evelyn Aswad

Faculty Articles

With large and powerful social media companies operating as worldwide speech regulators, it is unsurprising that governments have attempted to not only regulate how these companies address platform speech but also pressure them to deliver preferred speech outcomes. In 2024, the Supreme Court decided two cases addressing both themes in the U.S. context. In Moody v. NetChoice, the Court explained how legislation regulating private platform curation of usergenerated content runs afoul of First Amendment protections. And, in Murthy v. Missouri, the Court appeared to erect significant hurdles to challenging alleged governmental coercion of such platforms. These cases have left many …

Increasing Congressional Oversight Of Fisa Section 702 After Risaa, Noah C. Chauvin

Faculty Articles

In April of 2024, Congress passed the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act ("RISAA"). This bill reauthorized Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA'), an important counterterrorism authority that was intended to make it easier for the government to spy on foreign terrorists but which has been repeatedly abused to spy on Americans. While RISAA enacted modest surveillance reforms, it also included substantial expansions of the government's spying powers. Moreover, it largely left intact the existing oversight regime for Section 702, which is deficient as a matter of law, policy, and fact.

This article assesses the extent to …

Insider Trading & Unconstitutionally Complelled Speech, Steven J. Cleveland

Faculty Articles

The Supreme Court has recently weaponized the First Amendment to invalidate economic regulations. Consequently, the Court’s current analytical framework risks invalidating as unconstitutional certain speech compelled by Congress and the SEC to combat insider trading.

The government may compel speech to combat fraud, and many courts and commentators view insider trading as a fraud against the counterparty to the insider’s trade. Today, the government primarily resorts to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its implementing regulations, including Rule 10b-5, to combat insider trading. Those regulations prohibit deceptive conduct and do not directly compel speech. Interestingly, in …

An Empirical Exploration Of A Jury Veto, Stephen E. Henderson, Vanessa A. Edkins, Matthew L. Jensen

Faculty Articles

Among the many contemporary dissatisfactions with American criminal justice are longstanding concerns relating to the scarcity of jury trials and the resulting lack of democratic oversight and control in the adjudicative process. A novel solution has recently been proposed in the form of a ‘jury veto’: perhaps a jury could be empaneled, prototypically if not exclusively by defense request, that would be empowered to select between the judicially-imposed sentence and a prosecutorial and defense alternative. We conduct the first empirical exploration of such a structure and find reason to believe it could lessen the disconnect between the American framing vision …

Confessions Of A National Security Lawyer, Noah C. Chauvin

Faculty Articles

In part one of this paper, an unidentified national security lawyer tells all. In part two, I explain why the overclassification issues part one satirizes have important implications for the democratic accountability of intelligence agencies, using examples of classification abuses related to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The Economic Cost Of Exclusion: How Trump's Second-Term Immigration Policies Threaten California's Economy, Kit Johnson

Faculty Articles

The second Trump administration has pursued an array of immigration enforcement initiatives—from denaturalization and visa scrutiny to termination of humanitarian programs and aggressive workplace raids. Legal scholars have sharply debated these measures, but almost entirely through constitutional, statutory, and rights-based frames. This Article exposes a critical omission in immigration law scholarship: the economics of large-scale noncitizen removal. Drawing on major empirical studies of historic enforcement episodes—including Mexican repatriation between 1929-1934, Japanese internment during World War II, Arizona’s immigration restrictionism from 2007-2012, and federal immigration enforcement efforts of 2008-2015—this Article demonstrates that broad noncitizen removals may reduce the employment and wages …

Can States Force Ice To Take Off The Masks?, Noah C. Chauvin

Faculty Articles

No. But that does not mean they are entirely powerless to combat the practice.

In Defense Of Pardons, Stephen E. Henderson

Faculty Articles

Pardons by the past two U.S. presidents—one Democratic and one Republican—have caused some to question the wisdom of executive clemency. American criminal justice is imperfect, such critics of course recognize, but here the cure might be worse than the disease. If pardons have become the playthings of would-be monarchs and tyrants, perhaps it is time to let them go. As a strong proponent of role-reversible criminal justice, I am sympathetic to this view—even in mercy, why is the decision of the single elite supplanting the will of the people? Still, I write in pardons’ defense. Not only are pardons an …

Undocumented Eldercare, Llc, Kit Johnson

Faculty Articles

Americans are aging. Within five years, 20% of the U.S. population will be over the age of 65. In the next 25 years, the number ofcitizens over the age of 80 is expected to triple.

Many older Americans, particularly the oldest, need help with daily lifeeverything from dressing and showering to cooking and cleaning. Assistance, however, is hard to come by. At-home caregivers are expensive. Institutional settings, also expensive, are routinely understaffed.

Thousands of noncitizens provide eldercare in home and institutional settings. Many of these noncitizens have work authorization pursuant to Temporary Protected Status (TPS), an immigration program that President …

Space Resource Development And Property - Clarifying Usufruct, Jeremy A. Kent

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

This article examines competing legal frameworks for governing property rights in outer-space resources through a comparative analysis of two distinct approaches: the rule of capture and the concept of usufruct. The increasing interest in commercial space activities, such as mining the Moon and asteroids, has raised questions about the legal frameworks governing property rights in space resources. The growing challenge is that while the Outer Space Treaty (OST) serves as the foundation for space law, it does not explicitly address property rights in the resources humankind increasingly can extract from the space domain.

The rule of capture is a legal …

Dangers From Regulatory Vacuums In Outer, Inner, And Near Space, Rob Frieden

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

Space, “the final frontier,” has become an attractive but increasingly risky market for both public and private investments. Gold rush enthusiasm anticipates solutions to the digital divide via small low earth orbiting satellites, extraction of valuable minerals from asteroids, a vibrant space launch and tourism industry, and expanding earth observation opportunities. Such entrepreneurial boldness juxtaposes with a severe lag in government oversight, consumer safeguards, and essential operational guardrails. The ambitious plans of Elon Musk and other space entrepreneurs could fail—despite recent market success—as SpaceX’s plans for 148 rocket launches in 2024.

Without substantial refinement of global space treaties and effective …

Flight Path To Accountability: A Legal Comparison Of Boeing’S Shortcomings, Airbus’S Successes, And International Aviation Safety Regulations, Riley M. Wagstaff

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

Investigations following two separate and deadly crashes of Boeing 737 8 Max aircraft revealed that America’s most trusted manufacturer had failed to notify pilots and airliners alike of a new Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, commonly known as MCAS. What had first seemed like an accident unfortunately had a deeper and traceable history. Through relatively new United States legislation, Boeing was essentially permitted to oversee their own operations and grant airworthiness certifications for their own aircrafts. This practice is wholly unlike the detailed certification process of the European manufacturing giant, AirBus, by the European Aviation Safety Administration (EASA). This comment sheds …

High Crimes In Low Airspace: The Rise Of Drones In Cross-Border Drug Trafficking, Hannah Haight

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

Can the United States effectively regulate its airspace when criminal actors exploit it without entering traditional territorial channels? Mexican drug trafficking organizations increasingly deploy drones to deliver narcotics across the U.S.–Mexico border. These flights often occur at low altitudes, at night, and in remote areas, which renders them nearly undetectable by conventional enforcement methods. Yet, no statute squarely addresses the use of drones in cross-border drug trafficking. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates drones under the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, but its mandate is safety, not interdiction. The result? A growing technological asymmetry: criminal cartels innovate, while …

Learning From Mistakes: A Quantitative Comparative Study Of Court Decisions Involving The Excuse Of Contractual Mistake, Brian Mccall

Faculty Articles

In almost two decades of teaching Contracts law to first year law students, I have found one of the hardest doctrines to teach to be the excuse of mistake, both mutual and unilateral Students typically express the frustration that they cannot articulate a clear standard to determine when a party’s claim of an excusing mistake will succeed or fail. This frustration with the doctrine seems to be thousands of years old. After years of struggling to teach this topic, I resolved to dig deeper into the caselaw to see if any trends could be observed that would help dispel some …

Breaking The Boomerang: Judicial Oversight And The Fourth Amendment When The War Comes Home, Benjamin K. Eldredge

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

“With Love, From Me To You:” Replacing The Unconstitutional All-Comer Provision With Favorable Conflict Of Laws Principles To Still Confer The Postmortem Right Of Publicity, Jackson Polish

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Volume 76 Issue 1 (2025)

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tribute To Professor Kevin C. Mcmunigal, Michael J. Benza

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Relational Approach To Public Private Contracting For Innovation: The Example Of Arpa-H, Liza Vertinsky

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Volume 76 Issue 2 (2025), Case Western Reserve Law Review

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Growing Role Of Venture Studios In Startup Finance, David Nows, Lawrence J. Trautman

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preserving The Future: Recognizing Intergenerational Equity In United States Constitutional Jurisprudence In Light Of Evolving Climate Rights Litigation, Molly Morgan

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Climate rights litigation is an essential part of holding states accountable for their climate change obligations. This type of litigation has increased across the globe, and domestic and international courts have issued landmark rulings that serve as precedent for reinforcing state obligations and protecting constitutional and human rights in the process. One focus of these cases is intergenerational equity, which implicates the theory that inadequate state action on climate change violates the rights of future generations. This Article explores the evolution of this theory in domestic and international law, illustrating its increasing importance in climate rights litigation and the necessity …