Law Commons^™

The Alien Tort Statute And U.S. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Legal And Economic Corporate Governance Implications Beyond Al Shimari V. Caci Int'l, Gabriel Richardson

Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vols. 28:2 onward (2019-present)

This note is divided into four overall parts. To continue with the academic dialogue regarding the ATS, the first part (Part I) deals with the historical overview and case law of the ATS, while contrasting the development of extraterritoriality in the United States with that abroad (particularly, Europe). More specifically, the first part is divided into two subparts—Subpart A provides a comprehensive background and historical legal overview of the ATS and Subpart B discusses the international trend, particularly in Europe, in extending legal mechanisms to hold corporations accountable beyond their borders, unlike the United States—which, again, was once at the …

Debt, Work, And The State, Kate Sablosky Elengold

Faculty Publications

In every state and the District of Columbia, an individual who owes a debt to the state can lose their license to work. Without the ability to make a living, it is much harder to pay off debt. Although using occupational license restrictions as a debt collection tool appears nonsensical, it has never before been the subject of scholarly debate. This Article thus begins an important conversation about debt, work, and the state.

This Article identifies the pervasive authority that state and local governments have to revoke an individual’s occupational license solely because that person owes a debt to the …

Text, Fairness, And Efficiency: The Case Against The Plausibility Standard For Affirmative Defenses, Jessica Marks, Marcus A. Gadson

Faculty Publications

Lower federal courts have struggled to answer the following question without any guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court: Does the Iqbal and Twombly plausibility standard apply to affirmative defenses? In this essay, we explain why the answer is no. We aim to provide practical guidance to the countless judges deciding whether to strike an affirmative defense. First, we argue that Rule 8’s text makes using the plausibility standard to evaluate affirmative defenses improper. Judges should pay especially careful attention to our textual analysis because the Supreme Court has placed great weight on the text’s plain meaning in recent civil procedure …

Flooding The Zone: The State Of Federal Flood Insurance At The Beginning Of Trump 2.0, Maggie Caudle, Jacob Dowler, Donald T. Hornstein

Faculty Publications

The risks of flooding in the United States have never been more apparent, making all the more significant the state of flood insurance and the legal and political volatility of the National Flood Insurance Program. In this Article we discuss the details of “Risk Rating 2.0,” the most significant change to federal flood insurance in half a century, and its legal and political future in the new world of Trump 2.0. And, in addition to describing the details of this new change to federal flood insurance, we describe its advantages and disadvantages in both the newfound political environment in which …

Government Lawyers, Ethical Dilemmas: The Case Of Herbert Wechsler And Japanese American Incarceration, Eric L. Muller

Faculty Publications

This essay examines ethical dilemmas facing government agency lawyers through two episodes from Herbert Wechsler’s wartime service as head of the DOJ War Division: overseeing the Supreme Court brief in Korematsu v. United States and administering the Renunciation Act of 1944 amid turmoil at the Tule Lake Segregation Center. In the Korematsu matter, Wechsler managed a brief that skirted the Army’s problematic “Final Report” claims (including shore-to-ship signaling), privileging institutional role fidelity over disclosure, and helping sustain a framework that justified mass removal of Japanese Americans. In the renunciation program, he chose to accept any “voluntary” citizenship renunciation regardless of …

Arrest Unbound, Eisha Jain

Faculty Publications

Arrest has long been legally defined as a seizure, or temporary restraint on liberty, under the Fourth Amendment. But when the government arrests someone today, it imposes far more than a seizure. The government also marks individuals with arrest records, which enable wide-ranging penalties, such as deportation, civil detention, loss of a professional license, and disruption of custody. One consequence is that this regulatory structure unravels arrest from the key institutional checks that would permit the public or key actors to examine whether the government-imposed consequences stemming from arrest are fair and justified. Proportionality depends on the public at large …

Developing Lawyering Skills In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence: A Framework For Legal Education, Julie Kimbrough

Faculty Publications

This Article explores the emergence of generative artificial intelligence technology in legal education and law practice. It first offers historical perspective by examining the development of online legal research systems and other existing law practice technology tools that leverage artificial intelligence. This Article then proposes a framework for legal education based on twenty-first-century competencies that advance human interaction with legal technology tools. Next, this Article recommends that law schools incorporate these competencies into learning outcomes along with a holistic approach to teaching technology-driven lawyering skills as a strategy to narrow the learning gap between legal education and law practice. It …

Suspending The Truancy Paradigm, Barbara A. Fedders, Lucy Carlson, Max Parker

Faculty Publications

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, school absences have skyrocketed. While racially minoritized, disabled, and low-income students have historically been, and remain, most likely to experience absence, white and affluent students’ rates of attendance have also declined. To respond to this new universality of student absenteeism, some policymakers have begun to seek alternatives to what we term “the truancy paradigm.”

We define the truancy paradigm as the range of coercive and often punitive interventions deployed by states and school districts to enforce compulsory attendance statutes. This paradigm, we argue, wrongly assumes (a) that strict enforcement of compulsory attendance laws …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones

Seattle University Law Review

For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.

This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen

Seattle University Law Review

Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

The Face Of Ageism, The Reach Of Ageism: Law, Medicine And Society, Janet Dolgin

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Liberty Before Party: The Courts As Transpartisan Defenders Of Freedom, Youngsieg P. Kim

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

Like many legislative acts in the United States, election laws are subject to judicial review, often by unelected judges with life tenure. This precipitates what Jacob Eisler calls the counterpopular dilemma. If the laws governing self-rule are dictated by courts that are unaccountable to the people—in the case of Article III judges, by design—they intrude upon democratic autonomy. But without arbiters who are resistant to popular pressure, elections can end up facilitating a mob rule or a tyranny in democratic disguise by enabling elites to manipulate democratic procedures for their own political gain. How, then, can judicial review of election …

Neither King's Horses Nor King's Men: The Proposed "Uniform Alt-Currency Act" Of 2025, J. Scott Colesanti

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Fascist Government Speech, G. Alex Sinha

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

On the day he was sworn in for a second term, President Donald Trump issued pardons and commutations to all of his supporters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. This sweeping act of clemency gave legal effect to a longstanding grievance: since the attack, which disrupted congressional certification of his 2020 election defeat, President Trump has consistently glorified the attackers and denounced their prosecutors. In defending the clemencies two days after issuing them, President Trump reiterated familiar themes. Once more he refused to acknowledge that he lost the 2020 election, celebrated the patriotism of his supporters, and …

The Reasonable Pregnant Worker, Madeleine Gyory

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

Pregnant workers often need changes to their work responsibilities to stay healthy during pregnancy while earning a paycheck. Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) in December 2022, entitling many workers for the first time to “reasonable accommodations” for their pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions—so long as they do not impose an “undue hardship” on their employer. The PWFA dictates that the law’s key terms, “reasonable accommodation” and “undue hardship,” should be construed as they are under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), ADA caselaw, and PWFA regulations issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in April …

Tribute To Sally Katzen, Rachel Rothschild

Articles

I have been excitedly waiting for the opportunity to speak to you all about Sally tonight. I don't think you could find anyone more deserving of this award than she is. You have heard this evening about her extraordinary professional accomplishments and the indelible mark she has made on administrative law over the course of her career. But in addition to her achievements in government service and private practice, Sally will leave a lasting and significant legacy through the students that she taught at NYU. I hope I can do justice to the enormous role she has played in my …

Altering Rules: The New Frontier For Corporate Governance, Gabriel Rauterberg, Sarath Sanga

Articles

Corporate law has taken a contractarian turn. Shareholders are increasingly contracting around its foundational rules—statutory rights, the fiduciary duty of loyalty, even the central role of the board—and Delaware courts are increasingly enforcing these contracts. In the one case where they did not, the legislature swiftly overruled the decision and adopted a new statutory provision permitting boards to completely cede their powers to a shareholder by contract. These developments have sparked a polarized debate, with some calling for a return to mandatory rules, while others push for total contractual freedom.

We argue, however, that the best approach lies neither in …

The Perils Of Pseudo-Textualism, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

How much freedom does the IRS have to interpret the code?

In recent years, the Supreme Court and lower courts have put significant barriers in front of the IRS’s ability to interpret the code as it wishes. The question is to what extent the IRS can live with the barriers of textualism, nondeference, the major questions doctrine, nondelegation, and the Administrative Procedure Act. Of these, textualism seems to be the most problematic because it is the hardest to fix. The major questions doctrine rarely applies to statutory tax cases. Nondeference based on Loper Bright can be restricted by Congress adding …

Collaboration Is Key: How Collaborative Learning Unlocks The Door To An Inclusive Legal Writing Classroom, Lisa M. White

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judging Bankruptcy Without Distress, Jack Zarin-Rosenfeld

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, the United States Supreme Court rejected the bankruptcy plan of OxyContin producer Purdue Pharma, which purported to settle claims against both Purdue (the bankruptcy debtor) and Purdue’s individual owners and managers, all members of the Sackler family who had not themselves filed for bankruptcy (the Sackler Release). Concluding that the United States Bankruptcy Code does not authorize settlement of claims against non-debtors without claimant consent, the Harrington Court appeared set to stem the tide of “bankruptcy without distress,” a flourishing practice in which solvent non-debtors (like the Sacklers) would settle their liabilities within the …

Odmówić Dostępu Czy Rozebrać Tory? Zakres Doktryny Essential Facilities W Prawie Ue, Mateusz Kaik

internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny (internet Quarterly on Antitrust and Regulation)

The purpose of this article is to determine the scope of the essential facilities doctrine for single firm conduct in the area of EU law. The analysis of this issue was carried out using the following methods: dogmatic, comparative and historical. Based on the economic foundations of competition law, a set of boundary conditions for imposing an obligation on the undertaking occupying dominant position to provide facilities in order to protect downstream competition was formulated. This was followed by a review of key decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States on the essential facilities doctrine, which concluded that …

Do Courts Get It Right When Piercing The Corporate Veil? An Empirical Study, Franklin A. Gevurtz

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

This Article presents the results of a unique empirical study addressing whether courts achieve rational outcomes when piercing the corporate veil. The study examined a set of over 300 court decisions upholding piercing claims in the last almost four years. It asked whether the courts in these cases could rationally have found either deception of the creditors or improper removal of corporate assets (siphoning)—two grounds generally agreed to justify imposing liability upon the shareholders. The result was an affirmative answer in around three-quarters of the cases. This result provides an important response to the argument that piercing decisions are irrational …

40 Years Passing By In (A) “Heartbeat”, Christopher Janney

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

This article outlines the forty-year history go Christopher Janney’s iconic performance work “HeartBeat.” Trained as an architect and jazz musician, Janney combines these two disciplines to create large interactive light/sound installations and performances. On the one hand, he attempts to make architecture more like music, more “alive” using real-time sensing devices as on his “Harmonic Convergence” installation on the Miami International Airport. On the other hand, he attempts to make music more like architecture, more physical more visual. In his “HeartBeat” performance, a dancer wears a heartbeat device that amplifies his/her heartbeat in “real time.” Over this pulse, live musicians …

Yoga Sūtra Book Four And The Yogabindu, Christopher Key Chapple

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

Four themes from the fourth pāda of Patañjali’s Yoga Sūtra are examined here: karma (IV:2-13), individuality (IV:16), humility (IV:20-22), and freedom (IV:29-34). Affirmations and variant interpretations of these four are provided from Haribhadra Virahāṅka’s Yogabindu, most likely composed a century or two later.

Collective Karma: From The Yogasūtra To Taylor Swift, Zoë Slatoff

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

The Indian knowledge traditions speak at length about karma, which is divided into three categories—accumulated (saṃcita), ripe (prārabdha), and future (kriyamāṇa). While much is said about our individual karma and how it affects our repeated reincarnation in cyclic existence, how does this affect others and how do others affect us? In other words, as this paper explores, what is our reciprocal and collective karma?

Painting Liberation: A Visual Ontology Of The Interplay Of Mind And Consciousness In Book Four Of The Yoga Sūtras, Melissa Townsend

Monsoon: South Asian Studies Association Journal

This presentation explores how artistic practice can illuminate philosophical questions about the nature of mind, consciousness, and liberation as articulated in Book Four of the Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali. Through a series of paintings that visually translate these sūtras, I propose that art offers a unique, experiential means of engaging with the complex relationship between citta (mind) and puruṣa (consciousness).

The paintings function as a form of “visual ontology,” inviting viewers to engage with abstract philosophical concepts in a sensory, tangible way. By depicting the interplay between the mutable processes of the mind and the unchanging awareness of consciousness, these …

Error In The Loop: How Human Mistakes Can Improve Algorithmic Learning, Ryan W. Copus, Cait Spackman, Hannah Laqueur

Faculty Works

Algorithms often outperform humans in making decisions, in large part because they are more consistent. Despite this, there remains widespread demand to keep a “human in the loop” to address concerns about fairness and transparency. Although evidence suggests that most human overrides are errors, we argue these errors can provide value: they generate new data from which algorithms can learn. To remain accurate, algorithms must be updated over time, but data generated solely from algorithmic decisions is biased, including only cases selected by the algorithm (e.g., individuals released on parole). Training on this algorithmically selected data can significantly reduce predictive …