Law Commons^™

Informative Jury Disagreement, Roy Baharad

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The article introduces a counterintuitive argument, contending that jury disagreement on the defendant’s guilt—a nonunanimous conviction—may well provide a more informative signal, compared to consensus. Because stronger consensus implies higher likelihood of herding, it is shown that beyond some threshold, further accumulation of votes to convict would carry negligible epistemic contribution, barely enhancing the posterior probability of guilt. On the other hand, while dissenting votes provide a direct signal of innocence, they indicate that herding has not been involved in the decision-making process, hence increase the epistemic contribution of any vote generated by said process— including votes to convict—and may …

Family, Faith And Nation: The Roberts Court And The Global Pivot Against Legal Liberalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Roberts Court has veered sharply in a culturally conservative direction. Traditional solidarities of faith, family, and nation have been elevated above the individual autonomy interests that motivated the justices in the twentieth century. The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this vein complements and is reinforced by changes in public law more generally—for example, in recent executive orders that amplify the same values. In legal scholarship, this jurisprudential shift is pervasively framed in terms of domestic electoral politics, in particular as a product of Republican dominance of the presidency and the Senate at key moments.

But expand the analytic lens outward, …

Agonistic Federalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Zachary D. Clopton

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

It’s been called the “oldest question” of American constitutional law: How does the national government deal with its sovereign subnational states? Judges and scholars have tried to capture this dynamic via theories of “dual federalism,” “process federalism,” “cooperative federalism,” or “federalism by integration.” But all these models suddenly seem to have superseded, and even perhaps rendered obsolete, by an unexpected step-change in the intensity of federal-state conflicts. In the place of longstanding federalism models, this article demonstrates, an underappreciated form of intergovernmental relations has emerged. We call this model “agonistic federalism.” The article’s aim is to introduce and theorize this …

Bypassing Agency Adjudication, Brian Lipshutz

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Article examines the contested practice of bypassing agency adjudication to accelerate judicial review of non-final executive action. Parties typically challenge final action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). But parties may also seek an injunction or declaratory judgment with respect to a non-final action that violates a statute or the Constitution. Traditionally, such “ultra vires” review required a clearly unlawful action and an inadequate administrative remedy. But modern courts further limit it by applying three judicially developed timing doctrines—exhaustion, ripeness, and Thunder Basin.

This Article explains why the traditional ultra vires model— without the timing doctrines—should govern the bypassing …

Monarchy, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

A Meditation On The Thirteenth Amendment And Constitutional Redemption, Darrel A. H. Miller

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Effects Of Round-Up On The Environment, Sandra J. Marcu

Journal of Earth and Life Science

Many people around the world have used and still currently use Roundup but are unaware of the effects it has on the environment. Roundup is a spray on application weedkiller that is widely used around the world today both residentially and commercially. It enables its user to grow a garden or a field of crops with a no-tilling approach to eliminate weeds. It is a well-known and popular choice for killing weeds that has been around since the mid 1970’s (Oca, 2017). John Franz, a Monsanto scientist discovered that glyphosate (main ingredient in Roundup) was an herbicide or weedkiller, and …

The Effectiveness Of The Minnesota Buffer Law And Its Impacts On People, Ellen P. Isakson

Journal of Earth and Life Science

In January 2015, the then-governor of Minnesota Mark Dayton announced new legislation that would require 50-foot vegetation buffers along all waterways in Minnesota; this legislation would come to be known as the Minnesota buffer law, exact requirements being “perennial vegetative buffers of up to 50 feet along lakes, rivers, and streams and buffers of 16.5 feet along ditches” (Albert, 2017; MN Board of Water and Soil Resources [MN BWSR] 4 ). A buffer in the context of vegetation and natural resource management is a strip of vegetation around a body of water “designed to intercept stormwater runoff and minimize soil …

Generative Ai Is Doomed, Eric Goldman

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

Eric Goldman delivered this talk as the 2024 Nies Lecture at Marquette University School of Law, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The talk compares the recent proliferation of generative AI with the Internet’s proliferation in the mid-1990s. In each case, it was clear that the technology would have revolutionary but uncertain impacts on society. However, the public sentiments toward the two innovations have differed radically. The Internet arrived during a period of widespread techno-optimism, creating a regulatory environment that fostered the Internet’s growth. Generative AI, in contrast, has arrived during widespread techno-pessimism and following decades of conditioning about the dangers of “AI.” …

Beyond The Hype: The Use Of “Artificial Intelligence” In Healthcare And The Legal And Business Risks Associated With This New Technology, Greg Gulick

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

What Can Copyright Law Learn From Greek Tragedy?, Mira Moldawer

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

My Body, My Voice: Defining Vocal Identity Rights To Combat Ai-Generated Deception, Kamran Moos

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

Kamran Moos emphasizes the growing risk of nonconsensual AI-generated voice misappropriation and suggests a novel legal framework to address the issue. Moos explains how AI models have made voice replication quick and easy, in some cases requiring only a two-second voice clip to produce a convincing audio recording. These AI-generated recordings can be used to carry out identity theft, misinformation, and commercial exploitation. Moos argues that current legal frameworks, such as the right of publicity, misappropriation, and copyright law, are inadequate to protect individuals from AI-generated voice misappropriation. He advocates for a new legal framework rooted in copyright and property …

Tech Addiction: The Legal Limits Of A Growing Concept, Haneen Abu Ghanem

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

The Laboratory Of Repair: Testing California’S Right To Repair Law In The Post-Analytical Phase, John Wilson

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

Characters In Copyright Law: Extraordinary Rules For Ordinary Content, Robert F. Helfing

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

Characters are a breed apart in copyright law. Only they have a special standard of creativity. Only they must have unique elements to qualify for protection. Only they are exempt from analysis as derivative works when they appear in multiple works, and only they are required to maintain consistent features in order to maintain protection previously earned. These and other idiosyncrasies do not follow naturally from precedent or statutory law, but operate heedless of and even contrary to legal authority.

This article shows that, after fifty years of undifferentiated treatment, the courts suddenly began to apply divergent rules to characters. …

Stars, Statutes, And Sharing: Designing Global Ip Frameworks For Space-Based Discoveries, Ed Koellner

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

As humanity stretches farther into space physically, commercially, and intellectually, contemporary legal frameworks are beginning to creak under the pressure. Intellectual property laws seem to be playing catch-up. Those laws were written for a world bound by borders and gravity, not for orbital labs, the Earth’s Moon, or AI-generated inventions drifting above the Earth.

This article takes a closer look at the increasingly complex intersection of space law, intellectual property, and artificial intelligence. This domain is no longer reserved for state-led missions or high-level treaties. Now and in the near future, a university lab or a private startup might be …

The Role Of Antitrust In Innovation: Standard Essential Patents, Alexandra Perez

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

A Standard Essential Patent (SEP) is a patent that is chosen to streamline a chosen industry standard to promote economic growth and consumer satisfaction. Consumers interact with SEPs in almost everything they do in their daily life, from connecting to WIFI to charging any device. This is possible because the patent selection process requires patent owners to license their patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms (FRAND) upon selection.  Yet, without proper regulation, this is easier said than done. Often SEP implementers are left with two options, entering exploitative agreements or rely on litigation to address unchecked anticompetitive behavior. This …

Can Miley Cyrus Really Buy Her Own Flowers: An Analysis Of Answer Songs In Relation To Fair Use, Emmeline Eike

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

September 16, 2024, Tempo Music Investments LLC filed a copyright infringement complaint against Miley Cyrus. The complaint is due to the striking similarities between Cyrus’s song, Flowers, and Bruno Mars’s song When I Was Your Man. Tempo Music attributes Cyrus’ success with Flowers in 2023 to When I Was Your Man’s existence and not purely from the song itself.  In discussing this lawsuit, this comment explores how likely a fair use claim is to succeed, while also analyzing how the parody fair use defense is currently applied to songwriting. Additionally, it also discussed parodies vs. answer/response songs, specifically what the …

Virtual Court Proceedings And Their Effect On Criminal Defendants’ Rights, Hunter J. Phillips

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

This Comment examines whether implementing virtual evidentiary proceedings diminishes a criminal defendant’s Constitutional rights. Part One introduces the Confrontation Clause and judicial interpretations that shape its modern legal view.

Part One also introduces the importance of face-to-face testimony and how the Confrontation Clause is founded upon that principle. Part One concludes by offering psychological research that highlights the im-portance of face-to-face proceedings that allow for effective criminal proceedings. Part Two introduces legislation that hinders defendants’ Confrontation rights and critically analyzes that legislation. Part Three argues for the abandonment of virtual criminal proceedings and highlights other factors that should be considered …

Avoiding Four Fallacies In The Fair Allocation Of Influenza Countermeasures, Govind Persad, Johan L. Dellgren, Ezekiel J. Emanuel

Publications

No abstract provided.

Preventing Chemical And Biological Attacks: Enhanced Threats Requiring Enhanced Solutions, Alex Elliot Ottoni-Belval

Graduate Theses/Dissertations

Chemical weapons (CW) and biological weapons (BW) are becoming more dangerous for experts to employ and more accessible to amateurs. Despite CW and BW attacks throughout history that killed and maimed millions of people, the international community has failed to establish meaningful consequences to prevent them. Agreements such as the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Convention vow to eliminate and reduce the effects of CWs and BWs but lack respected response precedents and capabilities. The limited and inconsistent enforcement has inadvertently allowed CWs and BWs to become plausible weapons, especially to gain asymmetric advantages, while modern developments exasperate …

Next In Line: Addressing The Constitutional And Policy Problems With The Current Presidential Line Of Succession, Arian Carlo Rubio

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The presidential line of succession is a critical component of the United States government, designed to ensure continuity and stability in the executive leadership during crises. This Note examines the current statutory provisions concerning presidential succession to identify constitutional ambiguities and practical challenges that could undermine governmental operations during unforeseen emergencies.

Through a detailed analysis of historical instances, such as the incapacitation scenarios of past presidents and recent threats to government officials, including the COVID-19 pandemic and a rise in political violence, this Note highlights the risks posed by the existing succession framework. The ambiguity primarily revolves around the roles …

Lawyers And The Abuse Of Government Power, Margaret Tarkington

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The legal profession needs to amend the rules of professional conduct to protect our constitutional system of government from those most likely to effectively undermine it: lawyers. The historic federal indictment against President Donald Trump for conspiring to stay in power after losing the 2020 presidential election included five attorney co-conspirators: Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sidney Powell, Jeffrey Clark, and Kenneth Chesebro. Eight lawyers were indicted in Georgia on similar charges.

Lawyers weren’t just involved in Trump’s plot; they devised and enabled it. Rather than accurately advise Trump that he had lost and needed to concede, lawyers crafted a plan …

Court Forms And Court Reforms: Pro Se Litigants And The Limited Success Of Standardized Family Court Forms, Caroline Rogus

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The first step in any civil lawsuit, long before a court will contemplate awarding relief, is initiating the court matter: a plaintiff must always start by effectively pleading their case. The court system rests upon the presumption that an attorney will create and file the requisite court documents—including complaints, answers, and motions—on behalf of their client. The reality, however, is that an extraordinarily high number of litigants do not have legal representation and must therefore proceed pro se and submit these documents on their own. Most jurisdictions offer pro se litigants standardized, fillable court forms. These forms are intended to …

A. Harold Weber Moot Court Competition Award 1980-81 To 2024-2025, Notre Dame Law School

Student, Faculty, and Staff Awards

For outstanding achievement in art of Oral Advocacy 1980–1981 through 2024–2025.
Discontinued in the 2024–2025 academic year.

Defining Arbitration, Jill I. Gross

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) does not define the term “arbitration,” the very process the one-hundred-year-old statute was enacted to promote. The absence of a definition has led to courts' inconsistent and unpredictable application of the FAA's regulatory benefits to agreements to resolve disputes in processes other than traditional, binding arbitration, such as appraisal, evaluation, and mediation. Additionally, with no clear definition as guidance, companies have inserted arbitration clauses into adhesive consumer and employment agreements that require “arbitration” of disputes but designate a process lacking hallmarks of due process. The Supreme Court even justified enforcing class action waivers in arbitration …

Front Matter

City University of New York Law Review

No abstract provided.

People Ex Rel. King V. Gallagher And The Forgotten Legal Struggle Over Racial Segregation In New York State Public Schools, David A. Weinstein

City University of New York Law Review

In 1883, in People ex rel. King v. Gallagher, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought on behalf of an eleven-year-old African American girl who sought admission into her neighborhood public school in Brooklyn and thereby challenged the legal segregation regime governing New York’s public education system. The case, largely forgotten today, had a profound impact on subsequent legal efforts at school desegregation. This article examines the development of African American legal rights to public education in New York State in the nineteenth century and early efforts to challenge the exclusion of Black …

Mailing It In: Due Process Requires Technology-Driven Safeguards In Public Benefits, Eric Lukoff

City University of New York Law Review

Due process in safety net public benefit programs requires agencies to employ modern technology in providing notice that is reasonably likely to reach participants. The Supreme Court has held that due process is dependent on the time, place, and circumstances in which it operates. Scholars have further argued that due process is adaptable to changing facts and circumstances over time. Yet, mailed paper notices remain the standard in providing notice to participants in public benefit programs. Living in poverty today looks significantly different than it did nearly fifty years ago at the time of Mathews v. Eldridge, where the …

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Evaluating Its Promise And Navigating Regulatory Challenges In A Post-Chevron Era, Rebecca B. Stein

City University of New York Law Review

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) establishes the first federal standard to protect pregnant workers by explicitly granting them the right to reasonable workplace accommodations. Historically, pregnant workers have faced challenges in receiving the necessary accommodations due to limited legal protections, often forcing them to choose between income and health. Previous legislation, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, provided insufficient protection. This comment examines the PWFA’s potential impact, analyzing factors influencing its effectiveness and critiquing its limitations. It also explores recent state legal challenges to the PWFA in conjunction with the Supreme …