Law Commons^™

Conference Speakers, Speakers

Canada-United States Law Journal

Proceedings of the 2nd Wilson Canada-United States Legal Issues Symposium

6. Mark: Sources And References, Matthew Lipman

Secondary School Curriculum

This sequential bibliography matches the 1980 edition of Mark page by page. It contains both sources—works that influenced Matthew Lipman in writing the novel—and references to philosophical works he and Ann Margaret Sharp recommend to explore the novels’ philosophical themes.

The Silicon Valley No-Poach Conspiracy, Eric A. Posner, Ruth Zheng

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

The Silicon Valley no-poach conspiracy is the most important cartel no one has heard of. It is rarely discussed in the cartel literature and is lost to public memory. More than forty tech firms, including Apple and Google, agreed not to poach employees from one another over three decades, causing an estimated $3.1 billion in lost wages. The Justice Department discovered and broke apart the cartel in 2010, but did not punish the cartel members, who quickly settled with employees and never admitted guilt. However, the case foreshadowed, and perhaps helped spur, two major developments in antitrust law a decade …

Pay To Plead: Finding Unfairness And Abusive Practices In California Debt Collection Cases, Claire Johnson Raba

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

To Insure Domestic Tranquility And Provide For The Common Defence: The Preamble's Concern With Internal And External Threats, Stuart Ford

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

University Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law Commencement Program, May 10, 2025, University Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law

Commencement and Hooding Programs

No abstract provided.

The Emerging Framework For The Recognition & Enforcement Of Annulled Arbitral Awards In U.S. Jurisprudence, Sarah Klim

Articles

The recognition and enforcement of foreign awards are governed almost universally by the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention"). However, this recognition and enforcement necessarily invokes national judicial power. The New York Convention does not devise a harmonized set of rules for courts to follow when faced with a request to recognize and enforce an annulled award. This has resulted in divergent approaches by national courts, which derive "not from any perversity of judges but from good faith variants in perspectives on how to construe the treaty."  This paper seeks …

Annual Survey Of Georgia Law: Legal Ethics, Patrick Longan

Articles

This Survey covers the period from June 1, 2024–May 31, 2025.1 The Article discusses developments with respect to lawyer discipline, bar admission and reinstatement, malpractice, ineffective assistance of counsel, disqualification of counsel, judicial misconduct and recusal, attorney’s fees and liens, contempt and other sanctions, unauthorized practice of law, attorney-client privilege, prosecutorial misconduct, amendments to the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, advisory opinions, one miscellaneous matter, and potential reforms to the delivery of legal services.

Our Partisan Supreme Court And An Essential First Step Toward Reclaiming What's Been Lost, Gary Simson

Articles

Partisan decision-making by even only one Supreme Court Justice in a single case is not a trivial matter. The ill effects are greatly compounded when five or more Justices of a similar partisan bent regularly deliberate about, and decide, cases in a partisan way. At that point, we’ve got what can fairly be described as a partisan Supreme Court.

I argue in this Article that, to all of our great misfortune, a partisan Supreme Court is very much what we’ve got today. On a more hopeful note, though, I also argue that although reforming the Court to be a much …

The Dangers Of Denying Prosecutorial Independence: Wrongful Convictions, Official Misconduct, And Public Corruption, Meagan R. Hurley

Articles

In recent years, desires to limit prosecutorial discretion have become the focus of a national dialogue on the authority of the elected officials, allegations of their misconduct, and the need for stronger accountability measures. Legislatures across the country have considered a slew of bills aimed at diminishing prosecutorial power by prohibiting “progressive” office policies, creating oversight commissions, and promulgating simplified processes to recall or remove prosecutors entirely. In various jurisdictions, those proposals are now coming to fruition. While heightened scrutiny for some of the legal system’s most powerful leaders may seem attractive, an analysis of national trends aimed at curtailing …

The Centerline Presumption And Easements: A Property Owner's Guide To Understanding Property Rights In Land Ownership Disputes For Inverse Condemnation Lawsuits, Grant Houske

Law Student Works

In this Pathfinder guide, you will find a comprehensive analysis concerning the legal doctrine known as the centerline presumption combined with easements as two foundational requirements to establish liability as a basis for landowner property rights in asserting claims for an inverse condemnation claim/ "takings" claim, or quiet title lawsuits.

The research for this pathfinder will include history on the evolution of the centerline presumption, the "strip and gores" doctrine, easements, and the application of an easement with respect to potential ownership rights in real property subject to the possible application of the centerline presumption where a property owner can …

Concealed Carry And The Right To Self Defense In Missouri, Andrew Stafford Ii

Law Student Works

Firearm regulation, both nationally and in Missouri, sits at the center of ongoing constitutional debate and evolving public policy. Missouri’s legal landscape reflects a significant shift over the past two decades. The state moved from a traditional permit-based concealed carry system to a broad permitless carry framework that allows most adults to carry concealed firearms without a permit. This shift follows major developments in federal Second Amendment case law, including District of Columbia v. Heller, McDonald v. Chicago, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, as well as Missouri’s 2014 constitutional amendment requiring courts to evaluate restrictions …

Causation's Due Process Dimensions, Cassandra Burke Robertson, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes

Faculty Publications

For decades, courts have grappled with the tension between compensating victims of mass harms and maintaining fairness to defendants when causation is difficult to prove. This Article argues that the Supreme Court’s due process jurisprudence provides a relevant framework for navigating this tension. We contend that the Court over the last three decades has established a consistent Fourteenth Amendment due process approach in punitive damages and personal jurisdiction cases, which is rooted in antecedents tracing to the nineteenth century and relies on a nexus of interests that balances individual rights, state interests, and federalism concerns. This framework, we argue, has …

Money Moves: Taxing The Wealthy At The State Level, David Gamage, Brian D. Galle, Darien Shanske

Faculty Publications

It's widely understood today that inequality is a major social problem that in turn contributes to other crises. By most accounts, tax systems are supposed to be our engines of equality. Yet in today’s United States, state and local tax systems mostly do the opposite: they take a greater percentage of the resources of the poor and middle class than of the rich.

Perhaps surprisingly, the traditional view among fiscal policy experts has been that this state of affairs is correct. In this standard account, only national governments should impose progressive or redistributive taxes. While acknowledging that there would be …

#Taxback? Prohibiting State Real Property Taxes On Land In Indian Country, Pippa Browde

Marquette Law Review

Land is a critical asset of Indian tribes. As tribes wrestle with how to create sustainable economies to support their sovereignty, the use and management of tribal land is integral. Taxation is a key component of economic development. This Article is about taxation of land within Indian country. It considers existing law that allows for state taxation of some land within Indian country. It makes a normative claim as to who the proper taxing sovereign should be based on tax policy principles and principles that support tribal self-governance and tribal sovereignty.

In Part II, this Article provides the background for …

Warning: What You Don’T Know May Kill You: Why California Needs Fentanyl-Specific Legislation, Fredrick, Abygail

Santa Clara Law Review

The lack of fentanyl-specific legislation in California is causing an overdose crisis throughout the state. This is partly attributed to the potency of fentanyl with low doses often resulting in death. Despite this increased risk of danger, however, current legislation merely lumps fentanyl punishment with the designated punishment for other controlled substances. Yet, these criminal statutes have consistently proven unsuccessful as the use of fentanyl continues to rise and unintended consequences continue to grow.

The ineffective management of this threat by our legislative branch has caused vigilante prosecutors to use illegal tactics of prosecution. Prosecutors are now charging dealers with …

South To Justice: Using International Law To Defend Against U.S. Border Externalization Policies Through The Example Of Forcibly Disappeared Migrants In Mexico, Cadwalader, Natalie

Santa Clara Law Review

The United States is increasingly employing border externalization controls as a primary means of preventing immigrants and asylum seekers from accessing due process and protection on U.S. soil. From Title 42, to metering, to the Remain in Mexico program, to Texas’s State Bill 4 today, no country has been more instrumental in facilitating or halting this suite of policies than Mexico. In this paper, I address the rise of border externalization policies in the United States, describe key differences between Mexican and U.S. human rights frameworks, and show how U.S. lawyers have mischaracterized enforced disappearances of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico …

Modeling Meaning: Causal Inference Under The California Racial Justice Act, Ball, W. David

Santa Clara Law Review

In order to evaluate claims arising under the California Racial Justice Act (RJA), judges and attorneys need to learn how to draw inferences about racial disparity from data—and, equally importantly, to learn how to avoid drawing inaccurate inferences from data. The key questions in many RJA claims are, first, how to determine what constitutes “defendant[s] who have engaged in similar conduct and are similarly situated” and, second, what might supply race-neutral reasons for those disparities. In other words, how can practitioners learn to distinguish between permissible disparities driven by offender characteristics and conduct and impermissible disparities driven by factors the …

The Disparity In Litigating Racial Disparity Claims: The Need For California Courts To Articulate A Framework For Assessing Racial Justice Act Challenges To Charging, Conviction, And Sentencing, Romo, Lisa M.

Santa Clara Law Review

Under California’s Racial Justice Act (RJA)—codified in Penal Code section 745—the state may not seek or obtain a criminal conviction or sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin. There are four pathways to establishing an RJA violation. Two of the pathways proscribe discriminatory or biased conduct or language inside or outside the courtroom by specified criminal legal system actors, including judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, and expert witnesses. The other two are based on disparities in charging, conviction, or sentencing associated with defendant race, ethnicity, or national origin and alternatively, in the case of sentencing, that of …

The Efficient Default Rule For Sandbagging In Mergers And Acquisitions: A Limited Pro-Sandbagging Default, Alexis Klimaszewski

Connecticut Law Review

In the area of mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”), a buyer “sandbags” a seller when, knowing the seller has breached—intentionally or unintentionally—a representation or warranty prior to closing, the buyer nonetheless closes the sale and subsequently brings a post-closing indemnification claim. Parties to a merger or acquisition can negotiate a pro- or anti-sandbagging provision; however, the recent trend has been rising instances of silence in M&A agreements. Given the modern majority default rule, the result is that most buyers in the United States hold a sandbagging right; however, default rules are ambiguous, uncertain, and inconsistent across jurisdictions. While sandbagging at first …

Navigating Wastewater: Minnesota Mining Wastewater Permit Challenges And Evolving Compliance Standards, Madelaine Adamich

Journal of Earth and Life Science

February of 2021 marked the beginning of Minnesota clearly establishing that groundwater qualifies as a Class 1 water in a legal battle involving United States Steel, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, WaterLegacy, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, and eventually the Minnesota Supreme Court (MNSC). Minnesota has a water classification system, as required by the federal Clean Water Act, with 7 classes of use. Class 1 waters are waters used for domestic consumption (MPCA 4, n.d.). According to Minnesota Statute § 7050.0220, the acceptable level for sulfate is 250 mg/L in Class 1 …

Informing Choice: The Role Of Adoption In Women’S Pregnancy Decision-Making, Elizabeth R. Kirk, Ryan Hanlon

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Don’T Trust The Vibes: A Better Test For Pop Music Copyright Infringement, Lauryn M. Sparger

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Sidgwick’S “Move”: A Reply, T. A. Cavanaugh

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Haitian Revolution, Anti-Haitianism, And The Evolution Of Exclusionary Immigration Policy In The United States, Joseph M. Frengel

Student Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

The Escazú Compliance Mechanism And Its Legitimacy As An Effective Tool For Advocacy, Sarah Dávila A.

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Adjusting The Law Librarian Pipeline, David Whelan

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Social Justice, Practical Lawyering, And The Elephant In Solitary Confinement: Why Animal Law Belongs In The Legal Writing Classroom, Conley Wouters

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Continuum Of Responsibility: An Examination Of The Human Right To A Healthy Environment Of Present And Future Generations, Sarah Dávila A.

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Harmonizing Delegation And Deference After Loper Bright, Kristin Hickman, Amy J. Wildermuth

Articles

By overturning Chevron, the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision clearly changed the way in which courts must approach agency actions interpreting statutes. But Loper Bright stopped well short of declaring that courts should always ignore agency interpretations and only interpret statutes using their independent judgment. In two critical paragraphs, the Court acknowledged that some statutory provisions delegate discretionary authority to agencies counseled a more restrained judicial review for reasoned decisionmaking when agencies exercise such power. But, whereas Chevron focused nearly exclusively on the statutory word or phrase that an agency was endeavoring to interpret and implement, Loper Bright shifts …