Law Commons^™

The New World's Pandemic: Sexual Exploitation In The Digital Age, Rocio Iglesias Gonzalez

St. Thomas Law Review

Mary is a fifteen-year-old who is excited about starting her sophomore year of high school. Unbeknownst to Mary, George, a classmate whose romantic advances Mary had rejected, created a sexually explicit image generated by artificial intelligence, most commonly known as a deepfake, of Mary and started sending it to other classmates. Once Mary discovered the deepfaked pictures, she and her parents sought legal advice on available remedies. Unfortunately, Mary lives in Nevada, a state that has no legislation addressing the issue of nonconsensual sexually explicit deepfakes. Similarly, at the federal level, Mary has no course of action against her offender. …

Intrinsic Human Equality: A Critical Overview Of Recent And Historical Theory, Robert Diab

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Demanding Or Dodging Death: Reconciling The Inconsistencies In Medicine, Katherine Drabiak

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Safeguarding Children From State Intervention, Salihah R. Denman

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Insurance Solution For Financial Advice Failures, Adam J. Gana, Benjamin P. Edwards

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review

Solving the retirement savings crisis requires widespread access to reliable financial advice. Yet financial advisers often operate without insurance, collecting fees and commissions from customers and leaving them penniless when substandard advice causes harm. Instituting insurance coverage requirements would protect investors and allow market forces to discipline misconduct. For decades, advocates and regulators have raised awareness about the millions of unpaid arbitration awards each year; an insurance solution would significantly reduce the harm suffered.

This paper aims to create a roadmap to solve the problem. It identifies the problem and maps out the different levers available to policymakers to increase …

Competitive Effects Of T-Mobile/Sprint: Analysis Of A "4-To-3" Merger, Thomas W. Hazlett, Robert W. Crandall

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review

Mergers in the mobile telecommunications industry are of keen interest to policymakers and scholars. This sector often experiences high concentration levels, driven by pronounced economies of scale and scope, alongside substantial regulatory barriers to entry created by radio spectrum allocations. Hence, antitrust authorities frequently struggle with the tradeoff between the benefits of enhanced synergies and the potentially adverse effects of increased market power. This tension results in varied outcomes from regulatory agencies when approving (or blocking) mergers. Between 2012 and 2016, for instance, four E.U. nations (Austria, Ireland, Germany, and Italy) allowed the consummation of “4-to-3” mobile telecommunications transactions, while …

Solving The Proxy Advisory Problem: Minimum Regulation For Maximum Competition, Dominic P. Keilty

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review

The proxy advisory industry is often criticized on two primary accounts: the lack of accountability for informational accuracy in the development of voting standards and the conflicts of interest faced by advisors when they make proxy voting recommendations on issuers to which they have previously provided corporate governance consulting services. The industry has also been accused of having “anemic” levels of competition, since only two advisors command a vast majority of the market share. While much has been written about curtailing the prevalence and effects of proxy advisor conflicts of interest through increased regulation, the regulatory route toward increased informational …

The Causes And Impact Of Evictions In Southern Nevada, Mohit Pande

Student Research

As the Southern Nevada region continues to quickly grow, evictions have become a structural feature of the region’s rental market. The region has one of the highest eviction filing rates in the country and this trend has continued to increase in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. This paper examines the availability of market-rate affordable housing and the expansion of subsidized affordable housing to understand how the local housing conditions contribute to the number of evictions in Southern Nevada. Additionally, the paper studies local legal processes, such as the summary eviction system and habitability procedures, to understand the relationship between …

Ai As A Service: What Lawyers And Business Clients Need To Know, Martin Petrin

Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents

AI is seemingly everywhere. Hardly a day goes by in which there is not another media report on new areas in which the technology is being deployed and its potential consequences. While the advances of AI entail many opportunities for business and society, they also create challenges and risks. Although there is already awareness around problems such as AI bias, privacy, and human rights impacts, there are significant issues arising in the specific business-to-business context that have remained largely hidden and tend to receive much less attention. This article will, first, look at business-to-business more generally and show how AI …

Think Globally, Act Globally: A Review Of The Elgar Concise Encyclopedia Of Animal Law, Conley Wouters

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Celebrating The Fiske Fellowship Program: 2001-2025, University Of Michigan Law School

Event Materials

This program contains statements of impact from the 2001-2025 recipients of Fiske Fellowships.

Some information was shared in 2022 and may not reflect current roles and/or responsibilities of Fiske Fellows.

The Inconvenience Doctrine, Alexi Pfeffer-Gillett

Scholarly Articles

In a nation of stark inequalities, the Roberts Court is often portrayed as siding with the wealthy and powerful. Many scholars argue that the Court has abandoned legal principles altogether and instead simply chooses winners and losers based on the conservative majority’s political agenda. Meanwhile, scholarly examinations of the legal reasoning underlying the Court’s most impactful decisions are largely confined to specific subject areas. Such compartmentalized analyses, though, overlook broader patterns in the Court’s rulings that transcend substantive legal boundaries.

This Article bridges the gap in these parallel conversations by connecting the Roberts Court’s reasoning across many legal fields with …

Reflections And Gratitude: The Journal Of Food Law & Policy From A Twenty-Year Perspective, Margie Alsbrook

Articles

Twenty years after the Journal of Food Law & Policy published its first issue, I find myself looking back with deep gratitude for the people who helped create it, for the students who sustained it, and for the community that continues to make it thrive. What began as an untested idea has grown into a respected publication and a cornerstone of a still-growing field. This essay is both a reflection on that journey and a heartfelt thank-you to everyone who made it possible.

Rahimi And The Future Of (The Rest Of) The Protection Order Prohibition, Bonnie Carlson

Articles

In the summer of 2024, the Supreme Court considered United States v. Rahimi. Scholars and lawyers watched with bated breath to see how the court would interpret and apply the foundation-shifting Second Amendment test it established in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen two years earlier. Ultimately, the Court upheld the federal law which temporarily bans some protection order respondents from possessing firearms. But the Court provided little in the way of additional guidance that lower courts desperately needed as evidenced by the disparate outcomes on gun cases nationwide following Bruen. Rather, the Court opted for a …

Informing Choice: The Role Of Adoption In Women’S Pregnancy Decision-Making, Elizabeth R. Kirk, Ryan Hanlon

Scholarly Articles

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the authors of this Article offer a practical, collaborative response to a seemingly intractable, divisive issue. Kirk and Hanlon draw on their academic expertise in law and social science, respectively, to address the paradox of the general esteem for the institution of adoption alongside the rarity with which adoption is chosen. In this Article, they examine social science data and literature on women’s pregnancy decision-making in order to explain the need for laws and policies that promote informed choice. They introduce never-before-published survey data and …

Deference And Discretion In Bank Regulation, Heidi Mandanis Schooner

Scholarly Articles

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the Chevron doctrine of judicial deference to administrative agencies’ interpretations of federal statutes, will impact future regulatory policy. The shape of that impact is less certain. Using bank regulation as a vantage point, this Article explores how the end of Chevron may influence legislative and regulatory outcomes. Through case studies, the Article contextualizes the impact of Chevron within the bank regulatory regime’s complex ecosystem of technical expertise, political influence, and industry capture. The dismantling of New Deal restrictions on banks’ activities illustrates how Chevron may have …

Associational Rights Versus Nonprofit Transparency: Information Reporting In The Internet Age, Roger Colinvaux

Scholarly Articles

For decades, the nation’s charitable and nonprofit organizations have been required to file an information return, known as the Form 990, with the Internal Revenue Service. Congress mandates that the return be made publicly available. Such information reporting, both to the IRS and to the public, is the cornerstone of the federal government’s approach to assuring that nonprofit organizations are legally compliant. The Supreme Court’s decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (APF), however, casts a shadow on the constitutionality of nonprofit reporting requirements. In APF, the Court held unconstitutional California’s effort to require charities to …

Virginia's Congressional Districts Are Unconstitutional, Kevin C. Walsh

Scholarly Articles

The Elections Clause in Article I of the U.S. Constitution provides that “[t]he Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations.” This Essay will show that Virginia's current congressional districts were not established in compliance with the Elections Clause. These congressional districts were prescribed by the Supreme Court of Virginia, not by “the Legislature” or by any other body exercising legislative power to establish districts. Because judicial power is the only power that …

Answered By Text, Jennifer L. Mascott, Eli Nachmany

Scholarly Articles

This Essay takes stock of a pivotal moment at the Court: statutory interpretation at center stage in administrative law. The U.S. Supreme Court’s most recent Term saw numerous landscape-shifting administrative law decisions. The most widely discussed was the Court’s elimination of 40-year-old Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. The Court’s decisions also effected significant change in the scope of Seventh Amendment jury trial rights and the length of time that individuals, businesses, and associations have to challenge agency actions. But taken together, the Court’s decisions did not radically restructure the administrative state on constitutional grounds. Despite the substantial …

Right Not To Work: Unions And Title Vii, Seth C. Oranburg

Scholarly Articles

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued the landmark decision of Groff v. DeJoy. Groff will probably be remembered for reversing the Court's 1977 decision of TWA v. Hardison, even though the majority claimed to merely be clarifying that precedent. Hardison seemed to interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended in 1972, such that employers do not have to make accommodations that have a de minimis cost. Groff restored the original meaning to Title VII. Groff held that "Title VII means what it says." And Title VII says …

One Year Of The Clean Vehicle Provisions: International Law And Trade, Yongei Jeong

Emory International Law Review

No abstract provided.

A More Luminous Beacon, William M.M. Kamin

Scholarly Articles

Over the Supreme Court’s past four Terms, federal post conviction habeas corpus has been placed on the chopping-block. Its fate hangs in the balance of an historical debate over the maxim, oft recited by the Court between 1830–1953, that post conviction habeas reaches only “jurisdictional defects” — as opposed to “mere error” — on the part of the convicting court. Justices Gorsuch and Thomas maintain that “jurisdiction” carried then the same narrow meaning it does now: power ab initio over the offense charged and the defendant’s person. Justices Kagan and Jackson contend that, in this context, “jurisdictional defect” was understood …

Insects, Ai Systems, And The Future Of Legal Personhood, Jeff Sebo

Animal Law Review

This Article makes a case for insect and AI legal personhood. Humans share the world not only with large animals like chimpanzees and elephants but also with small animals like ants and bees. In the future, we might also share the world with sentient or otherwise morally significant AI systems. These realities raise questions about what kind of legal status insects, AI systems, and other nonhumans should have in the future. At present, debates about legal personhood mostly exclude these kinds of individuals. However, I argue that our current framework for assessing legal personhood, coupled with our current framework for …

Is One Cow’S Waste Another (Hu)Man’S Treasure? Exploring The Environmental And Energy Impacts Of Manure Biogas, Katie Thompson

Animal Law Review

There is no question that manure biogas, a form of natural gas derived from animal waste, is quickly becoming the most valuable product supplied by factory farms, known also as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Manure biogas can be used to produce heat, electricity, or transportation fuel, but its greatest profit stream rests in the myriad government credits and subsidies it can garner. Although turning trash into treasure by giving waste a new life may appear laudable and worthy of such investment, this Article argues that manure biogas is far from a sustainable solution to the United States’ environmental and …

Front Matter, Front Matter

Animal Law Review

Front Matter contains Masthead and Table of Contents for Animal Law Review Volume 31, Issue 2.

Factory Farms And Labor Law: Can Unionization Get The Job Done?, Miranda Herreid

Animal Law Review

At different moments in U.S. history, workers have joined together to fight for a better future. Now more than ever, as industries become increas-ingly consolidated and powerful, workers’ ability to band together and ad-vocate for their rights is integral. Recent victories in labor rights have not yet made their way to the industrial animal agricultural sphere. This is unfortunate, as the conditions at slaughterhouses and concentrated animal feeding operations are extractive and abusive towards workers and animals alike. In the past, strong union presence in slaughterhouses aided workers in achieving wage increases and job stability. However, this resulted in extreme …

The Implementation And Use Of Intimacy Coordinators In Motion Picture Productions, John J. Chung, Pia Piscitelli

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Challenge That The Advent Of Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Tools Poses To The Procedures For Determining The Existence Of The Preliminary Facts That Condition The Admissibility Of Items Of Evidence, Edward J. Imwinkelried

Marquette Law Review

“[A]d quæstionem facti non respondent judices; . . . ad quæstionem juris not respondent juratores.” Judges do not answer questions of fact; jurors do not answer questions of law.

The jury is a central institution in the American level infrastructure. The Sixth and Seventh Amendments elevate the jury trial right to constitutional status. Of course, when a judge presides at a jury trial, the question that naturally arises is the division of decision-making labor between judge and jury. In the past few decades, the Supreme Court’s Apprendi v. New Jersey line of authority has expanded the jury’s authority to decide …

Don’T Trust The Process: The Viability Of Eighth Amendment Claims For Ultra-Processed Food Overconsumption In Prisons, Markus C. Johnson, Rita L. Rahoi-Gilchrest

Marquette Law Review

With the largest prison population worldwide, American prisons serve more food than anywhere else. To cut costs, American prisons overwhelmingly (or even entirely) serve prisoners ultra-processed foods, which, if overconsumed, have detrimental and long-lasting health effects. Prisoners taking issue with the food being served to them rely on the courts to counteract any inappropriate prison dietary practices, wielding the Eighth Amendment as a constitutional guarantee to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. But courts are failing to protect this constitutional guarantee by relying on precedent that is at odds with modern Eighth Amendment principles. Indeed, when it comes to …

A City’S Day In Court: Using Class Action Principles To Protect Cities’ Due Process Rights, David Stage

Marquette Law Review

In a recent trend in public law, municipalities are increasingly bringing “affirmative litigation,” suing large corporations to protect municipal residents and increase revenue. As affirmative litigation becomes popular among municipalities, more and more municipalities have found that their respective states (e.g., the State of Illinois for the City of Chicago) have already sued the would-be defendant for the same action. Because of the state’s prior action, the defendant can raise the common law defense of res judicata against the municipality to preclude the municipality’s lawsuit. If a defendant wants to raise the defense and preclude a subsequent lawsuit, then the …