Law Commons^™

Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, And The Politics Of Exploitation By Juliann Emmons Allison & Ellen Reese, Elise Payette

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Front Matter, Natural Resources Journal Nrj

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

The Case For Nuclear: How A Simple Amendment To Purpa Could Invigorate The Market For Advanced Nuclear And Help The United States Decarbonize Faster Than Ever, Nathan Wise

Natural Resources Journal

The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) was passed in the 1970s to advance the United States’ energy independence through the encouragement of energy conservation, energy efficiency, small power production, and competition within the energy industry. Administered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), it allows energy producers whose facilities qualify under its criteria to buy and sell electricity to larger-scale energy producers at rates set by state agencies. Today, PURPA and FERC’s accompanying regulations do not allow for facilities that run on nuclear fuel to qualify as “small power production facilities.” Though these facilities could still qualify …

Forever Chemicals And Livestock: Exploring Contmination Of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances On Farms And Assessing Usda's Role In Indemnification, Chance Mitchell

Natural Resources Journal

This article examines the limitations of existing federal authorities in addressing the growing threat of PFAS contamination in livestock production operations. While existing programs at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), such as the Livestock Indemnity Program, provide critical support for producers facing natural disasters, they do not cover losses related to toxic substances like PFAS. The only USDA program offering PFAS-related indemnity is the Dairy Indemnity Payment Program (DIPP), but its narrow scope limits coverage to dairy farms. Efforts to amend the statutory language of existing programs or create new ones face significant hurdles, including Congress’s rigid approach to …

Dark Skies: Places, Practices, Communities Edited By Nick Dunn & Tim Edensor, Stella Rose-Wyatt

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Gender Inequality And Productivity Impact In Egypt, Hammad Elsaid Omar

The Undergraduate Research Journal

This study examines the relationship between gender inequality in Egypt's workforce and productivity across various sectors. Utilizing a comparative research design, the analysis employs quantitative data from sources such as the World Bank and the International Labor Organization. Key indicators of gender inequality—including the gender pay gap, the percentage of women in managerial positions, and female labor force participation rates—are correlated with productivity metrics like GDP per capita and productivity per employee (Figure 3). Findings reveal a strong negative correlation between the gender pay gap and productivity, with sectors exhibiting smaller pay disparities achieving higher productivity levels. Regression analysis indicates …

The Female Judge “Hunch” In Family Court; Does Female Judgment Differ From Male Judgment?, Kareem M. Rashed

The Undergraduate Research Journal

This paper offers an in-depth theoretical review of the differences in moral judgments between genders, particularly emphasizing their manifestation in the context of family court. Based on Carol Gilligan's critique of Lawrence Kohlberg's theory about moral development, there are distinct differences in moral reasoning approaches between men and women. Gilligan's work challenged the universality of Kohlberg's framework and instead suggested that gendered perspectives on moral reasoning commonly prioritize care and relationships over abstract principles. Complementing this theoretical foundation, the paper incorporates findings from a number of practical studies and surveys, providing non-theoretical evidence of these differences in real-world contexts. Moreover, …

February 5, 2025 — Letter To The House Ways And Means Committee On Tax, American Dental Association

Advocacy in Action letters

No abstract provided.

Preserving Incentive Awards, Christine P. Bartholomew

Book Reviews

reviewing Alexander J. Noronha, On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated: Class Representatives & Equitable Compensation, 122 Mich. L. Rev. 733 (2024)

Autonomy Now?: Is It Time To Start Integrating (Autonomous) Urban Air Mobility Vehicles Into The National Airspace System?, Robert Notari

Texas A&M Law Review

Urban Air Mobility has the potential to radically change the fundamental nature of transportation within the United States. But challenges abound—from critical shortages of air traffic controllers and pilots and gaps in key technologies and infrastructure to the negative public perception of autonomous vehicles. FAA and industry, employing an evolutionary and safety-focused approach, can overcome these challenges through a combination of creative regulation, targeted technology development, and leveraging lessons learned through the FAA’s drone integration efforts. However, if drone integration is any guide, industry should be prepared for a long integration timeline, with autonomy still on the horizon.

Doing More, Doing Better? A Critique Of The Criminalization Of Coercive Control, Janet Mosher, Shushanna Harris, Jennifer Koshan, Wanda Wiegers

All Papers

Canada recently stood on the verge of ushering in a new criminal offence related to coercive control in the context of intimate relationships. In this paper, we critically evaluate this development, drawing out lessons from past criminalization efforts (particularly their impact on Black women and communities). Our analysis raises significant questions about the potential of the proposed offence to deliver on the promises held out by politicians and frontline advocates. We argue that not only will these promises go largely unrealized, but the ongoing harms of criminalization will be intensified. Marginalized women and communities are the least likely to benefit, …

Doing More, Doing Better? A Critique Of The Criminalization Of Coercive Control, Janet Mosher, Shushanna Harris, Jennifer Koshan, Wanda Wiegers

Journal of Law and Social Policy

Canada stands on the verge of ushering in a new criminal offence related to coercive control in the context of intimate relationships. In this paper we critically evaluate this development, drawing out lessons from past criminalization efforts and in particular, their impact on Black women and their communities. Our analysis raises significant questions about the potential of the proposed offence to deliver on the promises held out by its proponents. We argue that not only will these promises go largely unrealized, but the ongoing harms of criminalization–harms that manifest not only in the criminal law sphere but in child welfare …

Class Of 2026 Halfway To Graduation Party, Cardozo Office Of Student Services & Advising

2024–2025 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The Power Of Procedure: Uncovering The Gap In U.S. Privacy Rights, Bernard Chao, Mandi Abbott

Pepperdine Law Review

As Congress faces increasing pressure to adopt comprehensive privacy legislation, this Article seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions by exploring critical procedural deficiencies in U.S. privacy laws and their implications for domestic privacy rights and international data flows. This Article makes several key contributions to the field. First, it uses a comparative law perspective to highlight the lack of robust procedural rights and remedies in U.S. privacy law. Second, while many have questioned whether the Court of Jus tice for the European Union will strike down the latest U.S.-EU Data Privacy Framework (the primary mechanism for allowing the transatlantic …

Pleading With Particularity: Decoding When Computer Fraud And Abuse Act Claims Must Comply With Rule 9(B), Brooke R. Newman

Pepperdine Law Review

The primary tool for litigating cybercrimes is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which Congress enacted in 1984 following increased computer misuse. Since its debut, the CFAA has undergone a series of amendments. The most noteworthy of which for civil litigators came in 1994 when Congress enacted a civil penalty for cybercrimes. Part of this penalty includes 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(4), which prohibits fraudulent conduct in connection with computer usage. In recent years, litigators have weaponized § 1030(a)(4) to challenge a variety of conduct, most of which has nothing to do with cybercrimes. These filings have split district courts …

Table Of Contents & Masthead, Jacqueline Kessel

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Emortgage And Crypto-Mortgage In Home Finance, Julia Patterson Forrester Rogers

Pepperdine Law Review

Most home mortgage loans today are documented on physical paper, but they are increasingly closed as eMortgages. The move to electronic documents is inevitable and will ultimately be a positive change for lenders and borrowers. However, additional regulation is needed to address issues raised by electronic home mortgage closings and the “crypto-mortgage,” a mortgage loan with the obligation evidenced by or tethered to a non-fungible token. Lenders have traditionally required that home mortgage loans be evidenced by a wet-signed paper promissory note to gain the advantages and the certainty of Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governing negotiable …

Formulary Apportionment: A New Framework For Personal Income Taxation, Andrew Appleby

Pepperdine Law Review

Increased post-pandemic remote working arrangements and interstate migration have upended existing personal income taxation regimes. For decades, the current paradigm has proved to be an imperfect but workable means to determine which state has the prevailing claim to impose tax on a particular item of income. The individual’s state of residence has a residual claim to all the individual’s worldwide income but defers to the state in which the income is derived if such a state is determinable. To that end, the state of residence typically provides a credit for income taxes paid on a source basis to other states. …

United States V. Rahimi, 144 S.Ct 1889 (2024), Alyssa Hohlbein

Ohio Northern University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Erlinger V. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1840 (2024), Joseph Phillipps

Ohio Northern University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Diaz V. United States 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), Madison Walsh

Ohio Northern University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Models Of Judicial Interpretation: From Marshall To Kavanaugh And How The Umpire Model Changed The Game, Beau Sullivan

Ohio Northern University Law Review

The three predominant modes of judicial interpretation are living constitutionalism, originalism, and the umpire model. The living constitutionalist believes the Constitution is a living document that must change and adapt over time. The living constitutionalist considers the history, text, precedent, and policy when deciding a case. This is in contrast to the originalist, who considers the history and text of the document when deciding a case. The originalist favors judicial restraint and seeks to limit the role of the judge. The devotee of the umpire model champions the independent judge whose function is to the law and does not consider …

The Evolution Of Race-Based Admissions In American Higher Education, Chenglin Liu

Ohio Northern University Law Review

This Article examines the Supreme Court’s evolving position on racebased admissions policies over the past 127 years. Between Plessy and Brown, universities used race-based policies to exclude black applicants from white universities. Brown shifted admissions policies from blocking black students to accepting them. As affirmative action gained momentum, universities escalated from merely accepting minority candidates to proactive recruitment by using quotas and lowering their admissions standards. The Court in Bakke set the ground rules for race-based admissions during that period. In 2003, Grutter upheld the university’s pursuit for a “critical mass” of minority students in its entering class. Two decades …

Shadows Of Prejudice: The History Of The Right To Counsel And The Strickland's Pursuit Of Justice3 Amidst Forgotten Witnesses And Disregarded Evidence, Reem Haikal J.D., Ll.M

Ohio Northern University Law Review

In the United States’ criminal justice system, persistent problems with ineffective legal representation reveal significant systemic issues and injustices, underscoring the urgent need for meaningful reform. This paper argues that the United States’ criminal justice system faces deep-rooted problems due to ineffective legal representation, as evidenced by the evolution of the right to counsel, the challenges posed by the Strickland standard, and contemporary criticisms of legal defense practices. Through an analysis of historical developments, landmark legal decisions, and case studies, it becomes evident that meaningful reform is essential to address systemic injustices and ensure the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance …

An Empty Guarantee?, Kevin Thomas Frazier

Ohio Northern University Law Review

Self-governance constitutes the foundation of a republican form of governance. Three pressing threats to self-governance warrant closer scrutiny of the long-forgotten and wrongly interpreted Guarantee Clause (the Clause). Election interference and other limitations on the right to vote may deny individuals the control over their officials required by republican governance. Corporate consolidation of economic, cultural, and political capital likewise threatens to disturb the ability of individuals to act as free agents—unbeholden to one or a few companies for critical information and free and able to pursue their own private goals. And, finally, intentional manipulation of citizens by state governments in …

Post West Virginia V. Epa The Administrative State’S Door Is Still Ajar, Jaclyn Lopez

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

The Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA, which carves out a new rulemaking standard for Congress and federal agencies, may be as significant for its articulation of the Major Questions Doctrine (“MQD”) as it is for its treatment of Article III standing and jurisprudential mootness. This Essay examines lower courts’ subsequent treatment of West Virginia v. EPA to add dimension to the inquiry of whether the new MQD has upended the administrative state or if it is merely another arrow in the quiver for judges that prefer a weaker federal government or nondelegation altogether. It also …

West Virginia V. Epa: Maybe A Big Deal, But Maybe Not, Michael Lewyn

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court held that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) lacked statutory authority to enact the Clean Power Plan, an EPA rule that encouraged coal-fired power plants to use non-coal sources of energy. The Court’s decision relied on the “major questions doctrine.” Under this doctrine, even if an unclear statute does not directly prohibit an administrative agency’s action, courts will reject an agency’s action when it is “asserting highly consequential power beyond what Congress could reasonably be understood to have granted.” Because the major questions doctrine is itself unclear, a variety of commentators suggested …

A More Modest Major Questions Doctrine Rooted In The Appointments Clause, Yonatan Gelblum

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

In this Essay, I explore how this constitutional mandate might guide courts adjudicating disputes that arise when agencies interpret ambiguous statutes in a manner granting them powers beyond those expressly vested by Congress. In Part I, I explain when such agency assertions of authority may implicate Appointments Clause limits on office creation. I also demonstrate how the test of Shoemaker v. United States, which assesses whether expanding an officer’s authority creates a new office for Appointments Clause purposes by adding duties not “germane” to existing duties, provides a standard for judicial review of such claims. Agency claims to …

“Major Questions” Malarkey: An Arbitrary And Capricious New Doctrine For Vetoing Controversial Agency Rules, Lars Noah

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

In 2022, after years of hinting at the idea, the United States Supreme Court officially adopted the “major questions” doctrine in West Virginia v. EPA. Commentators have already spilled plenty of ink trying to make sense of what this might portend, but so far seemingly everyone has accepted at face value the Court’s framing of the issue that it confronted in that case. This essay offers a slightly different perspective on the decision and suggests that closer attention to the precise nature of the question posed therein might reveal a distinctive flaw at the heart of the majority’s newfangled …

Climate Change, Democracy, And The Major Questions Doctrine, Joshua Ulan Galperin

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This brief Essay progresses in four parts. I will first argue that climate change is impacting the Court’s decisionmaking. Next, I will show that the significance of climate change as a modern political issue has caused the Court to downplay the statutory arrangement Congress created in the Clean Air Act. Third, I will suggest that the Court is not genuinely failing to appreciate the design of the Clean Air Act. Instead, the Court is aware of that design and feels the design goes beyond a constitutionally acceptable delegation of legislative power. Confronting the Nondelegation Doctrine head-on, however, would force …